Brazil has just wired a public blockchain into the official plumbing of a top-10 world economy. CSD BR, authorized by the Central Bank, the CVM and SUSEP to register, hold and settle securities, now mirrors live ownership records onto the XRP Ledger. The depository sits on more than BRL 22 trillion in registered assets, roughly $4 trillion, and can clear millions of transactions in minutes. No other public chain is in the stack. The first assets are investment-fund shares from BTG Pactual, Latin America’s largest investment bank, which runs about R$2.7 trillion in combined wealth and asset management. Those shares are tokenized as Multi-Purpose Tokens on XRPL and paired with Ripple custody. CSD BR stays the legal source of truth for registration, deposit and settlement. XRPL becomes a permissioned, near-real-time audit layer that authorized banks can check under existing KYC and AML rules; no new licenses, no change in investor process, and with freeze and clawback still under CSD BR control.That is the first time a licensed central securities depository has recorded securities ownership on a public blockchain in live market conditions. Once the mirror holds, the plan is native issuance and trading among approved participants, starting with CRI and CRA; the real-estate and agribusiness receivables that now form more than R$600 billion of Brazil’s private fixed-income stock after a fivefold surge in securitization over a decade.
>>62739715https://ripple.com/ripple-press/csdbr-and-ripple-use-the-xrpl-blockchain-to-expand-brazils-financial-market-infrastructure/
Very cool
This is seriously sad and pathetic. QNT gets a partnership that settles $2 trillion daily and you go out and scramble to find something to make you feel better. Give it up you fucking loser. You fucking lost and QNT won. If you had any brains you would covert part of your XRP bag into QNT but you won't because you're low IQ and delusional. >QNT got a multi trillion dollar parnersnip?>Oh umm uhh xRp DiD ToO sEe?
>>62739715Is the ripple coffee shop profitable yet and did they solve the cross contamination problem with the credit card factory out back?
ripple is unironically good for less wealthier nations because it converts the local FIAT currency into ripple.
>>62739747Lol Nigger COME ON. Basically the only people promoting or holding QNT over the past few years was xsg schizos. It was even included in our schizoposts. We literally all have QNT also and the two work together. QNT is the interop and XRP (one of the flagship blockchains QNT coded for use of) is the liquidity. QNT is like the ports of a trade system and XRP is like the boats moving the goods. It is mentioned in the shizo rambling green text and this is why the Digital Pound Foundation chose Ripple and Quant as their partners. They are not adversaries; link on the other hand is having its lunch dinner and dessert eaten, which is a GREAT thing for retail and humanity.
>>62739764ExactlyQNT is an operating systemXRP is a global currency
>>62739764For youhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSJqh3_rT1o
I choose pikachu
>>62739784Beautiful song. Thoroughly enjoyed and was a fresh breath in my day. Thank you!
>>62739799My pleasure, Delighted you enjoyed it!
No shit!? Let’s go check the price >1.49Fuckkkk
>>62739764>>62739782Alright let me tell you both negroes something important OK? So I watched an interview with The Clearing House's Chief Strategy Officer Sal Karakaplan and the interviewers were saying "ok ok we know you chose Quant as the connector but what about the layer one?" they literally asked him point blank what is the L1 that you will use alongside QNT? And he said "we are not going to announce all of the technical details yet". That means that they are going to announce it publicly just like QNT did a few days ago, we should see in a few days or weeks or maybe longer we should see the Clearing House publicly disclose their L1 choice. I HIGHLY HIGHLY HIGHLY doubt it will be XRP because Ripple is a piece of shit run by pieces of shit and it's all around a piece of shit it's fucking true. XRP is an IQ test (and so was QNT) and if you believe XRP is the connector of the future you failed the IQ test and you are a retard.So what am I saying? I am saying that we will let the future announcement decide. If the Clearing House DOES NOT choose XRP, what will you say then? I wonder what you will say and how you will cope. The only honest way to behave is to say that you were wrong, but I doubt you will do that.If they choose XRP I will eat my own dick livestreamed.Screenshot this.ps for what it's worth I believe it's likely to be hedera but I do not have the confidence that is indicative of low IQ people, such as yourself.
