[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Ladderbro
>MCUshill
>Kangfag
>Lokifag
>Carolfag
>Wandafag
>Gwenschizo
>Gwenpoolfag
>Tommy
>Milesfag
>That retard obsessed with calling Reed and Peter cucks.
>MCU AI Goon spammer

Notice the pattern? Why the fuck is it always Marvel with these schizophrenic faggots?
>>
Not your blog.
>>
>>154837287
Marvel’s writing has become retarded and infantile, and the editorials are just as big of schizos as the fags here, not to mention the MCU is the MCU, of course it would attract them.
>>
>>154837287
All the waifufags are likely also cartoonfags. Cartoon watchers have a higher incidence of mental illness.
>>
>>154837287
Kangfag?
>>
>>154837287
80% of these are the same guy
>>
>>154839393
Which cartoon Wanda would get waifufags? Superhero Squad?
>>
>>154840150
Some retard obsessed with the MCU’s Kang.
>>
>>154837287
I don't know who half of these are I get the feeling you have a serious problem seeing boogeymen everywhere
>>
>>154840223
Evolution
>>
>>154840234
Oh I thought you meant me cause I'm always having to bat for the actual character not the awful MCU version.
>>
>>154837287
I'm glad I hate capeshit, because I recognize none of those people.
>>
>>154841686
Nah, you’re good, mate. I’m taking about the annoying idiot who’s been making threads about how much he loves Majors/MCU Kang since 2023. Kang fans are fine as long as they’re not this guy.
>>
>>154837287
All me btw.
>>
>>154841905
>I’m taking about the annoying idiot who’s been making threads about how much he loves Majors/MCU Kang since 2023.

Feels like that's someone trying to do PR for Majors
>>
>>154841791
Do you like cartoons? Because those are plagued by a lot more schizos.
>>
File: masameer kino.jpg (61 KB, 1280x720)
61 KB JPG
>>154844278
Oh, I LOVE cartoons! However, the cartoons I like are either obscure or discussed very little. I'm fine with that, which means I can enjoy said cartoons all on my own.
>>
You forgot She-Hulkfag you poser.
>>
>>154844707
So... that's two MCU schizos based off shows created by R&M writers? Jesus christ...
>>
>>154844722
She-Hulkfag was around before the show you tourist.
>>
>>154837287
>>Milesfag


where? here? as much as people shit on miles i doubt it
>>
>>154837287
Kangfags feel completely manufactured. Hardly anyone made threads about Kang before the 2020s, and now, whenever they do, it's always about the MCU or Jonathan Majors, never the comics. It all feels fake.
>>
>>154846184
It is suspicious. I remember them melting down because X-Men 97 didn’t use Major’s Kang. It’s weird how it happened and how it’s been going on for so long. It just doesn’t feel real.
>>
>>154845007
He’s another schizo in the Spidey threads, though Gwenschizo overpowers him.
>>
>>154846290
That does sound manufactured cause they actually got a good actor for Kang/Rama-Tut in X-Men 97 and he's a better portrayal of the character in a fraction of the screentime then the entire MCU botchjob.
>>
>>154846184
Last time I tried to talk about Kang in a thread, it got derailed by Dr Doomposting
>>
Do mods never ban people here. I took a break from /co/ in 2019 and I remember threads being awful because of schizos then too
>>
As a Lokifag myself and hater of the MCU and whatever the fuck it’s done to him, I hate that I can no longer have discussions about him.

>>154846401
There’s been a weird influx of MCU posts in general that don’t actually feel like they’re made by real people. It’s strange to me. But the MCU Kang dickriding threads have been going on the longest.

>>154846745
Nope.
>>
>>154846745
They do but it's usually for things that specifically offend them or for obviously illegal or detrimental material and even then I'm pretty sure it's only for a few days at a time instead of straight up perma bans
>>
>>154847802
>>154844722

Speaking of Loki and the MCU writers, there’s also been this faggot called “Sylvieanon” who’s been going around trying to make that God awful Lady Loki sound more loved and important than what she truly is. He also keeps trying to make up a rumor/theory that Sylvie is going to be revealed to be Loki’s daughter, which considering he made out with her….
>>
>>154848098
The Sylvie faggot has been here since the show came out and is furiously defensive of her character. Like Kang, he also feels manufactured.
>>
>>154848098
>a rumor/theory that Sylvie is going to be revealed to be Loki’s daughter, which considering he made out with her
Honestly? Not too far off from the whole Luke/Leia thing either.
>>
>>154848098
Most of /co/ defends Sylvie. I’ve done nothing wrong.
>>
>>154848168
No fag. Don’t speak for me.
>>
>>154844741
99% of She-Hulk discourse on /co/ is one permanently-online anon seething about everything take on the character before and after the John Byrne version.

>>154847802
>There’s been a weird influx of MCU posts in general that don’t actually feel like they’re made by real people.
There's also weird schizo freakouts from anons who accuse you of being an MCU shill or Disney shill if you don't blindly consoom and accept everything the comics did and treat them like some sacred religious text, despite how the comics are decades of material of varying quality, produced by hundreds of people, and making leaps of judgment in "if you don't like A then you MUST like B"
>>
>>154848262
Well, the modern MCU sucks as much as some of the comics, so arguing “LE MCU IS BETTER THAN THE COMICS/LE COMICS ARE BETTER THAN LE MCU” are both stupid. I don’t like rapid MCUfags, personally, they tend to flood the board. I’ve had too many bad run-ins with them, but if you prefer the MCU to the comics, that’s fine as long as you don’t act like some of these morons. I won’t yuck your yum.
>>
>>154846184
It’s not. The Kang thread has almost 80 replies. If you dislike Kang, you’re illiterate. He was the best thing to happen to the MCU. You fags just hate quality.
>>
>>154848400
Nice projections, schizo
>>
File: .jpg (89 KB, 403x403)
89 KB JPG
>>154848400
80 replies, and almost all of them are from (you). Stop pretending people care about MCU Kang when you're the one keeping that thread alive.
>>
>>154848262
The other 1% is just musclefags pretending to care about the character.
>>
>>154837287
Several MCU threads are flooding the catalogue, currently. It feels like bots, they type like chatbots. It’s kinda weird.
>>
>>154846745
They babysit certain threads while the rest of the board goes to shit.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.