>45 calories>not a low calorie snackHow is that not a low calorie snack? You could eat 40 of them and still be under your daily calorie goal
>>22048502Why did they go from like $1.29 to $2.49 overnight? I used to get one at Aldi at checkout, but they doubled in price overnight.
>>22048502It's a legal thing apparently, has to be 40 calories or less. They also probably put that on the label because they don't want people seeing "zero sugar" and thinking it's <5 calories like a soda and then complaining when it's not.
Because that "beef stick" is only 14g, making it approximately 3.21 calories per gram. Where as 1lb (454g) portion of raw top round beef is about 753 calories or about 1.66 calories per gram.
>>22048643So is raw top round beef a low calorie food?
>>22048502320 kcal / 100g is quite a bit.Yeah it has just 45 kcal - but it also only weighs 14 grams. That's not much.It's not SUPER cloric but definitely not light / low.
>>22048643>>22048680Who cares how much it weighs?
>>22048691>This car only takes half a gallon>Per mile>Who cares how far it drives?
>>22048502my wife's son buys these. for the longest time i though they were dog treats, until one day i saw him eating one and the dog looking at me..
>>22048714If you only need to drive 45 feet that's fine though
>>22048715>$18 for 8 dog treatsBougie
>>22048729You wouldn't call that a "low fuel car" tho
>>22048734It is a low fuel car though? It takes less gas
>>22048512Trump damaged the agricultural sector
