How would gay character and storylines be handled differently in an alternate universe where queer acceptance came right after WW2?
>>154656124Well for starters the 60s lesbians wouldn’t have any butch characters as we know them today. Back then a lot of gay women modeled themselves on a sort of prince archetype. Short hair, gentlemanly attitude, a lot of them wore suits
>>154656124In america? Not much if we look at the example of other countries with better queer acceptance.
>going through alternate universe 20th century fanzines arguing if certain gay characters are good representation>they all read like /co/ threads
>>154656159Tbf, a lot of subcultures and genres as we tend to know them shift in their entirety.That whole "gays make art" thing didn't come from nowhere. It was because artsy underground scenes were a good place to get away from their usually repressed selves. So you'd see a massive shift in both media and fashions since they'd be more drawn towards what was already mainstream and not seek out alternatives>>154656216It is not at all uncommon to find people talking on the political issues of their time in ways that read like how we'd talk about them.The absolute second the common man becomes literate
>>154656124Wetham's Seduction of the Innovent wouldn't go affer Batman and Robin, or Wonder Woman and the Amazons.
>>154656216post them
>>154656124>>154656216Wouldn't they just be more like interracial depictions? That gained consider acceptance a couple decades after WW2 but still wasn't really allowed in depictions until much later or frequent until recently. Or do you mean 2025 levels of acceptance right after WW2?
>>154656216>find out about The Camp of the Saints (1973)>it reads like a contemporary /pol/ shitpost
>>154656124>Archie is popular >gays become accepted >Betty, Veronica, and Archie now becomes a true love triangle
>>154656124They'd still be hammy and bad and the current resurgence of homosexual rejection would just have happened much sooner.
>>154656124>>154656159
>>154656769I don't even disagree with the idea here, but there's something deeply ironic about how people can't even be bothered to parrot the real Tolkien quote instead of this made up bullshit.
>>154656159Look, the fantasy shit you fingerbang yourself too isn't tru. They had straight up bulldykes LARPing as men and being childish adolescent men mimicries and hyper violent cunts even then. You're confusing the fantasy written by effete lesbos with reality shown in music and underground writing and media and even real world stories written from back then.
>>154656124Who's fucking self insert was this? lmao
>>154656955I remember the actual quote had "The Shadow" not "Evil" or something to that effect.
>Sonic and Tails would officially be lovers getting rid of all the ship wars>Ren and Stimpy would have the relationship they had in APC in the original series>Rocko and Heffer would had been a couple>Beavis And Butthead would had been endgame in their series>Same with Daria and Brittany>Sleet and Dingo would had been gay before Tamers by that I mean explicitly gay in the original series. There's no way they weren't already loveable fags already. >Trixie would have her Camp Sherwood characterize in FOPSo the better timeline basically
>>154656955Well this made up bullshit was made by the same Leftist/woke scum that also Ruined Western media, LotR for best example.
>>154656124Do you think we are getting a straight Velma again?
>>154657551Pretty sure most of the dvd movies are straight Velma.
>>154657551No.Sorry. >>154657630Nope. Dyke in the popular tv-show canon dyke from now on. Hope you like Velma loving the capital V. Because that's how it is now.
>>154657648No, she's straight in most of the modern movies, and that outnumbers the faggot rep.
>>154656124Why not Marcie?
>>154656124How about you read Naked Lunch or The Soft Machine before you talk about what queers were up to back then, you fucking prudes