>>62739814You are cooked by meme coin trading and obsessing over link's barrage of press releases with a complete lack of actual value prospect for the token. The announcement response is not what matters. The thing it is announcing translates into real value through actual use, which has always been the whole point but dopamine fried and specific (bad) coin obsessed retards like you have always misunderstood how actually works.
>>62739877Again, we literally have been behind QNT this whole time and are probably the only community which has been. I do not know if TCH will announce XRP as its L1 if not a collection of them and varieties to settle across them. It is a major payments venue but not the only or even vaguely crucial to the XRP thesis. It would be an excellent complement and Ripple and Quant work together in many working groups and payment committees etc. but you are framing a false dichotomy and acting like it is an incisive challenge. If just Ripple move 10% of payment flows the businesses they acquired to XRP we will have done well. Ignoring all other services or the fact central clearinghouses are becoming increasingly vestigial by nature of the technologies themselves, just like the Fed will by stablecoins. I would be surprised if participants could not use XRP in some capacity through TCH Quant coded XRP functionality as one of the first release selections and the whole point is interop across multiple networks and traditional ledgers. You need to think bigger and broader.
>>62739883>>62739892I am surprised by your rational and coherent sentences, coming from a low IQ individual such as yourself. How do I know you're low IQ? Because you think XRP has any future whatsoever. Those fuckers have been shamelessly locking and unlocking xrp for years and nobody is going to use xrp seriously when there are many more faster and efficient chains out there. Also I have never owned LINK and the fact that you think I am "obsessing over link's barrage of press releases" is another example of your low IQ. Ask me how I know that your bag if QNT is significantly smaller than your bag of XRP. How did I know that?
>>62739715>mirrors live ownership records onto the XRP LedgerSo they're writing receipts to the XRPL.What a joke.
>>62739883>link's barrage of press releases with a complete lack of actual value prospect for the tokensays the OP of a thread about XRPL being used as a fucking receipt holder
>>62739895Cope. Your on statement is incoherent admission. You say my reasobing is sound but object to the project specifically. Your objections suck. Ripple's escrow is auromated outside their control and was done this way to guarantee slow release. Your argument is weak and within the first sentence admits mine is well formed and you only oppose it because you are in a literal cult, like I said.>>62739910They are literally building out tokenizing FICC on the XRPL. COPE.
>>62739937>They are literally building out tokenizing FICC on the XRPL.Source?Because your OP is exclusively about using XRPL to store receipts.
TALLTPSaFBT securityLatencyLiquidity and Track Record
>>62739937Ripple Re-Locks 700 Million XRP Back Into Escrow After Monthly Release:primexbt.com/news/ripple-re-locks-700-million-xrp-back-into-escrow-after-monthly-release/HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH FUCKING RETARD HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHHave fun being a low IQ bitch for the rest of your life. I also find your comment so ironic that you say I am in a cult when it's literally you who has the cult mindset and are in an XRP cult. Your retort to the link? Yeah that's what I thought.
>>62739937They used ripple xrapid To settle 13 trillion without xrpIf they do use xrp on the back end it'll take 5000 years to burn 1% of supplyLarsen owns 4% of circulating supply currently. You believe global finance will hand a single person more money than the united states gdp You faggots are sleeping on the techVeritx, Qudefence, bank of italy IVASS , google patents , visa mastercard and the US airforceBlcokstream announcing falcon 1024Google choosing algorand for ap2 ac2 x402 agentic payment You fucking idiots have no clue whats happening and it shows , you call it tranny coin while ironically shilling zecashNew ceo from chainlink , new foundation boardFuck idk know why im telling you any of this , its probably to do with the fact the xrp army is dumbest motherfuckers to walk the earth.Security is the new narrative.
