What is this in reference to?
Rebecca Sugar drawing Ed, Edd and Eddy having sex.
>>154137742Something from around early 2017 but I don't remember what
>>154137742>>154137771Drawings aren't real.
>>154137939But it is what it's in reference to.
>>154137939That does not matter. The political lines have been drawn and they made the lines in the sand. The things you draw, write, and say are crimes. Ideas are crimes. This is now a fact.
>>154138892no its not. fuck you nigger.
>>154138892Lolicons are weird but its not illegal to be weird. No one in america has gone to jail for loli.
>>154137939The people who pleasure themselves to them are, unfortunately.>>154138986Yet.
>>154139030>doesn't hurt anyone>helps some people get offI only see upsides.
>>154139638Necrophilia >doesn't hurt anyone the person is already dead>helps some people get offI only see upsides.
>>154139679Seems reasonable, but possibly unsanitary.
>>154139679The parallel would actually be drawings of necrophilia.
>>154139638>>helps some people get offSome people don't deserve to "get off," unless it's off this mortal coil.
Only the things I dislike should be illegal.Everything I like should be legal.
would you jerk off to floor tiles? could you honestly see yourself being friendly with them?
>>154139984Harsh. Try to avoid anyone who thinks you deserve that, anon.
I knew it! I never liked that stupid bitch.
This looks like furry Troonslop where tf is it from?
>>154140041Run anon! Run away from the tile fetish rabbit hole!
>>154137742Her drawing Eddy and edd gay porn in the Ed Edd n Eddy artstyle
i have that "Im shera. Im a racist lesbian" picture saved for years and now I cant find it.The one where diesel thinks Robert Crumb raped someone is good too.
dudethe art style is so uglyhow could anyone jerk or flick to it?a weirdo? who cares?its a fucking drawing
>>154140312lurk moar
we just need more rape scented candles
>>154137939Still questionable to go out of one's way to depict underage sex of all things.
>>154141797>Taps out like a little bitchLOL, good riddance to that degenerate Werewolf Jones, and fuck you and your parents.
>>154143241Nice seething
>>154137939Tell it to the judge.
Rebecca Sugar probably wouldn't get a job if she was joining the industry today even if it wasn't basically dying but ironically things are only this way because of people like her
>>154138986Nobody in America goes to jail for "being a pedophile" so your point is moot.
>>154143281Fuck off, onionsfag
>>154143321You're an ass fucking fag.
>>154140312Megg, Moog & Owl, a comic series made by a crossdressing faggot who ran a band with another faggot who was a junkie and he OD'd under a bridge one night. In the comic, Werewolf Jones also dies of an overdose under a bridge because he was a junkie scumbag.>>154143270I'm not the one using a little bitch who tapped out to prove a point.
>>154143422Nobody cares, newfag. Fuck off back to the sharty or whatever shithole you crawled out of.
>>154143422You are>>154143652Stop sneeding
fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
>>154137771It gets weirder when you find out one of her show colleagues drew the same thing and later drew Lars and Sadie porn, and Rebecca knew about it.
>>154143779No, moralfag
no one remembers the Ratattouile Sex joke comic she did. Bunch of posers. That was the funniest thing.
>>154137742Its a reference to how this comic is highly satanic because it has WITCHES and DEMONS
>it's a bunch of puritans try and smear draw friend requests episodeAnd Ian jq used too do draw requests of dextra here, go home /pol/tard.
>>154137771how come I never seen that. please post it
>>154143800Post it.>>154143837>Rebecca Sugar>DrawfriendsUnbased and cringe
>>154143883>/pol/tard screaming Go back
>>154143817Stfu
>>154143883Fuck off, weak faggot
>>154143883i'm mad i dont know the exact source. probally posted on her blog or DA ages ago. anyways. still makes me lol. cute art.
>>154143296>person from the past wouldn't be able to do something if they where from the present.Woah.
>>154143723You're the one getting ass-blasted over people pointing out that your favorite comics and cartoon people are degenerates that should be dead, tweak some more on my middle finger.
>>154144007>/pol/tard screaming Called it, back too the containment board.
mm&o thread?
>>154138892People on /co/ literally used those drawings to discredit her and paint her like a monster. We we're pulling it "It's just a drawing!" when it came to her.
>>154143779Why? The entire Sadie/Lars episode about her being is "Player 2" is literally about how they've had sex at least once and how Lars is too immature to be emotionally invested in pursuing anything further.
>>154143907>>154143934Samefag tourist.>>154143954Bruh lmao what the fuck.So is Remy a cuck in that situation?
>>154137939This.Anyone that freaks out over drawings is a retard.
>>154144049/co/ is my personal toilet
>>154144366No, faggot
>>154144348>Samefag tourist.You are>Bruh lmaoKys, zoom-zoom
There is no evidence a drawing, a movie, or some music, can turn people into criminals.You can jerk off to whatever drawings you want and it's fine.
>>154144348>So is Remy a cuck in that situation?I don't think Remy is in love with the human girl. He is more of a facilitator for Linguini to fuck better lmao.
>>154144396You're calling everyone a /pol/ack because you admitted to being a pedo.Die mad, bitch.
>>154144414Okay, but why are you jerking off to those specific drawings?
>>154144437Not even the same poster, retard.
>>154144437>because you admitted to being a pedo.No, obsessed cuck>Die mad, bitch.Still you
>>154144447>Not even the same poster, retard
>>154144447>>154144531Lol
>>154140084Don't worry; there are multiple ways to tell how many sex offenders are in my area, and how to avoid them.
>>154144546Okay but what are you jerking off to those specific drawings?
>>154144562Because you are seething really bad
>>Jack off to a drawing of a foot>"Yes, I'm a footfag.">>Jack off to a drawing of a chubby chick>"Yes, I'm into BBW.">>Jack off to a loli/shota>"Uhn actually this is just a drawing haven't you ever heard 'Ceci n'est pas une pipe' wow you can't just assume people's kinks and fetishes by them masturbating to fictional pictures of characters that don't even exist yet yes I seek these drawings out because they resemble a child human form to the point where my brain can abstract them as a child but that's not proof of anything!"
