WTF WAS THAT
Finally we're back at August 2020 pricesOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Remember to sell at $50 this time if it even goes that high
>>62733915If you want me to sell youll have to pump it to $81000, sorry
>>62733919>I will literally die bagholding Chainlink for some reasonMeanwhile Sergey has sold millions of LINK and is rich now
my bitch ex will sell her measly 100 link stack today at 20 breakeven and then link will rip to 50 over the next few days. checkem fuck you whore
bumpin up on the oct 11th resistance on linkbtc
>>62733910OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
>>62733910This is the night. Qnt like pump to 45.
>>62733919Based. This guy fucks, long dick style.
>>62733933what part of making an oath do you not understand?
>>62733950Watching coins with real utility like QNT and ZEC get their well deserved parabolic run ups must be brutal when that's what you've been told would happen to LINK for the past 10 yearsHodl the line marine it's coming soon trust me
>>62733964dont worry i will literally never sell
>>62733972kek based
>>62733972BASED COMMUNITY MEMBER
>>62733964Your desperation gives me the ick desu
I don't have enough Chainlink. Can I please get another chance to buy under $10
IT'S STILL GOING
>>62734074at this rate BTC will be sub $30k in october
>>62733910Wake me up at $150 which is $100 in 2022 adjusted for inflation
It's time
>>62734123sergey has met Trump before but this is fake. don't fall for this shit.
>>62734140dude im not sure, take another look
>>62734140looks real to me
20 waiting room marinebros!!!!
ARISE chainlink.
>>62734140nah its real I was there. shortly after this sergey also powered up to SSJ3 and his hair grew to like 8ft long. he started screaming about zero knowledge proofs then fuck ATE one of the winklevoss twins
The best orgasms are the most delayed
>>62733910That's a nice pump but it's still far from ath
50 cents from my breakeven, let's goooo
>>62734287>from my breakevenYikes.
ITT: A bunch of hopeless linkies thinking they are back
>>62734494CCIP is back
So why is this pumping? I haven't been paying attention but i see I am almost in the green again
I am literally figuratively still waiting on neet nodes. Anything less means chainlink is a scam.
They're trying so hard to suppress LINK by dumping BTC lmao
>>62735782Tale as old as time
>>62734209my balls have cessated themselves from my crotch do to unmet buildup
>pumping for no reason againBitcoin is rugging soon..
WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER
I THOUGHT I HAD MORE TIME I WAS SUPPOSED TO BUY MORE THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING
>>62733910honestly the beginning of a long a prosperous bull run to $1777
>>62733910this is when I either pull it off or give mom yet another reason to call me a failurebut feriously, this is like the fourth time I've almost made it financially (paying a year's rent), and yet something always happens that ends up screwing me over
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.
>>62736365wow thanks fantastic insight I just sold everything
>>62735782>>62735832looks like bitcoin's schizophrenic up down up down up down nonsense has finally tamed link
Can't even hold $15, only moves up when ETH does Nice bullish green token saars
>>62737938Link has made a bunch of moves against the entire market including ETH in the past weeks.Starting with mid-August when Link pumped out of the bear market before pretty much everything else including BTC.
>>62736365holy shit selling my whole bag this millisecond, thanks anon
>>62736388>>62739274newfags