>>62739944You had network network congestion failures dumbass Did you read the court filings?They literally said that ripples success wasnt tied to xrp , but xrp's success in retail funded ripple.Here's brad telling you straight to your retarded faces Stabelcoins do xrp's job better and if its on the xrpl then at best xrp will be used as the settlement token of transactions which means???? Price remaining cheap is beneficial for institutions 5000 years to burn 1% of supply You fucking morons
>>62739958Heres brad rolling back the hype and preparing you idiots to be left behindhttps://x.com/sentosumosaba/status/2103102125354209669
This isn't official financial advice or confirmed news—just an exercise in mapping out how Overledger solves system entropy when dealing with multiple networks.From an enterprise infrastructure perspective, a hybrid model combining private ledgers for domestic deposits with public rails for outward gateways seems highly probable. Using just one single blockchain model would actually restrict The Clearing House (TCH). By utilizing Quant's multi-chain schematic, they can deploy a hybrid architecture that matches the exact needs of different banking workflows:>continued in next post as over character limit
>>62739968>continued from previous postWhy This Prevents System EntropyIn traditional computing, hooking multiple legacy systems into multiple different database styles causes massive architectural friction (code conflicts, security holes, and latency issues). Overledger eliminates this by acting as the unified operating system layer. The banks only interact with a single, clean API standard, while Quant absorbs the underlying complexity on the backend._____________________The Dual-Model Dynamic_____________________• The Private Side (Domestic Workhorse): For clearing day-to-day commercial bank deposits domestically (e.g., between Citibank, Wells Fargo, and BofA), privacy and strict compliance are legally mandatory. This requires a closed, permissioned network layout.• The Public Side (Global Gateways): When a corporate client needs to move value instantly to an overseas supplier, private domestic rails cannot interface directly with foreign banking networks. Overledger safely bridges that value onto high-liquidity, public institutional networks (like the XRP Ledger, Stellar, or Hedera) to settle the international leg of the transaction.By utilizing this hybrid blueprint, TCH doesn't have to choose a single "winner" in the L1 space. Instead, they can securely tap into the unique strengths of both public and private networks simultaneously, managed entirely through Quant's secure orchestration layer.>What are your thoughts on this hybrid approach? Do you see a specific private ledger dominant for the domestic leg, or will it remain entirely custom?
>>62739963Only one chain is already secure never had downtime or failures was pilot tested by ECB in marshall islands , operates with one of 5 curcial central banks , has 3.5 billion transactions with zero downtime Has python , has evm and avm Not a competitor, the actual security layer Machines dont give a fuck about your memes your stupid fuckin mascots or the size of your 8 million wallet holders It wants instant finality and security Not to mention silivio micali is NSA and In-q-tel he co invented zpk that runs pur satellite dataHeads of board are fintech, cia, moneygram etcIts the cryptography that solves the machine to machine ai bottleneck and why anthropic and open ai are shitting bricksGoogle has cracked the practical use case of ai and they're using algorand to do itYou xrp idiots haven't a clue , this is the google 2.0 a, algorand is a computer who has blown past you faggots while you all chased pump n dumps Look at the supply chain problems and the issues across multiple sectorsOnly one form of actual cryptography solves it in a private public dltAint xrp
>>62739975>I just used XRP, XLM and HBAR in this example as we have been discussing them "(Fun fact on the L1 architecture: early Overledger schematics explicitly categorized these public rails by use case. While XRP is designed for high-value wholesale interbank settlement, XLM targets grassroots retail, peer-to-peer remittance, and micro-payments. Quant bridges both smoothly.)"
