it's all been a pack of lies
>>62881682that's a cube
avax is eating our lunch bros
>>62881682Not only that, but it's been very obvious the whole time. You're just retarded.
I like chainlink token
I have 5 link
>>62881682Why are they doing this to us?
I BELIEVE CHAINLINK WILL WINI BELIEVE CHAINLINK WILL WINI BELIEVE CHAINLINK WILL WINI BELIEVE CHAINLINK WILL WIN
>>62881682I can feel it too
>>62881682Well there's always the rest of crypto.
>>62881776>Well, AIDS hasn't worked out for you. Have you considered syphilis?
>>62881781Still pissed about your mother.
>>62881782Your stupid crypto of choice is just as pointless as link, retard.
I will keep holding on, just in case
worst, it's literally all truebut, it's years awayand what makes it worse is that you can't leave because you know it WILL happen but not for many years
>>62881682My fud was always sincere. Tried my best to warn linkies.
>>62881867The pain never stops…
>>62881682>>62881700>>62881730Name one lie from Chainlink/Sergey
>>62882108Build rewards.
>>62882115"$20 million worth of Build project tokens have been made available to eligible LINK stakers"They delivered, but have since changed the program to suit the circumstances.
Let’s be honest here lads, even if you sold the top the odds are you would have gambled it on other dogshit or blew the money by now.
>>62882122Someone mog this daft cunt by Ai'ing up Darth Vader wearing a sir gay shirt with bottom text "pray I don't change the program further"
>>62882134You realize that as human beings we age, when we age we get older, when we get older opportunities in our life go away and health problems rear its inevitable head, opportunities do no come back, better to spend now than later, nobody here is getting any younger, living now is the only thing I consider these days, will you/I be alive when Link does anything that's a question that has been on my mind holding this shite for 7 years, I un-staked half and will be selling within the hour, I am going to enjoy my life before its too late, Sergey's timeline has no impact on this decision, use your time wisely.
>>62882200Build was a tangential program announced out of nowhere a few years ago, you're acting like it's some inalienable human right.It was a good idea, but it didn't pan out, and Chainlink stopped accepting native project tokens and instead started converting them to Link through PAL. Which is actually a much better idea.Basically payment abstraction made Build obsolete.
>>62882108iterative and frequent staking updateslet's see how you're going to spin that, imbecile
>>62882341>iterative and frequent staking updatesThat's some very specific wording, care to post the source?>imbecilesays the faggot struggling to come up with a single Chainlink lie in a thread about Chainlink supposedly being nothing but lies.
>>62882349you're such a slimy piece of shit, you know that right?
what is a man?
>>62882382>future iterative upgradeslel where's that "frequent"? Anyway, source that future iterative upgrades have been cancelled?>slimy piece of shitSays the hooknosed jewlord retard who can't find a single Chainlink lie in a thread about Chainlink supposedly being nothing but lies.
what happened
>>62882466too many 4chan white men bought the tokens so the illuminati altered the system to work with no tokens as collateral, tokens as collateral was the value proposition they sold to us. Thats the lie, there is no collateral staking and the system works anyway. They scammed us by selling us tokens for a collateral staking system then never did it raping us all
>>62882486>Thats the lie, there is no collateral staking and the system works anyway.t. lying bolshevik kikeThe system was described as working with the token as payment for nodes, and nothing else.Staking was always an EXTRA security measure, not as a necessity for the system to work.
>>62882490im sorry my asshole is sore too and I have AIDs the sooner we eacape from rape the sooner we can heal
>>62882490>The system was described as working with the token as payment for nodes, and nothing else.>Staking was always an EXTRA security measure, not as a necessity for the system to work.So why hold it?
>>62882450bro, just stop, the gaslighting attempts are insane at this point
>>62882946Now post 4/>>62882881Most cryptos don't have staking, why hold any of them?
>>62882450there have been no material changes to staking since it was implemented. the ONLY change of substance was the migration to a pool where unstaking is now possible. staking still only "secures" a single price feed, on mainnet, and by "secure" we mean the uptime of the feed, not the accuracy.>>62882490Staking was (and still is) a requirement for decentralization, instead of relying solely on centralized nodes handpicked by Chainlink Labs. There has always been the hanging unresolved question of whether CLL would do the difficult work of transitioning to actual decentralization. I think we can safely conclude that there are no plans to do so
>>62882973>Staking was (and still is) a requirement for decentralizationwhoa, hear that Satoshi?btw you're a clown
>>62882983ah, you are just retarded. explains why you hold this coin
>>62882967bro it's been 4 years with zero updates, what the hell are you even arguing for right now?how exactly do you define "frequent updates"?
