[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0247.jpg (888 KB, 1092x1584)
888 KB JPG
>mystique has to wear clothes now to prevent the make gaze
>They still have her costume be blue
>>
Her makeup and hair look like shit now, I'm glad we didn't have to see them fuck up the rest of her body.
>>
>>154348637
She’s Aunt Mystique now
>>
>>154348637
she's wearing clothes because she's 55 years old, anon.
>>
>>154348637
Why are you whining she’s finally comics accurate?
>>
The pushed over importance of this second tier villain in the film universe after x2 has always felt off to me, they straight up make her the main character in the prequels. Its like a case study in how two ideas with a common origin can radically diverge like a game of telephone.
>>
>>154348637
>the make gaze

That BASTARD!
>>
>>154348637
>>
>>154348839
They cast Jennifer Lawrence and she blew up and became a big name so they just milked it for all its worth
>>
>>154348637
How did the 2002 makeup look better and more realistic than the 2026 makeup?
>>
>>154348637
if it focuses on cyclops, jean grey and wolverine, i won't watch it

making mystique unsexy will definitely give me a reason to tell other people not to watch it
>>
>>154349414
Better skilled
>>
JLaw has started going naked in her films so there's no excuse to keep Mystique in clothes.
>>
>>154348678
>she's 55
And?
>>
>>154348678
So?
>>
>>154348637
she looks like a star trek
both because of her completely inappropriate space-agey outfit, and because instead of looking like the source material, she's just got a bunch of shit on her face

guys. it's DARK blue. DARK. ultramarine. Midnight. not ... pale baboon-ass blue.
>>
>>154349414
Because the 2002 make-up was too much of a hassle for both the actress and the make-up artists.
I remember reading something about how it took like ten hours or some shit to paint her down and attach all the little scales and do touch ups. And the shit was super uncomfortable for the actress.
Thats why they made it shittier and simpler with each iteration. The 2002 actress was willing to put up with all the bullshit. Whatshername in the other movies was not.
>>
>is more comic accurate
>still bitch
I forgot /co/ doesn't actually read comics.
>>
There's no reason they can't make her look like this, but they prefer this space alien crap. I'll never understand it.
>>
>>154350822
In all fairness to op
It doesnt look one to one like her look here>>154351008
>>
>>154350804
Iirc Lawrence had bad reaction to the skin paint so they changed it mostly to be a bodysuit
>>
>>154351025
It’s not fair, it’s clearly very similar. You don’t anyone whining that Cyclops’ costume in the same movie isn’t perfect replication of his 90s costume
>>
>>154349073
> Jennifer Lawrence
> they just milked it
Phrasing
>>
>>154350721
> she looks like a star trek
Go see a star war
>>
>>154351070
It's not similar. For one, the Disney suit has no exposed skin save for her face, retard. And from the leaked footage, it's just another version of the Ant-Man tactical gear suit they've been giving every character. They keep pussing out from actual comic suits.
>>
>>154351245
No, they’re just saving money because it’s going to be a glorified cameo.
>>
>>154351070
Because they actually still pulled the 90s cyclops look off?
Op has a point, they fucked up with adapting the design for mystique, she looks inconsistently scaly in color, scales are bigger, and the haircut is different
>>
>>154351344
The visor is wrong colour, the gloves aren’t yellow, the underwear also isn’t yellow, the strap is more in the middle instead of properly the left side. These are all wrong if you wanted to nitpick like with Mystique.
>>
>>154351362
Nah, that cyclops is identical to cartoon and comics while mystique because a wine aunt
>>
>>154351433
>identical

Oh so you’re either blind or just lying
>>
File: 1651646626442.png (430 KB, 608x477)
430 KB PNG
>>154348637
I don't mind them dressing her up. I mind that the dress is utterly hideous. Why even add the stupid blue bits and pads? Why the brown boots? Why not add gloves? It's as if they tried to make her as ugly as possible. Same goes for the rest of the FOX-Men. What is the point of doing fake nostalgia, then putting them in shitty botched versions of the Jim Lee suits? I'd have much rathered they came back in some cool black leather suits. The nostalgia is tied to that version. >>154350822
>t. Xitterfag who's not read anything beyond 5 panels of Krakoa
Fuck off you disingenuous twat.
>>
>>154350721
Came here to post that she looks like a fucking Star Trek alien.
The kind that show up in one episode because there's a diplomatic crisis or whatever.
>>
>>154350294
>>154350348
and if you want to hire a 55 year old woman back to a role you can't dictate that she's going to wear the awful looking zentai from 30 years ago, because she says no

