Does it make sense to invest in Monad right now? It seems like a good project but the coming token unlock in Q4 worries me. Also idk about competing with OP and Arbitrum. Mostly Arbitrum or another L2 that could be developed in the next 3-5 years. Also their emblem or whatever its called kinda sucks
>>62702041it will probably go up but who knows how much
>>62702041They probably didn't want it to look like a pimple or a tit. It doesn't leave too many options.
>>62702041Does this vaporware coin even generate revenue?
Also.>9 digit market capNigger really?? You’re investing in a shitcoin that can do a 2x at best.
>>62702049I guess>>62702061it's not vaporware but no, not much revenue. But that's not important, what's really important is how much revenue investors speculate it could make in 10 years or so. This is crypto ya silly goose
>>62702079>shitcointheir node only needs 32GB+ of RAM + 300 Mbps bandwidth. It is a very low requirement compared to many "fast" EVM chain. Take the two Cosmos shitcoin EVM chains, Sei and Injective, for example. Both want validators to run1 Gbps+ bandwidth and 128 GB RAM. And Monad claims to be faster than both. If the claims are valid, Monad is really crazily optimized compared to the shit EVMs we have on today's market.Only Ethereum's ZkEVM roadmap aims for a lower hardware footprint to scale. But even then, only the verifiers run low-end hardware while their proof builders run more demanding hardware, e.g., ZkSync says builders need 2 5090 GPUs. And again, this is crypto, its all about speculation and hopium. I think it can do a lot more than 2x from here. But I'm not sure because of the token unlock schedule, if it weren't for that I'd be way into this.
>>62702083>i-it’s not HECKING VAPORWARE!! i-it JUST HECKING DOESN’T MAKE MONEY>>62702139I remember when retards like you shilled taraxa. Guess what? It went to 0. There’s way too many trashy blockchains trying to be the next ethereum and failing horribly.As far as I’m concerned, theres not enough liquidity to even do a 2x from here.