[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1789755318280592.png (387 KB, 2048x1270)
387 KB PNG
How are you taking sustainability and environmental impact into account in your investing?
>>
>>62704635
The hottest day on record was 134f or 56.7c in 1913 in death valley, ca. Stop spamming this shit on other boards, retard. You're just wrong.
>>
>>62704717
>single outliers negate obvious trends
Are you a woman? you're certainly arguing like one.

Also this record was probably in error:
>The hottest day on record was 134f or 56.7c in 1913 in death valley, ca.
https://academic.oup.com/oocc/article/5/1/kgaf015/8112840?login=false

>A critical review is given on this maximum temperature world record of 134°F or 56.7°C, set on 10 July 1913. Different evaluations like comparison with neighbor stations, comparison with 20th century re-analyses and measures of dispersion are carried out. They all show that this record is highly questionable, because no physical mechanism is known, which could explain such a statistical outlier of the maximum temperature on a local scale over desert regions.
>>
>>62704738
Bro, no one cares anymore about the climate. We have electric cars now, co2 harvesting, oxygen to co2 generators, etc. it was just to buy Chinese green products the dems invested in.
>>
>>62704752
I meant co2 to oxygen
>>
>>62704738
Just looked this up. You do realize it is still ongoing to disprove it right? After this long? That anon is right. You're retarded.
>>
>>62704635
I believe humanity deserves to go extinct for thinking they're smarter than the smartest people among them.
>>
>>62704796
Mimicry is a survival technique.
>>
>>62704778
>You do realize it is still ongoing to disprove it right?
How do you think you can "disprove" numbers written down over 110 years ago, exactly, anon?
>>
>>62704809
You just made your entire argument null and void than.
>>
>>62704815
i'm pointing out that the numbers are most likely to be in error, but there's no way to "prove" or "disprove" such a thing.
>>
>>62704806
>Mimicry is a survival technique
Until it's not
>>
>>62704635
No, because AGW is fake and gay
I can't do anything about the higher solar output, nor can I do anything about the magnetosphere going through its natural polarity inversion cycle.
If it gets bad enough I'll commission a hobbit hole to live in so I don't have to pay so much for ac
>>
>>62704884
>the higher solar output
why do climate deniers keep spouting bullshit?
the stratosphere is actually cooling, because the physics around global warming is well understood. this wouldn't happen if it were caused by the sun.
it's very simple, we've been using the atmosphere as a free waste dump and we're about to pay bigly for it.
>>
>>62704635
Shorting red states
>>
>>62704895
>climate deniers
Ugh nevermind I thought there was a brain there
Keep literally yelling at the clouds then I guess
>>
>>62704900
Doesn't work. Third world shitholes tend to show the largest growth because they're dirt cheap to operate in and they have nowhere to go but up
>>
File: 1783665428170567.jpg (263 KB, 1668x3072)
263 KB JPG
>>62704738
>The data contradicts my theory
>this means the data must be wrong
are you retarded or just pretending for the lulz?
>>
>>62705785
If a billion data points support your theory and one point disagrees it is possible the one point is wrong

You're so fucking retarded you ignore the literal billions of points disagreeing with you to concentrate on one that agrees

And you have the balls to call other people retarded when you're clearly disabled yourself
>>
>>62704635
> and here's why that is a good thing.
>>
>>62704635
It fine as long as it's global warming and not global cooling. Global warming drives growth, global cooling is quite literally an civilization ending tier.
>>
We are adding more greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere and simultaneously we're exiting an ice age, Earth normally is much warmer than it is now.
>>
>>62704635
>Average temperature is up TWO DEGREES over the past 100 years!!
>IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Holy retarded.
>>
>>62704635
I don't care about "climate sustainability" if by that you mean "muh evil CO2 is going to kill us all!"

