Link getting inadvertantly destroyed by fishy. He's talking about qnt, but the whole time it fits the chainlink reserve perfectly.
>>62732798except Quant doesn't have to pay on-chain consensus nodes, because it doesn't have those.All Quant has to pay is the one node for the underlying DLT, who only accepts payment in the DLT's native coin.
>>62732798give it up man, we lost
>>62732798There are no users its all fassade.
>>62732798Don’t know what the place but the fishy on meFishy to be I’ll slap your knee
>>62732800is the decentralized oracle network node wars in the room with us now? ohhh you've only "secured" and eth price feed the last 3 years with your tokens???>>62732802coward>>62732804just like link securing all of defi to earn $500 a day in fees. pitiful.
>>62732822checked and fishy pilledhttps://youtu.be/LUZSkdFTpkU?is=A1wZUzotHs35zAuU
>>62732798That guy is such a midwit retard. Emblematic of all stinky bagholders desu.
>>62732824>hurrr it's not decentralized if there's no stakingboomer-tier crypto comprehension
>>62732871not my point tard, who cares if link is decentralized but you as the investor do not get to participate and profit from the risk you are taking meanwhile they dump link to research more products which get settled in offchain subscription services. payment abstraction is additional not needed steps.
>>62732880>who cares if link is decentralizedHaving decentralized onchain nodes is what necessitates a token. That's how blockchain always worked.
>>62732871>hurrr it's not decentralized if there's no stakingyeschainlink currently operates under the model of "just trust me bro"chainlink is has some properties of "decentralized" but is NOT a decentralized network. It is gated by, and thus controlled by, a centralized authority
>>62732935You know you can build your own price feeds, bridges, ... using Chainlink code right? It's open source, meaning it's nothing like the totally proprietary and obscure Overledger code.It's just that you would also have to find your own nodes and develop your own contracts, security controls, chain integrations, monitoring, ...Which is a pretty insane amount of work, which is why users tend to ask Chainlink to do it for them.You're extremely confused.
>>62732943You seem to think you are on /tech or having a nerdspeak argument. Anons here are just pointing out the irony of linkshills pointing out TNN for other projects but not their own. As a cherry on top, the other projects actually go up, usually after the linkshill have fudded it with long essays of verbose technobabble. You fellas are a living meme
>>62732824Link has public users, a lot of them and they openly use and pay for it. Not just "partnerships". If in crypto your users are secret and they payments are secret these dont exist.
>>62732954Tech is OP's entire argument, nerd.If anything Quant proves you don't need token to be needed at all to pump. You can just build some proprietary web2 code, slap a token on it, and it'll pump if the news is good enough.
>>62732964>Link has public usersYes they fo anon, I'm glad you brought this valuable insight.
>>62732974Now do the rest of Chainlink's product suite
>>62732954This, and to add how many off hand comments have you seen about "qnt holders rotating profits into link".
>>62732980I WOULD IF THEY WOULD PUBLICLY DISCLOSE ANY OF THE THAT FUCKING INFORMATION
>>62732987The price feed data is all on chain just like the CCIP data. Just build your own tracker, like the CCIP guy did.>>62732983>HAHA LOOK TNN>so what if tnn, are you in it for the tech or something?you're schizophrenic
>>62732994>price feed feesPrice feed fee's are so ungodly low that nobody cares to compete for them. This is 4chan's own opinion on it. The cross chain fees were SUPPOSED to be the cash cow everyone would seethe over, and *checks notes* $900.
>>62733019>Price feed fee's are so ungodly low No they're not. They were raking in 100 million USD annually in the early 2020s when these fees were still being tracked.
>>62733031proof?
>>62733031>100 million USD annually in the early 2020sI bet that a lot of that revenue is flowing to token holders right ?
You can't do it, because the reply you'll get is Chainlink labs had to subsidize it's own nodes because fees were too low. They sent nodes 1m link a month.So yes nodes made allot of money off of....the back of chainlink investors.
>>62733036Eric Wallach and Linkpool used to run online revenue trackers back when price feeds were pretty much the only product that was live. They showed around $100 million per year in node revenues.It's all onchain, if you're motivated enough you can build a new tracker.>>62733073How do BTC mining reward revenues flow to BTC holders?
>>62733120>BTCApples to pears argumentTNN The irony of "dont trust verify">Just build your own tracker bro, its there bro i swear
>>62733120Are you not going to answer this?>>62733077>How do BTC mining reward revenues flow to BTC holders?Not even applicable to the arguement. What left field type of response is this. Pow and pos are completely different.
https://chain.link/blog/introducing-ccip-2-0
>>62733077>>62733120You can also do some guesswork: there are apparently over 2,000 price feeds (including identical feeds on different chains).If they have an average of 15 nodes per feed and 24 updates per day, that gives 720,000 node inputs per day.We know from pre-OCR feeds that nodes got anywhere from 4 to 1 USD per node input, so let's assume $1.That's $720k in node revenue per day, or $262 million per year.>>62733140>>62733147Link nodes and BTC nodes receive inflationary rewards. If one has to justify "value flowing back to holders" then so does the other.
