Moonbeam ticker 'GLMR' deals with Bonded evaluators, not just a named address. ERC-8183 only requires “an evaluator address.” That can be the buyer, a multisig, an LLM wallet, or a ZK verifier. Moonbeam wants the grader to post a bond and lose it if they grade badly.
Victim-pays-from-bond, not burn-the-stake. Their public argument is that if work is bad, the worker’s deposit should repay the buyer, not just get slashed into a void. That is a policy choice inside the standard’s hook, not a new blockchain.
GLMR as assurance capital. After the parachain migrated from Polkadot, gas/security is Base’s job. They want GLMR to be the collateral behind workers, evaluators, and premiums. That is a token-utility pitch, not a technical monopoly.

Proof-first grading. They claim cryptographic evidence means judges catch more failures, so workers can lock less collateral than on looser “LLM looked at it” markets. If that is true in production, it is an economic advantage. It is not proven at scale yet.

>do the needful saars

i don't know, i got burnt by this shit last cycle but ejected on time
would throw $100 max

>>62712658
This is some impressive technojargon. I enjoyed reading that.

>99% down
>saars buy