>>154144581>I touch myself to pictures of kids because it makes people angry lol :)
>>154144581Thinking about anons when you jerk off is gay
>>154144606Nice wall of text
I never had sex and I don't jack off anymore because i dont feel horny but i like to see lolishota and feral. what does that make me?
>>154144531Cry little /pol/tard for there is at least one other person who finds your kind insufferable.
>>154144611Drawings aren’t real life, you moralfagging tranny
>>154144647>Drawings aren’t real lifeBut (You) are, unfortunately.>trannyFunny that you'd accuse me of being a child-targeting cultist. How many autogynephiles have been exposed for "sus" behavior, again?
>>154144606>>154144447Because they're hot.they're cartoon kids, not irl kids.it's fiction taboo, not irl taboo.you're not gonna get arrested for the crimes you commit in gta because they're not real.
>>154144606oh no no no.I am a pedophile. If I could break free from my programming, something I don't want to, I'd probably eat a lot. But there are cognitive safety control in place, and they work pretty good.The first step to fix something is determine there is a problem isn't.
>>154144632>>154144645>>154144647>Reeeee you're a /pol/ tranny for saying I'm a pedo!At least >>154144676 is honest about what he is.Degenerate, but honest.
MMO is satirical. You shouldnt take shit that WWJ says as a true statement. Its edgy humor and miseryporn t. Fan
>>154144675>But (You) are, unfortunately.yes.anon is a real person, and they're confident in themselves. If they say they jerk off to loli and confidently say they're not a pedo, then I believe them because I and so many others are in the same boat. Furries are a very popular but they don't fuck animals, it's the same thing.Try and figure it out.
>>154144703>retard still thinks it's the same posterInb4 I was merely pretending.
>>154144675Nice cope
>>154144716>a real person, and theyYou just said he's A real person.>Furries are a very popular but they don't fuck animalsNot most of them, not yet. Just like (You) with kids.
>>154144703I am basically saying the same thing they are.
>>154144752>You just said he's A real person.You are an ESLfag, lol>>Furries are a very popular but they don't fuck animals>Not most of them, not yet. Just like (You) with kids.Stop projecting
>>154144762You should, faggot
>>154144752You are just wrong and underage.You have no idea how many people on this planet enjoy writings and illustrations of stuff that's not cool irl. It's because they are adults, because they can distinguish reality from fiction, and can enjoy media to the fullest like that.
>>154144776>It's because they are adults,Mentally he isn’t
Ed Edd and Eddy don’t even come off as the wholesome innocent kind of little kids that it’s controversial to sexualize a bit. They’re clearly based off of the under supervised latchkey preteen boys that everyone knows were secretly rooting through their dads’ porn stashes and trying to one up one another by bragging about edgy kinks they’d learned about. Yknow, like every kid in a Stephen King book ever. Or like the South Park kids. It doesn’t even feel pornographic to see Sugar’s drawings of them experimenting with each other, it comes off as a more potentially biographical experience projected onto these characters.
>>154144747Where?>inb4 duhhhhh, in dat post, fptptptptptpt!There's none, got it.>>154144765>You are an ESLfagYou're the one who used "they" to refer to a singular, specific individual. I know that's not a second-language thing, though; that's from the same cult that tries to normalize pedophiles by calling them "MAPs.">Stop projectingYou've not highlighted an example.>>154144776>You are just wrong and underage.Zero for two. Sorry to kill your boner; I wish I could do it permanently.>You have no idea how many people on this planet enjoy writings and illustrations of stuff that's not coolI do; most of them don't fantasize about being Humbert Humbert. Or relate to him. Or want to be anything like him.>they can distinguish reality from fictionDoesn't work with the kind of fiction (You)'d like to be reality.
>>154144818Even if it isn't, it doesn't matter.It's all fictional, there are no victims.You can do whatever in your imagination, it's not hurting anyone.
>>154144884>You're the one who used "they" to refer to a singular, specific individual.No, you retard>Doesn't work with the kind of fiction (You)'d like to be reality.Nice confession
>>154144818zoomers function like living golems. They don't care about anything other than obeying the dogma they were trained with. They will see porn of a non human character and still google the age to see if they can pretend they care about it. They act the same way about anything related to sex. They basically got turned into puritans because they were educated by tumblr users while growing up
I unironically believe that fandom puritanism contributed to zoomers being sexless and paranoid. When I was a teen literally nobody thought of cartoon characters as real. Rule 34 was invented around the concept of making porn of every cartoon imaginable because some autist somewhere would be attracted to Oswald the octopus. I was drawing invader zim porn into my 20s. Sure Dib is supposed to be 12 or something, but people like him because he's a concept. He's written, drawn, and acted by adults and is meant to be absurd and funny. Why is everyone okay with watching him get neglected by his dad for comic relief but when somebody draws him kissing Zim it's a crime? Plus, the way women draw porn is completely different. Rebecca Sugar isn't literally attracted to Ed, Edd n Eddy, she just thought Eddy and Double D had an interesting dynamic. Probably projected herself onto one of them. If I was a teenager discovering my sexuality through fanfiction in current year I'd be psychologically damaged seeing adults calling me a pedophile for shipping Shiro and Keith.
>>154144899>No, you retardThen what is >>154144716>>154144899>Nice confessionYou've not highlighted one.
>>154144959it's because we're not the same person you non-thinking fool.
>>154144957It's pretty gruesome how far this mind virus has spread.
>>154144959You must enjoy bile.
>>154144957The first time I remember seeing this kind of thing was around 2012 or so when I shipped Jack Frost and the Easter Bunny from Rise of the Guardians. I was a teenager and I was reading all kinds of weird fanfiction about knotting and stuff. But I'd see popular artists fighting people on Tumblr about it being an unacceptable ship or something. Before that people shipped pretty much anything and people would just call it a NOtp if they didn't like it, but there wasn't any kind of mass ostracizing of certain pairings like there is now. I also remember at that time there was a ton of Homestuck porn and I think they were supposed to be 14? I wasn't into it but I remember people drawing the trolls with tentacle dicks. It was so common and I don't remember anyone ever talking about it being bad.