>>62882993You can take Chainlink's open source code and build your own products, feeds, nodes, DONs, ... all yourself.Chainlink's products are run by Chainlink. >>62882997>it's been 4 years with zero updatesIt's been 3 years since staking v0.2 came out, and it has had changes and additions in the meantime, like Payment Abstraction.Chainlink described 0.2 as being "modular", so it was clear they weren't going to update in a hurry.Yes, 3 years is a long time, but staking is only functionally bullish at scale anyway. I bet they're waiting to release full staking after mass adoption. Not while crypto is still stuck in the Defi kiddy pool.
>>62883026>I bet they're waiting to release full stakingoh okay, if you say so>>62882993yup, he is
>>62883046Staking wouldn't do anything for functional demand while crypto is still in the Defi kiddie pool.Just look at how Ethereum's been doing since staking.
I love ChainlinkI love Sergey I hate fuddiesSimple as
man, it must suck to hold this coin as your only hope of making it. been holding since 2017, but i can go days without even thinking about LINK. i still think it'll happen, but i can only imagine the hell it must be to wait this long if you're stuck alone and waging.
>>62883099It is brutal. Especially since I was just shy of my real take profit target back when it was $50, but it was so close I basically had already "made it" in my head. I briefly tasted true freedom, only to be locked back into the wagie cuck cage. Holding chainlink is actual torture.
>>62883099>>62883662Good technology doesnt automatically make something a good investment. Some idiots here still cant understand that. Chainlink could become the backbone of the entire financial system and LINK holders still wouldnt be entitled to a single dollar of its profits. Youre buying a token, not equity. No ownership, no dividends, no legal claim on earnings. Yet morons here keep treating LINK like a stock… And yes, staking and the Chainlink Reserve exist, but where the fuck is the actual economic demand to justify a multibillion dollar valuation? For years the investment thesis has basically been hoping some other sucker comes along and pays more than you did. Problem is crypto isnt nearly as trendy anymore and finding new idiots to hold your bags isnt getting any easier. The funniest part is Chainlink could actually become a huge success while you lose money holding LINK. Imagine spending decades funding the future of finance only to realize you never owned a single piece of the business.
>>62883782I'm just not gonna sell
>>62881682wen $1000?
>>62883782Mainstream Chainlink adoption means massive token demand just for fees.
>>62883782you're mistaken if you think I, as a LINK holder, believe speculation will pump my bags. it all hinges on adoption *and* CLL releasing the full implementation of staking. we've almost got the first one in the bag, though the chickens haven't quite hatched yet. it's the second that's still up in the air.
>>62881682i can only hold on for maybe 12 more months before i will have to sell my link, only then will it finally moon
>>62883960>it all hinges on adoption *and* CLL releasing the full implementation of stakingWhat if the staking part never happens? What stops them from backpaddling this one? The networks provide services as is, without significant staking requirements.Wish they didn't leave us in the dark for this long.
>>62884329they backpedaled on build rewards and encouraged crime in using a vpn to americans to claim the rewards. If they're willing to publicly commit crime the idea they're waiting for legal clarity for staking does not hold up
>>62883055Staking creates scarcity. Doesn't matter if a system used the word staking if it does not create scarcity, for example chain link has "staking" in name only, there is no risk no loss of tokens for false information. Staking means you accept a level of risk and are rewarded for truth and -penalized- for falsifying as a token buyer I suspect the concept will work, what I no longer accept is that chain link as company of women, and sir gay as a weak faggot, has the fortitude to put forth this system
>>62884329then the world ends up with a financial system that is +50% more efficient than the last one at the cost of being 100% centralized through a two man team of stuttering potheads. I joke but chainlink as it is now is never going to be how it will be.chainlink has been going around the world to specific regional powers and mega-corps to show them how they can tweak their practices to monetize their data in a trustless marketplace. The binance dumps of 700k? treasury payments to Samsung, the Japanese Imperial House, the Vatican, the Yankee Telecom Cartel, etc. Every group that is going to be important in the coming world order has a stack proportional to their influence and utility. Staking has been figured out for years they have been proving it works to the big players behind closed doors. The titans of the future world are sworn not to buy any and disrupt the negotiated balance. Every chainlink pump out of no where? The ones that trigger a costly bitcoin dump to keep the price from running away? Usually its some clueless greedy bureaucrat trying to secure his family unfathomable riches. Ends up an overdose or helicopter crash within the weekStaking is needed for the whole system to workThe system can't scale on "just trust me bro"
>>62884329That would suck. Luckily for me, LINK is only a potential shortcut for making it. I can wait however long it takes, but if it never happens oh well. I still think it will tho>>62884440As another anon said, BUILD just didn't pan out and they scrapped it. It was an interesting idea, but ultimately tangential to everything else. It was lagniappe that ended up being worthless. As for committing crime? All I have to say to that is lol. Go lawyer up, go get em!
