>Q1: AI has not made a single cent>Q2: Google's "just fuck my ledger up" financial report>Q3 is almost overWhat are investors looking forward to? The shill threads on /sci/ are getting increasingly desperate
Just two more hacking break outs then AGI is ready!
my work gave us all copilot pro or whatever that uses the latest chatgpt, the best thing they could come up for it to do basically ocr a photo of a spreadsheet into an excel sheet. i'm like ... it takes a data center the size of virginia to do that? pretty sure someone could have written a program to do that that would run on a laptop from 2015. hey let's use ai to vibe code one! oh right, vibe coding makes trash slop that will never ship to users.
There aint no AGI coming this centuryWhat is coming is server operated robots managed by llm that perform better than average human.And that is kenough.
>>62715138why use a text processing chatbot to run a robot? seems like a fucking waste of resources.
>>62715149Did you miss the part where they perform better than average employee?
>>62715115i'm looking forward to AI IPOs followed by a crash followed by the scam artist CEOs being lynched.
>>62715138>it WILL be good enough>it WILL be profitablewhen?>it just WILL, okay?! Here, look, our "internal model" disproved the piss dick conjecture AI faggots spent about $3-4M in the time it took me to write this post, how many financial quarters will it take for AI revenue to reach as little as 20% of spendings?
>>62715163yeah the hype will continue until these cowards ipo and shows us their shitty financials
>>62715164> why would people need a wireless phoneReplacing one employee might not seem worth it. Try replacing 10 or 100 employees in the factory. No employees stealing shit to pawn somewhere.No employees taking a break.No employees having medical issues or sueing you.No employees working less than 24 hours a day.No employees learning new things one by one. You just update the server.Of course prototype will be expensive ya diglet. Compare first TVs to TVs now.
>>62715173> why would people need a wireless phonehow long did it take for wireless phones to turn a profit after they launched? >Compare first TVs to TVs now.How long did it take for TVs to turn a profit? AI is the new betamax/minidisc, if anything.
>>62715173oh cool so i guess since we won't need labor anymore we don't need to import a trillion "refugees" to do "jobs americans don't want" amirite comrade? or no not like that?
>>62715183Oh so you aint arguing its not profitable. You are arguing its not profitable fast enough.
>>62715191I dont care what you do in the land of the fee. Not like you can stop refugees anyway. Global warming will make east uninhanitable and they wont all fit in yurop and china would sooner shoot them.
>>62715198global warming from all the data centers?
>>62715195It has been 6 years if you are being generous discarding anything pre GPT-3. We are talking a negative profit in the trillions. Betamax lost the videotape format war in that amount of time and has been relegated to an irrelevant techie meme product because it failed to sell. Your own historical arguments work against you.>Just one more year! Two! 30!
>>62715198>china would sooner shoot them.I think they'd welcome them, actually. Look at their demographics, the decade of the black chinaman will soon begin
>>62715245they won't be as big of a problem in china either cuz if they try a riot america style the ccp will just drive over them with tanks and harvest any organs that aren't pancakes
>>62715252That is fair
