A woman had given out a free copy of a comic book in North Carolina for Halloween in 2025 but was arrested.https://graphicpolicy.com/2026/03/11/north-carolina-comic-retailer-arrest-leads-to-indictment/>In November, a comic retailer was arrested, over a comic handed out during a Trunk-or-Treat event in Sunset Beach, NC. Kathleen Hinds Lincoln, co-owner of Marvelous Issues was charged and arrested by the Sunset Beach Police Department on October 31st for some of the material in the comics provided to attendees. A copy Grendel Tales: Devil’s Hammer #1 by Matt Wagner published in 1994 by Dark Horse is at the center of it all. The comic features nudity.>The case has been active since and kicked up in mid-February when an indictment was returned in the case by grand jurors. That does not mean that Lincoln is guilty, just that there’s enough evidence for the case to proceed.Grand Juries just decide whether a case will go to trial. They don't determine guilt.
This is such an America thing, lol. Watch her end up on a sex offender list.
>>154826620 (OP)Here's the indictment quoted in the article:>>The jurors for the State upon above the defendant named above their oath present that on or about the unlawfully, willfully and feloniously date(s) of offense shown and in the county did KNOWINGLY DISSEMINATETO E.H., A MINOR, WHOSE AGE WAS 6 AND THUS UNDER THE AGE OF 13 YEARS, MATERIAL TO WIT: A COMIC BOOK CONTAINING IMAGES OF MEN AND WOMAN ENGAGED IN SEXUALCONDUCT, WHICH THE DEFENDANT KNEW AND REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWNTO BE OBSCENE WITHIN THE MEANING OF NCGS SEC 14-190.. THE DEFENDANT WAS 59 YEARS OLD ON THE DAY OF OFFENSE AND THUS WAS 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER AT THE TIME.And here's the rest of the article:>With that news, an assertion for a speedy trial has been submitted by Lincoln’s attorney, an assistant public defender. Also submitted was request for a recording of all phases of the proceeding by the Court Recorder as well as a request of discovery by the defense, and a motion to sequester witnesses.>Based on the voting registration of Brunswick County where this trial is set to take place, it is rather conservative with a 2-to-1 Republican to Democrat registration which could make this a tough fight.>We’ll of course follow the case and update as it progresses.
>>154826656>AmericaSouthern*This kinda shit ain't happening in places like California or Massachusetts.
>>154826677This is the law she's being charged under:https://www.ncleg.net/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bysection/chapter_14/gs_14-190.1.html
>>154826677Kinda weird to give a 6 year old a book full of mutilated naked people desu
>>154826807it was probably an accident. maybe she didnt look at the book she was giving out.
>>154826807>>154826835I’m guessing the comics were all dollar bin fodder that they didn’t review and didn’t expect to be worse than pg-13.
I had a Devil Quest tpb in sixth grade, in school, and it felt like carrying extreme contraband. Luckily my English teacher with whom i talked about comics, was cool. Though he scammed me out of a year of Mad Magazines I really wish I still had.
>>154826691Actually, obscenity laws are legal entirely because of Miller v California.
>>154826620This SHOULDN'T result in a conviction.>(3) The material lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; andIt's a published comic book that's been in circulation for years, it clearly has serious artistic and literary value. The only obscene materials convictions I've seen in recent years are shota/loli porn and this probably isn't that.
americans
>>154827560>>154827137the american right had wanted to make obscenity laws harsher and ban porn entirely. That may have been aimed more at "actual" porn but stuff like this that has nudity without sexual intercourse will probably get caught in the crossfire.I haven't read the comic myself, but a news article describes it as such:https://boundingintocomics.com/comic-books/comic-shop-owner-felony-halloween-grendel>Having more in common with a Bible tale than a letter to Penthouse, while the issue does not depict any explicitly sexual situations, it does contain multiple instances of uncensored, full frontal male nudity, and one particularly gruesome depiction of the Grendel pack’s butchering upon nude male and female bodies
>>154826620I'm pretty sure I had that book. It has gore, a character pees on a religious statue, a gnome with a giant penis and a bisexual group sex scene. Even if she didn't read it before giving it away the cover alone should have tipped her off that it may not be something to hand out.
