[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_4885.jpg (369 KB, 1140x2148)
369 KB JPG
This is insane but if you have been watching the stuff Quant has been doing with respect to the new payment system in Europe and UK finance in general, heading the SATP internet initiative, etc. it is not surprising. This is huge and there is no thread. Quant actually use their token at every step you a holder would think to hope to. Institutional winning plays with real token demand built into the use case seem to be:
XRP
CC
QNT
ZRO
XLM
HYPE/UNI (depending on how much banks carve up their business)
APT
HBAR
XDC (promising as a microcap with a lot of deep institutional traction)
SOL
ATOM
ONDO
POL
ZBCN
maybe SUI
W
ZEC (unfortunately, the fake privacy jew coin)
DAG (another promising microcap)
>>
>>62725290
Forgot the link:
https://quant.network/news/quant-powers-the-clearing-houses-on-chain-money-initiative-in-the-us/


The Clearing House handles more than half of all ACH and wire transfers in the US. $2 Trillion per day.
>>
>>62725290
imagine the Bitcoin dump if this were Chainlink
>>
Sigh, I still remember seeing Quant when it was 43 cents on Idex back in 2018. I thought about putting in $5,000 into it but never did. Still one of my biggest regrets.
>>
isn't it wonderful?

And do you know the best part?

It has been a secret until now because they don't pay any influencers. So even the announcements by big accounts about the tech developments, they never say QNT

Which means at the present Marketcap - buying a QNT is the equivalent of buying XRP at $0.02
>>
>>62725311
That isn't a reality moron, it is a meme you obsessively spam in every thread.
>>
File: Xrpgays.jpg (25 KB, 549x549)
25 KB JPG
>>62725290
>>62725305
>>62725311
>>62725326
>>62725370
>>
File: 1785937664448239.png (84 KB, 909x886)
84 KB PNG
>>62725390
>That isn't a reality
pic was Chainlink's last big news
>>
>>62725370
Agreed. The big players building real deep infrastructure token plays have not marketed to retail and have just plugged on in institutional building and dealing. Eventually it all matures and the retail migrates to it while the frauds and wash traders get flushed with exception of a few (possibly solana will not, though maybe (hopefully) it will). Beautiful to see.
>>
>>62725394
You spam the same pictures in every thread and ignore counterexamples. It is totally arbitrary cherrypicking that has no zero statistical relevance or predictive weight
>>
File: 1776956173030318.png (151 KB, 1238x943)
151 KB PNG
>>62725402
pic was probably the most recent one before the DTCC one
>>
>>62725393
>>62725394
>>62725409
really no reason I need to retype it every time you share another cherry you picked. Just see >>62725402
any time you make a new post while samefagging.
>>
File: 1789917907222397.png (348 KB, 1807x1525)
348 KB PNG
>>62725410
>cherrypicked
>>
File: 1760967147061165.png (238 KB, 1235x1313)
238 KB PNG
>>62725402
and here's your counterexample
>>
Quant just dabbed on chainlink
>>
File: IMG_4893.jpg (304 KB, 1169x1822)
304 KB JPG
>>62725290
>>62725305
>>62725326
>>62725370
>>62725485
Additionally.
>>
>>62725516
Overledger is literally an API router, Quant says this themselves. The actual plumbing for connecting to chains is as basic as a block explorer's.
>>
>>62725290
Linktards truly can't catch a break
>>
>>62725516
Bump
>>
>>62725568
They called the original Overledger an API gateway but you quit paying attention to what else they built and just obsessively fixated on press releases from another project while still not understanding even it despite being obsessed beyond reason. That is not the full stack or what The Clearing House chose or is using. It is a multi-chain platform with one credential set and API surface across public/permissioned/legacy ledgers, with protocol-abstracting connectors. The Fusion Rollup (74 networks), flow apps for orchestrated regulated workflows, and firewall sit on top. The Clearing House chose this stack (not just the API routing function), for an orchestration and transaction-management layer so tokenized deposits can clear between banks and still hit RTP/CHIPS (their realtime payment system and high value wire system) rails that already move <$2 trillion daily. TDaaS lets members not have to build their own stacks. UK banks already ran live customer payments including remortgages on it. mApps run multi-chain on all configured DLT and legacy rails with any network desired being configurable to add. QNT is at the root of its function.
>>
>>62725290
Do you think QNT could pull a Z-Cash?
That thing went from $50 to $1600 very quickly, 30x. I remember two years back some dipshit on YouTube shilling it to an audience of no-one, i decided it was a dead token with zero utility.

Shoulda taken his advice, he didn't exactly convince me with the premise though.

Quant has some fiercely dedicated channels though, they are always quoting shit like $10,000 per token, 1 Trillion market cap & SUPPLY SHOCK INCOMING. It's almost as bad as the Terra Luna Classic fags spamming $1 EOY.

Still i have a sizeable investment on Quant and literally $0 elsewhere. might put a little on Hedera & XLM Stellar since they're often lumped in together. They often talk about QNT being programmable money but wonder if we'll ever receive APY simply for holding (not staking) Kraken offers this for a few tokens
>>
>>62725971
>They called the original Overledger an API gateway
They still call the current Overledger an API gateway: https://quant.network/perspectives/the-three-layer-digital-money-architecture/

>you quit paying attention to what else they built
nope, it's all right here: https://docs.overledger.dev/docs/connectors
A connector calls a blockchain node. This is the same fundamental security as a block explorer.