>>62739975Exactly , you got it brother.They're announcing algorand end of NovemberYou're all warned.t.top tier glownigger
>4 trillion brazillion Now they’re just making up numbers
>>62739958>>62739963Brad never said stablecoins were better, he said there are some condition sets where they customers prefer them (for compliance etc.), which has always been the core thesis, which is why you need an intermediary asset between walled gardens for many corridors and onchain exchange, which XRP autobridges doing as the only neutral counterparty-less token that can ever exist onchain. How is it possible to hate something this much this long and still not know its basic features? In doing this, a US federal court ruled XRP the only non-BTC non-security in existence, particularly since Clarity failed. Other moneycenters like the UAE have done same. XRP is very uniquely positioned legally, established rails, on-chain compliance, technical features and liquidity, associations, etc. wise. This does not mean Ripple have value behind using XRP, it means that XRP is not a Ripple security. Ripple spent $150M and 5 years of legal stigma and risk with the names of the Chairman of the Board and CEO both attached to a suit they were invited by the SEC to settle up front for a small fine but risked their own personal selves as attached parties because they said they would as long as the SEC would declare XRP a non-security and the Gensler SEC then declined literally serving the Epstein crowd through Ethgate to force through a technologic turd that is left unflushed in the toilet and newly has to compete. They sacrificed a huge value and risk and regulatory proximate reputation hit to fight uniquely for the functional use of XRP, which they have the overwhelming percent of their company treasury in, in a vaulted, escrow gradual release. XRPL functions better and is more cost effective at a lower volatility and higher, deeper liquidity based price. Fees are the same regardless of payment size and users and custodians alike are incentivized to have as high of a stable price as possible, and to synergize their businesses using it to drive use. You are RETARDED.
>>62739982KEKthis is the perfect antidote to the verbose XRPL shilling
>>62739982Another unnecessarily adversarial retard. I like Algorand. I participated in every round of early governance and was an xgov voter. I have been DISAPPOINTED in how they wasted so much money in the tranny years failing to market it, but technologically speaking I hope it eats Solana's lunch and the tech it has deserves for it to if the foundation can stop sucking and making every wrong decision. You are literally a sister project of us in the Depin Alliance and part of our lore. It has its definite place if it can get off its ass and escape its Clinton stink and common NGO foundation style bloat/rot (which I hope it does because I hate solana).
Algorand in the Quantum AgePost-Quantum Security (The Future-Proof Shield): This is massive for banking networks looking 5 to 10 years into the future. Algorand is the only major Layer 1 network aggressively deploying Falcon-based post-quantum cryptographic signatures. New CEO William Herklrath has actively pivoted the network to offer quantum-resistant security as a structural service. If a bank is worried that a quantum computer will one day crack transaction signatures, Algorand is already immunized against it
>>62739982>>62740040And also here, the reality is that the most enduring and deepest and basically only well (this time on biz, algo has a modest but solid social media following outside) of following of ALGO is xsg schizos who promote it in our graphics. You are also championed by and partnered with Easy A, who are huge XRP advocates. We compete on payments but we are not incompatible and complement each other hugely alongside QNT.
>>62739747Almost Every Xrp schizo has a bag of QNT for obvious reasons how can you not buy it after years of research.
>>62740030>Brad never said stablecoins were betterThey are.stablecoin settlement:>wallet A => wallet BXRP bridge settlement:>asset A => exchange => XRPL wallet X => XRPL wallet Y => exchange => asset BYou have to be a complete retard to think the XRP bridge is better.
>>62740049Vostro nostro accounts not needed Being protected from inflation are just some of the perks. Being married to your bags makes you a retard I’am in this to make money and so should you.
>>62740055>Vostro nostro accounts not needed Being protected from inflationthis is complete nonsense
>>62740060If you say so, stay poor neckbeard not my problem t also have a gigantic bag of algo
>>62740062>If you say soEvery single institution that is working towards stablecoins and RWAs says so.Even Brad will tell you so.
>>62740064Again I’am in this to make money don’t give a fuck what a Cheeto crusted nerd like you has to say. T never lost money in this crypto sphere
>>62739747Imagine holding both. Can you handle that?
>>62740065>don’t give a fucksure seemed like you gave a fuck when you tried to bring up some magic cripplespeak to defend your bags
>>62739895This sounds a little desperate.When I tell a retard something and I know I'm correct and they disagree I just move on.But you see to REALLY need to convince this retard(?) of something?Weird. Sounds like you are convincing yourself if I consult my brain's psychology library.
>>62739947>THE DIDN'T DUMP ON YOU>YOU ARE MADE NOWI was told their entire reason for existing was dumping on me though?