>>154826620I'm all for going against heavyhanded obscenity laws, but for fucks sake, I'm so god damned tired of having to defend retards like this who may as well be bad actors. TAKE A FUCKING LOOK AT THE STUFF YOU'RE HANDING OUT TO PRESCHOOLERS, IT'S NOT THAT FUCKING HARD.
>>154826807If this is the book I'm thinking of, it is seriously a filthy book. It basically has everything you don't want a child seeing.
>>154827729>>154827647i think this is the book.https://ia601608.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/5/items/the-complete-grendel-1982-2021/062%20Grendel%20Tales%20-%20Devil%27s%20Hammer%2001.cbr
>>154827669yeah it seems like the boundingintocomics article i posted missed some details:>>154827734
Why are Grendel fans like this?
>>154827734Yeah, that's the one.
>>154827669>I'm pretty sure I had that book. It has gore, a character pees on a religious statue, a gnome with a giant penis and a bisexual group sex scene. we've seen worse in more popular shows and comics.>Even if she didn't read it before giving it away the cover alone should have tipped her off that it may not be something to hand out.it doesnt look that disturbing. it probably looks like venoms mask at a first glance to a normie.
>>154827816>we've seen worse in more popular shows and comics.So what. There is always worse. I'm telling you I had a dirty feeling after reading that as a teenager. If I were the parent "sorry" wouldn't cut it.>it doesnt look that disturbing.It's a bastardized religious portrait. Even as a teen I picked up on that. In general it looks like a vertigo comic which is also not for kids.
>>154826902That's almost certainly is what happened. It could have been she just removed the ones with bikini covers before buying whole box. She absolutely was unaware that it's possible for things like Grendel to both exist and get mixed into those dollar bins if she was only looking for things with inappropriate covers
>is on the parents to police internet content so kids can't do view it!!Same people:>that poor innocent comic book store owner. It's not her fault for not properly vetting a comic book with graphic depictions of mutilation of innocent people before giving it to a 6 year old. How was she suppose to know?!This case is so dumb. Its like I have have to defend the retard on principle but fucking hell do your fucking job. Would it have really been that hard to flip through the pages before giving it to a child?
>>154827816>t. Groomer
>>154828048>if she was only looking for things with inappropriate coverswell, there is a bastardized religious portrait on the cover. Do people these days not know what those look like?Even with complete ignorance, this book does not look like something you could had a minor without at least skimming it first.
>>154828113Children shouldn't even be allowed outside.I hate kids and their simps so much jesus christ.
>>154826701>An act or condition that depicts torture, physical restraint by being fettered or bound, or flagellation of or by a nude person or a person clad in undergarments or in revealing or bizarre costume.Considering page 5 of >>154827734 features a naked guy with his dick ripped off, prosecution has a good case.
Why was a 6 year old walking around unattended? The vendor is a retard but the parents should've been spending time with their child.
>>154826620>https://ia601608.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/5/items/the-complete-grendel-1982-2021/062%20Grendel%20Tales%20-%20Devil%27s%20Hammer%2001.cbrBiblical stories are more gory, and we’re supposed to cheer for the genocidal god and his people. It’s a problem with politically correct laws, which is why anti-free speech laws are a slippery slope
>>154828288confirmed third worlder who never celebrated halloween
>>154828297>muh Bible>tips fedoraName me a single picture bible with graphic images handed to children
>>154828308My parents went with me until I turned 12. If you let out a 6 year old with no supervision, you are a bad parent.
>>154828322Jesus on the cross. Anti-free speech laws are a slippery slope because these artistic pieces that I don't mind could be censored for not complying with these stupid rules.