Move away from the equator than, faggot. We've been hearing climate doomerism for over 100 years at least. Ironically, the people telling you the Earth is going to flood are buying beachfront property 2 feet above sea-level.
>>
>>62704911
well you clearly have none, /pol/ACK following the right wing crowd like an npc, much like redditors do on the opposite coin flip.
>>
>>62704635
If you want to compete with china all the environmental shit has to go away. America legislated itself into a coffin, doubling down is not a recipe for success. I'm betting on America becoming a serious nation for the first time in 40 years or ceasing to exist. If you want to cut back emissions and grow your economy, nuclear energy at scale is the only option but the energy crises are here now so that means gas generation the next 3-10 years just to keep lights on. If you don't move fuel via pipeline then you have to move it by truck and train. All the you got what you voted for posting on Trump ignores equal or shittier energy policy by the left who assumed we could just skate by forever with the status quo paying no attention to declining treasury purchases in FX reserves for more than a decade.
>>
>>62704717
A season isn't a day anon. Are you retarded?
>>
>>62709225
>We've been hearing climate doomerism for over 100 years at least.
they were right then and they're right now, what's your point?

the temperature going up and the climate changing to something less convenient to humans is IRREVERSIBLE.

>Ironically, the people telling you the Earth is going to flood are buying beachfront property 2 feet above sea-level.
they sure as fuck can't insure it any more

>>62709297
china's building out more renewables and nuclear than anyone else so what are you even talking about
>>
>>62709315
Chinas building everything including nuclear is exactly what I am talking about. Americans have been gay eco concious retards who built nothing but solar panels for 30 years limiting emissions and keeping generation flat while all emerging markets ignored all that shit. America will build nuclear plants or cease to exist but thats an 7-10 year return which is why in the short term they will build gas and keep whenever possible legacy coal. The long timelines on nuclear is why china built all manner of generation simultaneously and can no afford to be picky. America has no such flexibility and it would make little difference on the environment if it did.
>>
>>62709315
>>Ironically, the people telling you the Earth is going to flood are buying beachfront property 2 feet above sea-level.

They also imported 100 million illegals into America which would certainly make global warming worse if global warming was real. They definitely dont care about the environment
>>
>>62709374
>which would certainly make global warming worse if global warming was real.
Lol
The funny part is you're almost certainly not pretending to be retarded.

You probably think those immigrants spawned into existence at the border or had zero emissions prior to entering the U.S. or that only U.S. emissions cause warming

Brilliantly stupid
>>
File: its over.png (317 KB, 447x447)
317 KB PNG
>>62709374
Also started like 5 different wars. They bitch about us having V4s and 1.4L engines but then casually deploy aircraft carriers stocked with F-18s and F-35s that use 100 gallons every nautical mile flown to bomb brown people whose lives do not change with every school hit.

The entire thing, no, the entire country, has become a joke
>>
>>62709360
Not building out nuclear has nothing to do with being eco conscious and everything to do with the politics of appeasing nimby boomers who got scared by three mile island and chernobyl.
>>
>>62709380
>You probably think those immigrants spawned into existence at the border
You are genuinely fucking retarded. People use MORE fuel and resources when they come here because they demand the same standard of living. Pablo and his fifteen grandkids use almost zero tons of carbon emissions in his favela where they all wander naked, barefoot, drinking gutter water and riding little scooters to whatever slave labor job all of them have. When Pablo brings them all here, they now need cars, they need running water, and infrastructure, which takes diesel to maintain. They also need to go to school every day, something they didn't need to do in their turdie shithole much like how you never went to school.

This is why so many climate activists are sounding the alarm about allowing migration from India and trying to bring all 1 billion of the sewer rats to first world standards of living. It can't be done.
>>
>>62709390
Just a cover for the fact that coal supports 1000 times more jobs than nuclear.

But boomers are almost done working so you guys can do whatever you want
>>
>>62709396
>It can't be done.
And that's why you're retarded

You admit the problem you're complaining about is impossible

A straw man, if you like
>>
>>62709396
This is irrational and motivated by your dislike of immigration rather than any serious environmental concern. It doesn't matter who is using the resources. If western countries had lower immigration but had more population growth you wouldn't be complaining that we had to deport the excess people.

It's also manifestly unfair to tell the rest of the world they aren't allowed to have a decent standard of living, so the right thing to do is to have large wealth transfers from western countries to raise a sustainable lifestyle in poor countries while making the quality of life worse in rich countries until we get a measure of global equality.
>>
File: Straw-Man-1-2745946705.jpg (98 KB, 1200x628)
98 KB JPG
>>62709403
That's not what 'Strawman' means you illiterate thirdie fuck. You simply don't understand the problem, so you dismiss it.
>>
>>62709405
> It doesn't matter who is using the resources.
Clearly it does, look at Mexico's CO2 emissions per capita in this chart. Look at the United States' CO2 emissions per capita. As you can tell from the chart: American CO2 emissions are 20 to 25 times more than Mexican CO2 emissions per capita.