>>154144957>the characters aren't real!>I'M a morally-spotless, Heaven-bound angel, because I only beat my dick to a pulp to FICTIONAL children!You're still a reprobate.>... uh-... I-...>... h-ha! learn to tell FICTION from REALITY, dumbass!It's amazing how much leftist discourse is pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible.
>>154145131You're the one literally strawmanning anon. The discourse is that nobody is getting hurt by lines on paper. CP is bad because kids get exploited and traumatized in its creation.
>>154145131I know I'm right because people who think cartoon porn is as bad as child porn are always talking like total retards
>>154145178>The discourse is that nobody is getting hurt by lines on paperThat's how (You) want it framed, to avoid answering why you find this shit attractive in the first place.>u-uhhhh... f-f-FICTION!!1!Answers nothing.
I don't think the retard actually is an adult.I think they're a child larping, 'cuz children are infamous for being emotionally immature and stupid.
>>154137771I saw it when she first posted it here.
>>154145196If only you had an example of that...
>>154145204>I don't think the retard actually is an adult.Be more specific. There are a LOT of retards in this thread...
everytime there is pedophilia talking, guy appears. the joke writes itself.
>>154145131Do you know where you are?
>>154145197>To avoid answering why you find this shit attractive in the first placeI said it here>>154144957Sonic the Hedgehog is cool, I get to watch him do cool things. I get to experience his adventures. He's written and animated to do things that will make me laugh, cry, cheer, etc. To make me feel emotionally connected with him. I'm not literally attracted to an abstract blue shape with one giant eyeball.
>>154145229Every lolicon, shotacon, incest digestor, guro lover, etc. is a god damn genius.
>>154145240Drawings will never be real
>>154145268depends. dont overrate perv stuff. its just like any subject: a concept. and people are people. some can be based and cool. others may be retards and offenders.something something everything is relative.
>>154145264>Sonic the HedgehogYou're reaching far above your paygrade if you need to resort to popular video games to justify your lust for as-of-now-fictional children.>>154145268Found one.>>154145280What (You) do when you see those drawings is. You miss this point so often, it has to be intentional.
>>154145280There is a literal pedophile in the thread or a ragebaiter. what the fuck are you implying? It is you? the niece fucker? please refrain to reply to me. you are a waste. of course drawings arent real but also fucking your underage relative will never wear off from you.
>>154145318>You miss this point so often, it has to be intentional.That’s all of your “arguments”
also this thread sucks and i feel schizos are derailing it. i will do something better with my time.
>>154145318>As-of-now fictionalschizo alert
>>154145331I’m not that nutcase
>>154145331>There is a literal pedophile in the thread or a ragebaiterI thank you. This line is going to make laugh the whole day.
>>154145131Genuine question. Do you think you sound smart or even coherent writing all of that crap?
>>154144729You typed one of those posts on your computer and the others on your smartphone.This isn't 2008, newfag
>>154143281Hilariously, that drawing isn't real either so the point still stands.
>>154145401No, (You) don't.
>>154145420Ok, schizotard>>154145451Stop deflecting, nutjob
>>154145386can you suck my penus?
>>154145420Everyone's the same poster, and they're all out to get (you) anon, spooky right?
>>154145465>Stop deflectingWhere? (You) sound retarded and incoherent when you defend lusting after children, that's the point.
>>154145477Stop being a retard
>>154145331I HAD to draw you. Best wishes. I love you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8uIFZSqcT8
Jannies are ass fucking faggots.
>>154145512i look like that and said that because im retarded.
>>154145533You are>>154145534Nice of you to admit it
>>154145505I accept your concession.
>>154144711This
>>154145542thank you :D
>>154137939
>>154145318>as-of-now-fictionalHoly fuck anons, our cartoon characters will become realChris chan was right, the merge will happen
>>154145556I lol'd. This thread just keeps giving joy.
>>154144711Is any of the books from hiselman good? I read some in my local book store and i found both sad and hilarous. but its there one that you recommend normies like me a collection to only like to read sometimes on the course of the day?
>>154145556I think cream the bunny is cute and funny :3
>>154145548Sure
>This massive debateBack in the day whenever this topic came up, the gist was pointing out the hypocrisy of how Sugar's fandom would have eaten anyone else alive if they found it.
>>154145589I don't trust you around her
>>154145623Cope
>>154139679>doesn't hurt anyone the person is already deadDoesn't work when your main religion thinks dead people are still people. Same reason we don't throw their bodies in the trash
>>154145623shadow and tails touched her and she liked it. what you gonna do abt it sonic fag?
>>154137742I need the entire rape scented candle panel please and thank you
>>154139679Hurts the family of the dead. Drawings of necrophilia are okay.
>>154145562You'll say anything to avoid answering "Drawings of what," won't you?
>>154145623I can draw 100 versions of her and do whatever I want with them.
>>154145737truly, the power of FICTION.
>>154144676Isn't this the same girl that got raped by a muppet?
>>154145474No, just (you), thinking you're the first faggot ever to try this shit. Stupid pedo
>>154145768But enough about you.
>>154145660This is a post typed by a grown adult man.
>oh no, these series of panels are normalizing the killing of babies by millitary forces>we need to ban this kind of graphical representations! They are hurting real children!
>>154145737Impossible, that's illegal. Cease your hand at once, drawfag.
>>154145776>Pedo>Argues like a child
>>154145787>They are hurting real children!No one says this. If you were spanking it to those children getting killed, that would be the point of comparison; it's not about muh heckin' squiggles or muh heckin' pixels, it's about (You).
>>154145787That page is not trying to convince the reader that killing babies is sexy.
How does this make you feel
>>154145781Yes>>154145801You do that
>>154137771When I saw those originally my reaction was a mix of cringe and finding it funny. Most rule34 is naturally humorous and absurd. To actually seethe at tame rule34 or rule34 in general is a sign someone might be a mentally retarded or a performative virtue signaler.
>its still going>everyones a pedo now
>>154145818No one is
>>154145836Those don't resemble anything pertaining to my kinks to the point where it stimulates arousal.
>>154145781yeah. i thought it was funny.
154145842I miss when this board had jannies
>>154145836they should be sweting and blushing
>>154145865Then why post it?