>>154828408Yet somehow it takes unironic Stalinism for people to understand the value of art for communicating ideas freely
>>154828204Judging it by the cover, she probably thought that it was just a generic story with dark elements that wasn't worse than pg13 stuff. She's an old nerdy woman. The real baby boomers and Gen X grew up with a resentment against their parents for not allowing them to enjoy "satanic" media. So during adulthood they became more liberal. Well a decade ago kids in preschool and elementary school were watching Adventure Time and Regular Show. And even CN years later said that they weren't shows for kids. Do you guys think that the christian parody in that cover was supposed to stop this? Nobody cares about that, let's be real. Just me, stop larping. Everyone hates or doesn't cares about christianism, even children media. Oh wait, most of the outrage would come from evangelists and larpers, so a nothingburger. On the other hand, she's a nerd. And certainly an old comic book nerd would know what Grendel is, and maybe already read that specific issue. HOWEVER, I think that she didn't even hand the comic to the kid. It could have been something like>oh yeah those comics are free, grab whatever you want (she forgot or wasn't aware that it was there)moments later>OH GOD JOHNNY WHO GAVE YOU THIS???>the old woman at that comic book handed it to meOr the parents added the handed part.
>>154828267>>154828297>>154828322>>154828408There was the stuff in the bible like the song of solomon which is erotic poetry:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Song_of_SongsThere was also the stuff where samson got a ton of foreskins as a dowry or something.
>>154828322Not pictures, but the bible has it's moments:>There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.https://biblehub.com/ezekiel/23-20.htmand its worth noting the law doesn't require visual depiction. Obscene writing could be prosecuted as well:>>154826701>This is the law she's being charged under:>https://www.ncleg.net/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bysection/chapter_14/gs_14-190.1.html
>>154828592>>154828616Good ole Old Testament. The New Testament has its moments, but it's funny how people always bring up the Old one. I think that this should imply something else, specially because most christians concentrate on the values of the NT. Or at least that's the idea
>>154828592>muh song of songsHand you found a graphic Bible picture story handed to kids yet? Protip, you won't.
>>154828774It doesn't matter if its a picture book or not under this law:>(a) It shall be unlawful for any person 18 years of age or older, firm, or corporation to intentionally disseminate obscenity. A person, firm or corporation disseminates obscenity within the meaning of this Article if he or it:>(1) Sells, delivers or provides or offers or agrees to sell, deliver or provide any obscene writing, picture, record or other representation or embodiment of the obscene; or>(2) Presents or directs an obscene play, dance or other performance or participates directly in that portion thereof which makes it obscene; or>(3) Publishes, exhibits or otherwise makes available anything obscene; or>(4) Exhibits, presents, rents, sells, delivers or provides; or offers or agrees to exhibit, present, rent or to provide: any obscene still or motion picture, film, filmstrip, or projection slide, or sound recording, sound tape, or sound track, or any matter or material of whatever form which is a representation, embodiment, performance, or publication of the obscene.https://www.ncleg.net/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bysection/chapter_14/gs_14-190.1.htmlobscene writing would also be illegal
>>154828797Sorry fedora tipper but the Bible is a cultural work of historical value unlike your funny picture book peddled by a proto-groomer
>>154828839So you're saying that comic books have no cultural value at all? What are you doing on /co/? If it's porn, there's /mlp/ and other non-blue boards.
>>154828882I like funny picture books but don't equate them to cultural and historical artifacts.Your anthro feet fetish picture is not on the same level as the paintings in museums
>>154828927Were you gonna answer his question or just jerk yourself off with more buzzwords
>>154828927>I like funny picture books but don't equate them to cultural and historical artifacts.>Your anthro feet fetish picture is not on the same level as the paintings in museumsyou are very wrong:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leda_and_the_Swan
>>154828927I don't know, man, a lot of my favorite comic book artists are way better than many of the so-called “classics, not that I don't see the importance of the canon. It's just that it's bigger than you think. Not to mention that artistic interpretations of the Bible are heresy.
>>154829004For context, it's a story from greek myth where Zeus turned into a swan and seduces Leda.It's been depicted many times by numerous different famous painters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leda_and_the_Swan_(Leonardo)
>>154829005>I don't know, man, a lot of my favorite comic book artists are way better than many of the so-called “classics, not that I don't see the importance of the canon.which ones are worse?