Do you need further education on why it does, in fact, matter a whole bunch on who uses it and where? Do you also need assistance understanding why it wouldn't be realistic to bring the 6 billion people living in the third world to the living standards of 300 million people who use 25 times the resources they do? It's not racism, it's just simple fact: If you think global warming is real then you cannot expect everyone to share the same standard of living as people who have massive carbon footprints while they live like cavemen today.
>>
>>62709430
It doesn't matter if a Mexican in America or an American in America uses the resources.

>Do you also need assistance understanding why it wouldn't be realistic to bring the 6 billion people living in the third world to the living standards of 300 million people who use 25 times the resources they do?
Yes, obviously the 300 million people need to stop doing that. We need to have a dramatic downgrade in emissions from rich countries because there's no other way to get everyone else in the world to agree on global emissions limits. That means big transfers from rich countries to build out nuclear and green energy in poor countries. That probably means that people in rich countries are going to have a serious downgrade in their quality of lives.

> If you think global warming is real then you cannot expect everyone to share the same standard of living as people who have massive carbon footprints while they live like cavemen today.
There's no question AGW is a real phenomenon. The answer is that everyone needs to stop having a massive carbon footprint, not that people in developing countries can't want to have better lives.
>>
>>62709430
Fallacy of division
What a tard
>>
>>62709405
>It's also manifestly unfair to tell the rest of the world they aren't allowed to have a decent standard of living, so the right thing to do is to have large wealth transfers from western countries to raise a sustainable lifestyle in poor countries while making the quality of life worse in rich countries until we get a measure of global equality.

Ive never seen such honesty from a commie who admits they want to take our stuff and give it to subhumans all in the game of fairness. Must be an AI zogbot
>>
>>62709445
Nobody wants your used Honda civic Tyler
>>
Wait until these retards wake up and realize climate denial was the boomer plan all along
>>
>>62709445
It's my stuff as well. Like it or not, the planet's going to cook unless we can get every country to agree to stop emissions. The only way for this to happen is for the rich countries to uplift the poor countries, otherwise they'll burn whatever they can. That means people in rich countries are going to have dramatically poorer lives than they do now. Goods and services will become much more expensive. Fairness is just the mechanism, not the goal.
>>
>>62709405
Damn, you gotta go
>>
>>62709438
>It doesn't matter if a Mexican in America or an American in America uses the resources.
The chart disagrees, look: The Chart plainly says it
Mexicans in Mexico use 25 times less carbon footprint than a Mexican in America.

That's why the people trying to migrate the entire third world to America are signing the Death Warrant of the planet. Or they don't believe it's real. You can't bring the entire world to America's living standards for free. America requires infrastructure, jobs, entertainment, living that far exceeds the requirement of the third world. We see that in how much fuel is burnt keeping the country alive.

>Yes, obviously the 300 million people need to stop doing that.
I like how China is clearly, obviously, and blatantly twice the carbon footprint of your average American and you immediately hyper-focus on the American being the one that needs to stop and not the Chinaman.
>That means big transfers from rich countries to build out nuclear and green energy in poor countries.
Like this shit, right here. Look at this map, and look at the carbon footprint noted in this map >>62709430 They're the same. The number of nuclear reactors does not significantly reduce the carbon footprint of a country because you can't run shipping and infrastructure off electric trucks and electric ships.

Your entire understanding of the world is based on an infantile ability to do simple math.

>>62709439
>A Fallacy of Division is the reasoning error that occurs when one arguments or assumes that if something is true for a whole then it must also be true for some or for all of its parts.
That doesn't mean what you think it means either you fucking illiterate dipshit.
Can you pajeets either google the words you're pasting or fuck off?
>>
>>62709452
>It's my stuff as well. Like it or not, the planet's going to cook unless we can get every country to agree to stop emissions
The problem in general is that the people who are preaching for a solution understand it the least. They don't have an answer for "We cannot keep global shipping running off of nuclear power and electric engines". They think there must exist some magic technology that big oil is keeping under wraps, and there isn't. You have two choices: Live like Cavemen in the third world, or live like you are right now and accept that all we can do is attempt to shrink.

And no, shipping every turdie into America to hold up the specter of boomer communism to make sure pensions can still be paid is the opposite of shrinking to sustainable levels.