>>154350822
you know these pricks aren't /co/, they're some fucking groyper discord trannies so far up the loop they don't even know what they want any more
>>
>>154351592
>the awful looking zentai from 30 years ago
Do you know what mystique looks like in x-men 2000 and x2 retard. Romijn did an interview 2 years ago where she talked about how she'd come back if they asked and she talked about the 7 hour makeup as if that were still her expectation for the role.
>>
>>154350294
So if you’re going to ask a 55 year old person to do a glorified cameo for purely nostalgia points you have to face reality.
>She’s probably not going to look as good as she did 27 years ago, that’s a fact of life, so making her be almost nude again would have issues because you already can’t recreate her look perfectly without her real age showing and it’s especially going to break immersion when you’re dealing with a shapeshifter who should by all logic be able to look as young as she did in original movies
>The studio is not going to pay her a trainer to get into that type of shape again she was in 2000/2003 and there is no time for her to realistically do it anyway because the older you are the harder it is to get certain shape quickly and safely
>Nobody is going to want to spend ten hours a day to paint her entirely blue because that is going to cost a lot and it’s easier to do her face and make her wear a costume because she isn’t a major character so that’s just basic cost cutting. They also ain’t gonna put any money into cgi de-aging shit for her because again, it’s waste of money when she’s a secondary character
>>
>>154349540
>cyclops, jean grey and wolverine
Cyclops will probably be the X-Man with most focus; Jean apparently isn't in it, and Logan is only in the openeing scene and probably the epilogue.
>>
>>154348637
Yes, and?
>>
>>154351433
>Nah, that cyclops is identical to cartoon and comics
Come on man
>>
I'm out of the loop, are they actually planning on having the fucking 50+ year old fox movie actors play the X-Men forever or are they gonna replace them with new people after? Cuz it's gonna look real weird if they take the first option
>>
>>154349414
DEI hires
>>
>>154348678
Yes, and?
>>
>>154351008
I don't either; the prudes, authenticity autists and general audiences would all love this shit but they'd rather make no one happy
>>
>>154352452
like half of the foxmen are in doomsday then they'll recast them after.
>>
File: 1w5x30jvj5ka1.png (441 KB, 993x558)
441 KB PNG
>>154352452
We've seen from Star Wars that Disney hates replacing actors.; They would rather have an embalmed corpse appear in a movie than risk a fan meltdown.
>>
>>154348637
The scales look ugly as shit if she's clothed
>>
>>154352452
Isn't Sadie Sink playing Jean in the new Spider-Man film?
>>
>>154352550
speculation.
>>
>>154352547
Yeah it reads like face blemishes if you don't have confirmation that it's all over her body. Should have at least had exposed shoulders.
>>
>>154352550
I Hope not.
She would have more legs as Firestar and be the "new mutant that shows up" in the MCU Xmen.
Name is catchy, great powers, tied to spiderman so they can double dip and tie him more completely to the new younger mcu.
Plus she's a hot redhead.

The america chavez thing went over like a lead balloon, with sony being so put off by her character that they wrote her out of brand new day, and no one is hyped for the rainbow avenger squad so they have to start over fresh.
>>
>>154350286
I'm sure JLaw hasn't been the issue with that for some time. The MCU is just so sanitized and sexless by design
>>
>>154352615
That's because of Feige whose initial success has made him unimpeachable. OMD is going to get retconned before MCU is purged of Feige aesthetics.
>>
>>154349058
I will now watch your movie
>>
They're going with the born a blue boy, nightcrawler daddy, and is a prolific serial rapist and murderer origin.

It's Disney after all.

