[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Iconic Looney Tunes Character
>Hasn't been used in ANYTHING in over 20 years.
Why does WB refuse to do anything with Martian Queen? Lola Bunny somehow gets used every half decade in stuff but NOT Queen Tyr'ahnee?
>>
she's only iconic to cartoon fans
the type of normie who buys tweety bird merch or wears gangsta looney tunes shirts don't know about her, which is unfortunate because her design would be amazing on gangsta shirts wearing crop tops and apple bottom jeans
>>
The age of expecting big name studios to give a shit about your IP is over.

The time of the fanwork you must commit to, if you seriously want to see your favorite characters appear once more, like you did back then, has come..
>>
Was Commander Worf more present than Marvin in the cartoon?
I remember some of the jokes being funny but the series mostly being references, both to long dead fiction/genres and to (outdated) current-thing adult trends like liposuction. Oh and that women were sexy and animators could draw curves rather than ugly lines like the animaniacs revival had in lieu of an art style.
>>
>>155578673
because she only works as a Duck Dodgers character
>>
>>155579306
I think she could work in Marvin the Martian shorts as the character that motivates Marvin to try to claim Earth in the name of Mars.
>>
>>155578673
Exactly as it should be. Unique characters should remain unique. To do otherwise is to invite just the sort of endless creatively bankrupt rehashing we see elsewhere to no good end.
>>
>>155578673
She has an attractively shaped body and doesn’t explicitly hate men so western media doesn’t do that anymore
>>
>>155579371
>Marvin the Martian shorts
The Bugs Bunny shorts?
>>
>>155580088
No, I mean hypothetical standalone Marvin shorts.
Imagine a set up where Tyr'ahnee sends Marvin to conquer a planet just to get rid of him, thinking he'll fail. Then the rest of the short is Marvin failing over and over but never giving up. The short ends with Marvin succeeding somehow and something that happened earlier comes back to bite Tyr'ahnee in the ass, figuratively or literally.
Marvin has a lot of potential to be the underdog for once especially since he's a very popular character that people love despite his actions.
>>
No way they're bringing back such a sexually charged design. Did the cartoon age well though?
>>
File: 1000000066.jpg (56 KB, 408x286)
56 KB JPG
>>155579066
Hmmmmm.
>>
>>155580236
Not OP but I rewatched Duck Dodgers recently and it absolutely holds up. Genuinely fantastic cartoon and still underrated imo. Some of the episodes can be hit or miss but the hits are really hits
>>
>>155578673
They're dumb
>>
>>155578673
I mean what do you even reuse her in? Getting a Looney Tunes project greenlit is hard enough, much less a thrice removed Daffy Duck character from Mars.
>>
>>155580236
Its written by Paul Dini
What do you think?
>>
>>155580641
I didn't like Tiny Toons.
>>
>>155579371
Marvin the Martian is self-motivated in most shorts. The Earth gets in the way of his view of Venus, etc.
He's only "the Martian Commander" in Duck Dodgers.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.