[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 38983.jpg (967 KB, 3080x2000)
967 KB JPG
Is the idea of "the big three" now obsolete?
>>
File: HOj8SJJXgAAICRs.jpg (67 KB, 500x500)
67 KB JPG
>>
File: sale.jpg (159 KB, 648x853)
159 KB JPG
>>
File: images.jpg (29 KB, 400x287)
29 KB JPG
>>154849449
Spider-man and his side-kicks.
>>
No, the fact a movie as horrible as Gunnman got that much is indicative Superman is still popular. He is, however, in the exact same death spiral as Spider-Man where audiences are only putting up with him from memories of two decade and older movies, not knowing how raped the character has become. That spell will break eventually, given enough of these movies.
>>
>>154849547
Look at the OP's image again.
>>
>>154849582
I did. Gunnman didn't deserve to break 150, it got carried by brand power, horrendous movie. Hell, Supergirl just proved that point crashing and burning.
>>
>>154849388
Superman is only in the big three if you count only individual superheroes.
If you count brands, general comic book lines, then the big three have been
>Batman
>Spider-Man
and
>The X-Men
since at least the early 90s.

And just because there can be a popularity gap in a particular medium that doesn't make them not all parts of a big three.
Batman wipes everything else off the floor in comics sales
Superman has been the biggest superhero on TV since the 50s
Spider-Man's movies make bank
>>
>>154849388
No, someone it's going to take the first spot regardless of the idea of the Big Three. And that's has been Spiderman since probably the 90s. Superman has always been more culturally iconic, most people know what you mean by "Superman", most people use Kryptonite as if it was something that existed before it, and most understand the tropes, but his stories? Not so much, that's why he has always been more culturally present yet never a ticket seller. Batman is really fucking popular, but he has been ping ponged into a lot of different takes, and this recent one is good but not great with most audiences, even if it's closer to the character.

Spiderman is just overall great with everyone, he's "relatable", he has the autistic colors, he has stories most people know of, always rising actors playing him, and overall high hopes for the sequel or next part. Marvel can go and fuck him over in the comics for the last 15 years, and despite all that, people complains are still too much of a minority for them to do something.
>>
>>154849388
Spidey and bats always make money supes just needs a genuinely good script the big 3 is still not obsolete
>>
>>154849449
peter would use the hard R



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.