>>62883842Tonight!
EAT THE STEW
>>62884571Good post.However, for now, the future appears to be heading towards centralization and:>you will own nothing and you will be happy
>link above $10Rejoice you picked the slow horse of going up AND going down.
>>62881682I can't feel it coming in the air tonight anymore, bros. I can't feel anything.
>>62882420a miserable pile of secrets!
CCIP intentsYes, that's right, the fee is in stablecoins or LINK
>>62886011>the fee is implicit in the quoteChainlink payment abstraction and Chainlink reserveVideo unrelated
>>62886013>>62886011
>>62886016
>>62886020
>>62886024Ah, there's our reliable mp4 poster. Even including the closeup of the african gentlemen flapping his feces colored lips at us at high speed. Surely a great way to convince people!
>>62886047Thanks for posting in the Chainlink thread. Get up to speed on Chainlink CCIP intents.
>>62886016I dig this style of advertising
>>62887214A cucked white man with a mulatto kid. Yep, that adds up for you guys.
>>62882134Naw, I cashed out into boomer funds.
>>62887278Proud of you anon. Now just sit back and watch the gains. Don't sweat the downswings.
>>62882226bahhaahahahahahahhago any investment cult on the internet and you'll see similar cope you know your investment is dead when the cult leaders have to wax on poetically about the true meaning of life... on an investment boardnot so arrogant these days eh? take that L like a man, little boyTHE Cuckolds of crypto
>>62887361>>62887397Have you found a single lie yet?
>>62883782this guy gets it. everything he said is correctfurthermore, all of the cheap money that flowed into the industry around '20-22 was probably the worst thing to happen to it. the idiots running crypto companies thought it would always be like that. they read their headlines, thinking they were geniuses. and why wouldn't they... an altcoin founder could make $100M+ for an idea and a presentation of infographics then that money dried up and went into other asset classes. a lot of savvy investors saw this coming and front ran it. so what you have left in the crypto in the space are the dumbest most gullible people who have zero life experience>>62883960>it all hinges on adoptionadoption has already happened and there's no impact on price>CLL releasing the full implementation of stakingyes they are "working" on it right? because that's how normal companies operate right? they raise billions and billions of dollars for 10 years and then they start working on their product that still doesn't existdo you still believe in santa little boy?
>>62884571>chainlink has been going around the worldpaid for by gullible cult members. and it's first class all the way for them every hotel, every flight, every premium rental car, and every 5 star restaurant... you paid for it boy >very group that is going to be important in the coming world order has a stack proportional to their influence and utilityand yet you can't show a single one that's actually holding link many of them are public companies, and yet when i see their financials, they don't own any crypto>>62884571>Staking is needed for the whole system to worktheir business works fine by having people pay in usd >>62884578>BUILD just didn't pan out and they scrapped it. It was an interesting idebahahahhahahi guess if you find welfare "interesting" then yeahit was hilarious and also very cringe when all of you idiots thought you were going to get rich off build>>62887402>Have you found a single lie yet?a lie about what
>>62887397>>62887445>>62887481meanwhile, your bags
>>62887481your posts are so performative, it's actually a little stomach turning. you remind me of elliot rogers.i never go into the xpr threads -- is it the same there? are there individual posters who consistently go into xrp threads to shit on it? that's probably just the nature of people
This is lul because the updated chart is even worse. Jesus how cucked are these baggies?
