>comics and comic adaptations will never look like this againfeels bad man
>>154850224I miss gothic Batman
Reminder that gothic art deco Batman was an invention of the movie
>>154850515And? Do you shit on Batman 66 for inventing a lot of modern takes on characters, or on TAS for inventing modern Mr Freeze, or on anything else?Gothic art deco expressionist Gotham was the first time the city actually had a REAL character and was so influential Furst got hired to design Gotham for the comics and to this day Old Gotham is still Furst Gotham retard
>>154850224You could learn to do it
>>154850545I didn't say it was a bad thing. Just that it's an example of adaptations adding to the source. > so influential Furst got hired to design Gotham for the comics I don't think they literally hired him, they used concept art he worked on for the '89 movie. He was already dead before Batman Returns came out, and while it's possible they could've been working with him before he died..still feels like a stretch since all the art in the Destroyer arc is just stuff he had already done. Don't think they'd have hiring them within their budget
>>154850515yeah and it's cooler than any batman comic.
>>154850636Art is hard, anon. Anyone who's ever been two secs in /ic/ knows, years of drawing fucking cubes and spheres
>>154850735No
>>154850875Yes.
>>154850224>>154850545>>154851513Nice art.
>>154850861It is hard. If you love something and don’t want it to go away forever, it’s worth the effort.
>>154851513>>154850545>>154850224NeatWhere are these from?Is there an art book for the 89 movie?