>>154137771With each other? That's nasty.
>>154145898I didn’t
>>154145908Then fuck off.
>>154145887One of them is 16 you pedophile
>>154137939It's still pedophilia since the attraction is still there.Why deny this?
>>154145931that is hot. dont call me a pedo please.
>Looking at fictional loli porn makes you a pedo>No it doesn't work like that with rape porn>No it doesn't work like that with violent porn>No it doesn't work like that with porn in general>No it doesn't work like that with violent media in general>No I couldn't articulate why I think any of this>Yes I draw other arbitrary lines based on my political biases>That's just how it is PEDO. STOP ARGUING WITH LOGIC AND COMFOOOORM
>>154145925You should >>154145946Nice cope
>>154145660Headcanon
where are the fucking jannies? What do we even pay them for?
>>154146019>>No I couldn't articulate why I think any of thisAttraction to children makes you a pedophile. You're only a rapist if you've raped, you're only violent if you've committed violence, and you only pretend not to understand this to make discourse impossible.
>>154145946Because no-one is getting hurt.If you imagine killing a bunch of people and draw it in graphic detail, are they really dead?The attraction may be true. But if you aren't acting on it, what's the crime?
>>154146057Meltie pedofag will not refute this point
>>154146050The funny part is they did do their job, and then left this shit thread up. Surprisingly, nobody has posted the offending pictures yet.
>>154146019You know how lolifags will go around going "ooh cunny ToT" and joking about being pedophiles and other weird behaviors? You never see that with people into rape or violent porn, and I really do think that's the difference.Like, if lolifags jerked off to loli every day, but when you spoke to them they were otherwise normal and didn't have all the weird, creepy coded slang, I don't think loli as a fetish would be as stigmatized. But instead people basically go "I'm a pedo!" and when people respond with "you're a pedo?" the lolifags go "WHAT!? WHAT!? You think Im a pedo!?!"
>>154146019>Looking at fictional loli porn makes you a pedoCorrect. It doesn't make you a diddler. >No it doesn't work like that with rape porn>No it doesn't work like that with violent pornThis makes you a sick fuck, a sadist even, but not a rapist.>>154146062Not saying you're a criminal, just a pedophile. You are conflating two things that may be related, but aren't the same. Get it now?
>>154146062>what's the crime?Notice how often the pedos in this thread keep trying to move the goalpost from "is it pedophilia?" to "is it a crime?"Liking feet isn't a crime either, but jacking off to drawings of feet makes you a footfag.
>>154146057That’s you>>154146097Don’t reply to your posts
>>154146112>It doesn't make you a diddler.We're talking about your attraction, not any kids being sexually assaulted.
>>154137939>Drawings aren't real.>ERM ACKSHUALLY YES THEY ARE x8How do you people get so retarded?
>>154146112In you dreams
>>154146138>>ERM ACKSHUALLY YES THEY ARE x8Nobody said this.
>>154146130>That’s youIncoherent sentence-fragment addressing nothing.>Don’t reply to your postsHe didn't.>buuhhhh, inthpect ewement!!1!Your mom.
>>154146138>ERM ACKSHUALLY YES THEY ARE x8Everyone said this.
>>154146109It just astounds me how consistently retarded the lolifags here are. Every single one of them is either roleplaying as a brat or making the exact same intellectually-dishonest goalpost slides while refusing to engage with anyone calling them out.It's a retarded cope that makes me wonder if thy have any self-awareness, as if they realize they're just making themselves look retarded and unsympathetic.
>>154146195But enough about you and your boyfriend
Porn piggy seethe is always welcome
6207>This post is extremely low quality
>>154146160Not directly, but they use their logic to justify shaming virtual art on the same level as if it were a real life action, and play dumb when you point it out. Ignore the logical windowdressing and look at the raw moral value judgements. It all hinges on the cognitive distortion that virtual art morally equates to real world actions. And that's what this argument is about, morality. Everything else is a distraction.
nobody sucked my penus :(
>>154146225Ok, jakfag
>>154146243Fucking thank you
>>154143837>puritansThis reeing just outs you as being a teamfag, team BLUE I'm guessing. Unfortunately, your team started the ball rolling and team RED kicked it, so we live in a hypocritical victim-complex with-hunt status quo, where moral wrong is determined by if the alleged perpetrator is on the opposing team or not.
>>154146057Watching murders makes you a psychopath. Watching someone's brain explode on screen makes you a sick fuck who enjoys seeing people die realistically.Weird how you extend your own logic only up to what tumblr taught you to be mad about
>>154146243>that's what this argument is about, moralityAnd loli/shota is objectively immoral, as is producing, enjoying or distributing it.
>>154146243You're saying a lot of words that amount to "if you're ignoring the logic, they're actually implying that liking loli makes you a rapist!">>154143281 is the only one even coming close to implying that.Stop being disingenuous.
Tfw no sexy /ss/ art of Rebecca Sugar's artsona and Dib.
>>154146321Why?
>>154146321No, moralfag
>>154146295>Implying there isn't something wrong with people who look for gore vids to jerk off to
Dont waste time trying to be sane with these people. Can we talk about the green witch comic instead?
>>154146338Nice strawman
>>154146243>they use their logic to justify shaming(You). You, and sometimes the people making the "art" are what's being shamed.>play dumb when you point it outI know you do that, you've done it before.>It all hinges on the cognitive distortion that virtual art morally equates to real world actionsWhere's is the "cognitive distortion" in "being sexually aroused by children is the definition of pedophilia"?>that's what this argument is about, moralityYes, (You) are immoral.>>154146295>Watching murders makes you a psychopath. Watching someone's brain explode on screen makes you a sick fuck who enjoys seeing people die realistically.If you sought it out, then yes.
>>154146372Meant for >>154146243
>>154146388>no uDo you have any arguments or should I just stop responding to you? I'm sorry your uncle molested you but that doesn't mean you need to cry about literal pixels on a screen. Just click exit bro it's not that deep.
>>154146109what about poppie rappie?
>>154146136And the attraction alone makes you a pedophile.
