What would need to happen for Chainlink to break ATHs in isolation?
>>62771597real staking aka token actually needed
>>62771597There would need to be more buyers than sellers.
link will only re-enter the top 5 once btc tanks to a price below $25k
>>62771597really funny pic but i dont know how to make a good thread with it so im leaving with you op
>>62771663finder better
>>62771598Its this simple
>>62771597BTC not dumping/pumping massively in response.That's literally all that needs to happen.In the middle of August Link broke out of its bear trend all on its own, against the market, and the very next day Bitcoin suddenly megapumped out of its own bear trend too. Obviously that killed Link's solitary momentum on the spot.It's always something.
>>62771598>>62771713>only coins with staking are neededkek so explain BTC, pre-merge ETH, XRP, SOL (same "staking" as Link), etc.
>>62771597You sleeping.
>>62771723BTC is the og scarce digital resource, that's all there is to itXRP idk but amazing shilling seems to be keySOL, it's fast, cheap, and makes defi actually fun again
>>62773633So it's not "real staking" that makes a coin needed, but a positive tagline?I can do one for Chainlink: "Link saved Defi and is crypto's best shot at mainstream adoption"
>>62773635I could say link will run when it stops being supressed but that narrative, true or not, has been going on for years and assuming it's true means the only realistic way for link to fly is for people actually wanting a reason to hold it aka real staking aka link backed contracts and actual "universal gas token"sure link will pump here and there like it has recently, but an actual fucking pump will take more than another announcement
>>62773641>an actual fucking pump will take more than another announcementOnly because of the suppression, yes.
>>62773644Maybe, maybe not, maybe it's just because I hold it or maybe it's just because you hold it.
>>62773646Or maybe it also has to do with retards like you helping spread mindnumblingly stupid fud like TNN all day every day.I mean you admitted yourself XRP's success is mostly due to "amazing shilling".
>>62773650I'd rather be a retard than mindlessly parrot token need when I don't need it, do you?Nobody really knows about chainlink outside of crypto circles, if I tell a normie crypto friend I can talk about BTC or even ETH or SOL, good luck with LINK, I can't do shit with LINK, I can't use it in prediction markets, I can't buy tokenized assets with it, all I can do in defi with it is loan it or borrow it, to me it's useless outside of banks need this. Don't get me wrong, XRP is 1000000x worse, but normies know it and it has captured their attention somehow. Maybe link will do that one day, XRP has been around a bit longer, but don't get it twisted, LINK isn't needed because, if we agree on supression, they don't want us to be able to even use it.
>>62773658>mindlessly parrot token neededit literally is needed.>Nobody really knows about chainlink outside of crypto circlesExcept all of the world's banking giants.>if I tell a normie crypto friend I can talk about BTC or even ETH or SOL, good luck with LINKJust tell them about all the world's banking giants.Or the fact that ETH and SOL wouldn't even have defi anymore without Chainlink.
>>62773663I don't need it, I'm not a NOP.Who cares, if they actually "needed" it they would buy it, they pay in whatever the fuck and they print the moneySure, the Chainlink network is needed, but nobody outside of NOPs need the token without real staking.
>>62773666>I don't need it, I'm not a NOP.If you used defi, you paid for Link tokens at some point. Your Defi use needed Link tokens.
>>62773669I didn't need link tokens to do defi shit, and the link tokens given to NOPs is from the ICO pie. Chainlink gets deals in real cash and they throw enough link at NOPs to keep them honest.
>>62773676>I didn't need link tokens to do defi shitYou did.>and the link tokens given to NOPs is from the ICO pie1) a lot of it was bought on the open market through PAL2) most blockchains have inflationary node rewards
>>62773678Now I really understand why /biz/ fuds its own bags.
>>62773682It's mostly you xerpies fudding Link though
>>62773684omg shut the fuck up you stupid faggot
>>62773688If you're lying this hard about Link while larping as a Linkie, odds are you're a xerpie.That's just how it works.
