Lmao, Freudian slip?
>>62885450Boooooooooooom
So bullish
>>62885450Profound cope by you. Forgery and projection and repressed lies are the only argument linkies have.
>>62886402So is XRP gonna moon yes or no? I'm tired of waiting bros...
>>62886409Yes, but with actual use coming online in things announced and elsewhere, not speculation.
>>62886409it's a meme coin but the owners walk around in suits to look important
>>62886402He's wrong.Even if XRPL is MASSIVELY successful, demand for XRP would still be negligible.Time needed to capture 1% of XRP supply:>full Swift adoption of XRPL: 2,000+ years>all of today's credit card transactions on XRPL: 100+ years
xrp so bullish
>>62886717Dogshit
>>62886409Yes! XRP will moon to $1.20 each by 2039, the same price as 2013 and 2026
>>62886686This
>>62886699You are reusing the same argument for demand that literally no one has ever used. Funnily enough David even commented on it in the first post he is replying to in the full tweet OP cut off to similarly cope. We have had this argument 100 times and you lost every one and now you are pretending it never happened because you are an indian paid poster or spirit nigger jew.
>>62891659The only way XRP can gain demand from XRPL being successful, is from its use as "gas" token.The paragraph in pic is what you're talking about, and it also 100% boils down to XRP as gas.
>>62891967This literally isn't true and you have had this exact discussion with me 100 times in different threads and David himself says the same and that no one informed thinks this. Why continue to strawman when the attempt has failed so bad and literally couldn't be more robustly contradicted by David than direct statement. Have written paragraphs worth of XRP as collateral and liquidity operation requirements etc. to you in the past. Hit the archives, bucko.
>>62892140>This literally isn't trueSo enlighten us.>David himself says the sameWhere?>XRP as collateralIt has to have value *before* it can even be considered for use as collateral.Where does this value come from? Not utility, but pure speculation. Meaning the collateral is built on sand.>liquidity operationDemand neutral, ask Ripple. Therefore not a driver of value at all.
>>62892140I really don't get why CLL invests so heavily in shilling on /biz/ of all places, it's not going to move the needle even a tiny bit. All it does is provide indication that they feel threatened, and reaffirms the xrp bull thesis.It comes off as inorganic, low IQ, jeet shilling
>>62892198>CLL invests so heavily in shilling oopsie!
>>62892207>no, ukek, even if you were to be paid a jannies wage, I still think CLL overpaid
>>62892249I just hope they're paying you in Ripple shares and not xrp.
>>62892159Literally no one (myself particularly) has ever argued gas was the core value capture or even vaguely that sizeable. We claimed it is needed for marketmaking, will be/is usable as neutral collateral, etc. It is already used as collateral and has value at the price it has regardless of what it is. Genuinely unsure how that is confusing? David literally says this and that he doesn't know anyone serious whose thesis is based on gas in the picture I posted that you replied to originally in the part I specifically point to, the tweet his followup the OP truncates is a reply to, you fucking retard. ODL is mechanically demand neutral as a transactional basis (again, SOMETHING THAT IS A CORE PART OF OUR THESIS AND WE KNOW AND HAVE ALWAYS KNOWN). The demand comes from marketmakers/LPs as use scales who need to provision for its increased use. We have had this argument 100 times I am not going to NPC loop with you for 30 posts in another iterative L for you. >>62892198Genuinely. It is insane. It is the same dude too. Genuinely like they hired an Indian on fiver on a rolling basis to just sit day and night to collect (You)s and double down on feigning indignance and freshness in the same conversation had for the 101st time which he lost the prior 100 times, ultimately leading to massive face loss for CLL after our months long campaign dragging him and the other two or so one of which literally broke so hard he just posts old copypastes now and starts 20 obviously linkie formed XRP threads at once in total admission of defeat on the ideas and just coping/trying to make us seem like the thirdworlders they are by pretending to be us. It is SO strange but really very fascinating to watch from a psychological standpoint.
>>62892207Every single crypto company does ambassador programs and forms influencers and are retarded if they don't. NOT every crypto company pays a Fiver Indian to practice digital Diwali poop ceremony day in day out to try to form a literal fucking cult around a corporate paypig extraction for a token they have abandoned every single aspect of and deliberately chose to build no utility for.
>>62892365>It is already used as collateral To be used as collateral, it has to have value first. Being collateral is now what gives the value, it's what uses value that already exists.>ODL is mechanically demand neutral >The demand comes from marketmakers/LPs as use scalesIn ODL, xrp is demand neutral. It's bought and sold in the blink of an eye. MMs/LPs can never boost value because of this.>>62892372>Every single crypto company does ambassador programsYeah but in this case they're paying influencers to spoof "public support".That's not the same.