>>154146285tribefag retard, literally doesn't understand that he is the sjw he hates.
>>154146341I might have killed myself if I was famous and somebody found this drawingAlso stop arguing with retards online. Just draw your loli porn and ignore them. They don't actually care about loli, they just want to argue.
>>154146409>I'm sorry your uncle molested youYou're not, because you probably typed that with one hand.>literal pixels on a screenSee >>154145816
>>154146422Nope
>>154145818art expresses. The rationalization belongs to the beholder.
>>154146364If you watched the boys and didn't turn it off in disgust after the first bloody murder you're every bit as sick as the guy watching it with his dick on his hand. Just like a fangirl drawing his underage ship kissing is as bad as the guy gooning for 12 hours to loli.>>154146373Then we agree that all violence should be purged from media?
>>154146459What does it make you, then, when you are sexually aroused by drawings of children?
>>154146476Ho back to shitter>>154146483No, I just think you are an annoying louse
>>154146476>Then we agree that all violence should be purged from media?It's amazing how much pedophile discourse is them pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible.
>art isn't realDo you need to talk to someone?
>>154146495>No argumentI accept your concession. See how you couldn't articulate how the arbitrary line you drew is different?>Ho back to shitterThose are your boys. Like this retard spamming the same phrase all over the thread thinking he's making a point >>154146505
>>154146409>>no u>t. Faggot that asked people to "Ignore the logical windowdressing and look at the raw moral value judgements" and then goes off on some weird fanfic about molestation.Retard you blatantly asked people to not read what any of those posts were saying and instead go off of your own judgmet call, but only one of them aligned with what you said, and you were so stupid that you missed one of them agreed with you (>>154144363)Why can't just one of you pedos have an IQ above freezing temperature? I get that you're attracted to children, but you don't have to act as retarded as them.
>>154146464So you're saying that people who beat off to loli are 100% responsible for their sexual attraction.
>>154146564>spamming the same phrase all over the threadPosted once, and one variant which you linked to. That's two (2) total, both times used appropriately.
>>154146476>If you watched the boys and didn't turn it off in disgust1) Never watched The Boys because it doesn't interest me2) From what I've heard The Boys is intentionally made to try to make the viewer feel disgust and horrified. So, people looking for that do want to be disgusted and horrified at whatever depraved shit happens. And people who spank their monkey to loli want to get horny for something resembling a child. Your point is moot.
>>154146505I understand that fiction is different from reality.Do you?
>>154146646I understand that pedophilia is defined by attraction to children.Do you?
Pedos here will perform gold medal mental gymnastics about how their photorealistic AI loli pics aren't indicative of any real life sexual preferences, but never answer why they masturbate to those pics in the first place
>It's like porn! You'll know when you see it!okay... what do YOU see?
>>154146681Like you.
what do you feel when you see it?
>>154146728>Incoherent sentence-fragment addressing nothing
>>154146736I see that filename and hope you never go near a school or pet store.
What are the odds that >>154146728 is Indian?
>>154146767Get a grip>>154146786Low
>>154146736Like I want to pat his head
>>154146767You Fool!! I want to be THE PET BOY!!!
>>154146666What is the harm in being attracted to someone if you never act upon it?
>>154146815I hate this image you are posting schizo-kun!!!!! stop that!!!but same i want to give him head pats.
>>154145579Not sure what you're asking. They're all fairly similar in tone and length. Bad Gateway, Below Ambition, and Crisis Zone are the only ones that have one storyline all the way through. Crisis Zone is explicitly not canon, but canon is also a loose thing in MM&O. They're all about the characters being mentally ill, dysfunctional addicts. Werewolf Jones and Sons Summer Annual is the only one I wouldn't reccommend, since half the stories are done by a different artist/writer
>All this drama over loli/shotacon>Nobody does a damn thing about furfags romanticizing bestialityI hate this world so much it's unreal
>>154146809Saar
>>154146860I’m not the moralfag
>>154146844oh so its pretty much the same in tone? sorry if i wasnt clear. I was asking if there is a anthology book that was more funny than depressing
>>154146847Furfags are at least smart enough to try to splinter off people who just like the aesthetics from the "zoos."
>>154146887We know you're Indian.
>>154146847furfags just like to frot against other people in fursuits and have to get jobs as engineers to finance their perversion. They're a net positive to society. A pedophile either has to offend to get off, or find someone into age play, which costs nothing and any asshole can do it.
>>154145816Your point makes no sense.
>>154146890Yeah its all the same. Bad Gateway is the first time the story kind of starts to dwell on how badly their lives are being ruined by their drug use and general listlessness, but even that has goofs and gags before it starts to get depressing. Any other collection is generally more light hearted, but there's always an under current of desperation
>>154146911Sure
>>154146824>never
>>154146057Drawings arent children,etc alone people.Does it ever occur yo you that these are abstract ideas that will never truly age or die since they are archetypal concepts from the 5th dimension Thats why spider-man is always a 20 something year old loser, thats why bart Simpson is still a kid even though the Simpsons is older than most of us now>>154146109Nah you actually do see degenerates bragging about rape pornTheres an infamous tripfag on /x/ named migga who's fuvkknf obsessed with tentacle rape porn and loves shoving that shit in conspiracies, his favorite is that we're all anime girla trapped in a cosmic tentacle rapd simulation Pretty gay
>>154146951Translation:>ERROR:UNKNOWN_PARAMETER
>>154146225This isn't even about loli, this is about adult age gaps which are a separate topic in and of itself Whats your point???
>>154146681>photoeralistic ai loliThats not even art thats just pedo material idiot, theres a reason why 2D only is a rule here, once its too realistic you lose the loli cardYoure thinking of the pedo grok fags on twitter
>>154147053It just doesnt make sense lol, it's a bad point when you actually put it in context
>>154147111>theres a reason why 2D only is a rule hereSays who? Do the people in the Miraculous threads know?
>>154147049>Drawings>>154145816>Does it ever occur yo [sic] you that these are abstract ideas that blah blah yadda yadda something something my dickI'm sure your new "friends" in Cell Block 1 will be happy to hear all about it.>>154147132>it's a bad point when you actually put it in context>I will refuse to elaborate on that so I can avoid thinking about it further
>>154147036If they act on it, sure. Punish them. Whatever.But punishing someone for crimethink is immoral.
