a sandwich has never been improved by adding a third slice of bread in the center
yes it has
>>22176596>wow this sandwich really needs to be slightly harder to bite into for an ingredient adding nothing to the meal
>>22176607why do they make them like this? its intentionally being made to be bigger than the mouth can accommodate. there has to be a reason
>>22176607>he uses bread so shitty that it adds nothing to the sandwichYou are in no place to judge sandwiches, retard.
>>22176633a recipe i found from 1928 said to use 1/4 inch thick bread which would be a bit thinner than most bread today. also they probably weren't putting so much meat so overall the sandwich would be thinner. it just seems to have gotten bigger over the years like a lot of food items.
I figured them out when I thought of them as two sandwiches with less bread instead of one sandwich with more bread. It's understandable to miss this considering the most famous example barely counts as one nowadays but you'll see the next time you make sandwiches. Just assemble a second sandwich on top of the first and tell the others what you saw.
>>22176594>a sandwich has never been improved by adding a third slice of bread in the centerstatements like that are why this anon isn't in the club
>>22176663that makes sense. just typical>lets make it bigger
>>22176594The one inside gets toasted, the two on the outside do not.It just works
>>22176594this but with sliced tomato
>>22176594The structure can actually improved, especially if you toast both sides
ITT: seething jawlets
>>22176594Don't disrespect the "Moist Maker".MYYYY SANNNDWICHHH?!
>>22176594the double decker pb&j would be entirely imbalanced without the third slice
>>22176594Sure it has.
>>22177801Looks like a jeet shit on your fries after they undercooked your burger.
>>22177801So bad it looks like AI