[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: fiona[1].jpg (6 KB, 209x300)
6 KB JPG
why aren't shrek styled people more common?
>>
it's not an industry trend. you must pick between photorealism and 3d beanmouth
>>
>>154599574
bigger risk of looking uncanny.
>>
>>154600391
Shrek did it surprisingly well
>>
>>154600949
It is honestly weird how good those character models look for something so old.
>>
What do people think of the big eye style Disney's been using?
>>
File: raya[1].jpg (326 KB, 1000x576)
326 KB JPG
What do people think of Raya's face? It's a lot less round and smaller eyed than most Disney cgi women
>>
>>154601406
>>154601419
Doesn't look so bad imho.
>>
>>154601406
Big eye is fine but no excuse for the sameface

>>154600965
Dreamworks were able to do great human designs but annoyingly they've pivotted to super stylised
>>
We need more realism in CGI designs. It doesn't have to go near real, just make the slider closer.
>>
>>154601406
Its sex. More porn artists should use it.
>>
>>154603201
The danger is always making your film look like a poser/SFM animation.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.