AI really is revolutionary
>>62692872Yeah that fax machine guy said the same thing about inflation.
in 2021 the cost of a million tokens was 60 million dollars. It is now about 2 cents. The goal is to decrease these costs further. While GPUs like Nvidia are dominant, because CUDA was the industry standard, AMD's helios rack processes inference 30 times faster and can in theory reduce costs by about 30 times making it ideal for cost scaling. Faster cheaper AI that can perform menial administrative tasks is ideal for their business model. Anthropic's goal is to reduce expenses as much as possible.
>>62692872
>>62692913>A token was 6 bucks in 2021What are smoking
>>62692872> gambling addict say he's highly profitable if you take out some of his biggest lossesturn off the money printer and see what happens to the AI "industry"Does AI work? Yes it doesIs it profitable at these retail prices? FUCK NOAre the governments going to push that regardless? Absolutely yes - it provides the tools necessary for their open air panopticon, profit is secondary
>>62692922kek
Moor's Law cannot be beaten in this case I guess
>>62692872What he meant was "buy our stock when we go public"
>>62692922lol
>>62692927
>>62693047Hi sexy
if AI is so smart then why can't AI companies use their own AI to make the business profitable?
>>62693264Money and banks cutting off payment lines.
>>62692872> highly profitableUnderstatement no matter which way you look at it. These are moments in time. And in time, there are no more limits for humanity using this sort of intelligence as it progresses. Profitable. That's a joke. It's basically a hyper intelligently fast mega autist that never has to sleep.
>>62693264Because of Joe Biden and the democrats who tried to kill AI
>>62692872Why can’t Anthropic and Altman accept that open source has always won out since the computer age? Then before that, the printing press. Why do they think they can stop the natural order of God?
>>62692872it makes sense if you are a tard>the business is profitable once you remove development costs to set it upThe same shit that happened with Amazon. AI models become 10 times cheaper every year so if they leap ahead the business will mogg the fuck out of any company ever in terms of margins and size. Of course, all of this is if they manage to build a MOAT, if things remain the same cheap open source models will end up winning
>>62693528RSI is their bet which looking at how powerful Astra 6 is, doesn't seem too far from now
>>62693528Because you can't ask for infinite money for open sourceThe real question is why are all these leftist companies not open sourcing all their code if they're all about muh heckin greater good
>>62693801lol the models should be free considering they were trained with open source code and freely available text data
>>62692930>gambling addict say he's highly profitable if you take out some of his biggest losseskekd
>>62692922(EMOJI) YOU WERE RIGHT TO CALL ME OUT THERE!!! I WAS BEING OVERLY ENTHUSIASTIC AND WENT ALOMG WITH YOUR VIBE! HONESTLY? IT'S OKAY TO JUST WALK AWAY! IT'S 3 AM -- GET SOME SLEEP. (Insert your local suicide hotline number)
>>62692913How much did training cost? Does it cost more today?
>>62694091Training every model is expensive so you train a base and then speed up the inference and make it as cheap as possible. Instead of having one very well trained AI you have a lot of better than jeet AIs that are cheap and can run quickly.People are posting dumb shit likle 'ai not profitable' but inference is what brings costs way down to make it profitable for the average retard with an Etsy store to subscribe to a pre-trained Accounting Bot to manage his sales and put quickbooks out of business.
>>62692930>>62694020>Is it profitable at these retail prices? FUCK NOThat's why you speed up inference to bring costs way down.
>>62694135Anon, it has plateaud, it plateaud over a year ago. This is all you can squeeze out of "attention is all you need" + all the avaipable data in the world. This is it. It was all a pipedream. Fugazi. Fairy dust. It's search 2.0.
>>62692937Moore's law is a finance problem. Not a tech problem.
>>62694145RetardGet left behind I guess.
Post your face when we can't create consciousness because materialism was wrong, dualism was right, and only the grand architect of the universe can create consciousness.
>>62694151(Emoji) Youre right to call me out there. Keep huffing scam altmans farts and keep drinking dario's koolaid lil bitch. AGI in tumorweeks...trust the plan....GDP gongo up again
>>62693528True. In a way its these people getting super insecure that open source tech exists.
maybe he can make up a new accounting thing like ebitda but instead of before taxes, depreciation, and amortization it could be like ebcogs like earnings before costs of good sold man just imagine how good every company could look with that one
>>62694169They need something like ecclesiastic doctrine at this point. Sola Earnings
>>62693830Kek
>>62694129Do you know the hourly rates they are paying to people for training?
>>62694145If they had only treated the tool as a form of search. Like a spotlight to potentially guide you towards what you were looking for.
people say ai isn't going away therefore these companies are good investments, well the web didn't go away, but how's your netscape stock doing?
>>62694208Oops!
>>62692872that's not how corporate finance works retards. your bottom line is your bottom line. these fucking retarded dumbasses ain't making two fucking nickels to rub together.
>>62692930Kill yourself Ivan.
>>62694287What a strange sentiment. Your ability to be wealthy is based on the capacity of your consumers?
>>62692930Its not profitable because they are using it wrong, renting God in a box isn't a sustainable business model in America though it would have been 30 years ago. You can only augment services so much, especially when the people that would buy such services are increasingly out of a job and cannot afford them regardless of prices.The best use is the chinese model of augmenting manufacturing, deflationary on prices and boosts production, can run overnight in the dark, so you can make more sales and even open new markets. Products chinese could not afford before they now can and the AI is infinitely profitable as a tool rather than something to be sold. If Adobe or intuit lays off their staff to sell software they can only hope to reduce overhead costs, profits are otherwise capped at a % of revenue.>Without printed moneyBad news anon, the printing has not even begun. Our economy is so dependent on assets remaining at ATH that any drop would nearly immediately be followed by QE just like in 2020 for the same reason and a then much better balance sheet. You can't austerity your way out of 40 trillion in debt and entitlements growing 7% faster than receipts.
>>62694360>You can't austerity your way out of 40 trillion in debt and entitlements growing 7% faster than receipts.Sure you can. Allow deflation to occur.
>>62694208I called it Nutscrape
>>62694360>renting god in a boxThis is so close to the actual markThe >people that keep propping up ai at the highest levels are literally trying to ensnare demonic entities within silicon prisons and brand it as agi. I truly wish that was hyperbole, but here we are.>>62694410>allow deflationCool it with the ____________
>>62694208Cool it with the anti-semitic remarks
>>62693528>>62693528It clearly didn't? Microsoft is still making billions decades after Linux. There are no open source alternatives to Excel, Photoshop with even a comparable reach
Why doesn't he just tell us the numbers
>>62696767Microsoft making billions means little in the face of virtually every server in the world of real importance operating a Linux kernelAnecdotally, have you used windows 10 or 11 on the same hardware as a modern nix distro? The performance gap for the hardware use isn't close: microsoft just can't make good software anymore.