>>154828774bible is regularly taught to kids
>>154829005Forgot to mention I think my Warhammer 40k books are high lit and I take hrt pills
Whole lot of groomers itt upset that can't give graphic materials to kids
>>154830227you dont know what grooming is
>>154830227Grooming is what trannies, real pedos, and niggers like you do. I can feel it, go back
>>154826620>says NOT FOR CHILDREN on cover
>>154830632oh yeah i didnt notice that, you can see it better on this bigger scan
>“If your child received a comic book, please review it before allowing them to have it. ... If you locate any items that appear inappropriate, disturbing, or not consistent with a typical Sunset Beach Trunk or Treat event do not discard it, please contact the Sunset Beach Police Department immediately.”https://www.newsobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article312754138.htmlimagine having the police say this shit
>>154826691I'm a coastal elite liberal and I would vote to convict were I a juror on that case, perhaps begrudgingly.Nudity is fine and dandy but if she's handing out that comic indiscriminately, that's a clear violation of the law regardless of whether or not I agree with the law itself. Short of nullification, my duty as a juror is to vote according to the evidence and laws. The law is clear and the evidence showed she broke it.
>>154828839what's the cultural value of lot being raped by his daughters
>>154826656As she should.
>>154826691Yeah, they're the opposite extreme where they will arrest parents if they don't agree to let their children troon out.
>>154830874It doesn't violate the miller test though, so it should be legal under current case lawhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test>Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;>Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law (the syllabus of the case mentions only sexual conduct, but excretory functions are explicitly mentioned in the majority opinion);>Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[ That last bit is very important. The comic has serious literary value.
>>154831115>Yeah, they're the opposite extreme where they will arrest parents if they don't agree to let their children troon out.when has that actually happened?>>154831079why should she end up on that list?
>>154831317Literally considered child abuse in California
>>154831391Which post are you talking about and have people actually been arrested for it in california?
>>154826656There was that one ryona hentai that was apparently so fucked up that Japan itself successfully prosecuted it as obscene.
>>154831405>There was that one ryona hentai that was apparently so fucked up that Japan itself successfully prosecuted it as obscene.apparently that was because the genitals wasn't censored properly:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misshitsu
>>154830924not even the worst thing in there
Grendel thread? I totally forgot to read the new issue of Devil's Crucible until I saw this. Are there any Grendel Tales issues worth reading? I've only read the main series and like the first part of tales.
>>154832251it should have happened to me
>>154830874>I'm a coastal elite liberalyou say that as if it precludes you from being an authoritarian faggot.libtard or conservacuck, it's all niggatry
>>154830874>>154831249The miller test is also mentioned in this specific law itself:>(b) For purposes of this Article any material is obscene if:>(1) The material depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by subsection (c) of this section; and>(2) The average person applying contemporary community standards relating to the depiction or description of sexual matters would find that the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and>(3) The material lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; and>(4) The material as used is not protected or privileged under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of North Carolina.
>>154826656>herShe'll be fine
>>154828616>Ezekiel 23-30Grok, why does it not apply under the law?>In short, graphic language alone is not enough. The law distinguishes between unprotected obscenity (material that, as a whole, is prurient, patently offensive, and valueless) and protected expression that includes frank or disturbing content within a larger work of recognized value. Ezekiel 23 falls into the latter category as part of the Bible. This is settled constitutional doctrine, not a special religious exemption carved out ad hoc.
>>154826620>>154826677>comic from 1994>defendant is a 59yo woman>co-owner of Marvelous IssuesSo a boomer comic store owner raided their bargain bin for horror comics to give to kids for Halloween and accidentally included one with graphic content. Between most sensible people this would be fixed with a simple>uh, you gave my kid a comic with content that wasn't really appropriate>shit, sorry about that, how about you come to the store and I'll let them choose something they likebut this is America, so of course she got reported to the police and arrested. Parents probably want to sue her for mental anguish or some shit.
>>154833508the police were encouraging that behavior too:>>154830768
>>154828592>>154828616>>154828461Whenever I hear these lines of thought I can only conclude the person making them thinks children aren't exposed enough to adult themes and need to be exposed as much as they can.I grew up in a Christian family but my parents didn't sit me down and say "Okay, Johnny, today we're going to read about bloody dismemberments and show you images of spicy sexual impropriety" (from the Bible or otherwise). No one was saying the Grendel book should be banned, but maybe... just maybe... don't hand it out to six-year-olds on Halloween.
>>154830924Seems simple enough: Don't rape your father.
