Officially confirmed: AI is NOT slowing down. What does this mean for your """""""career""""""" in STEM?
>>62687035>"What? Slow down AI development? But that's supposed to give us those immortal super robots that'll do everything for us?">Later>"Hey hey uh, Mr President? Look, we're gonna be honest with you because it seems like you didn't get the memo; we need to 'slow down' because we're making no fucking money and literally cannot afford to keep going at this rate.">"Oh... too late I already made the tweet."
Trump can't do shit and will be left bagholding when the market opens tomorrow, kek.
how do you even "slow down" tech in an internationally competitive sector? You think China will slow down AI development if we slow down? Fuck no. This will be an arms race. No brakes.You anti-AI activists need to get a grip of reality.
>>62687203It's wild how we are all worried about AI stealing all of our jobs (or at least as claimed by AI salesmen) but if that happened in China it'd be absolute fucking mayhem.
You realize the AI bubble is the only thing keeping us from going into a full depression?
>>62687203You slow down because you spent all your money on frauds and doomsday tech cultists and can't keep going and the collapse ushers in WW3.
You can cope and seethe about a market downturn but I am not betting against the US economy
>>62687211the difference in china is that employment and work is controlled by the government instead of the markets
>>62687242I'll take that bet, look at the oil prices lol. it's fucking over. you can't print more oil.
>>62687256We have an infinite supply of that bigger liquid beneath our feet
>>62687146fpbp
>>62687035>What does this mean for your """""""career""""""" in STEM?Same thing it has for the last nine months. My career is dependent on me remaining the most tech savvy and knowledgeable at my company. Pretty sure my employer was thinking about firing me before taking the AI pill and getting all hyped up on it.
>>62687035The AI companies want the governmebt to slow them down for "safety." Sounds a lot like an excuse to me.
If AI can fully replace someone half good in development, then it's only a matter of time before they replace everyone. Devs go first because those who develop AI are... Well... Devs. But in time everyone is in danger (if AI is truly capable, that is), therefore some form of UBI will have to be implementedSo, in short, no worries :)
>>62687035Good. Those AI bastards tried to bail on the problem they created, they should be made to stay so they face the consequences of their actions..
>>62687203Communism now! Free Palestine! Ban AI! Ban whiteness!
>>62687203AI doesn't work if u break da computer
>>62687211They use AI to augment manufacturing and we use it to erode the tax base.