>>62740068It’s one of my bags not the biggest that one would be QNT you guys are so fucking weird like you hate money because you see investing like some football match my team your team dialectic. I’am on team money stay poor neckbeard
>>62740049Hi biepum, going hard at it again I see?link bag feeling extra heavy today?Especially with the QNT pump recently.Hard times for the permafuddies. Its like the more you fud, the higher your fudded projects pump. Would be hilarious to see XRP next right? XRP can still be useful where the sender and receiver do not share a common stablecoin rail, where exchanges provide better XRP liquidity than direct FX pairs, or where XRP functions as a neutral bridge asset between otherwise disconnected markets. But that is a liquidity and interoperability use case, not proof that the route is superior to direct stablecoin settlement.
>>62740040That was done strategicallyWhole new boardgame now , and who said i was being adversarial? Apologies for my wording Its the security layer, ai has already cracked lackluster 32 bit All the hacks we have seen recently will bring a hault until people understand the narrative.The optic narrative was exactly what kept people from loading their bags.By this time November it'll be obvious which way this is headingWe all work together but some before othersSolana is vc controlled trash Once the news hits of whats coming i hope you're all ready.
>>62739988
>>627400491/2Ripple Payments is one instruction. The quote gets locked, LPs on each side are already peered, payout dumps onto the local rail. Done. Originator never opens the wallets. Beneficiary never holds XRP. The two conversion legs sit inside the market makers. Wallet A -> wallet B only describes a same-unit send. USDC to USDC. Fine. Cross-border is JPY, GBP, EUR, CNY, CHN, PHP, MXN, BRL, USD, etc., not to mention illiquid stablecoin pairs (with probably hundreds of stablecoins spanning multiple base currencies and many same currency stablecoins from different issuers) between parties not wishing to receive each others' counterparty. To clone what XRP offers with stables you need an issuer, reserves, a bank line, redemption, and a real book in every currency and every issued asset you want to swap between. Those pairs mostly aren’t there. What you get in practice is RLUSD/USDC in the middle plus a local coin you hope someone will mint when the corridor spikes or exported issuer risk at the heart of the whole system. XRP concentrates the FX on existing XRP/fiat books instead of launching a sponsored coin per country or injecting centralized clawbackable assets into the depths of the books if you structure it as fiat -> stable -> fiat. You aren’t adding a new issuer every time you open a corridor or expanding the a to b exchange pairs it offers. Stablecoin hop is a claim. Reserve banks, freezes, weekend gates, delayed redemptions, sanctionability, etc. Same-unit stable send can be right in many contexts. “Just pair two stables across 40 currencies” assumes books and issuers that do not exist and are technically inefficient to be built this way and inject risk and centralization many foreign banks do not want, legally may be unallowed to assume and is a trust this technology is solving for and automating away (which is also why centralized consortiums like SWIFT become less necessary and eventually vestigial if they exist at all).
>>62740094Here's the thing.You are talking to the schizos who already made out on any associated pumps like XDC, we have ALGO, etc.But the idea that everything but XRP will pump is retard tier. It will go to the moon just as with everything else that schizos ever talked about except Casino Coin.
>>62740049>>627401102/2XRP makes all issued assets liquid against each other in market making rather than needing to cobble books together for every pair and does so in a counterpartyless way after having been targeted by the Epstein crowd and western establishment through lawfare, with a huge global presence and broad legal clarity and a sister US stablecoin with the best regulatory base (NYDFS) in existence that cracked the top 10 after 10 months in very late launch. I know you are the same disingenuous low IQ fag who obsessively posts in every thread pretending to not understand but if you do not understand the value of this, you are RETARDED (but you obviously are either way given your obsession and perpetual failure spanning 100+ threads).
>>62740094Apology fully accepted and no worries whatsoever. I hope you are right. I have a lot of schizo thoughts I could say wrt this and other similar things (particularly the reason for the XRP lawsuit), but do not want to diminish the case I can solidly make through their association. Completely agree solana is centralized VC trash. I REALLY do not want to see it take the spot as the smart contract platform nor do I think it could do so in a non-western-centic way. ALGO is my favorite technology for this role by far. Good luck and God bless, brother.