It's orchestration software with the most basic chain connectivity imaginable.
>>
>>62726024
Lol DUDE, COPE. They called it a gateway because the entry point IS a gateway. That is one component. Their own overview says Overledger is three foundations: Gateway, protocol-abstracting connectors, and the Fusion rollup. "Flow apps, off-chain firewall, on-chain fusionfFirewall, payment gates and data isolation" sit on top of that. A marketing page saying “universal API gateway” does not delete the rest of the stack, which is what The Clearing House chose. A connector is not a block explorer. There is one connector per DLT family, common RPC surface, node pools (with possibility for customer-attached private nodes), load balancing, method allowlists, and firewall checks on the authenticated caller before anything moves onchain (all also marketed in their materials). Node selection includes latency, error rates and staking. That is not “paste an RPC URL into etherscan.” You are wrong on literally everything and literally don't even remotely care, you just care about shamelessly and trying to shill and paper over in a very grubby and low IQ way things that rek your thesis like you do in literally every thread over and over in the most insufferable, jewish way imaginable. SERIOUSLY. Become a real person again.

https://docs.overledger.dev/docs/overview

https://docs.overledger.dev/docs/fusion-rollup

https://docs.overledger.dev/docs/connectors
>>
It's very cool they have a Rockefeller Capital Director on the Board of QNT

love that for them
>>
>>62726111
I don't, but hating the Rockefellers doesn't change the tech or broad adoption and institutional association with Quant.
>>
>>62726108
You're babbling incoherently.
Overledger connects to chains by picking "a healthy node from the network's pool". This is literally in the link I posted.

A
NODE
>>
>>62726108
i had a feeling you were the gish galloping xrp shill. just lmao
>>
>>62726141
You have no argument to being objectively wrong and are coping in bad faith gay and jewish sophistical games like "yeah well ackshually being granular and using technical terminology is BaBbLiNg!!! The facts don't matter because I said so!!" You are wrong and demonstrated to be in extremely clear and proven terms. Literally how insane do you have to be to think playing this weird as pretend and acting like everyone else can't read the reply would convince anyone you are right or a person who is well considered and investing based on good understanding and non-specific coin obsession? You are legitimately low IQ and you are even more insufferable, particularly for trying to drag others down with you, knowingly committing to by even choosing to argue in the strategy you are. Legitimately shameful and evil.
>>
>>62726190
Writing a competent paragraph is not gish gallop. You have never once used that fallacy correctly and use it like a literary device to invoke to invalidate writing you are mad you can't reply to because you know nothing but still feel entitled to automatic rightness. Stop samefagging and COPE.
>>
>>62726193
this wall of cope
>>
>>62726199
>Writing a competent paragraph is not gish gallop.
that's exactly what the gish gallop xrpfag always says.
>>
>>62726199
your insanity is amusing
>>
>>62726212
Nigga you're literally in a cult based on a crypto scam.
>>62726208
It is literally an inarguable statement of fact that you argue against repeatedly anyways.
>>
>>62726202
Sorry a paragraph is so overwhelming for you. Will script a 20 second TTS with subway surfer to read it to you next time. Or you could just admit you read it and realize that pretending it was extremely taxing to is not a strong argument.
>>
Enjoy your thread gay niggers. I hurt my back a few days ago and am on a fucked sleep schedule unable to cobble together sleep and am going to try to take a nap.
>>
>>62726248
>I hurt my back a few days ago
No idea what you did, but unironically hope you get better
>>
QNT is the 4th industrial revolution

that's it
>>
>>62726248
Fuck you. But sleep tight anon.
>>
LMAO QNT -is that even still a thing?
>>
The verbose linkshill thinks his nerdspeak has any affect while every single project he has beem bming is outperforming link.
When this is pointed out he copes by saying its a grand conspiracy to keep chainlink low by dumping BTC.

Just go to /g to argue with other nerds. /biz is for making money.
>>
>>62726405
>LMAO QNT -is that even still a thing?
It's some token that doubled in the last couple of days ,
since bankers want to pretend it's not XRP.
>>
Alright /biz/, I've been bag holding a meager 30 of these for several years now, when should I sell them?
>>
File: 1747436410879613.jpg (17 KB, 433x432)
17 KB JPG
I was watching the chart when it broke out. Really hope this does a Zcash one day, 20 billy market cap would go so hard for QNT I'd actually be able to taste my freedom

My time frame is 4 years
>>
>>62729067
>4 years
Oh well, guess I'll keep holding unless it goes crazy anytime soon. I got in when it was around $80 a piece, small bag but still kinda comfy
>>
>>62725390
Mad as fuck that quant is a scam coin and chainlink is kingmade
>>
>>62725290
P/E -20
>>
does this news translate into value for the token? is there a good reason to buy at this point or is token not needed? thanks
>>
File: IMG_2286.png (171 KB, 434x664)
171 KB PNG
>>62725402
Don’t bother anon, there are mentally-ill individuals stuck in their echochamber threads and generals
>>
File: 1653306874529.gif (1.08 MB, 261x293)
1.08 MB GIF
What was THAT?
>>
>>62725290
SEI not mentioned
>>
>>62725971
>>62726108
>>62726193
>>62726239
>>62726248
>the mouthy and effeminate xrp pseud has pivoted to trying to gargle qnt's balls because he gets btfo'd by people pointing out that xrp has no significant lockup or collateralization prospects that would make the token price increase

Kek how did I know it would come to this



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.