>>62709451
Wait until these retards realize that shipping in third worlders only happens to keep the population pyramid scam going for their version of communism.
>>
>>62709462
>Mexicans in Mexico use 25 times less carbon footprint than a Mexican in America.
So by this logic, all Americans should be deported to Mexico.

>I like how China is clearly, obviously, and blatantly twice the carbon footprint of your average American and you immediately hyper-focus on the American being the one that needs to stop and not the Chinaman.
Do you know what "per capita" means?

>The number of nuclear reactors does not significantly reduce the carbon footprint of a country because you can't run shipping and infrastructure off electric trucks and electric ships.
You can actually run infrastructure off nuclear power you idiot. And nuclear or electric cargo ships are possible.
>>
>>62709462
>if you disagree with me you have to leave

Ultimately if you spend enough time around you losers you have to conclude that your anger against other races, generations, and authorities springs from envy rather than outrage.

You hate the groups you agree entirely with
>>
>>62709430
>co2 emissions
nobody cares nigger
>>
>>62709476
>So by this logic, all Americans should be deported to Mexico.
If they did, they would live like cavemen and their carbon footprint would go down, yes. That's statistically what is happening in every shred of evidence we have at our disposal. The third world uses less because it owns less.
It wouldn't come without a fight, though.

>Do you know what "per capita" means?
Do you?
>per capita /pər kăp′ĭ-tə/
>Per unit of population; per person
The problem with you and >>62709481 is both of you seem to have a very difficult time with English. Per capita, the regular Chinaman is using way more carbon footprint than the average American. This is because their government simply doesn't care.

>You can actually run infrastructure off nuclear power you idiot.
Can you find that nuclear powered truck in production that can replace diesel engines tomorrow because if you can't you're full of shit and understand the problem the least out of everyone.

>>62709481
>Ultimately if you spend enough time around you losers you have to conclude that your anger against other races, generations, and authorities springs from envy rather than outrage.
Nobody is envious of how you live, poopbeesh. We, in fact, find it quite barbarous and don't wish to go back to living like you to prevent climate change.

>>62709485
The topic of this thread is literally CO2 emissions. Score one for indians not being able to read.
>>
>>62709490
>Per capita, the regular Chinaman is using way more carbon footprint than the average American.

>United States: U.S. per capita carbon emissions generally hover around 13 to 17 metric tons of CO2 per person annually, depending on the specific accounting model (such as production versus consumption-based footprints).
>Source: Union of Concerned Scientists
>China: China's per capita emissions are lower, typically estimated around 8 to 10 metric tons of CO2 per person annually.
>Source: Union of Concerned Scientists

Now that we've established you have no fucking clue what you're talking about, how about you fuck off and never ever post again on this topic?
>>
>>62709490
>Nobody is envious of how you live, poopbeesh
You defend boomers, bankers, oil companies, and the system you claim to hate.

It's an interesting hypocrisy particularly when you agree with the malthusians that the system is doomed even as you're defending it
>>
American here
I live up north and want warmer winters, I am going to be burning a big pile of trash tonight and give 0 fucks
>>
>>62709504
Colorado here. We skipped winter entirely last year and now California is going to die of thirst
>>
>>62709495
Your information is ancient and you do not know how to google.

Now that we've established that you really are an illiterate shitheap, find this magic nuclear powered truck or fuck off. We aren't going to your standards of living which is living like cavemen eating our own shit.
>>
>>62709502
>You defend boomers, bankers, oil companies, and the system you claim to hate.
I've defended none of them. You continue to argue that we should live like the third world and bring in third worlders.
Stay in your own country, Rahjeesh
>>
>>62709507
Literal fallacy of division again

Fucking tards
>>
>>62709506
>Colorado here. We skipped winter entirely last year and now California is going to die of thirst
so, you are saying I need more trash to burn
>>
>>62709509
You don't know who gave you your opinions you just know it feels right to blame brown people for your failures
>>
>>62709495
>>Source: Union of Concerned Scientists
FURTHERMORE:
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/union-of-concerned-scientists-ucs/
You fell for a political action committee's hokum.

YES Carbon footprints are a bad thing, NO, American don't have the highest carbon footprint. The Third World cannot live to our standards.
>>
>>62709514
We're burning literal square miles of forest, but sure. I guess your little bonfire will do great damage
>>
File: 1562174309186.jpg (30 KB, 750x597)
30 KB JPG
>>62709522
Thanks, its good to know I am doing my part
>>
>>62709507
>>62709517

These are recent sources and you're unable to understand what "per capita" means.

https://ourworldindata.org/profile/co2/china
https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/us-co2-emissions/#google_vignette

>You fell for a political action committee's hokum.

