"Fuck you, i liked it" thread.
>>155113132
>>155113132Honestly feel like I'm one of the only few people who actually enjoyed it and had fun with it, even if it's constantly critiqued for the art style and the gross-out humor
>>155113261This show was underrated and it was the perfect sequel to duck tales, disney should had atleast done a goof troop crossover.
>>155113132Not gonna lie, this show could be quite funny when they aren’t making half-assed jokes about asses. The villains especially are the standout characters.
>>155113132It's not half bad.
picrel made me immune to seizures
>>155113261YesYES
>>155113132This show can be pretty funny if you can get past the rather sadistic treatment these two get every episode (especially Robot)
>>155113422agreed. it understood you have to be wackier to pull off 'disney toon sitcom'
>>155113132this would imply that I half-agree with the detractors and I don't do that. I like what I like unironically.
>>155113132Fuck you, me too. Is there a mega for Quack Pack, Darkwing Duck, and Mighty Ducks?
>>155113347It had some it's moments of both wacky fun and down-to-earth sentimentality
>>155113261Spicy take - 'Canon' episodic wg is the only sort of wg I like. This episode is partly why.
There was nothing else on, but I came round to liking it.
>>155114685I actually really like Curtis Armstrong's performance a lot in this. He can make Robot sound genuinely infuriated and/or defeated about his situation. He can deliver anger very well.
Had more charm than Dorkster, The Pumpkin Heads and The Ducks
>>155114685I prefer it over Frederator's entire Nicktoon catalogue, Invisobill and Nerdtron (But not pic related due mainly to nostalgia)
>>155114772i wonder what it is about disney ducks that makes everything wackier than it has to beDuckTales wasn't overly wacky, it was kinda perfect. Darkwing is deliberately playing up silver age tropes, so it has an excuse, quack pack is deliberately being super extreme zany because of how dull Goof Troop kinda ended up being.. but Mighty Ducks REALLY suffered from the goofiness. there was a good action show under the surface, but they chose to go full Road Rovers, without the quality 90s WB writing.
>>155116172This show was good!! it had a few eh moments (like when they were SO PROUD OF THEMSELVES for writing a song that they repeated it like 5 times in the episode) but overall it was excellentgod now you have me thinking of Stripperella, which I will defend to my grave as a profoundly excellent action comedy, at least 88% as good as Freakazoid.
Everybody hates Eliza and blames her for the problems in each episodesShe gets a little preachy but why dump on the whole show for a bad character
Yeah.
>>155113132At the time, when I was a regular user of ToonZone, this was probably the biggest "Fuck you, I like it" show. It's had a bit of a nostalgia comeback in the last five years or so, but for the longest time, it was absolutely despised and hailed as the poster child for Warner Bros. mishandling of the LT brand.
>>155117519I've never heard people whine about eliza, they just think the art is dumb, and when a show is all about animals, which normally look cool and are fun to look at... ehh
>>155117582I never understood why this show was so hated. I thought it was fine
>>155117582This, to me, is one of those times when I agree with the sentiment without agreeing with a single reason whythe issue is not making a sharp, pointy action show out of looney tunes, the issue is making an action show out of LOONEY TUNES. the entirety of the 90s was LT trying to be hip and cool, and I'm sorry, it just isn't. It's the exact oppositeit also reminds me of how every game dev back then was trying to recreate Sonic, without understanding ANY of what made Sonic cool, instead they all made Looney Tunes shit.
>>155117606There's something about the Looney Tunes brand that upsets everyone. Animation diehards scoffed at Space Jam, some people thought Tiny Toons had too much Ruegger and Dini influence and not enough Clampett and Jones, they thought Loonatics was a joke, they said that Looney Tunes Show was too writer-driven and not slapsticky enough, they called Wabbit. ugly and uninspired, the HBO shorts got criticized for feeling more like Ren & Stimpy than Looney Tunes, people called Space Jam 2 unnecessary (lol) and nobody saw Day the Earth Blew Up.It was honestly not surprising when they wrote off Coyote vs. ACME. The LT brand hasn't really made money in twenty years. The 90's were its best revival point and even THEN, it was still criticized by animation nerds, so someone was always upset about it. I personally feel so vindicated that people love TLTS now. I remember when it was despised for the longest time because of the whole, "Why even bother being a cartoon?" criticism when it played more into sitcom writing.
