>this frame of Homer glitching out + staring at the camera>missing from official streaming services and new Frinkiacyeah yeah, how spooky blahblahblah. but when did it become fine for official services to edit or REMOVE existing footage?like The Simpsons is no longer a 90s cartoon. it's a live service provided to you by Disney (no Michael Jackson episode for you!)
>>153912827how's your job search coming along, op?
>>153913001this is off-topic & trolling.i would never announce a report since that's against the rules. however, i respect the mods and i hope their decision to ban you gives you time to reflect on your actions.
>>153912827Frinkiac doesn't do smear frames, you have to hunt them down yourself. Similarly, streaming may have it but you lack the fine frame-by-frame advancement from actual video players in their corposlop-approved unified locked down goycattle tiktok sneedator
>>153913127>corposlop-approved unified locked down goycattle tiktok sneedatorDid you have a stroke? Im pretty sure whatever you just said is about the same brain damage youd get watching tiktok all day
>>153912827Looks like someone damaged a cel
>>153912827when something is classified as an artistically insignificant technical error like your case.
>>153913127>corposlop-approved unified locked down goycattle tiktok sneedatorMy greates invention!
>>153912827They still banned that mj episode???Jesus
>>153914687the archivist in me thinks we should preserve technical errors. Citizen Kane has visibly dolly tracks, should we paint those out? plenty of classic films go out of focus, you can see the corner of a boom mic, whatever.discolouration and grain are a different situation. they're artefacts that are are introduced because of how the film itself is stored or preserved. as long as they don't do stupid shit like when they made The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly piss-yellow. obviously that's not how the film looked or was meant to look.
