>imagine not fucking selling IMAO
Do you not remember 2022? It was very bad.
>>62695348those are the boomer pensions
>imagine bagholding for 15 years to break even and another 10 for profityou are now 30 years old
>>62695348post M2 money supply on the same chart
Yeah of you bought the top of the fotcom bubble for $4,000 you would have almost $10,000 in 2000's USD.
>not using log chartsRetard filter.>>62695351If you DCAd for those 15 years you'd have profit before your original bags even broke even.
>>62695348I can sit out the down swing.
>>62695348use log scale and fundamentals retard
>>62695398Keep preaching to the tardies. The stock market is not even expensive keks. These morons are missing a generational opportunity LARPing as le genius big shorter
>>62695350the money "put into" the stock market doesn't just sit there as cash. it ends up in some corpo stockpile. if valuations drop, the corpos are the ones who keep the money, not the pension funds holding heavy bags
>>62695427are you a tardie? the stock market is a secondary MARKET, the company earns nothing when you buy a stock
>>62695348Imagine not using log chart
>>62695398>log chartsretarded for the same reason bitcoin power law and rainbow charts are retarded>DCAif you have the dry powder and/or income to make a dent in the losses by DCA then you were poor to begin with
>>62695431lmao
>>62695398When we crypto fags started using log charts it just usually went down.
>>62695348>Bro just baghold for 15 years lmao
>>62695348Sell at the top, buy at the bottom and 3x your money
>>62695348this sort of chart is not possible without insane manipulations of the markets and essentially zero enforcement the SEC is fucking useless.
>>62696581>he doesn't understand compound interestPro tip going from 1 to 2 gives you the same gain as going from 1000 to 2000
>>62695398not even adjusting for population either which is significantly higher now than 2000
>>62695434>inflation is exponential but stock prices have to be linear because... they just have to, okay?Also your anti-DCA fud ignores the simple fact that all investments made in NASDAQ prior to 1997 never went red, even at the bottom of the dotcom bubble, your only paper losses would have been from 1997 to ~Oct 2002. And your paper losses wouldn't have been 80%. Also if you're not a retard you wouldn't have gone all-in on NASDAQ anyways. The S&P only lost 50% from its ATH.
