I told you the 50/50 SpaceX and MSTR setup was the best, and you didn't listen. Today, SpaceX is putting in a performance that gives me a massive hard-on.
>>62755251>Saylor>MuskI'll pass.
>>62755270>I don't like Saylor and Musk, so I'd rather be poor.Classic case.
>>62755290I'm a fucking retard, what do you expect?
>>62755290Also I know that Musk has a lot of fanboys for various reasons, but I honestly can't imagine Saylor having any fanboys.
>>62755294> can't imagine Saylor having any fanboysOne right here. He's fun.
>>62755294I’m not exactly a fan of Saylor, but I think he’s right about Bitcoin, and I’d rather hold MSTR than iShares or direct Bitcoin—because if Bitcoin succeeds, MSTR will outperform Bitcoin on its own. I have a fair amount of confidence in his ability to increase my Bitcoin-per-share ratio for a long, long time.
>>62755309>>62755332I know you're paid shills / one shill samefagging / possibly a bot shilling glow assets but I come into your thread being rude and you're still positive. You also in fact did make many threads before the Elon Stank pump, which is rare for /biz/ saars that come out of the woods after their shitcoin pumps.So ok, I'll listen to what you've got to say. Now that SPCX pump happened, when next moon? Assume I'm a total fucking retard (no need to mention that I guess).
>>62755644Checked.No shill. I was just being honest Simple as.
>>62755644I’m not sure; things need to keep running smoothly, future Starship flights need to go well, and financial results need to improve, particularly with SpaceX demonstrating that the AI segment is generating more revenue and reducing losses. At that point, I think the share price could reach around $200, though there is a risk of rejection. Given its valuation, SpaceX needs flawless execution. However, holding SpaceX will make you a winner in the long run rather than the short term; it is the only company capable of carrying out large-scale space projects.