>>154147200>punishing someone for crimethink is immoralUntil it's "crimethink" that (You) happen to find particularly egregious, like every other twat that parrots this particular virtue signal.
i want to take a piss
>>154147158Allow me to explain it since yiure begging me lol: its a waste of time in practicality.Even if your point is that (supposedly) people arent being attacked for the depiction of fictional children being harmed and instead its about them jacking off to the content then it is objectively still dumb, because youre getting agitated over someone looking at fiction, even if the idea of it is weird.Is it really accomplishing anything?Trying to stop someone from raping a kid is morally justifiable in all categoriesBut how will you stop an anon from fapping to owl house porn or something? Exactly, you cant. And there woukd be no point in doing so because you thought they are taking part in something (you) find reprehensible, theres no clear and present danger, no victim.It just feels like a colossal waste kf time and energy, especially since the REAL monsters (our baby eating/raping politicians who love our taxes) are gwtting away scott free because people are too pjasy to revolt and instead waste their time on idiots jacking off to line artAnons here could be fapping their ass off to gwen Tennyson as we speak, but theres nothing you can do about it. Yiu won't be able to literally stop an anon from leaving this thread, beating his meat, and jumping back like nothing happened. You can complain, but really thats all you can do.TL DRits a waste of time and resources when you actually put it into context, especially when real.children can use those time and resources to be saved or avenged I care more about the epstein list than bitching about loli because that means my hard earned tax dollars went to a fucking pedo ring
>>154147419>youre [sic] getting agitated over someone looking at fictionFantasizing about being Humbert is not how most people read Lolita.>my hard earned tax dollars went to a fucking pedo ringWhy are you complaining, then?
>>154144065did he shitst himself? also is he wrong??
Nice thread you got here fellow fags!
>>154147261Now you're just making a strawman in your own brain.(As if you weren't already.)
>>154147488>Fantasizing about being Humbert is not how most people read Lolita.We're talking about loli the category, not Lolita the book. You thought you were slick.>>my hard earned tax dollars went to a fucking pedo ring>Why are you complaining, then?Because I dont want to fund a pedo ring???I dont want to pay taxes to hypocritical perverted psychopaths on the epstein list???Id ask if youre retarded but this is clearly ragebait lol
>>154147561>recognizing patterns = strawman>>154147588>We're talking about loli the category, not Lolita the bookAnd where does the name of the "category" come from, you infected cunt.>I dont [sic] want to fund a pedo ringWhy wouldn't you want to help out your allies? YOUR allies.>I dont [sic] want to pay taxes to hypocritical perverted psychopathsNeither do I, but then 1776 happened...
>>154147647>you infected cunt Holy kek this lil nigga going nuclear Yeah the name came from it but your point is STILL retarded>>154147488Here you clearly mentioned Lolita in the false context of people reading it, when clearly this thread is about people jacking off to drawings that fall under "loli", instead of the actual bookNo one mentioned ot but you brought it up as a failed "gotcha" moment>Why wouldn't you want to help out your allies? YOUR allies.Nigga they aint my allies They literally pulled teeth from children you sick fuck (this is actually in the files)>Neither do I, but then 1776 happened...You on the spectrum? Yoj type like a chris chan lolcow
>>154147756>Here you clearly mentioned Lolita in the false context of people reading it>pretends not to understand examples>they aint [sic] my alliesStop acting like it, then.>Yoj [sic] type like a chris chan lolcowAnd you type like a remedial middle-schooler.
>>154145623I don't need your permission to cream that rabbit.
>>154146583Everyone is responsible individually for what they hold in their hearts.
>>154147873Youre the one insinuating that people shoukd support these politicians and that people love reading Lolita to jack off, yijre weird and emotional >And you type like a remedial middle-schoolerId rather type like that then type like a cringy emotional retard lol, youre lolcow material, you keep replying and getting emotional when people point out your dumbass points lmaoJust accept your "moral" crusade is pointlessThis is so pointless Im not even removing the ifunny watermark for you
>>154137939neither is america but here we are with 10 dollar gas
>>154146815>consent is a mythno one ever says thisthis is like schizo babble for incels to explain away why they cannot get pussy
>>154148042>America isn't realOK this cope is getting out of hand
>>154148040That dude looks like he watches anime.
>>154148040>Youre [sic] the one insinuating that people shoukd [sic] support these politicians>pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible>Id [sic] rather type like that then type like a cringy [sic] emotional retardGood, you can stop any time.
>>154148143Why would I stop?Im having too much fun pissing you off Retards fapping to shitty drawings got you fuming
>>154148204>Im [sic] having too much fun pissing you offIn your dreams.>Retards fapping to shitty drawings got you fumingAt least you admit you're retarded.
>>154137939It's only real when it's lolis and women.
>>154147419TL;DR anon thinks verbosity= intelligence and says a lot of stupid shit.>But how will you stop an anon from fapping to owl house porn or something? Exactly, you cant.This statement implies that the moral justifiability in loli is that an anon can't act against it. The contrapoint is that loli is morally unjustified if someone can get it removed.>theres no clear and present danger, no victim.If r34 were just characters being drawn in the show's style, sure, but this wasn't even the case even before the AI slop flood. Somewhere along the way in the mainstream characters, an artist drew a character using an actual naked child as a reference, displayed a clear lust for children, and got rewarded either in exposure or monetary gain. That's also ignoring the sizable number of artists that also thirst for and draw actual children they would attack if given the chance. Shadman drawing that girl that got attacked by a sea lion comes to mind.>the REAL monsters (our baby eating/raping politicians who love our taxes)Whataboutism is not an argument.What exactly is someone supposed to do about those people? It's really disingenuous to go from "you can't complain about loli because you can't do anything" to implying anons have a personal responsibility to take down the global elite. Even if that were the case, who said it was ever one or the other? On what planet does complaining about lolifags mean someone's never spread an Epstein file online? It makes no sense.>Yiu won't be able to literally stop an anon from leaving this thread, beating his meat, and jumping back like nothing happenedCorrect in that we can't stop someone from leaving, doing something degenerate, then coming back and leaving their fetishes at the door. What we CAN do however is say you're a disgusting faggot, we can report it when you post it in spaces like this, and make it harder for people to access those drawings by having them migrate to another platform.
