>>62785869
And to think that at some point it was $2.50, paying a % just for holding it, and promising to be THE Difi/dApp coin.

Many such cases (HBAR, for example)

Jesus Christ, just stop buying alt coins. They always die eventually. You're just setting yourself up for failure

>>62785869
It solves the trilemma though

>>62786023
>>62786052
>>62786079
is Algo joever?

>>62786090
Probably, unfortunately >>62786052 is right. These coins never come back to previous cycle highs. ALGO rode the "internet 3.0" bubble and promised to pay yields, which attracted a lot of people. The bubble popped though - nobody cares about NFTs, distributed finance isn't really a thing (debatable though, because Polymarket, distributed exchanges, etc). But if you are being honest, what do ALGO and HBAR do, really?

Like when would you say "Oh, I need ALGO for this project, it's easier than vibe-coding a normal website/app". Basically never.

One coin might solve bank ACH/wire transfers, I do see that use case, but USDT already does fine for that.

For algo not to be dead, it has to solve something, and I don't see that what.

Same is true for all old shitcoins in the batch - ALGO, HBAR, ICP, Filecoin, etc. If i had to market any of these to someone who isn't retarded, I wouldn't know how.

I was a believer. Was.