Actually you just did.

>Influence Watch is a project of the Capital Research Center (CRC), a conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. It was designed as an online database to map out the funding, connections, and agendas of political influencers, acting deliberately as a right-leaning counterpart to left-leaning watchdog sites like SourceWatch.

> American don't have the highest carbon footprint.
They don't have the highest in the world, but they are a lot higher than China per capita.
>>
>>62709511
>>62709516
I can tell I really pissed off pooprape by pointing out that his country is a caveman society.
Fallacy of division doesn't mean what you think it does, please google this definition
and
My opinions came from years of research on the topic, and a few minutes of googling would make you realize that you're simply too stupid to be having this conversation.
>>62709522
Like this shit.
Forest fires have been happening naturally every year since the first tree took root. Man-made emissions from machines far eclipse forest fires. See that tiny little gray sliver? That's every forest fire in America.

You can't understand the data because you don't take the time to look any of it up. so your little brown hands come up with fallacies about forest fires, and never google to see if you happen to be incorrect.
>>
>>62709452
The imaginary problem of climate change could be solved by getting rid of the subhumans rather than making whites poor .

I live in Japan and according to your map they dont use much carbon. They also haven't imported tens of millions of nogs like Australia, usa and canada and Europe has. Importing nogs literally causes the imaginary climate change
>>
>>62709527
Burning modern trash or forests isn't really the problem. Yeah it releases carbon but that's mostly modern carbon.

The actual problem is digging up hundreds of millions of years worth of old carbon and burning it
>>
>>62709531
Post hand with timestamp retard.

I bet money I'm whiter than you
>>
File: sigh.gif (5 KB, 220x220)
5 KB GIF
>>62709530
>worldometers.info
https://www.worldometers.info/faq/
You just posted an AI source you fucking moron. Holy fuck. You truly are the pinnacle of Dunning-Kruger.

>They don't have the highest in the world, but they are a lot higher than China per capita.
Let's assume your AI source is right (It's not but we can pretend) you're literally admitting that you're absolutely incorrect in your assumption and you're going to double down on it anyway.
Didn't this all start with "Yes, obviously the 300 million people need to stop doing that." your own source is telling you that you're hyperfixating on the wrong thing because the thing you hate is people living comfy lives. Not pollution or carbon footprint.
>>
>>62709538
The absorption spectrum of CO2 is not imaginary you fucking retard.

>They also haven't imported tens of millions of nogs like Australia, usa and canada and Europe has.
Even Japan is now importing migrants at scale because of their ageing population.

>Importing nogs literally causes the imaginary climate change
You're just a dumb racist, which is ironic, because the Japanese nationalists would love to throw your ass out, too. There is no difference between carbon emitted by a black person and carbon emitted by a white person. If natural population growth rather than migration had added to the population would you be calling for deporting the excess people to the third world? I doubt it.
>>
>>62709538
No, he wants to import the entire third world: >>62709380 >>62709315

You're talking to an anti-humanist retard who just wants everyone to live the same caveman-style life and melts down with random google searches when you point out how unrealistic this is and how destructive it would be to make them live like we do.
>>
>>62709546
>Even Japan is now importing migrants at scale because of their ageing population.
Look guys, look! It's the Boomer Communism fallacy again! We MUST import Jamal and Poopbitch to replace our working population to who used to be able to work for a livable wage.
Fuck job growth, fuck the pollution this would cause, fuck the carbon emissions this would incur, fuck the very population of Japanese people living in Japan not being Japanese anymore. We have to ruin all of it to make sure Boomer Communism can afford their pensions.

Stable populations? What is that? Doesn't keep line going up, that's what.
>>
>>62709547
Import the third world to where?

Co2 doesn't stop at the borders and people don't magically burn more fuel when they move to a different country

Sorry you're retarded and failed at life, but that's not the fault of brown people
>>
By the way pointing out these people could not reasonably be imported without fucking up the environment is "Racist" because you can read charts and he uses AI websites that are notably lying to him.
>>
>>62709542
That's not an AI source. Can you even fucking read? This website's been around for 20 years.