>>62740076>XRP can still be useful where the sender and receiver do not share a common stablecoin railwhich is where interoperability comes in. Heard of it?>>62740110>LPs on each side are already peered, payout dumps onto the local rail. Done.You don't need LPs on each side when settling in stablecoins.Stablecoin settlement: 1 stepXRP bridge settlement: 5 stepsIt's retarded.
>>62740130>which is where interoperability comes in. Heard of it?Yes I do, thats why I hold xerps.The amount of steps dont matter if the finality is 4 within seconds dummy. it could be 1000 steps, if its near instant, it doesnt matter. I mean, it does matter in your head, because you want to argue and not make money, but thats on you lol.
>>62740148>The amount of steps dont matterbig oofLook around you, ask yourself why everyone is working towards stablecoins instead of XRP bridges. Even Ripple.
>>62740155>why everyone is working towards stablecoins instead of XRP bridges. Even Ripple.To have a second product with a higher mcap than link. So you can have another meltdown.
>>62740172And to obsolete XRP bridges. Not everything has to be about Link, you know.
>>627401301/2You only get one step if both sides already sit in the same stable and want to stay there (which (as Brad was saying) some do (most do not)). That’s a RLUSD/USDC balance send. The second they want bank money in another currency you’re back to ramps.Fiat -> stable -> fiat is buy the coin, move the coin, sell the coin. Two books and an issuer. "No LPs" assumes the beneficiary takes the IOU as final settlement. Most of this flow ends on SPEI, PESO, PHP, etc. a bank account. Someone still makes that market. Your 5-step XRP diagram counts the customer walking through two exchanges when the production path is just one instruction. Quote locked, XRP moves, local payout. Same number of economic legs as the stable version, just has a different middle asset. The difference is what that middle is. Dollar coins are a claim with reserves, freeze, mint/burn, banking hours, counterparty solvency/liquidity/political risk, etc. XRP is the ledger asset. BRL to PHP through USDC is two dollar FX books plus Circle. BRL/XRP and XRP/PHP is the spot books that already exist in the live corridors. Same-unit stable send is fine. Counting arrows on a retail loop and calling the bridge retarded doesn’t make the off-ramp disappear and in many cases as already said, it forces the new creation of them at a lot of operating cost and risk and inefficiency and legal limitations. Interop does not smooth any of this or forge liquidity from nothing. If sender and receiver don’t share a stable rail, an interop layer can hand the payment to another chain, a bank network, or a DEX path; Someone still has to sell what the sender delivered and buy what the receiver wants, at size, at a spread you can live with. Connectors do not fabricate liquidity. Interop only answers how the two systems talk. The XRP claim is where the FX sits. XRP/fiat or XRP/token books that already exist, one intermediate instead of a thin A/B pair. That still fails if those XRP books are empty.
>>62740183>You only get one step if both sides already sit in the same stableNo you don't.XRP bridging is 5 steps, count em: asset A => exchange => XRPL wallet X => XRPL wallet Y => exchange => asset B
>>62740130>>627401832/2Same failure if you route USDC across a bridge into a corridor with no USDC/local book. Wrapped stables on another chain fail and insert WAY more counterparty and tech risk. QNT/ILP/W give interoperability. You still have a peg, an issuer, and whatever depth that wrapped market actually has, and the necessity to form and maintain it across every pair where there is none.
>>62740179Sure mate, whatever you say. Can you let the Central Securities Depository from Brasil know this info? Im sure they are keen on hearing your opinion on the matter.
>>62740189>the Central Securities Depository from BrasilThey're not using XRP bridging. They're only using XRPL to keep their receipts on.
