10-20 years ago you could be forward looking and see opportunities everywhere. nowadays it does not feel like there is anything left on the horizon. the big name stocks today IPO'd back then at reasonable valuations without positive cash flow or revenue. today, the similar "next big name" stocks are IPO'ing at absurd, unjustifiable valuations. even if you say - robotics, or some ai component, space exploration, satellites, nuclear fusion, or whatever. if there is a stock in that sector it is wildly, and i mean wildly, overvalued to the 100th degree. its difficult to say -- ah yes, i believe X will be something big in the future, i will invest in it. when the price doesn't even come close to reality, nor the future potential. and any kind of correction will bury that company so far underground without a chance of recovery. are the only forward-looking avenues left degenerate? like onlyfans, gambling, or scamming. i'm desperate for someone to show me something i might be missing but the potential of the future just simply does not seem to be there anymore.
>>62892595>if there is a stock in that sector it is wildly, and i mean wildly, overvalued to the 100th degreeindeed
1. Ai analysis is literally on the verge of bringing us genetically engineered loyal wives.2. Its really hard to "value" something since money itself is so valueless now. You mind is probably stuck in precovid mindset.3. When you say the only forward looking avenues are degenerate keep in mind the amazon ipo was like a 4th of the average company. So an opportunity like that isn't really the equivalent of these big hyped up news cycle companies. Its something that goes public that most people don't believe in. Nvidia wasn't seen as an ai potential powerhouse, but people who saw the value of graphics cards could have guessed they would be applied to other computational heavy tasks.
>>62892723You wont get shit.Even if singularity comes tomorrow it will be felt 50 years from now when you are dead from monster drinks.
>>62892595>big name stocks today IPO'd back then at reasonable valuationslol no they didn't. They merely look reasonable today in hindsight. But at the time they were viewed as massive overvaluations.
>>62892723>Since money itself is so valuelessPeople were saying that after QE too lmao. So cyclical