I liked the Donald episodes more.
>>155117727looney tunes as a sitcom makes a lot of sense. I might have watched it if it was.. yknow, made in the 90s. I don't want to hear modern humor.
>>155117727lean the torso forward and this is actually kinda tits. this is how Sonic looks so cool. fuck that rubbery squash and stretch shit.
>>155117727Desu, I wonder if the shorts being constantly hailed as the pinnacle of cartooning/animation inspires Looney Tunes fans to be elitists, because I never see fans of its contemporaries (Mickey, Woody, Popeye) to be anywhere near as vicious despite the latter two being treated even worse.
I don't care if its not as good as Beast Wars, I liked it. Finally a show set on Cybertron, with a unique animation style I liked.
never understood the hate
>>155117847People hate it for the art style, her voice and that one Digimon short that allegedly caused a divorce.
>>155113132underrated
>>155117593It's typical klasky csupo style. It handled locations and animals pretty accurately.
>>155117847The art style, the voice acting, the characters. The entire look of the show had this repulsive corpse quality, of everyone being black and white and moving like janky puppets. It's like it was made by a focus test group on how to piss you off the fastest.
>>155113132The problem is not that you liked it.Is that not enough people liked it for it to be financially sustentable
>>155117831I definitely notice people praising the animation on classic disney morei don't get praising classic looney tunes' animation. I mean yeah they worked hard and they accomplished a lot on a small budget with very little else to copy from, but.. looney tunes's value lies entirely in the writing. it's just funny 30s comedy bits. I don't care if I'm watching a rabbit and a midget with a gun, or three little jewsif I cared about animation, I'd just watch old pretentious french shit about giant blue aliens abducting humans
>>155117920yeah but 90% of western stuff is that bad or worse. The Incredibles is exactly as gross, yet it gets a pass.I respect angela anaconda for at least representing the kinda offbeatness of childhood, it just forgot to not be babyish as fuck.
>>155117911exactlya style that has meshed with the content of the show exactly once
>>155117911>accurately handled animals
>>155117580Better than Adventure Time and Regular Show combined>>155117582This (I lurked the toonzone forums) but when I watched it, I thought it was on the same level as Teen Titans, The Batman and Xiaolin Showdown
>>155113132I watched this last year on a whim and I only remember the triplets' radical designs. Opening was good though.
>>155117831I have a theory that John K's blog contributed to it. Obviously, there was already a cabal of people who thought just like John K. He would not have found friends in the industry if there weren'. But his blog of glazing the shit out of old Looney Tunes while shitting on any reboot attempt in the 90's put it into a lot of aspiring cartoonists heads that the Tunes were much better than they were. Especially because Tom & Jerry is so much better and consistently funnier while also having waaaaay worse cash grabs that aren't nearly as criticized as some of the Looney Tunes stuff. I'd take Space Jam 1 and 2 over the Tom & Jerry 1992 musical, the Willy Wonka DTV movie, and the recent live-action movie, but Space Jam still gets targeted far more for being soulless. However, because the only real T&J cash grab out at the time was Tom & Jerry Kids, he rarely talked about that brand in comparison to the Looney Tunes resurgence that was happening. He obviously praised T&J a lot, but he used LT as a direct "do and don't" comparison for aspiring animators. We know that a ton of people in the industry right now were heavily inspired by John K's blog. It was pretty much the place to go to if you wanted to learn about cartooning in the 2000's. And most of the LT elitists are somewhere in their 30's and 40's. They're also the ones who kept pushing for Warner Bros to bring LT back to its roots. I feel like it lines up.
>>155118097I meanif I put that much work into something as tedious as animation, and ANYONE else dared to put out a product that didn't also do just as much work, I'd be mad toobut I'd be wrong
>>155113132I liked how this show was able to handle about 15 characters in a 22 minute format by giving a bunch of them a part in the story. It also had some pretty good jokes spliced in.And yes, I hated that one fat kid as much as everyone else did.