>>62740185You’re counting a customer walking through two exchanges. That isn’t how the payment is sent. One instruction. Quote locks. LP on the send side, XRPL hop, LP on the receive side, local payout. Originator doesn’t open wallet X. Beneficiary doesn’t open wallet Y. Those accounts belong to the market makers.Fiat -> stable -> fiat is the same three economic legs: buy the coin, move the coin, sell the coin. You just refuse to count the two ramps so the stable path can look like “1 step.” It only is if both sides already hold the same IOU and keep it (again, some do (as Brad was saying), most don't). The 5-count is you labeling the plumbing as the user journey because despite literal years of obsessing over it you STILL don't understand 101 of XRP or Ripple, even discounting how intentionally retarded ignorant you deliberately act like you are, this one is a genuine failure.
>>62740192Whatever makes you cope. This is phase one btw. Keep me posted on their reaction to your advise.
>>62740199>You’re counting a customer walking through two exchanges.No I'm not.>You just refuse to count the two ramps so the stable path can look like "1 step"Once the stable is onramped, it is free to live on chain and be transacted a trillion times over without ever having to do the onramping again.Same with offramping.
>>62740199>because despite literal years of obsessing over it you STILL don't understand 101 of XRP or RippleHe is paid to not understand.
Posted this forever ago, not sure why it was filtered. Will break it up into constituent parts to try to get through:1/2>>62739947Literally what did you say here that you think contradicts what I did? The escrow is scheduled release they can do whatever they want with when happens. How is them relocking some supposed to be a bad thing or proof against me? Lol>>62739955Xrapid is has not even been a Ripple product for years. They did not use it for $13T ever. Payments using XRP scaled up exponentially even if you set your benchmark growth point to their pre-lawsuit 2019. You are literally all low IQ projecting.
>>62740231>>627399432/2Weird, this is the part that wouldn't post. You are objectively and the source is the company themselves. Lol See pic related.
>>62740241>it's not true!>well it is true but it'll change, I promise!the cope
>>62739943>>62740192They are not necessarily using them for bridging, but your characterization of them "just using them for receipts is retarded and wrong according to them. See >>62740241 and pic related.https://ripple.com/ripple-press/csdbr-and-ripple-use-the-xrpl-blockchain-to-expand-brazils-financial-market-infrastructure/
>>62740252>your characterization of them "just using them for receipts is retarded and wrongHere are direct quotes from Ripple's own statement:"In this first phase, CSD BR will begin using the XRP Ledger as an additional layer for recording and auditing financial assets""The goal is to evaluate how the technology performs under real operating conditions and build a solid foundation for future developments"
>>62740205100000000000%>>62740202Yes you are. If you aren't, say how. Ans you are assuming the transacting balance is desired to stay onchain at the issuer, again, the overwhelming amount of crossborder payments do not, for myriad reasons. Unbelievably ignorant and low IQ argument.
>>62740250Again, this is literally per the company themselves explaining what they are doing exactly. See (and cope):>>62740252
>>62740255Why not take a look at the company's own quote explaining what they are doing explicitly? See (and cope):>>62740252
>>62740256>>62740261>>62740262Here is the company themselves, as quoted in Ripple's statement."We chose to start with record mirroring""'The goal is to evaluate (...) and build a solid foundation for future developments"
>>62740266I know. I literally posted this quote in thread and pointed you to it multiple times. In what way does this quote or your apparently having been so inept or unattentive that you didn't see the quote vindicate you vs. what I said in >>62740241?
>>62740272I said they're only using XRPL to record their receipts. And that's exactly what they're saying.
>>62740277You stated it as though it was the point of the program deliberately glossing over (and being genuinely ignorant to internal processes to) the reason they are engaging this program. There is literally no reason I should need to reword what I wrote in pic related in >>62740241but there is zero world where a financial institution of this sort insta-live launches with zero taper. That is what they are doing, tapering, and that is why they are doing this in the first place, to migrate to use, which is exactly what they say is the reason for doing so this way. This is INSANELY pedantic "no well ackshually at the moment they are only…" COPE. Is it really THIS important to you to try to ru cover. Are you actually THIS desperate? Literally why be such a butthurt and petulant and disingenuous faggot?
