Why did it fail?
=you asking that would imply anyone knows what the fuck youre talking about
>>155038984I dunno even know what it was?
>>155038984You mean this whole time this project was just a pitch for a show? What a shame
>>155039013Industry cocksucker.Going to draw her
>>155039675>Industry cocksucker.damn, im a fag who likes industrial music so i cant even call you a liar
>>155039013>>155039154It's Sublo and Tangy Mustard, a quite underrated youtube series.It's pretty good, would definitely work well as an Adult Swim cartoon back in the day.>>155038984>Why did it fail?I dunno, I've wondered the same before. Maybe the art style didn't quite catch people's attention?
>>155038984>no strong shipbait >everyone besides Sublo and Tangy Mustard has a pretty mundane look to them and lacks that "fanartable factor" >no fantastical elements outside of that one Halloween episode I love the show myself and admire Long's dedication to his passion sideproject, but that's just how the cookie crumbles I guess..
>>155039747adult swim fucking sucks
>>155038984It's hard to describe, but it's probably because the writing is too dry. The slow, natural dialogue just doesn't hook many people, and clashes with the zany artstyle. It only took SubparGeekGirl96's debut, someone with an actual big personality that pairs well with her cartoonish looks, for the recent episodes to get a couple more extra eyes on them.
Okay I need a link for this, I feel like I'm being gaslit
>>155038984Did it fail? I just see it as a small series that's actually pretty good. Sure it deserves more recognition and success but a lot of good things do.
>>155038984Too similar to Regular Show.
>>155042426https://www.newgrounds.com/series/sublo-tangy-mustardHere's the whole series.
>>155038984Did it fail? I think it's a comfy youtube show and does what it tries to do perfectly. What is it supposed to fail?
>>155038984Normal words, but a submarine guy!
>>155038984How did it fail?It's just a thing the creator enjoys doing and is as popular as it needs to be, anything more would probably change the show for the worse.
>>155042789Some anons just think or try to convince others to think that unless a cartoon gets 30million views then it's a failure.
>>155038984This bitch doesnt have enough lewds
The show feels Canadian. Is it Canadian? Why does it feel that way if it's not?
Everyone got diarrhea from eating Sub lows
i want to FUCK subpargeekgirl96
>>155044769This. Genuine geeky girls are one of the best girl types.
It failed?
>>155046485No
>>155046485OP is baiting for replies but any Sublo and Tangy thread is better than none.
>>155038984Vivzie and Glitch (and Monkey Wrench to a far lesser extent) have mindbroken people into thinking indie cartoons HAVE to be these super-polished major productions that rival feature animation when that was never the case. This is exactly why the latter can't deliver new episodes of their shows at a reasonable pace Everyone should understand that cartoons produced independently are free to take shortcuts or to look a little rough around the edges. That's part of the charm; seeing the passion over the production quality
>>155047059Cope If your indie cartoon doesn't have a Netflix or Amazon deal then it's a failure I don't make the rules
>>155047059>Vivzie and Glitch (and Monkey Wrench to a far lesser extent) have mindbroken people into thinking indie cartoons HAVE to be these super-polished major productions that rival feature animation when that was never the case.No they haven't? They just put a lot of work into their productions. They are aiming to make polished stuff because that's the quality they're seeking. But they're also trying to break into streaming services and larger syndication deals. In Moneky Wrench's case a lot of that is just Zuerel's crazy level of animation.At worst they've raised the bar a bit but they're not really chasing the same goals as most indie youtube content.
>>155042426Here's the youtube link for the series' playlisthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbIKi6hWNaY&list=PLh4vX2Bsczm4sZALJ58w5Suc-5qWkt_IJ
>>155042789>>155043765I agree. While a creator usually does enjoy raking in the money from views, it doesn't have to be a massive billion-view show for it to be satisfying.I like sublo and tangy mustard, it's nice to see a genuine series.
>>155047213These projects are spending tens to hundreds of thousands and have teams of dozens
>>155038984>>155047059Only thing i had ever seen about this character is this fetish image.limewir e . com /d /zn8nH#OOT7uxNuLb
>>155039675ResultCame out like The Scream, so deep
>>155047161awman :(
>>155038984It's been going for 10 years and clearly has fans, not sure how that qualifies as failing
>>155044769For me it's the Subpar Sirens
>>155038984Has it failed? She seems to inject life into the cartoon and they get an episode every once in a while.
>>155049247I like her intro music
>>155038984>no woman>not popular>woman>popular
>>155051251>>no womanIt had Katie the Normal Girl™ and that didn't do anything. The reason SubParGeekGirl works is because she's a genuinely wacky character in a cast of somewhat normal people. The idea of a fangirl for a fast food chain is just a good concept.
>>155051547Oh, pffft. I've heard of fangirls in cartoons before. Somehow picrel was the most memorable character in Star Vs. just for her name alone.
>>155038984From what I’ve seen and heard of this, the whole thing reeks of:>we wanted to do Smiling Friends too but Zach beat us to the punch
>>155052487It's much older than Smiling Friends, it started like 10 years ago.I'd say it's more like Regular Show.
>>155039154There's your answer
>>155038984the creator seems to be doing fine and has stated many times this is exactly what he wants to do so it seems like it succeeds on its own terms>>155044007it is very explicitly set in Toronto which is Canada
>>155054099>very explicitly set in TorontoAh, no wonder i can't relate to it.
>>155047213Yes clearly they have, because the fact that a long-running series with a cult following made entirely by a single person is being called a failure in comparison is literally proof of >>155047059's point.
>hustle culture brainrot
I do not care for this show. Katie actually being a third idiot instead of the straight-man she appeared to be was the best joke and that was pretty early on.
>>155051547Katie's not normal; she's a failure.
>>155038984>using waifubait as the OP image instead of any one of the actual main characters You're tellin on yourself, anon
>>155038984has anyone cosplayed as her yet or
>>155048825The copy+ pasted bodies make it really funny somehow >>155052487It's far less wacky than Smiling Friends. The Regular Show comparison doesn't fit either. It's more 90s slacker- core, like Mission Hill or Daria in tone.
>>155038984Girl looks cute but what the fuck is it?