>>155118097>But his blog of glazing the shit out of old Looney Tuneseven then it was mostly just clampett dicksucking a lot of the time. he, at best, has begrudging respect towards chuck jones and he would shit on friz freleng whenever the chance allows it
>>155118134I genuinely thought this was a horror themed show about monstrous kids when I was younger because I only heard the song on the Count Chocula CDshttps://youtube.com/watch?v=Ic-b-hgqar8
The Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald
>>155113132I adored this show as a kid. Great story and wicked stylish. It's VERY 00's but I rewatched it as an adult and I still think it holds up extremely well in spite of that.They recycle the animation more than some are probably comfortable with but if that doesn't bother you then it's super fun.TIa best girl.
>>155117859>>155117847it's mostly the angelamon thing. my thoughts on the matter? well... it's a crappy short, related to a nothing show, that was attached to a admittedly pretty looking, yet otherwise eleborate toy ad so... fuck.
>>155113132I liked the Pompeii Pete, Genghis and Khannie and Power Pooch segments.
>>155117859>>155117920>>155118368I actually like the artstyle, it's unique. I re-watched it for the first time since it aired originally a couple years ago and the writing is surprisingly clever. The digimon thing never bothered me either.but then, I am a sucker for an artyle with some soul like>>155117519>>155118005old school klasky csupo
>>155118005>>155118495Klasky Csupo gets so much heat.I find the wiggly animation charming.
>>155119086The artstyle was good, but the writing for The Real Monsters and The Wild Thornberries was too down-to-earth/jokeless/dull for me
>>155119086Look nobody's saying it's lazy. They worked HARD on that shit. Just like the CD-i Zelda artists.but all of us attempted to learn how to draw as kids, to make things that made us happy, that looked cool, that were appealing to look at or cute or something else. Russians had the opposite goal, and it just doesn't jive with us. We tried hard NOT to draw things ugly. It's hard to just accept it.
>>155119167That's why Disney's more popular with normos than all of its cartoon competition
>>155118374>that one Power Pooch segment that got banned after 9/11 because the plot was Power Pooch stopping a bunch of PETA employees from hijacking a plane and crashing into a taxidermy centerI can’t believe this of all shows had a banned episode.
>>155119270what?
>>155119566See for yourself.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ljqb1vydiQ
Best show to watch while greening out
>>155113132More specifically I fucking loved the other two segments as a kid: Pith Possum and Tex Tinstar. I thought they were the funniest shit on Toon Disney. The actual Shnookums & Meat segments were just ok. Also every print ad I could find has the dog about to kick the shit out of the cat when I could’ve sworn, in the actual show, they had the standard nice dumb dog/mean smart cat dynamic. Kinda weird.
>>155117339For Mighty Ducks, they just didn't care.
>>155119243well, it was during the good daysbut starting in the late 90s, they seemed to get bored with beauty, and started making everything gross and ugly, and that became the standard across all animation companies. I think Dreamworks actually started it, or at least hammered it in hardest.
>>155120042and yet they cared a lot about the wrong parts. the voice actors have said they had the fucking censors IN the recording booth, to ree at them for lines sounding too sexybut nobody ran the script past the legal department, so they found out way too late that they couldn't use 'duckworld' and had to change it to 'puckworld' which, by union regs, meant the actors got paid double for the series, just for re-recording those specific linesthen that happened a-fucking-gain, with one the villain names. late 90s disney was fucked.
>>155120116>they had the fucking censors IN the recording booth, to ree at them for lines sounding too sexyWhat?? No fucking way, I need a source on this, that's way too hilarious to be trueMD is definitely one of the strangest Disney cartoons I can think of; I enjoyed it though
>>155113132Fuck you I didnt!
>>155120223It's been too long, but I remember it was MORE than one of the actors talking about this, and it was almost certainly on Rob Paulsen's "Talkin' Toons" if you cross-reference that show with the names of actors from the show, you might find itanyway I enjoyed it too. The silly parts didn't ruin it, and I appreciated the cool early 90s hair
>>155117896The girl and her friends were worryingly popular here :')
>>155114537LMAO
>>155117022I don't believe you.
