>Show has more episodes than there are days in a year>No one ages at all>Bonus Sins: It has multiple holiday episodes >Extra Sins: There's multiple birthday/anniversary episodes
Why is that a "sin" you autist? The cartoon drawings don't act like real life? Is the Simpsons characters being bright yellow also a "sin"?
Radiation from power plant makes things weird. Okay it’s explained are you happy now?
Wizard did it
>>155001989Edna sex
>>155001848>multiple holiday episodes I used to have the same complaints about Bob's Burgers at first. Then I grew up and realized it's a freakin' cartoon designed to last indefinitely.
>>155001848>"HAH, unlike you peons, my brain is capable of comparing TWO pieces of information at ONCE, and with this power I have deduced that despite attempting to portray characters who are human and have experiences that are clearly adjacent to our own, this cartoon does NOT, in fact, adhere to the same laws of time, space, or general physics as we are subject to in reality! I have decided to classify this is a FLAW, because I am SMART! I must share this right away on the internet, to much awe and adulation, no doubt!"yoy
Genuinely what is the second Simpsons movie even supposed to be about? I feel like the OG already covered all the bases as far as what stakes would hit at the core of the show's characters: Homer & Marge's marriage, Bart's daddy issues, Lisa rallying up the town to do good, etc. Where do you even go from there?
>>155002794I tried watching this show and it's just awful, there's no point to any of it
>>155003225>there's no point to any of itwell, same as your post, but you still made it, right?
>>155001848Ok
>>155001865He's using sin to mean "something which is incorrect based on an arbitrary standard"You might think that the characters should age with time but they don't. Ergo the show sins because it doesn't meet this standard. There being multiple annual events featured makes it even more confusing, given you have this standard.
>>155002794>Then I grew upApparently not if you're posting in this thread about it. A grown up would understand the topic is tongue in cheek.
>>155003103>Where do you even go from there?Down
>>155004675>A grown up would understand the topic is tongue in cheek.A grown up would have not made the topic to begin with because there's nothing to be discussed.>>155004664>He's using sin to mean "something which is incorrect based on an arbitrary standard">You might think that the characters should age with time but they don't. Ergo the show sins because it doesn't meet this standard.It's a cartoon. Cartoon characters not aging is the "arbitrary standard". Heck, it would probably be the arbitrary standard in live action TV and movies if it were physically possible. Not that hollywood doesn't try.
>>155004664>You might think that the characters should age with time but they don't.no, most people are fairly aware that cartoons are not beholden to the physics of the real world. YOU might not be, because you have no friends and spend 99% of your time watching cartoons, or being on the internet complaining about cartoons, so you've inflicted a unique sort of psychosis on yourself. But please realize, not everyone is as poorly-adjusted as you.
>>155001989I'd let her give me a paddlin'
>>155003225Don't go into it expecting 'another Simpsons.' It's a more conventional Home Movies, with a touch of King of the Hill... and some toilet humour.
In the episode Lisa gets married, takes place in the far off future of 2010
>aaaaaah this cartoon series has a sliding timeline im going insane
>>155006398This but unironically
>>155004688
>>155003103Disney will do what it does best; try and fail to reinvent the wheel. I'm anticipating the movie being used to transition to a new art style like the 3d Spongebob movies, or even new voice actors taking over the rolls. If they do switch to 3d or hand off the roles to new actors, I think that's what Cartwright meany by the show ending at season 40.