>>62887361>Don't sweat the downswings.I love downswings since I'm not retiring anytime soon, I can go on /biz/ and see the red arrow threads. And my index funds will automatically buy at a lower price.Of course this is with the fundamental belief that America wont implode but if that happens then every other country is fucked too.
>>62887652get your gay boomer index shit out of this threadit's for mocking stinkies
SERGEY HUNNGGRRYYYYY
>>62887832What better way to mock them then to show investments that actually pay off? You know, getting an actual return instead of watching your hair turn gray and losing to inflation along the way.
>>62883782>>62883960>>62883811>>62883662>>62887445....look im not even against Chainlink you fucking morons lol. I actually hold LINK in a diversified portfolio, just wanted exposure to crypto overall, not married to it or whatever. But seriously.. you idiots think big money is gonna buy your fucking LINK bags just because chainlink succeeds? lmao. ChainlinkLabs is the REAL business here,making private deals, negotiating with institutions etc. Adoption of chainlink DOESNT mean buying LINK as investment. You think BlackRock gives a shit about pumping your bags on binance?. Labs could literally tell holders to fuck off and move towards a normal stock company. You own ZERO equity, ZERO dividends, ZERO rights to profits. Company makes billions and your token could still be worth shit. And yeah yeah before some midwit starts typing about staking, payment abstraction or the reserve.. I KNOW THEY EXIST ffs. But those are design choices, not some law of physics. Sergey decided to keep LINK relevant, doesnt mean they HAVE to forever... They could change the payment model, use fiat deals, reduce LINK utility etc. There coul be technical consequences but its not fucking impossible. Thats what you idiots dont get. Every partnership=bullish, every announcemen= trillions coming, every criticism =some 500 word tokenomics mental gymnastics lmao. Youre so emotionally attached to your bags you cant even consider that good tech doesnt mean good investment. Just keep screaming NEVER SELLING while CL builds the actual business. TLDR IQ LINK marines.. CHAINLINK IS GOOD TECH. SERGEY DID HIS JOB. GOOD TECHNOLOGY, SHIT TOKEN INVESTMENT. Real institutional money can use chainlink without investing billions into LINK. Show me actual economic demand justifying the valuation instead of praying some other sucker buys your bags. Imagine being 50 yo and realizing you spent decades funding the future of finance without owning a single fucking piece of the company lol.
>>62888303that's a lot of words I'm not gonna read
>>62888303And before some midwit comes screaming BUT MUH SWIFT AND DTCC!!! yeah no shit dumbass, I KNOW theyre working with Chainlink. Thats literally my fucking point. CHAINLINK adoption is NOT the same as LINK investment. You think SWIFT moving trillions in financial messages means trillions flowing into your token? LMAO. DTCC did pilots, SWIFT tested interoperability, cool technology, genuinely impressive. But how much actual revenue does it generate? And more importantly how much of that becomes LINK buying pressure?? Yeah payment abstraction converts fees into LINK and the Reserve accumulates tokens, nobody is denying that you idiot. But converting fees into LINK doesnt magically justify a multibillion dollar market cap. If an institution processes $100 billion worth of assets and pays $100k in service fees, THATS $100K IN REVENUE, NOT $100 BILLION IN TOKEN DEMAND. Get that through your fucking skull. And even then, how much of those fees actually goes toward LINK purchases? How much gets sold by node operators? How much demand is recurring? Whats the actual net buying pressure versus circulating supply? Show me the fucking numbers instead of posting another SWIFT logo and screaming bullish. Also the entire payment abstraction model is something Labs designed and can potentially modify...Its not some divine guarantee that link holders get rich, chainlink could process trillions but still LINK be overvalued
>>62888319>CHAINLINK adoption is NOT the same as LINK investmentChainlink isn't getting adopted by shit. It's all just smoke and mirrors implying "BIG BANKS ARE GOING TO USE IT", when what it actually means is "banks are half-heartedly testing it as one of 20 alternatives." Banks are never going to sign off on such a ridiculous mechanism.
>>62888319>CHAINLINK adoption is NOT the same as LINK investment.Yes it is.Full Swift adoption equals dozens of millions in demand for Link tokens.
