Idk about you guys, but I'm pretty excited for this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-3fv8Sv8Gs
>>155593836why?
i hope it makes you happy.
just reminds me that groening was on the epstein light logs
>>155593836Eat shit paid shillOh wait you already do this
>>155593973yeah like 60 years ago he made it, was he even involved in the mid 90s(on the simpsons show) when the epstein island was booming?
>>155593836Hearing an aged Julie Kavner try to voice Marge in surround sound seems like a distressing feature length experience.
>>155594058These rich voice actors are ruining their own characters by refusing to step down and pass down their roles to AI
>>155594058Notice how the clip they shared conveniently left out Marge
>>155593847They think The Simpsons doesn't need actual stories and we'll just tolerate a compilation of farmed clips
>>155593836are they trying to kill Julie Kavner!?
>>155593847Personally I'm just fascinated by what DISNEY'S attempt at a Simpsons Movie will be like, especially so many years after the first go at it. Will they actually lock in and deliver something special, or will they just settle for something serviceable that's no different than a 90-minute NuSimps episode?
>>155593836horrible, horrible title
>>155597287>Implying she isn't being Weekend at Bernied as we speak
>>155598052lol damn
>>155593836Looks to be a perfectly cromulent feature film.
>>155594058LA LA LA
Marge doesn't even sound that bad, calm down you assholes
>>155597625I remember feeling this way about seeing what a Disney-led Ice Age theatrical movie would be like. Maybe they'd reinvigorate the characters, maybe the humans would come back but it could be cool or something.And then their first theatrical film is a low budget ugly rendered return to dinosaur world with a giant dinosaur scrat (alongside already keeping baby scrat.)Don't bother with hopes.
>>155601574Grim...
Do we know who's writing/directing?
>>155602862I can't imagine Silverman will want to take up that responsibility all over again
>>155602862Groening will write, direct, and storyboard the entire thing himself
>>155593836I'm morbidly curious, but I wouldn't say I'm excited. Though, the title being "The New Simpsons Movie" feels intentionally creatively bankrupt and I feel like that's gonna be a large part of the marketing/jokes within the movie and I don't like that. I imagine it being like that one scene in the first movie except worse https://youtu.be/cn3hMIJfWTg?is=Ehg-wRYc4tnnaP_O>>155594058Like I wonder what they're gonna do about this. Are they gonna pretend like it isn't happening (like the series is currently), try to AI upscale her voice? Replace her entirely? I don't see any scenario being a pleasant experience and that's funny to me.
>>155603982Well he does put his signature on everything, that's how you know he's a hard worker.
>>155601428Sure thing, Kavner.
>>155603982That's very generous of him :)
>fake ass overly detailed animatic that was clearly manufactured for this
>>155604863Pretty ballsy move to have an animatic clip be the first video footage released for a theatrical film. I would've opted to prepare a specially animated promo clip like they did back in '06: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOsqz9-FXW0 but I appreciate the extra polishing they did for this occasion, even if it is ultimately wasted effort. Also has me worried that they won't wrap up with the final edit until the literal last second at this rate.
>>155593847Disney needs to justify spending $66 billion buying FOX
>>155602862Matt Selman or some nu-writer probably
They will definitely bring Spider-Pig back or a similar substitute
>>155605199>This made Gen Xers piss themselves in laughter
>>155606321It was either that or yellow weiner
>>155604089Their marketing is already entirely based around the Homer sinks into the bushes meme. Look at the OP video, not only did the Disney expo have a selfie room where you can take pictures sinking into the bush with Homer, it's part of how they wanted to display the new movie's logo even.
>>155606321I meanif I'd seen it in the movie, instead of 9000 times in the trailer, I would have laughed too
>>155604089All they need to do, and I can't believe I have to keep explaining this, let alone that Fox hasn't figured it out yet,is to let her do the same voice in a lower register, then pitch it up. That's her only issue, she can't hit those high notes anymore. Just like Lucille Ball couldn't. If you took "Lucy Carmichael" and pitched her up, she'd sound like "Lucy Ricardo" y'dig? it just uncigarettes you
>>155606621Ah, the Pickle Rick dilemma
They should get a celebrity cast to voice the Simpsons. Get The Rock to play Homer J Simpson
>>155606474hm.
>>155593836What will the title of the 3rd movie be?
>>155607492>3rd movie Let's wait until Family Guy at least gets ONE real movie
