It can be but macro can modulate the geometry

>>62829486
if it was legit then a bot reacting to patterns would get rich

the best technical analysis I ever ignored was in june 2026 when a black guy was talking about how AI was going to the moon and the chart was a triple top and I was like "it can't possibly dump that hard, it's got massive profits".

If nigs are bullish on your stock you sell that shit.

>>62829486

Astrology for men.

>>62829486
Broadly, yes, though heavily context-dependent and requiring both experience and a structured approach to be somewhat reliable long-term.

>>62829510
If astrology makes me money then great!

>>62829486
For post-ex analysis? Potentially.
For predicting the future? Nope.

>>62829486
Technical for short term, hype for mid term, fundamentals for long term