>>62740305what the absolute fuck is wrong with you
>>62740309You are literally the weirdest, most jewish faggot that has ever been an anti-XRP obsessive link fat on this board. The redditor flair and constant grind of just absolutely nothing to say but continued, tranny meth head defending his cope worldview persistence you have is LITERALLY insane. You chose a shitty project. It isn't too late. COPE AND REPOSITIONz
>>62740312I didn't say "all they will ever use XRPL for is keeping receipts", I said they're only using XRPL for keeping receipts NOW.And you've been vomiting word salad for hours now only to agree with what I said.
>>62740315"Word salad" is not "lengthy arguments I really don't like I can't respond to." Your literal whole aim is to have the preliminary stage be qualified as the extant absolute stage, like DBS and Franklin Templeton announcing they building out tokenizing a fund using XRPL in order to build a repo market onchain. You would say "ACKSHUALLY THEY ARE JUST TOKENIZING A FUND!!!" It is so petulant and corny and wormy and desperate it is literally like how a leftists argues about how the vax was ackshually a good thing. No answer or fact would change it, no reality about it matters. All that matters is the conclusion and sophical posturing around it. You are 100000000% a brown handed paid poster. What a valueless and amoral life.
>>62740324What is happening now is nothing but receipt keeping.There's zero commitment to anything in the future other than "we'll see".
>>62740331They literally say they are "doing it this way to build a foundation for the future." You are a MASSIVE fucking loser and career equivalent of a parasite.
>>62740341Yup, they literally said "The goal is to evaluate how the technology performs under real operating conditions and build a solid foundation for future developments".In other words: "we'll see".
>>62740346From the same press release:"Once the mirroring phase is validated, the partnership envisions gradually expanding blockchain use to native asset issuance and to trading among authorized participants. Assets under consideration for the next phases include Real Estate Receivables Certificates (CRI) and Agribusiness Receivables Certificates (CRA)…" Literally exactly what I said. Exactly what he obviously indicated. Same statement appears on the Brazilian Valor:https://valor.globo.com/financas/noticia/2026/09/29/csd-br-usara-blockchain-com-a-ripple-em-registro-de-cotas-de-fundos-do-btg.ghtmlCope lil paid jeet fudder nigga.
>>62740362How the fuck does that change anything about what I said?(also note how it says "expanding blockchain use" and not "expanding XRPL use")
>>62740372Exactly what I described in >>62740324made manifest. The partnership is using and building the foundation on the XRPL. You literally said they are only doing receipts and diminishing this like it is a pilot with no planned next steps. You are a massively low IQ faggot who sucks at fudding despite spenins your entire professional life doing it on 4chan for SirGay.
>>62740388>You literally said they are only doing receiptsWhich is exactly true.And after evaluation they'll look at expanding "blockchain use".
>>62740391This is just sad sell half your link and buy anything else like HBAR or something you will miss this bull run again if you don’t
>>62740391You are a lost person.
>>62740410You're incapable of dealing even with the most basic reality.
>>62740413Miss another bull run then just don’t ham on the newfags to hold eternal bags like you losers
>>62740241It's hilarious how little people know about actual business in this forum.I'm a podunk e-comm guy, been around since 1999 selling, built website, ran live inventory, payments, etc.Nothing overly complicated.Every major switch I've ever made took a year and we ran parallel data infrastructure for 6 months.Again, this is for a podunk operation.It's hard to imagine how these people think "busienss" works.
>>62739764>QNT also and the two work together.Proof that XRPL use Quant or vise versa?
>>62739715>Brazil>muh top 10>muh 4 tril
>>62740477Both the ledgers are gonna be interconnected lots of iso20022 coins gonna be used after that
>>62740598Quant isnt a ledger....
>>62740598>claims to hold Quant in addition to XRP>thinks Quant has a ledger of its ownXerpers are too retarded to even lie right.
>>62740612Quant connects the ledgers how do you not know that?
>>62740614>>62740752
>>62740752You said "both the ledgers". You clearly thought Quant was a ledger like XRPL.
>>62740889>Both. the ledgers are gonna be interconnectedUnderstand it now retard?
>>62741013>the ledgers>ledgers>gers>rs>slet it go
>>62741013How much traffic flows through it?