>>155114685Spitfire was one of my weirder childhood crushes.
>>155117582>>155117606same.my guess would be that people were more horrified the more they were knowledgeable or attached to "proper" LT.as a little kid i had no notion that bugs and daffy were going at it for the last 50 years.to me Wile e coyote was on the same level as something like Cow & Chicken.plus i really liked the 90's 2Kool4U thing
>>155121700I mean it..
>>155119591This is amazing.Thank you.
>>155116172I mostly just started this because Evans' voice and deliveries were funny, but it had some good running gags.I loved the down-on-his-luck guy who was always in the bar and always had some relevant life story about how he had it all and fell from grace, each time within a different profession, and whenever Evans asked him what happened the answer was always:>"D'aahhh, I killed a kid."The delivery is still seared into my mind.
>>155113132only thing I hated was the nephews wearing shorts now.
>>155117582The hate for this show always felt astro-turfed to me.Firstly, there was that early promo art that looked WAY more edgy and used the name "Buzz Bunny" which was famouly mocked in that shitty flash cartoon that most of the people allowed to inform their opinion of the show, long before it even aired a single episode.Also, there was a more widespread issue of acceptance in long-running franchises. Looney Tunes had been a staple of American childhoods in the theater and on TV for decades. It wasn't until the turn of the century that it notably vanished amidst some degree of contoversy (guns/violence/stereotypes/etc.). Then people saw this new show getting advertised, so it was viewed as a "replacement". Normies and retards felt personally attacked, as if "their" Bugs Bunny had been specifically "cancelled" to make way for this edgy new show, when it was really just a spin-off trying to do new things with the brand in a shifting animation landscape.Personally, I always found the sterilized, poorly-animated crap from the 70s and later to be far more offensive and derivative than Loonatics. But the thing is, those cartoons were still trying to look and feel like the golden age Looney Tunes shorts, so they got a pass no matter how hard they failed. Ultimately, Looney Tunes suffers from a lot of the same issues as Superman; it's too well known and everyone has a strongly-held opinion about it, regardless of their actual knowledge or appreciation of the material. They just enjoy being able to pipe up and complain when they feel like something "raped their childhood".
>>155116935This
>>155118374>I liked the Pompeii PeteSame. I mostly only watched the show because it was on before something else I was waiting for, but I also had a thing for characters who spoke in pseudo-language gibberish like Pete did.
>>155119270>ALLAHUUUUU WACKBAR!!!!!>*rams a plane into the side of Les Studios Tex>well THAT just happened.
I was pretty neutral on Scrappy Do. He... existed for me, that's it. I didn't care if Scooby Do cartoon had him in an episode or not.Much later I was very surprised that he was so hated. Why hate such a non-character?
>>155118163It’s not “dicksucking,” it’s authentic opinions. The man is fucking dead. You suck dick to get a job with a living person.>>155118097What is “better” about Tom and Jerry? It’s easier to imitate and understand? More kids these days watch it so it’s more helpful for trend chasing?John didn’t target people who care about brand comparisons, he targeted people who care about entertaining with drawings. Classic Looney Tunes is better than almost anything else at that - when you’re concerned with the actual drawings and not brands, social forces, trends, popularity, appearances, and other things gay-minded people focus on.
>>155117582Loonatics was fine. I loved the idea of Yosemite Sam being a space bounty hunter, and Coyote and Road Runner being best friends. It was a fun take on Looney Tunes as a sci-fi action show. People were just mad because they thought it was literally replacing the old Looney Tunes, that they had likely not watched since they were a child, anyway.This was probably one of the first major instances of adults being made aware of and getting irrationally mad at entertainment that wasn't intended for them in the first place.
>>155126132He was pretty annoying. The group dynamic also didn't benefit from his kind of character.
>>155126825>This was probably one of the first major instances of adults being made aware of and getting irrationally mad at entertainment that wasn't intended for them in the first place.You've clearly forgotten about the Barney backlash of the 90s, which was more prevalent, and even more well-known.https://youtube.com/watch?v=FY2kP-tOOXM
>>155126887>DIE YOU COMMIE FUCKER!
