does all this good news with quant actually mean anything for the token? or is this like chainlink where token not needed?
>>62730174Quant is almost entirely web2 software, the coin is an afterthought that was tacked on for funding purposes.It's nothing like Chainlink where Link is a technical requirement for every single thing nodes do.
>>62730181That's not true; the Link is completely useless, and you know it.
>>62730174>>62730181the token funds queries
>>62730181Why do you do this to these people? Why do you mislead them? You know fully well that you are lying. You know that they don't have enough money to raise the price significantly? You probably also realize that they don't have enough money to use QNT to become financially free. Just let them have this one. Just tell the, the truth, which is that QNT is one of the best god dang investments that crypto has. Some of them might make a decent amount of money so they can change careers or start a business or simply have a nice windfall in case things become even more expensive than they already are.tlrd don't listen to this retard. Buy QNT because it definitely belongs in the $10 billion mcap club, and possibly even higher. If QNT plays their cards right, the price could go to a crazy amount.
Finally I'm a genius for buying at $100 a year ago
>>62730181This hate is bullish. If I listened to faggots like you I wouldn’t have bought 45 ZCash at $400. Just bought more QNT thanks.
“Nothing will run unless you have the tokens” Gilbert Verdian
LINK muhrines will never get a pump like this, and that's a good thing
Is $10k QNT realistic?
>>62730174I want to buy but why did it do nothing for 4 years
>>62730651$100k ez
>>62730322Token still not needed
>>62730906“Nothing will run unless you have the tokens”Gilbert Verdianhttps://x.com/SMQKEDQG/status/2103591408812581114
>>62730657simple, its a 12.88 million max supply token. Small amounts of large volume pump the price. There is a supply shock which might have started or will start soon if you know where to look for the tokens on the exchanges. This will launch it much higher than it is now.>t. tokenomics master
>>62730939So would you hold long term?
>>62730939>12.88 millionits 14.88 that was the main reason
>>62730174I bought 150 dollar at 100 dollar is 1 QUANT. Am I going to make it?
>>62731163>>62731332you buy when its low, like the 50 bux it has been hovering around for a while now. Then when it 2x you sell half to regain the money you spent, let the rest ride as its all profit you mong>do you hold and round trip, or do you take back your initial and sell the rest when you feel like it?Some people just like to struggle lmao. Now, you could argue i missed out on some gains by selling my 2x, but its called risk management. Do I miss my 2x or do I secure the 2x returns, then when it hits 5, 10, 50, 100x later i claim those? Either way you make money instead of holding until it round trips.
$500 waiting room? Wtf is happening
>>62731367I mean like I said as a poorfag that was under water I bought Quant at 100 dollar is 1 Quant. They now have a deal with the Clearing House in the US which handles 2 trillion dollars worth of transactions per day (according to GoogleAI)
>>62730181Ok what about the important part.. the tokenomics? Quant has only 14m tokens while stink has 1 billion Quant will reach $1k eoy while link will be lucky to hit $50 by 2030
>>62732610>the QNT coin is useless, but at least there aren't that many of themtop to the kek
>>62731344>Then when it 2x you sell half to regain the money you spentthat is some sunken cost fallacy tier bullshit strategy