> the thing you hate is people living comfy lives. Not pollution or carbon footprint.
Rich countries' comfy lives depend on using the atmosphere as a free CO2 dump and ignoring the cost to everyone else, so they need to stop doing that.

>>62709549
You don't HAVE to import anyone to look after your ageing boomers, but you're going to have 20% inflation and severe shortages of labour if you don't. You can call that boomer communism if you want, but there's a reason every country even ultra-xenophobic Japan is doing this. It's not because of a Jewish conspiracy to replace you, it's simple math on demographics.
>>
>>62709552
>Co2 doesn't stop at the borders
Idiot lol >>62709430
Ramjeesh and his sixteen cousins use less carbon because they're not required to live like we do. They live like they're in the 19th century, still. They cannot be brought to 21st century living standards without annihilating the resources for everyone else.
>>
>>62704635
>Improve accuracy of temperature-measuring devices
>Adds a ton more temperature-measuring devices in hot places
>Add so many that there is no real consistency of how they are measured
>Inflate temperature numbers and call it a crisis
>????
>Profit
>>
>>62709561
How hard is it to post a timestamped pic of your skin?
>>
File: leader-age-1024x573.png (201 KB, 1024x573)
201 KB PNG
>>62709560
>That's not an AI source.
ok I'll read it for you
>For the live counters, we try to be as accurate as possible. For each set of statistics we perform extensive research and data mining in order to bring the most authoritative, comprehensive, and timely information to be displayed on the live counters. Users should understand that the live counter's figures represent highly informative estimates rather than exact measurements, which would be impossible to obtain in real-time for such dynamic metrics.
It's literally just making shit up based on statistics and you believed it.
>You don't HAVE to import anyone to look after your ageing boomers, but you're going to have 20% inflation and severe shortages of labour if you don't. You can call that boomer communism if you want, but there's a reason every country even ultra-xenophobic Japan is doing this. I
It's because they're ran by boomers, and boomers want boomer communism. It's not logical for sustainability. They're doing it because the government is captured by old people who want free shit.
Hence "Boomer Communism".

Notice on this map all of the politicians and countries pushing this shit are 70-80 years old. And no, before you try to 'no u' me, that is not an AI map nor an estimate.
https://vividmaps.com/age-of-leader-of-each-country/
You've fallen for the propaganda that we HAVE TO keep population pyramids going up to keep fiscal system from collapsing because you seem very susceptible to propaganda.
>>
>>62709578
>It's literally just making shit up based on statistics and you believed it.
Do you even understand the concept of statistics?
It's giving the most accurate answer based on original sources which that page links and known emissions rates. That's how I'd answer the question myself.

You are a fucking retard who thinks China emits more than the USA per capita, so just fuck off, there's a good chap.
>>
>>62704635
is this good for solar stocks?
>>
File: images~2.jpg (44 KB, 440x454)
44 KB JPG
>>62704806
>>
>>62709597
>It's giving the most accurate answer based on original sources which that page links and known emissions rates.
AKA it's estimating shit based on wild projections because you fell for an AI service. You didn't even say that I was wrong, just that you think it's a good service.
So just fuck off, you lost. Your retarded utopia where the first world starts living like the third world will never happen. You sound British so I get why you think that way: Your island is well o its way to that dystopia already. There's a good chap, be a good loser now.
>>
also lmao at the brit trying to lecture anyone on sustainability or economics when they grenaded their own economies and futures importing infinite pakis until young people can't find jobs and their economy is worse than singular US states.
>>
>>62704635
i don't invest in china or india
>>
>>62709810
>also lmao at the brit trying to lecture anyone on sustainability or economics when they grenaded their own economies and futures importing infinite pakis until young people can't find jobs and their economy is worse than singular US states.
Young people are all lazy neets pretending to be depressed and if anyone tries to throw them off welfare they shid and fard themselves until the politicians back off
>>
>>62710638
from: the boomer communist who is on literal state welfare and voted for the reason they're NEETs who can't get jobs. Import another jillion, nigel.
>>
>>62709786
>AKA it's estimating shit based on wild projections because you fell for an AI service.
It's nothing to do with AI you fucking moron. The estimate for per capita emissions is a direct pull from the paper they cite and for cumulative emissions it's the same projection anyone sensible would calculate.

Meanwhile you're here claiming China has per capita emissions higher than the USA, which is just a straight up lie. Fuck off.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.