>>155126887People made fun of Barney because Barney was fucking dumb and suddenly he was everywhere. Parents with small children, caretakers, or schoolteachers were forced to be exposed to him. Barney was a cultural phenomenon in the same way Pokemon was, so obviously both had their fair share of haters. That's normal and always will be.Loonatics backlash was much weirder, and it started before the show even existed. Some concept materials trickled out, made the rounds on the irate manchild forums of the day, and enticed people to hate it wholesale, on principle, before there was a single episode in production. Nobody even remembers Loonatics outside of animation nerds, and largely they only remember it BECAUSE of the controversy.tl;dr: Barney was hated for being a cultural phenomenon that was kind of dumb. Loonatics was hated before it even existed because "NOT MUH". It's not really the same at all.
>>155124847I think it was just an easy scapegoat for how idiotic network execs had become after over a decade of making groundbreaking new animated TV. Obviously this wasn't THE TURNING POINT or anything, it just illustrates cluelessness.
>>155126240but this is just good, it's not disliked.I mean nobody watched it because it was on apple, but>>155126314you're right, it's dick-RIDING.
>>155127907No, Bob Clampett is just legitimately top tier at cartoons. Like Plato is at philosophy. He’s not like Alex Hirsch for whom all the power of his drawing style comes from being associated with a popular TV cartoon. People did try to ride the popularity of GF and almost all of them failed, even ones like Owl House. You need real skill for consistent results.
>>155128025you can still dick-ride someone who deserves it, anon
>>155113439>"Care to celebrate with some, shall we say, "politically correct sparkling fruit juice?"
>>155114537>Electric Soldier Porygon: American Edition
>>155117519Wild Thornberries is a show that feels like its hate gets exaggerated online. I remember people really liking it when it was airing. It wasn't super popular or anything but I don't remember there being a negative reception, and the people that watched it enjoyed it.
>>155120995
>>155117847Writing was feh (and I had my glut of slice-of-life kid shows)
>>155129322did they really say that? bonzer.I loved that bit in Over the Garden Wall "we're gonna go hang out in the graveyard and drink age-appropriate beverages"
>>155118203>a horror themed show about monstrous kidsWell, from Ms. Graves’ perspective, it’s exactly that. The reason the show itself isn’t that though is because the viewers are seeing it from the kids’ perspective.
>>155130343I think it started out a lot better. There was something to it, I mean, this girl's realistically flawed, her life does kinda suck, you feel for her. Having to borrow her brother's underwear and then bad-lucking into showing them.. that was the kind of stuff most cartoons didn't do much of, really getting that FEEL of an imperfect childhood. Buuut yeah the writing quickly became fluffy bullshit right out of a kids' book. it still had the odd interesting bit other shows wouldn't do (backyard nudist teachers comes to mind) but
>>155118134>that one episode where a kid creates a scathing story about the principal (voiced by Squidward) being a organ butcher, only to not get sent to detention because he misspelled his name.
Great choice OP. Out of all of Disney's 80's-00's shows, it's easily the most rewatchable. Along with Winnie-the-Pooh, actually.Pic is the biggest one for me though. Cans without Labels as well.
>>155113347>it's constantly critiqued for the art style and the gross-out humorstrange how ed edd n eddy isntnostalgias a hellava drug
>>155131761It is though, mostly by people that haven't seen the show. The art style works great in motion. I knew kids that refused to watch it based on the promo images alone.
>>155113132it was OKAYjust O.K.
>>155117582Anyone who likes this slop deserves all the smoke.CLERKS on the other hand was a tragedy of network faggotry.
>>155131787>>155131761Edds is a really gross show in a variety of ways, but it's offbeat and silly and I get why people like it. I just don't.if there had been 20 shows with this same art style, people would have whined. and if Rugrats had been a one-off, nobody would have said anything
There was lots of dumb shit and deadshot Eminem was overpowered, but i liked it. I liked how it was inspired by his brother being a douche when they were kids.>why aren't there superheroes?>the villains teamed up and killed them
>>155131831>is it safe?
