Here to remind you again, calories are not real and if you believe in them, you're dumb. First of all, "empty calories" are contradictory. A unit of measure cannot randomly be meaningless, like an empty kilometer. It's either consistent, or it isn't.Secondly the measurement system is stupid to begin with. They used a gizmo called a calorimeter and burn a substance and measure how many degrees the heat of a fire increases and that's where the calorie calculation comes from.How much energy an apple, when you burn it, raises a fire's temperature has no bearing on the efficiency of human metabolism they are two completely different things. do not believe nutritionists and their made up bullshit
>>22033116>calories are not realneither is any other unit of measure.but yet you still believe your shoe size, height, weight, distance traveled, etc.
>>22033116>How much energy an apple, when you burn it, raises a fire's temperature has no bearing on the efficiency of human metabolismi'm going to educate you, anon.a fire requires fuel to raise it's energy output.you require fuel to raise your energy output.wild, i know.
>>22033122maybe you should eat gasoline and charcoal, then. They make good fires.
>>22033116there is some truth to that. you lose like 30% of the calories from protein while digesting it, less for carbs and even less for fat. empty calories just means pure energy without much nutrition otherwise. refined starch/sugar/oil are mostly empty calories because they've had most everything stripped away except for the main calorie source. however you can still reasonably say protein gives the least amount of calories, carbs gives second most, and fat gives the most. eating less will make you lose weight and eating more will make you gain weight regardless of the numbers.
>>22033128who are you, uncleverbot?
>>22033128No, he should eat uranium.Good Saskatchewan uranium, not the slop coming from Kazakhstan.
>>22033116retard the post
>>22033116
