>>62758182
the emperor has no clothes. link is a security miscategorized as a commodity because of this we all suffer

>>62758275
Explain this to me in a language i understand (such as Toms obvious minimal language)

>>62758182
>jeetlinkers out here getting raped
F

>>62760186
the howey test.

link -is- a security (with alleged ambitions to -become- a commodity)

Due to this miscategorization, investors who bought/buy the token are exploited because the asset, the token, a security, is -not- a valuable commodity until it becomes one, for example through staking.

Apparently the chain links team plan was to fake it until they can make it, the question is, if they can or will; why should they?

>>62761121
the question is will they or can they before the jig is up, it -is- in their best interest to evolve the token from a security into a commodity. Investing in link is buying into a scam that allegedly aspires to not be a scam

Do you guys notice how the pumps get smaller every cycle but the dumps continue to grow. This coin blows cock

>>62761524
Why donyou type in notepad and screencap it instead of posting the text? Trying to avoid bots and jeets?

>>62761547
It's too late for me, if you're reading this do not buy the token until staking exists, do not trust an announcement about staking coming soon, do not buy the token until staking exists

>>62760189
>saaringan