I really liked Mega Man Fully Charged and i don't understand why the fans are mad that a children's media franchise is trying to appeal to children.
>>155132442trying to appeal to children is retardedappeal to mature adults, kids will follow.
>>155116935>Dorkster, The Pumpkin Heads and The DucksI have no idea what any of those are
>>155132442Only things I remember was he and his sister were not Rock and Roll and that disappointed me. That and the weird mini-Mega Man that was in his head for seemingly no reason.
>>155120995So? it's a cartoon tourist.
>>155131761>ed edd n eddy>gross-out
>>155132442I only know about this show because one episode had a good hook for weight gain but did nothing with it.
>>155116935I remember this actually being on air and not being able to get into it.
I know it was just Who Framed Roger Rabbit with the serial numbers filed off, and the alcoholism removed, but I enjoy it. At least the Lucky episodes. Once Miranda shows up, the humor gets sucked right out of it.
>>155132723it's a subtler gross. it's a smelly show. you can practically taste their gross, sweaty, caucasian fat rolls. it's shoved in your face. Very much indicative of that kind of childhood
>>155132840the problem is, there was only one way to do this>have a wacky studio draw the toon characters, while the cinematic unit draws the realistic human characters so there's a contrastand they didn't do it.
>>155132863But there was a contrast. Bonkers and the other toons would squash and stretch in ways the human characters didn't. They would often imitate the more reserved movements of the human characters, but would still randomly do things humans can't do.
>>155132953disagree
>>155132963You came to a "Fuck you I liked it" thread to argue why people's opinions are wrong? Can't you go suck dicks somewhere else?
>>155133085no, I disagree that they drew them in different art styles.Clearly the same studio drew them both, in the exact same style.
>>155118282>I’m sorry we couldn’t save your family
>>155131878What?
>>155113347>making animators draw extra unnecessary lines that aren't aesthetically appealing and don't convey any specific motion Nah this style is shit.
>>155114685The theme song slaps i cant lie
>>155133553Kek, I get that reference
>>155131375>did they really say that?Yep https://youtu.be/9ffLvS6CVRs?si=drIYZ_dzJ-YMDx-G&t=660
>>155126314>What is “better” about Tom and Jerry?On a technical level, it's amazing. Some of the best cartoon animation with fantastic shape control, line of actions, great usage of timing and space, just a general strong understanding of all the principles. Humor-wise, it is far more timeless than many Looney Tunes shorts and very consistent. There are MANY LT shorts that are outright duds, especially during the black/white era. T&J had like, 15 years of nothing but bangers. It's the best performance of slapstick humor you can find.
>>155117582I remember seeing this when it was new and on the front page of Newgrounds. I remember it vividly. Holy fuck, how long have I been using the internet?
>>155134284that's hilariousit's kind of a misnomer since political correctness isn't the type of censorship on display here, but still
>>155113132>earnest>didn't oversteps it's boundaries and becomes something entirely different>appeals to 2000's kid sensibilities much like Regular Show did to 80's kids>wore its references and influences on it's sleeve but never becoming solely about them>K.O. wants to help everyone and isn't obnoxious like Steven Universe>underrated soundtrack>Shannon is best girl
>>155133197NTA but the Miranda episodes absolutely did fuck all at expressing contrast with between humans and toons. But the Lucky episodes were mostly handled by Disney Australia who understood the assignment much better.In the Lucky... arc(?) humans were drably colored with grounded pallets so as not to fight your for you attention against anything else on screen. They were exaggerated in design to an extent, but mostly seemed to follow a set of limitations to keep them "human-coded" for lack of a better term. A lot of the backgrounds had a dirty and textured feel to give them a sense of tangibility that made sense for their human characters to occupy. They'd usually be either darkly lit or a bit too washed out. On the other hand, the toons were colored loudly and obnoxiously in so they'd always be the most eye-catching element in the shot. They would come in a far greater variety of shapes, sizes, species, object, etc. You can even see in the screenshot how Lucky's details almost become a little lost against his office background, but Bonkers just pops right out.So, yes, there was a very conscious effort to create a contrast between toons and humans. How strictly it was adhered to and how effective it was would vary from episode to episode, but it was definitely there.