>>154148094Stop coping.
>>154148282Justify this >>154148128
>>154148261Who said I was doing that?You literally forgot what I was discussing earlier in our gay debate? That just trying to police these people is retarded?Way to forgot the topic and make assumptions retard, but like I said youre giving me entertainment
>>154148297No, because it's faggotry.
>>154148297whatever makes people going.
>>154148282>Somewhere along the way in the mainstream characters, an artist drew a character using an actual naked child as a reference, displayed a clear lust for children, and got rewarded either in exposure or monetary gainNone of this changes the fact that the end result is fictional. The artist being horny for his creation or for children doesn't make the drawing more or less immoral, neither does him getting rewarded in some way. Using a piece of illegal content as inspiration of some sort doesn't transfer the morality of the drawing itself, as the wrongdoing was possession of said illegal content, not using it as reference.The only thing that matters is that the end result, regardless of it's conception, is a piece of fiction.
>>154148282>TL;DR anon thinks verbosity= intelligence and says a lot of stupid shit. the other fag was begging me to explain my point, so I did.Its ironic youre claiming that I was attempting to be verbose to sound intelligent...when youre doing what you exactly described: typing a bunch lf stupid points.>This statement implies that the moral justifiability in loli is that an anon can't act against it. The contrapoint is that loli is morally unjustified if someone can get it removed.This is straight up retarded. I never said it was justifiable, just that its pointless to spend so much time on it.>That's also ignoring the sizable number of artists that also thirst for and draw actual children they would attack if given the chance. Fuck shadman, who said I defended him??? He drew real people like semesters daughter, thats not fiction thats vrossing the line big time and kta fucked up. Thats someone's real child.>Whataboutism is not an argument. What exactly is someone supposed to do about those people? It's really disingenuous to go from "you can't complain about loli because you can't do anything" to implying anons have a personal responsibility to take down the global elite. In this case it is, since it involves real children. If pedophilia mattered to you and the other anon that much...why waste time on drawings instead of real children? ACTUAL pedophilia anywhere is an issue everywhere (and thats why I dont defend shadman, the faggot intentionally crossed the line multiple times. Barely anyone on this board defends him)If it really mattered to you youd do something, the Twitter crowd actually do something ironically enough, you and fag#2 just engage in slacktivism
>>154137939Based and true. Rebecca Sugar may be terrible at everything she does, but she is not necessarily a pedophile.
>>154148515>Correct in that we can't stop someone from leaving, doing something degenerate, then coming back and leaving their fetishes at the door. What we CAN do however is say you're a disgusting faggot, we can report it when you post it in spaces like this, and make it harder for people to access those drawings by having them migrate to another platform.If theyre not a weird retard who boasts about it, you literally cant do anything but complain, and realistically complaining doesnt do as much as you think it does especially if the person doesnt careIts like telling a shoplifter "swiper no swiping" What are you hoping to accomplish?Congrats anon, you made a retarded post while trying to come off intelligent I bet you some people are jerking odd to amphibians porn right now as we speak and you nor I can do anything about itAlso I wanna add that just because something can be taken down roesnt mean its necessarily a moral thing, sometimes art can be taken down juat because, some art of adult characters get taken down because people assume they are somehow too youngJust because it CAN be taken down does not automatically translate to it being morally unjustifiable.Theres even controversial art online that is still up to thia day despite complaints.
>>154148549Sure she is. She may not be a molester, but she's still a pedophile.
>>154148514>Using a piece of illegal content as inspiration of some sort doesn't transfer the morality of the drawing itself, as the wrongdoing was possession of said illegal content, not using it as reference.The only thing that matters is that the end result, regardless of it's conception, is a piece of fiction.OK im gonna have to disagree with you there, im the guy that the fag was replying toI disagree, the moment real children get involved in any capacity thats when its not acceptable in any capacity.When it comes to something like loli, fiction must remain fiction.
>>154148591Your brain is broken. Sorry to be the one to have to tell you this.
By (false) crusader logic, these two are the BIGGEST pedophiles in the business
>>154148602Elaborate.
>>154148686You think drawings equate to real life one-to-one and there can't be a nuance or Grey area beyond that. You also don't understand what the word "necessarily" means. You are terminally online. You probably support other brands of mental illness because they get you internet good boy points on other sites. You are a cretinous, troglodytic, tourist nigger faggot.
>>154148718>You think drawings equate to real life one-to-oneAnon never said it was 1-to-1.>and there can't be a nuance or Grey area beyond that.Ironic considering that you're one of the fags that can't acknowledge that you can be a pedo without being a child molester.
>>154148595I understand your opinion, but i place any guilt only on the artist. A loli drawing made based on a real person remains a loli drawing. While that context can add controversy, it doesn't impact what the drawing is. If you can put it alongside a hundred other drawings with no noticeable problem other than a weird backstory, it doesn't matter. Separation of artist and art and all that.On another note, loli drawings are drawings of children. Regardless of the level of abstraction, they will be based on children in some sort of way, so they can't just "remain fiction" in the way you mean.
>>154148809>Ironic considering that you're one of the fags that can't acknowledge that you can be a pedo without being a child molester.Funny how you just make assumptions about my beliefs and then whine about me doing the same to that anon. Kill yourself.
>>154148836You didn't deny it, faggot.
>>154143779I have never seen a worthwhile opinion using this reaction image.
>>154148862You can be a pedophile without my being a child molester. Given your vehemence thats probably you projecting. Many such cases. You can also fap to lolicon without being a pedophile and kill NPCs en masse in GTA without being a psychopath. Kill yourself.
>>154147530Yes. No.
>>154148904>Given your vehemence thats probably you projectingThat's your posts in >>154148718 >>154148904 summarized. Seriously, what the fuck does GTA have anything to do with anything?P.S. First post to you was >>154148809. Reread "Anon said," ESL
>>154139679>doesn't hurt anyone the person is already deadNah, it's very unsanitary
>>154148925Are you drunk or just retarded?