Can someone explain why link keep posting fud about qnt?is it because qnt is up 250% this week?
>>62733156Your napkin math is substantially too high. You are multipling a pre-OCR payment rate by a post-OCR volume, and not accounting for luls in market volume. Nodes currently are in the tens of millions. Back in 2020 ( which was your previded date) the market was heavily subsidized by chainlink labs.>>62733159>is it because qnt is up 250% this week?That and clearinghouse not choosing chainlink. So mainly seething.
>>62733220>You are multipling a pre-OCR payment rate by a post-OCR volumeand?>not accounting for luls in market volumelulls in what?>Back in 2020 ( which was your previded date) the market was heavily subsidized by chainlink labs.What "market"?
>>62733232>not following along with the arguement>deflections>red herrings
Gilbert is still a fucking idiot larping as a "cyber security expert"
>>62733262You're making zero sense because you're clearly too emotional about this.
>>62733156>Link nodes and BTC nodes receive inflationary rewardsLinks inflation comes from token founders selling 8% of the total amount of tokens per year. Bitcoins inflation is algorithmically fixed and declines over time via halvings. The whole value proposition of link was staking LINK as slashable collateral as the economic-security mechanism.This is not the case with btc. Apples to pears, standard link advocate
>>62733409>Links inflation comes from token founders sellingIf they're selling the Link, then how can they still pay the same Link to the nodes?Holy fuck you faggots are stupid. Holy shit.
>>62732935>just trust me broI just trust who Swift and DTCC trust, bro. That way I don't have to even bother doing any homework. It's really the easiset investment thesis out there.
>>62733427You just read it like a retard lol.8% per year is brought in circulation. Part of it is sold by paying node operators, they then sell it to cover costsPart of it is sold to exchanges and then to baggies.Top kek the advocate acts like he doesnt understand. You better understand how you are paid lol
>>62733468>8% per year is brought in circulation.kek you said it was all "sold".Yes, tokens are brought into circulation to pay node operators. That's what "inflationary rewards" means.BTC has them too, it always has. In fact 95% of BTC miner rewards are inflationary.
>>62732798>>62732824>>62732831>>62732880>>62732974Fishy isnt wrong in this case though. Link has a clear prospect for token price appreciation at scale, while quant doesnt seem to - and theres no reason to hide that mechanism either. Very poor reading comprehension as per usual OP. You ARE third world fuddie trash grasping for straws so don't worry, it's not like anyone had expectations that you'd produce anything good after like 5 or 6 years of trying at this point. Maybe go back to "researching" gay porn and cock cages to photoshop the link logo onto or something, it was higher IQ fud unironically.
>>62733483Semantics, brought in circulation is selling. Its hilarious you avoid the term. CLL SELLS TOKENS. And they will continue to sell till 2030.So far the advocate used:Semantics Ad homimemApples to pears
>>62732800>duuuuuuuuuuuude we have moarrrr BUZZWORDSbro just stop. nobody gives a fuck. the goal is to make money. of course link holders don't even remember what that feels like. why you ask? because they are...THE Cuckolds of crypto
>>62733530>brought in circulation is sellingNow THIS is semantics
>>62733427>Holy fuck you faggots are stupidsays the guy holding an asset that's down 70% from 2021 meanwhile stocks and real estate are at all time highs and other cryptos ie btc are also up since then. >>62733489>Link has a clear prospect for token price appreciation at scaleonly when you throw out fantasy scenarios that will never happen only gullible saps are falling for this these days >>62733530>Semantics, brought in circulation is selling. Its hilarious you avoid the term.it's insane they argue otherwise. imo it hurt their credibility a lot. i had someone here one time argue that it's not a "sale" because they use the proceeds to grow the business. lol what the fuck...also funny people are talking about decentralization above when the new made up bull case is reserve purchases will grow. of course this increases the foundation's holdings, increasing centralization.
>>62733489You have no right to be this smug until LINK actually pumps.
>>62733591>>62733612>brown and triggered replies straight awayIm right and it upsets you. Its ok. You're just degenerate subhumans with various crippling addictions just trying to make a few cents posting on biz after all.
>>62732798https://moonbeam.network/moonbeam-protocol-whitepaper-v1.0.pdf
>>62733570economically, the 7–8% "annual float growth" is functionally similar to a recurring sale, even if the tokens were minted at genesis and are now just being unlocked and distributed/sold.
>>62732983>QNT goes parabolic>hrrrmmmm... Me tinks dis bullish for Chainlinks!Yes, and XRP too! BOOOOOOOOOOOM
>>62733722lighten up, francisyou should learn to laugh at yourself some, little boy
>>62734001notice how the shill just poofed Probably the same retard https://warosu.org/biz/thread/55619816#p55620427
>>62733722Kekbaggie still seething about chadem in 2026. Hahahaha he really mindbroke you
>jeetlinkcels getting uppity at $15>still down YoY -28%>still down ATH -71%
>>62734508>>62735084>s-so what if us fudcucks are obsessed with nigger dicks for some weird reasonI just dont understand what the peeling has to do with any of it. Care to finally explain what a "porn identity layer" is?
>>62733150
>QNT gets massive real world adoption>linktards continue to seethe
