Do you think nacho fries is a flawed concept?
>>22044732we call that Texas Poutine where I'm from
It gets rid of the chip disparity and the soggyness but they don't pick toppings up well
>>22044732Any fry that's loaded needs to be extra crispy to compensate for the toppings and they never are. They're significantly less convenient than nachos because you're almost always stuck using a fork and awkwardly smashing sideways French fries into your mouth
>>22044732Yes. Why not just use nachos?
>>22044808The potato is the corn of the Irish.
>>22044732No but you need to use waffle fries.
>>22044732these are great. the cubed tomato really does spruce it up.
>>22044838genuis
>>22044732It works much better if you scallop cut them
>>22044732any dish where something wet sits on something that's supposed to be crispy is fundamentally flawed. It still tastes good, but a soggy french fry is no different from putting it on a baked potato.
>>22045023>any dish where something wet sits on something that's supposed to be crispy is fundamentally flawedyou dont know how wrong you are
>>22045023>putting it on a baked potato.that will get completely soft but the crispy texture still holds up differently to moisture even if it starts to get a little soggy. maybe because of the oil repelling some moisture. something like eggplant parm isn't as good without breading and frying it first even though you add tomato sauce to it after.
>>22044732All "SLOP ON CHIPS" type concepts are inherently flawed. The SLOP ruins the CHIPS.
>>22044732Nachos themselves are a flawed concept.
>>22045189>>22045721die
>>22044732nachos are a flawed concept that belongs in the garbage
>>22045737>>22045721Your post is so gay 4chan tried to reject it the first time
>>22045721why
