Previous thread: >>4396755Guide to Steins;Gate content: https://rentry.org/steins-cuteOther Sci;Adv girls also welcome.
celeb sev
https://x.com/yccm_aoa/status/1962861196455100849
>>4427571Cute
meowho
Wish I had my edit of her reading The International Jew by Henry Ford
>>4433967
Happy Halloween nya~
New Frau skeb I saw
>>4435805
>>4436020>>4435805My wife
>>4442447>no Faris
>>4442455>no Luka
Merry Kurisumasu!
きああああ
@naruto___05
New official Kurisu
>>4457993>>4457799>>4457702>>4456340>>>/e/
>>4458719While I normally encourage community moderation, only >>4457799 is really a bit more lewd than /c/. Her top is a bit too small in that one image, but the others are fine and we've had countless swimsuit/beach threads before so you really don't have much of an argument with those other ones. Also >>4457702 is a bit on the silly side and while I'm not a fan of it, it doesn't seem like it's a rule breaking image.Also don't textbump threads.
>>4458719More swimsuits, your grace?
>>4458720
>>4458720/c/ should generally be non-sexual. Almost every other blue board is filled with gooner art whenever Steins;Gate is discussed and I feel that this thread would be better off being a break from that. While disliking swimsuits seems kind of silly on paper, it's a slippery slope. If swimsuits are fine, why not microbikinis? Why not show lingerie as well? And then eventually the thread turns into the same thing steins;gate threads are on every other board
>>4459392You are silly. You can go in loads of threads on /c/ and you'll find images that are sexy as well as cute. The two are by no means mutually exclusive. The board as a whole has been completely fine with hot girls in swimsuits, bunny suits, china dresses, skimpy maid outfits etc. for years and years. There is a line on /c/ but girls looking cute in their bikinis doesn't cross it.
>>4459392>/c/ should generally be non-sexualAlready is, stop making up a problem. Its a blue board and threads are pretty tame, especially when compared to the rest of the site. >it's a slippery slopeProof? "What if" isn't an argument and it most certainly isn't fact. And when will things start to get worse? There have been multiple swimsuit themed threads (or they get posted in threads) every year for well over the last decade, going back longer than any anon ITT has even used 4chan. You're only argument here is "I don't like it" as the slippery slope argument doesn't make sense given that /c/itizens can handle being responsible posters in swimsuit themed threads without the board devolving into degeneracy (again these kind of posts have been made on /c/ long before any of us even started using the site).>why not microbikinisMicrobikinis by nature are lewd and will get deleted as they have been (if they're even posted) and no one has ever made a thread for them despite all the swimsuit threads. /c/ is the most archived board on the site, its not hard finding evidence to support this. >why not show lingerie as well?See argument above. More lewd so they will normally get removed. If you don't know the difference between a bikini and lingerie, then that isn't our problem and the board will not change due to that.Search any archive, notice how we've had 0 (or close to 0) microbikini or lingerie threads and if we do have swimsuit threads that are too lewd, mods clear out the trash (and this is after years and years of bikinis/swimsuits being posted on /c/, so no one is worried about a "slippery slope"). >tldrAnons on /c/ aren't stupid and have basic common sense, like this anon >>4459405 said there is a line on /c/ and bikinis don't cross it. /c/itizens have been responsibly posting bikinis for years without issue, you bitching isn't going to change that.If you can't stop viewing swimsuits as lewd, that's a "you" problem, not a board problem.