>>154352644
Everyone knows Feige had very little to do with the actual success of OG MCU.
>>
>>154348678
Out of ten!
>>
>>154348637
>Blue cloth where skin is supposed to show
Dastardly.
>>
>>154352542
>They would rather have an embalmed corpse appear in a movie than risk a fan meltdown.
>"Muh Fandom Menace"
Rent-free
>>
>>154353730
My thing is, at this point anyone who got mad at a recast would be the ones getting mocked, not Disney. These actors are human, they can't keep a franchise alive forever.
>>
Are even shoulders lewd enough to force design workarounds now?
>>
>>154352452
They’re bringing old cast back for nostalgia factor and then recast everyone
>>
Remember,women can't show their bare arms, but Thor being butt ass naked was perfectly acceptable.
>>
File: 1630856593153.jpg (266 KB, 1024x1570)
266 KB JPG
>>154353778
Yes, that's why they were banned from MCU after Thor Ragnarok.
>>
Mystique better look like this in.the movies...
>>
File: IMG_2888.jpg (228 KB, 1200x676)
228 KB JPG
>>154353872
>Remember,women can't show their bare arms

No I don’t remember that. Sounds like made up bullshit
>>
File: IMG_2831.jpg (895 KB, 2539x2820)
895 KB JPG
>>154348637
The day kevin faggie gets shot and killed is the the world can finally start to heal again
>>154348678
So? Naked milfs are hot so thats no excuse
>>
>>154348637
I dunno why but the makeup looks better here imo which only makes the fact shes not nude even worse. Sex negative feminism literally ruined western civilization. I wish all neo puritan zoomers would get killed already
>>
>>154348637
>they actually turned the parts that are exposed skin in the comic into blue cloth
LMAO
>>
>>154353911
...
mommy
>>
>>154353947
I would rather Mystique never show up in Xmen again to be honest.
She's been permanently ruined and all shapeshifters are now rapist gross queer degenerate bullshit as a rule.
It's over.
>>
>>154354318
>muh degenerate
Get the fuck out
>>
>>154352452
>>154352550
The FoX-Men will appear for the last time in Doomsday/SW, then new actors are cast for the parts for the reboot. Sink as Jean is the only one who's been cast so far.
>>
>>154353962
I don't like Jane having Thor's powers but Natalie looks good in the costume.
>>
Tonguing blue soles
>>
>>154351362
>>154351493
>>154351927
Compared to Mystique, Cyclops is accurate.
>>
>>154354318
Never understood whyntrannies firce themselves onto every shapeshifter as trying to claim it.

If id have her powers and could turn inti anyone, female included it doesnt make me a weird non binary monstrosity as i was born male, male is my "base form" and who i see.myself as, even if i can make myself a vagina and my dick ti disappear at will.

Raven Darkholme was born a woman, first years without powers she was a woman so she should be feminine as fuck, just with an option if shapeshifting a schlong temporarely.

Why trannies are weird?
>>
>>154350822
That applies to good things, not flaming pile of garbage repeatedly salvaged by secondary media like X-Men.
>>
>>154354471
Nothing says cis like turning yourself into the opposite gender
>>
>>154348678
>implying you wouldn't a 55 y/o baddie
>>
>>154354367
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/degenerate
It's apt.

>>154354471
Word of god states that Claremont made Mystique a male at birth. But that doesn't matter to the queers and people who like shape shifters.
It currently looks female, it being born male, spending centuries of time as male, spending centuries as female, being a serial rapist who has knocked up and gotten knocked up many many times, and being the father of Nightcrawler?
Doesn't matter to them.

They look at a shape shifter and think of the creepy sex and gender fuckery they can do. And the current writers and social media/media rulers love that and push it.

Normals who have a shape changing power would just use it to turn into a bird or dolphin or any number of cool things. None of which Mystique does as a matter of course.

Hell it was supposed to just change into variosu women and that's about it. The sex change shit is recent and Shooter had to tardwrangle the absolute shit out of Claremont when he wanted to go insane with the character.
>>
>>154354464
That's not how it works. It's either accurate or it's not. You can certainly claim "more accurate," but outright claiming it "is accurate" is disingenuous and fucking retarded.
>>
Orville alien lookin ass
>>
>>154348637
They switched to clothes because blue paint is hazardous and CGI looked like shit on a person.

Now why turn back.
>>
>>154348637
Looks like a shit Star Trek alien.
>>
>>154356435

God bless Jim Shooter, he is sorely missed.

Marvel desperately needs someone like him...
>>
>>154348637
>mystique has to wear clothes now
She wasn't naked in the comic anon.
>>
>>154348637
didn't they cast a tranny for that role?
>>
>>154351344
Really needs the trunks, this just looks like a plumber



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.