>>154834880>I hated gay people because of Sodom and GomorrahIt’s not just a pro-genocide story. It was used to persecute gay people and even ban them from getting married as late as the 2000s. In some countries, this dumbass story is still used for that purpose. How can this comic book, which has absolutely no influence, be bad?
>>154830768Something I've noticed with boomers -- especially if they don't get out much or live in a bubble -- is a lack of awareness about changing norms or thinking the world they grew up in is the same world today's children have. Some might have an attitude or belief that "Oh, they would never show something like that".
>>154834942Your butt wasn't made for that, faggot.
>>154833503>Grok, why does it not apply under the law?Way to out yourself as terminally retarded in just one sentence.
>>154826620you made this thread a long time again, you coprophilic faggotI hope she's found guilty and made to pay a hefty fineFuck comics and comics shops for pushing garbage onto children.
>>154836192Go back to jerking off to toddler cartoons, retard.
>>154836192>you made this thread a long time again, you coprophilic faggotThe previous thread didn't mention that the grand jury indicted her: https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/153489189
>>154834962there are other forms of gay sex
>>154826835>>154826902It's not 1930. She should know she has to check.
>>1548408481930s is pre comic code era
>>154826620This story is years old, this link is months old.
>>154827816>we've seen worse in more popular shows and comics.Name 5
>>154832952You can’t even post the pages on this 4chan board and youre surprised they’d get someone arrested?
>>154833508What an absurd time we live in
>>154841392OP posted it here 2 or 3 times for some reason too. Ive seen this here last month
>>154841392no she was arrested last year and the court case is ongoing.
>>154831317>why should a woman committing epe be arrestedGEE ANON I WONDER
>>154828592>>154828616reddit takes and same talking points. why not talk about the more crazy shit in the Tanakh like ol St Elijah butchering a bunch of pagans or the trippy shit Enoch saw in his visions
>>154827980You are such an obvious tourist.
She should’ve been indicted for BAD TASTE! That shit is like Johnny The Homicidal Maniac but for Boomers.>2edgy4me
>>154842076The Bible has been and continues to be used to justify atrocities. This is a book published in a fringe magazine, and it raises people’s awareness about certain issues. Meanwhile, the Bible is all about reveling in sleeping with young girls and genocide. The Bible is EDGY, but not even the edgiest nigga would write the insanities found in the Bible because he has a moral core. Something the Bible usually lacks.
>>154842021epe?
>>154841408DeliveranceI spit on your graveRequiem for a DreamIrréversibleA Serbian Filmmight not count, but human centipede series.Ok, some of these are probably more well known due to Notoriety than actual popularity.
>>154842021>>154843801Did they mean EPI?
>>154836971>t. Seething AIDS-addled floppyfaggot making another baseless attack
>>154842726>but not even the edgiest nigga would write the insanities found in the Bible because he has a moral coreWhere does morality come from and is it absolute?
>>154841477Are you talking about this thread or a different post?>>154838781>The previous thread didn't mention that the grand jury indicted her: https://desuarchive.org/co/thread/153489189It might be that more than 1 person has discussed this.
>>154844775comes from multiple sources and probably no.
>>154842726> This is a book published in a fringe magazine, and it raises people’s awareness about certain issues. I haven't read grendel (tales) so I don't know much about what it's about. How does it do that?
Why does obscenity law even exist, doesn't it defeat the whole point of the 1st amendment?
>>154828797People always do this about the bible but not only is it the foundational work of literature for all of modern Western civilization, it's also monolithic and not something you're going to have your 1st grader just rush through to get all the gory or sexual bits.It's like saying you can show incest porno to kids because "Well there's femdom incest rape in the bible"Nobody would accept that defense in court lmao.
>>154844294They did they just mixed up exposure and introduction
>>154847403In my opinion yes but I believe the argument is that obscene speech *can* be free in a particular audience but is obscene in another. For example, pornography is not illegal, but there's a moral argument for producing it around or providing it to family spaces where it is still free speech but is contextually inappropriate, and people should have reasonable expectation not to have someone goatse in front of their family at the park.
>>154847403Defeating the point of the 1st amendment IS the reason obscenity laws exist. No government actually wants their people to have true freedom of speech, just the freedom to express what they consider to be within acceptable parameters, which varies from country to country. The USA has historically done this less than other countries via law, but instead via the threat of imposing laws which cause industries to self-censor their media (the CCA, Hays Code etc) but the FCC still exists as a blunt tool if anyone actually steps out of line.