>>154148943Are you? Seriously, what the fuck was that malding cope in >>154148718?
>>154148982Just because you are an ESL who can't understand the language doesn't mean everything in that post wasn't true. Keep seething about it.
>>154148904GTA is a satire. You're not supposed to want to be like the protagonists. You're like the third person in this thread whose tried to make this kind of argument and you'll be just-as-many for pedos that don't acknowledge this difference.
>>154149013Insert any violent game then if you declare that a satire. Unteralterbach is a satire to, but I bet you feel differently about that.
>>154148993>ESLCopying insults said against you. Very jeet-brained
>>154149013So what you're suggesting is that loli porn would be fine if whoever is depicted is presented as morally wrong?
>>154149039You can't read four sentences without your brain shutting down.
>>154149035Your strawman is proving my point
>>154149060>No argument I accept your concession retard.
>>154149052>intent behind loli pornCalling it "porn" already betrays that it's made to be sexually gratifying, so that's a trick question.It's not even a good one since that was actually the intent behind the Lolita novel.
>expect an MMO thread or a "Rebecca Sugar sucks" thread>get the same tired lolicon debate we've had a thousand timesYour time is better spent doing literally anything else. No-one is ever going to change their mind and you're all just seething into the void.
>>154149082The arbitrary boxes you slot media in to proves you have a tiny peabrain.
>>154149059You can't make one sentence without turning into a malding faggot.
>>154149092I love it. I've been arguing with these retards for 18 years, you'll never get me to not tell anti-loli tourists to kill themselves.
>>154149097And you can't articulate a single coherent argument or point.
>>154149096>>What do you think about (X) Porn? What if it were ironic?>You're calling it "porn," so...>>S-SHUT UP!>>154149067You didn't make an argument, faggot.
>>154149136What an intelligent, logical post you just made. Clearly, I've been bested.
>>154149134Watch out everyone, we have a smart guy who passed high school english over here, using big words to masquerade his unoriginal responses.
>>154149082Games are also made to be gratifying. The entire appeal of GTA is making crime and violence fun. If you have a problem with semantics then i'll rephrase: you're suggesting is that loli content in a sexual context would be fine if whoever is depicted is presented as morally wrong?>It's not even a good one since that was actually the intent behind the Lolita novel.You have an issue with Lolita?
Like I said, nobody does a damn thing about it
>>154149144Why thank you.
>>154149147Motherfucker you can't read at a 12th grade level and you expect me to take you seriously?
>>154137742Daily reminder: a good portion of /co/ anons are self admitted pedophiles!
>>154149148>a problem with semanticsIt's not a semantic argument to point out that the game's premise is satirical.The whole point of the world of GTA is that it's a crapshoot world where criminal empires escalate in escalating violence against law enforcement and other gangs. It's a jab at American urban culture by taking it to its most absurd endpoint. It's not meant to stand-in for actual crime. You could say something like Hitman and have more of a point, but even then there's a difference to be stated.>You have an issue with Lolita?No, I don't. I bring it up to discredit the leading question about loli material being made as a satire, because Lolita exists, and should exist. Lolita fills that niche pf a seemingly pedo-indulgent fiction that's made to throw shade at pedophiles.
>>154149170Nobody is impressed by $5 words, midwit.
>>154149306Nah, thats not cartoony enough, weird to me
>>154149286
>>154144957>If I was a teenager discovering my sexuality through fanfiction in current year I'd be psychologically damaged seeing adults calling me a pedophile for shipping Shiro and Keith.Female fandom shippers are aggressive though. I feel no sympathy for that group.
>>154149254If GTA stood for actual crime, which you seem to think it doesnt, would it make the violence presented any more or less moral? Regardless of how "satirical" you think it is, the acts presented are 100% intended to be entertaining and bring satisfaction for the players.>something like Hitman and have more of a point, but even then there's a difference to be stated.How are the crimes on Hitman any more ambiguous than GTA? It's a spy movie but you play as somewhat bad guy.>I bring it up to discredit the leading question about loli material being made as a satire, because Lolita existsTh question was if (you)'d think lolis in sexual context would be acceptable if the characters involved were presented as morally wrong. I don't know why you're so focused on the word satire when that was not in discussion.
I hate the fujoshi of /co/. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
>>154149360>If GTA stood for actual crime, which you seem to think it doesnt, would it make the violence presented any more or less moral?What a stupid question... you're basically asking "if the premise of GTA was different, would the context be different?" That's not an argument, that's a tautology.>Regardless of how "satirical" you think it is, the acts presented are 100% intended to be entertainingPlease look up what satire is. To operate, yes, satire needs to indulge in something to showcase its absurdity. That's a consequence of the genre.I really don't understand what point you're trying to make here by acknowledging GTA's violence and trying to equate it to lolicon even after you're given an explanation. You're not actually trying to defend lolicon, you're just trying to drag down GTA. What if, for the sake of argument, I didn't understand the point behind GTA and just said "both suck and are signs of mental illness?" What would your honest-to-God response be?>How are the crimes on Hitman any more ambiguous than GTA? It's a spy movieWell, yeah, you just answered my question. I don't want to dwell on this too much since it's a tangent that I just wanted to introduce as a better example than GTA for fairness for your point, but the appeal in Hitman comes from a similarly absurd world, except instead of social commentary it's elaborate environment interaction.>The question was if (you)'d think lolis in sexual context would be acceptable if the characters involved were presented as morally wrongAnd as I said before, that's just Lolita, so knock off this wannabe gotcha.>I don't know why you're so focused on the word satireBecause (you) wanted to bring up GTA.
Suck on my penus Pleeeeaaase???
>>154149434We must work through a synthesis. Is the only way to heal The West.
Anyone that wants to argue in here is gay and should give me a belly rub and an sandwich instead.
>>154148613Well, one of them is jewish.
>>154149504I'm down, but I figure thats easier said then done. I just want everyone to get along.
>>154149190I miss pedobear.
>>154149613He will live forever in your heart.
Know the difference
>>154149554In my opinion? Needs more drawings.
