NOTHING AT ALL AHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>62794346>wrongtaking too long, also I didnt get in on IPO with the /biz/ group buy for pennies
>>62794346Cringe-marines made project unbackableToken Not Needed instead of Token Omics
>>62794346Token. Not. Needed.
>>62794346>>62794468>>62794519>>62796226>>62796538LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU
>>62794346Absolutely nothing went wrong except for the fact that 4chan incels are too much a percentage of the token holders. When that issue is fixed we moon. Simple as
>>62794346Nothing
Trust the plan. Two more weeks!
>>62794346It solved the lambo problem for Sergey in 2 months, but it's taking a long time to solve the lambo problem for the rest of us. Other than that, nothing went wrong.
nothing went wrong you fucking bastard it was always a long term play go fuck yourself
>>62797000Checked
Buy an ethereum erc20 token? Umm naw dawg, I’m good, sounds to me like it’s just riding coat tails
>>62794346>What went wrong?The price of the token didn't catch up with the expectations.>What went right?Literally everything else. Such an obvious play.
>>62794346constant and massive suppression
>>62797681It might be chainlink that are suppressing their own token. They wrote in one article how a sharp increase in price of the token can mess up the network in various ways. I wish I could find it again. Or they're just acoomulating for the reserve.
>>62797695>It might be chainlink that are suppressing their own token.Pretty sure Chainlink isn't the one dumping Bitcoin every time Chainlink gets big news
>>62797699>Pretty sure Chainlink isn't the one dumping Bitcoin every time Chainlink gets big newsSN=SN might be the case so who knows how much bitcoin he has. Maybe this was his plan all along.
>>62797723Why would he do this?
>>62797738To not spook tradfi until they are in / everyone important has their OTC allocationSN is essentially backstopping the entire operation with his humongous BTC stash, he doesn’t need the token to go up until he feels it is ready
>>62794346Cursed globohomo coin.
>>62797738>slurp up more LINK for the reserve>to keep the fees stable>not to increase huge sell pressure which which might empty out the staking pool>what >>62797783 saidI think the main one is that if you have a fast repricing it might disrupt protocols because suddenly a 0.01 LINK fee is much more expensive.I think they don't mind the price staying low as long as they have a lot of tokens left to sell to fund operations.
>>62797783>so institutions can buy more OTCWhy wouldn't he just sell directly to them if he wanted to please them that badly?>>62797833>to slurp up more LINK for the reserveSergey already has his Link reserve. He's had it since 2017.>fast repricing might disrupt protocols Dumping Bitcoin into the ground also causes fast repricingYou two are the most retarded people I've ever seen on here.>BTC dumps>let's come up with the most harebrained ways we can blame Sergey for it
>>62797695Is just sergey selling and slurping most of the liquidity
>>62798198And somehow this makes Bitcoin dump?