Americans are funny.I was brought up on nudity. It's completely natural to me.
I rwmember when I was like 9 or so I was at a Dave & Busters, and one of the prizes was a random issue of Gen13.Like it wasn't #1 or start of some story arc it was the very middle of the story. And while it didn't show nips or anything there was a sex scene.Just funny how when it comes to comics people who don't read just will assume stuff and put it out withoutchecking if it even makes sense for a kid to have/want it.
>>154847505This has nothing to do with nudity you disingenuous faggot.
>>154826620Good
>>154843824None of those show genital mutilation, urination or decapitation. Deliverance doesnt even have nudity.
>>154830187because it has values unlike the grendel comic and 99% doesn't go into the details pointed out by that other fagi know liberals and dems want stop secretly corrupting and raping kids and doing it in the open now but this isn't a good argument
>>154826620sounds like that retard that got in trouble for giving out pokemon games and every single one in the team and box was named niggergood ridance
>>154841408Berserk is one example.>>154849554If decapitation is enough, theres a lot of entertainment that have decapitated people or gore.
>>154849584Did they actually get in legal trouble for this? Where did this happen?
>>154849587Be honest have you seen the comic in question?
>>154847403lol did you think the christfags made up "obscenity" laws because they love free speech>>154849554gore has never been taken seriously as obscenity. they only care about sex.
>>154849735Anon toonami used to censor dragon ball for gore all the time wtf are you talking about? Impalement or decapitation in American media IMMEDIATELY makes something an R rating.
>timeout ahead
>>154849916Thats the thing I find absurd. You can’t even post the pages on 4chan without punitive action lol. And yet people are surprised that a parent would find it absurd that their kid was handed it.
>>154849980Something being banable on 4chan is not sufficient justification on its own for it being prosecutable in real life.
>>154850050It isn’t prosecutable. Until it’s handed to a minor. Something like this:>>154850025Isnt in anything listed here: >>154843824
>>154850293>It isn’t prosecutable. Until it’s handed to a minor.No, you can still be prosecuted for obscenity and it is still a felony if you give it to an adult. Did you actually read the north carolina law?
>>154850293>>154850361https://www.ncleg.net/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bysection/chapter_14/gs_14-190.1.html>(g) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a violation of this section is a Class I felony. A violation of this section committed knowingly in the presence of a minor under 18 years of age is a Class H felony.
>end
>>154849684are you saying berserk is a bad comparison?
>>154826902>>154828048It seems like that was the case:>She’s accused of handing out obscene comic books to children at a trunk-or-treat event, and she claims she had no idea about the content of the comics she was passing out.https://www.wwaytv3.com/comic-store-owner-appears-in-court-in-obscenity-distribution-case/
>>154826620I'd like to point out, like it says in the article, that she gave it to a six year old.
>>154853953see the post above you
>>154826620>>154826691>>154831115Fascists gonna fascist. "Land of the free" has always been a joke. >>154849572>de bibble has valyoosBWAHAHAHAHAHA
>>154854593I have harsh and recursive filters.
>>154854793What do you filter? If your filters are removing important info, then perhaps they aren't very good.
>>154854793>>She’s accused of handing out obscene comic books to children at a trunk-or-treat event, and she claims she had no idea about the content of the comics she was passing out.>https://www.wwaytv3.com/comic-store-owner-appears-in-court-in-obscenity-distribution-case/
>>154854967I have a policy, if you reply to shitposting, you're part of the problem.
>>154855039do you see the post right above yours now?
>>154826620>obscenity laws LAND OF THE FREEEEEE!!
>>154855087Yes, because it's not setting off my filters.
>>154855087He was an extension installed on his browser.The extension manipulates the content rendered on his browser based on formulas defined by him.
>>154855130HOME OF THE SLAVE!!!!
>>154855176Yes i know what an extension is.
one interesting thing about this case is that most recent obscenity prosecutions have been for stuff like lolicon hentai or similar.No children are in this comic though and its not sexual.
>>154826620That's crazy.