>>62888721Somehow I suspect that no matter how much "Swift adoption" Chainlink gets, it will never be "full adoption" so you can just always say this - "it's not REAL adoption!"But trust me once "real" adoption happens, it's straight to $81,000, right?
>>62883782Everyday I pray my newswire bots pings me with the news that CLL is raising to go public with zero reparations for the tokenholders. The gravedancing I will be doing will be biblical. Fuck everyone of these cancerous baggots
>>62887397What? I said i sold half, how is that cope?
fuck all stinkiesit's dumpin' and will soon be sub tenyou're all incels
>>62882486>>62882490>>62882538>>62882881Why would they care about us holding? What fun would it before them to have this system and they are just ruling over non whites? And for the system to work people have to own the tokens and be dispersed across a few hundred thousand people. Some people used to say pre covid… “we can get money and save the world!” Whatever I don’t really care about that seeing how the people behaved towards the unvaxxed during covid I mean is Sergey a good guy or a bad guy?
>>62888748Whether "full adoption" happens or not, the fact remains that Link's ROI scales very nicely with Chainlink adoption.
>>62892107>single digit shitcoin in 2017+9
>>62892161Adoption has to scale before price can scale with it.Any price action before that happens is speculation, which relies on hype. And Link hype is exactly what Bitcoin has been smothering all these years.
>>62892199>9 more years I swear guise
>>62892304Link would've pumped years ago purely on hype (just like the rest of crypto) without the suppression.I also love how Chainlink threads are now the official mass adoption waiting room for all of crypto.
That's it? That's all LINK could do? Now the walls are closing in.
Can't even hold $10. Absolutely abysmal.
>>62892334>woulda shoulda coulda guise!!!lol, lmao even
>>62892588You only took that simple statement of fact as an excuse because you thought you were assigning blame.To whom did you imagine you were trying to assign blame, anon?
My ex-girlfriend told me to sell when it hit $50 in 2021 and I didn't listen
>>62892334>suppressionNigga there's no suppression. All you cryptards have these Bob Lazar-tier grade conspiracy theories about your shitcoins being suppressed by shadowy powers. The reality is, no one gives a fuck. No bank or major financial institution cares even a little bit. Certainly not enough to engage in sUpReSSiOn.
>>62892902yes (((they))) do
>>62892902>Bob Lazar-tier grade conspiracy theorieshow about just pics of the actual charts?
>>62892917The first step to financial stability is being honest with yourself. Realizing when you've become too emotionally attached to something and have started constructing fantasies to explain why things aren't working out as you'd hoped. Untruths that allow you avoid admitting you just made some bad choices.
>>62893209This has literally nothing to do with emotions. Just the actual charts.
>>62893228"Charts" are how numerologists or astrologists make endless amounts of spurious and retarded statements about things that aren't true. It's the same with cryptard chart schizos.
>>62893287I'm not talking about meme lines and TA, just a basic event timeline:>good thing for Link>Bitcoin crash right after
>>62893316This couldn't possibly just be explained by cryptards with pure daytrading mentality jumping between investments to try and shave some value. Oh no, it's "them", the illuminati, manipulating a *checks notes* $7.5 billion market cap coin. You know what else has a market cap of 7.5 billion? The Gap. I'm not really sure the freemasons have any interesting in wasting time manipulating something with roughly the same value as a failing jeans mall outlet.
>>62893403you ok bro?
>>62893440I accept your concession.
I'm really tempted to email Elizabeth Warren to ask her to investigate Chainlink just to fuck with Sergey.
>>62893629It would be hilarious to get him up there and be forced to admit under oath that none of the stupid partnerships have amounted to anything.
>>62892902The suppression of chainlink is real.But is just sergey dumping his infinite stack and slurping most of the liquidity, at every push.The link baggie is right, just by hype this is supposed to be at x00$ or something, way worse shitcoins did way more than that, with barely any supposed utility and almost no connections/marketing.But sergey eats all.Link wil never rise, even if it really get behind the entire economic system, sergey will just dump a billion links and slurp it all.
>>62893711>Bitcoin dumping = Sergey dumping Linkget your head checked>slurping most of the liquidityRipple does this.Sergey dumps at regular intervals, regardless of recent price action.
>>62893629she should
>>62893629samegod bless senator warrenshe'll get to the bottom of this
>>62893629Please do it