>>62771723Bitcoin is for all intents and purposes a shitcoin. If it wasn't first, it would be worthless. That's the only reason it's valuable.
>>62773694The argument I made applies to 99% of all cryptos, not just BTC.
>>62773697Alright answer OPs question then
>>62773705I did
>>62773641It’s gonna pump to $10,000 over night one day soon. You think it’s gonna limp dick to $200 and sit there for 8 months and then slowly climb to $1,000 over the next year or two where nobody really notices or cares? Nonsense.Sergey is clearly gearing up to be the Steve Jobs of the financial system. He hasn’t been doing all this bullshit for 10 years now just to be some no name. He was already filthy rich, so this is the only motivation he would have. So it’s gonna have to rip so hard to 5-10k per coin where everyone including normies who don’t even know what Ethereum take notice. And then people who think crypto is just some bullshit scam will realize that things are all changing.
>>62773726I'm going to trust you because you're saying everything that I want to hear.
>>62771597Unparalleled fraud that would impress bankman-fried
When they stop suppressing it it will fly straight to 1k. WOOM, just like that
>>62771723staking has always been the thesiswe gamed it out pretty thoroughly during 2018a decentralized oracle network can only be valuable if faulty oracles can be punished on-chain AKA steaking AKA token needed AKA $81,000 EoY baby
>>62771723speculative
>>62771597$10,000 ETH
>>62773905ok so why in like 10 years has chainlink labs basically done nothing with staking then if its so crucial. And when are you as a stinkie going to go "Ok, its 2035, staking 1.0 still isnt out. They are not doing it and its over".
>>62773745.
>>62773745In 2019-2020 $1,000 EOY was like the motherload. If Link went to $1,000 in the next year, I would be happy no doubt but I wouldn’t be ecstatic given all the integrations and Sergey being involved with the govt, and the fact that a coin like Z-cash just went over $1,000. Also inflation. Link would have to hit 3-4k per coin to equal the excitement I would have had in 2020 if link at hit $1,000
>>62774511Fuck off with this baseless FUD
>>62775931>baselessShow me staking 1.0
>>62775535>>62775535I feel like at this point it's pretty much priced in. They recently announced some big deal with SWIFT, tons of supposed innovations and the price has not budged. I am at this point, holding it because I don't really care what happens. But at this point I wouldn't really be surprised if this thing stays at 10$ permanently with the entire ecosystem adjusting to keep this price. I remember back in 2021 when it dumped from 50+ down to where it is now and this is basically what it has returned to ever since. If it is as necessary as a lot of people claim it will be, I would actually argue that Sergey has a marked interest in not letting the price explode.
>>62777701can the new floor just be 100 fucking dollars in the meantime?
>>62775535If the price of a single LINK token went to $1,000 you wouldn't be ecstatic? You've had almost 10 years to accumulate. You should at LEAST the 10k minimum make it stack. $1,000 on 10k is $10 million. Set for life money, generational wealth money as long as you don't fuck it up.At this point I'd be ecstatic if it went to $100
WHAT IS THE POINT OF THIS BOARD IF THE FAGGOT SPAM FILTER IS GOING TO REJECT ANYTHING I TRY TO POST FUCK YOU HIROKU YOU SLANTEYED CHINK FUCK
>>62778360>nothing's changed and nothing willWho's to say it won't though? Aren't the chainlink employims paid in link token and therefore financially incentivized to make token go up? And the network cannot be thoroughly secured without collateral involved hence staking.
>>62778450If Chainlink was at $100 instead of $13 none of you guys would be bringing this up lets be real.
>>62771597My guess is that the dumps are really unfortunate for killing the momentum, even if the supply expansion is lower than other crypto.Useless shit like BNB can be made to gigapump via buybacks and strategic buybacks, the inverse is also true.
>>62778514Half the time Link pumps in the period after an unlock.Literally the only thing that is clearly shown to kill Link momentum is fucking bitcoin
>>62771597https://d.uguu.se/RHqOxCiC.webm