>>155134464it got too kiddy at parts, and I missed Stephanieplus it went woke at the end. I only say this because I wanted SO badly to go all in on this show, letting it fill the Adventure Time void.>>155134697ohhh that's a good point. though it is still weird since the thing that made Roger Rabbit stand out so much is that the toons were colored with 'real life' lighting, making them look more drab and realin any case, I wasn't saying they didn't try. I was saying they failed.
>>155134721>plus it went woke at the end.I don't get how these guys are inspired by what they grew up with but are still keen on putting pointless crap that wouldn't be in any of the media they liked.
>>155134404YOUR OLD
>>155134892hollywood does that. that's why no show STARTS that way. They start out normal, they had webcomics, some of them even posted here... but just like when your wife leads you to eat the fruit of knowledge or worship Baal, no man is completely immune to influence.
>>155126887>Getting Big Bird to fight Barney.You see, this is the sort of stuff I like; fun visceral high-energy hating rather than just making 30 minute pseudo-essays on Youtube or hot takes on Twitter.
>>155113132It may not be prime Hanna-Barbera/Quimby years, but I'll gladly take it over the Deitch and Filmation years, that's for sure
>>155118282This was better than it had any right to be. KC did not skimp on talent with the voice acting
>>155134464Cosma is one of the best and sexiest animated villains ever
This show got a cult following after the fact but I liked this as it was airing. It really hit its stride after the early season weirdness grilled cheese stuff which I think was probably more a result of executive meddling more than what they actually wanted to make. I like Sonic Boom for much the same reason, both shows give me the vibe that the writers kind of got to do whatever the fuck they wanted after the initial restrictions were lifted.
>>155134697I would totally fuck bonkers up the ass
>>155136674I would totally fuck lola up the ass
>>155137314
>>155137314Huey got the yellow fever
>>155118134>>155118322People hate these?
>>155133553The funniest part is that the anon kept doing it months after the episode was found.
>>155133553
>>155117847Same
>>155134404>WHAT’S UP MOTHERFUCKERS, I’M BUZZED FUCKING BUNNY, BITCHES!!!
>>155117582Came here to post this
>>155140318The fact they were forced to change Buzzed Bunny’s name to Ace Bunny because of a sex toy is so fucking funny.
>>155139227And that there is how you can (Not) find lost media.
>>155132442I actually really liked Hypno Woman. Fun concept, and actually a really great idea for an extremely mundane robot master getting twisted into a serious threat.>I'm a therapy robot.>People and robots are unhappy.>I have hypnosis as an approved tool for therapy.>This patient isn't responding to any of my techniques.>I can hypnotize them and force them to be happy.>...Wait.>I can force EVERYONE to be happy.
Pretty much everyone who watched it said it was great, it just never broke into the mainstream the way I'm sure Disney hoped. They talked about potentially making it MCU canon and I think that actually hurt it more than anything since they were restricted in what they could use.Glad the characters still show up in stuff and have kept their show VAs, though.
>>155130368>slow, calm movements>first scene of her talent coming out is during a thrashing tantrum
>>155136193I think this is by far their best era, and I'm not a fan
>>155137521and she loves his long duck dong
>>155140713surely it'd be because 'buzzed' means slightly drunk
>>155141768I think that's the point of this panel, anon.korra's weird because she's a firebender at heart, which should have been the hardest element for her. instead she had trouble with air, and presumably, early on, had trouble with water.
>>155117847>ugly art>bad animation>grating voice acting>unlikable main character>mean-spirited, unpleasant writingIt's like a cartoon from the modern day time traveled to be released in the last.
>>155126887>>155127109Barney was so god awful it inspired a paralyzed man to regain control over his body so he wouldn't have to watch Barney any more.
>>155142056all I'm reading is it's not the generic slop you craved
>>155113347This show ragebaited so many kids. The plot alone is basically “how can we make a show that has the most annoying type of episode resolutions”
