[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (46).jpg (91 KB, 480x640)
91 KB JPG
>The latest Transformers show is a five-minute Youtube series
>The latest He-Man show is a five-minute Youtube series
>The latest Monster High and Barbie shows are five-minute Youtube series
>The next Horse Show is going to be a five minute Youtube series
Is this the future of cartoons now?
And except for Barbie, they all seem to be voiced by non-union actors out of Toronto.
>>
>>154820817
Isn’t Hasbro in particular bleeding money?
>>
>>154820817
Not even a good 5min youtube series. It's like a lame korean cartoon.
>>
>>154820870
The fuck did they do?
Don't they sell magic, AKA cardboard crack?
>>
>>154820817
everyone seems to forget the cartoons aren't primary material, even for transformers, but just ads to sell the toys
>>
>>154820817
Cyberworld's voice actors are Br*tish.

Give it a few years and you'll be getting 90 second Tiktok shorts. I think Bratz already does that.
>>
File: ralphbakshirenstimpy.gif (114 KB, 500x386)
114 KB GIF
>>154820817
>>154821155
The future will unironically be AI shorts. I'm not saying as much to instigate a shitstorm either, all the signs just point to the outcome. The economy's shit, people arent having kids, animation's expensive, these shorts arent even making a significant return on investment nor will they see phsyical releases, and since hasbro already owns a vast media library to train AI on they'll probably settle for that option.
>>
>>154821202
I think they tried AI-voice and it was vehemently rejected.
>>
>>154821202
I have no doubt Hasbro is out of touch enough to try it, but do the tech companies and data centers that provide the “animations” even have a future?

They keep pumping billions into AI and it still loses them billions more because there’s no substantial or reliable revenue stream in it. McDonald’s and WalMart tried something similar with their kiosks and that was a failure to the point they’re rolling it back. There’s only so many “it’ll totally get better dude” promises investors are willing to waste money on before they pull it.
>>
>>154820817
Those are all franchises that have had more than just that coming out in recent years. If anything they're hitting as many platforms as possible.
>>
>>154820817
This is the same company who hired mercenaries to get some unreleased magic the gathering cards back
You already know where their priorities are
>>
>>154821202
>animation's expensive, these shorts arent even making a significant return on investment nor will they see phsyical releases

They're short-form specifically because they're loss-leaders meant to create brand affinity, not be meaningful (or directly profitable) pieces of animation. Cyberworld's animated in Malaysia. Tales from Eternia's done in entirely in the Philippines.
>>
>>154821380
I heard this from a guy at work, hiring SEAsians is actually cheaper than AI.
>>
>>154821267
It wont stop them from further pursuing it. A friend of my has argued we're overdue for a sort of market correction in the West after how often and egregiously we've been fucked over by corporations. Whether or not it happens remains to be seen but I mention it because it's just about the only thing that could shut the door on the AI push. By and large I just dont see it happening in anycase.
>>154821284
They will. People think one or two of them shuttering will be the end all be all when this entire effort is more like Highlander. Just one of them has to succeed and pandora's box is forever opened. Really we're at this point already. If all the biggest names in AI were shuttered right now the tech would still remain but advance at a slower pace. You'd just kick the can down the road another five to ten years. At this point the remaining players are just fighting for market dominance.
>There’s only so many “it’ll totally get better dude” promises investors are willing to waste money on before they pull it.
There's some short term fixes the tech's been able to deliver on. It's not the dead weight people assume it to be. It's just infamously overexposed at this point. Y'know how people complain about toasters and grills with WIFI receivers? AI is the 2020's equivalent of that, needless smarttech junk. It has a place but not everything needs it.
>>154821380
>>154821432
Yes 100%. That's also why we're seeing the jeet/chink flood. AI isnt "ready yet" so the money men are looking to bridge the gap with scabs and offshoring where possible.
>>
>>154821432
A lot of online content mill "news" websites have nearly entirely outsourced their writing staff to flips and jeets.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.