It is amazing with all the blowback against the McDonalds CEO, and all the free publicity on the table, not one fast food CEO paid several millions of dollars annually could pretend to enjoy their food in an unedited video
>>22243073A CEO is hired to keep salaries and costs down and shareholder profits high no matter what, he's basically a psychopath in a suit
>>22243073They are all vegetarians so they can more easily be fucked in the butt.
I think it was just a case of their marketing departments fucking up badly. They should have realized their CEOs weren't good at this but they went with it anyway.
>>22243073>>22243133There’s really no way to look good eating a burger. Watching other people eat is inherently off putting anyway, unless it’s heavily edited, but they all should have known that before they entertained this idea in the first place
Perhaps you should consider that they could have made faux slop burgers made from organic wagyu and so forth if they wanted. So they want you to see them pretending to eat the slop. Now ask yourself why?
>>22243073>unediteddo you really believe they didn't have mulitple takes and have all this planned out to stir up online discussion? you wouldnt still be talking about it if he liked the burger.
>unedited videoPlease seek help for your undiagnosed autism and/or schizophrenia
The meat contains a non-zero amount of human meat.
>>22243073My guess is that the burgers are props and not actually edible so they look halfway decent on camera.
>the ceo of a burger won't even eat The ProductAnd yet people here still buy that shit and start threads dedicated to doing so.
>>22243171>There’s really no way to look good eating a burgerI beg to differ!
>>22243697I don't really get this argument. Do you want the CEO of Pampers to wear a diaper? Hamburgers are for the consumerist masses with no taste — they're not actually good food. They're fuel. >>22243112>Running a business successfully instead of letting costs balloon is psychopathicThis is not true.
>>22244156Not him but when you prioritize even incredibly slight, minuscule increases in success over the well-being of your fellow countryman then you are in fact a psychopath. You will defend corporate heads greenlighting things that are actively harmful to people for slight profit increases, to the point of suppressing research that reveals said harmful effects, and you are welcome to lick that boot.You don't have to be a psychopath to successfully run a big business, but it certainly helps.
>>22243073That's cause they're not human
>>22244156Imagine entering the war on goyslop on the side of goyslop jesus christ
>>22244225Someone has to feed the goyim.
Is Andy Burnham moonlighting as CEO of Wendys?
>>22244269>Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to piecesVery based.
>>22244156I don't get j**ts who suck off CEOsIt's about as NPC soulless as it gets>omg he gets paid a big salary, he must be super smart and amazing
>>22244156>they're not actually good food. They're fuel.
>>22243171>There’s really no way to look good eating a burger.these two look awesome
>>22244494how come theres so many fries on the counter? can he not eat a fucking burger without getting food everywhere? is he not housebrokern either?
>>22244494does awesome mean dysgenic in your neck of the woods?
>>22244499I once saw someone trimming their burger's veggies on a bare table in that Cubs bar at O'Hare. People are animals.
>>22244494true americans
>>22244156Well, thanks for correcting the record, ChatGPT
>>22244547You're — a — great — example — of — someone — who — should — eat — hamburgers.
>>22243073the ceos look like normal boring rich white people with clothes that fit, so naturally the fat, ambiguously brown, modern amerifat slob that eats mcdonalds feels challenged and distanced from them.
>>22243073i could not give less of a fuck about which evil billionaire likes eating their own purchased burgerslop the most. they should compete with each other based on who can make their employees happiest and paid the best. that's something that would actually make a consooooomer like me have a more favorable opinion on the brands they own.This entire debaucle was a psyop and social media provided mountains of free advertising to each chain. let it die.
>>22244571>Raising the price of food (because they have to offset rising labor costs) would make consumers happyIt would not. You claim it would, but the revealed preference of every consumer shows otherwise.
>>22244985No price increases needed. The multibillionaires struggling to choke down the burgerslop for your interaction can take a pay cut. If any of your employees need to be on any sort of government assistance, those at the head of the company should not be allowed to bring home any bonuses. Truly, I think you should be allowed to be worth $999,999,999.99 and every red cent beyond that must go back to the employees you've exploited or face an enormous, painful tax penalty that WILL put you far below that limit.
