>Insider Daniel Richtman revealed that the plot will revolve around a space-time wormhole that mysteriously opens in Springfield, bringing the Simpsons family from 20 years in the future back to the present. The Simpsons must fight these older versions of themselves while getting a glimpse into their dark future. Richtman also added that ‘The New Simpsons Movie’ is a placeholder title and other options are being considering, including ‘The Simpsons VS. The Future’.https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/movies/articles/simpsons-movie-2-rumor-may-161159099.html
>>155675908
>>155675908What?
>>155675908Fanfiction ass plot
>>155675908So it's NOT about Bart Simpson becoming the richest person in Springfield? D23 blueballed us yet again.
>>155675908Spoiler warning please.
>>155675908Seeing the future versions of the Simpsons loses its fun when you consider that we’ve already seen future Simpsons multiple timeshttps://simpsons.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Episodes_set_in_the_future
>>155675995Nope, it’s “Lisa Is Successful In The Future And Her Family Sucks And Was Always Holding Her Back: The Motion Picture”!
>>155675908That's the only plot they could come up with for a second Simpsons movie?Fucking hell, even Frank Grimes getting resurrected would have been a better plot, and that would still fucking suck ass
>Marge>Your posture looks terrible
>>155675908I originally misread it and thought it was about the Simpsons from twenty years ago meeting the Simpsons from the present, which would be interesting.Like you could have Apu appear again because "it was a different time."
>>155675908If Fox was smart they’d use this opportunity to make this the series finale, but no, instead we’re stuck with Homer doomed to be a zoomer one day while Julie Kavners voice continues to deteriorate.
>>155676103>they travel back to the events of The Boys of Bummer when Bart’s on the water tower>Future Bart says “Don’t let go! You have 20 more years of adventures to live for!”>Past Bart lets go and falls to the ground head first
>>155675908So it's just a meta based plot of how long the show's been around?
>future Simpsons appear>they look exactly the same
>>155676212Probably. Bart should be 46 by now.
>>155676187No because the show is nearly 40 years old
>>155676227No. You’re wrong! You’re fucking wrong! There’s no way!He’d actually be 47. 49 counting the Tracey Ullman shorts.
>>155675908Some non-canon sounding thing is exactly what this movie doesn't need. It needed something to make you care about the characters for an hour and a half to trick you into being nostalgic for them and thinking they're still good. Not some shit that feels completely non-canon like they're sitting on the couch telling scary stories on halloween.Why would you do that? Do writers know how people connect or disconnect with the characters in a given story based on this sort of thing?
>>155676256Anon, most Simpsons episodes are non-canon
>>15567624846 or 47, does he have a known birthday?
>>155676103Nope for some reason it's some random made up future versions of the characters instead of versions you'd know or care about. Though I'm sure some montage through old episodes or shit would happen so people could say "this movie was bad but they were a real one for this" when ratboy bart floats past the screen or they have the whole town apologize for the watertower incident juel loak eoa some other third thing.
>>155675908They should make Future Marge a mute.
>>155676318It’s always been in April. Some old book claims he was born on April 1st, but Homer says in the show that Bart has the same birthday as Hitler, which would be the 20th.
>>155676319>juel loak eoaYeah, you said it Barney.
wouldn't it be more interesting if they opened a portal to 1990?
>>155676517Only if they could make the animation and art style accurate to a 1990 episode.
>>155676157I'm honestly surprised some creepypasta writer didn't rehash Squidward's Suicide and Dead Bart by using The Boys of Bummer
>>155676011We've already seen future Simpsons episodes so many times. It's not something I'd pay money for to watch in a theater. I did like Jenda, she's the most interesting part of the future Simpsons episodes. There was also a Futurama episode in the Simpsons where the Futurama characters traveled back in time, it wasn't very good.
>>155676782They can’t. It looks like 2000 at the earliest.
>>155675908I'd infinitely prefer a story with a new corporation/capitalist taking over Springfield and Mr. Burns being an ally as a commentary on Nu-America being a shithole and nu-capitalism being a nightmare compared to back then. I'd even stomach some groan worthy capitalism jokes than this shit.
>>155676319>juel loak eoaI heard it was still vibrant on the yaefh feshe man telodwww
>>155675995I assume that’s probably what kickstarts the plot. Bart does some wild shit with the money that indirectly leads to the “dark future” they’re hinting at
>the Simpsons get to meet their future selvesthis means we might actually get to see Homer creampie his own butthole
Nu-Simpsons writers do realize that the show is supposed to be relatively grounded and isn't a sci-fi/fantasy show like it is in every Halloween episode, right?
>>155677817Bitch anon, they’ve done normal to death. Every possible normal scenario has already been used on the show.
>>155677817>He thinks The Simpsons didn't stop being grounded around Season 3
>>155677817This is somehow worse than the custody battle plot someone posted about months ago with Sideshow Bob and Maggie.
>>155677314>I'd infinitely prefer a story with a new corporation/capitalist taking over Springfield and Mr. Burns being an ally as a commentary on Nu-America being a shithole and nu-capitalism being a nightmare compared to back thennot a bad pitch...
>>155675908>Richtman also added that ‘The New Simpsons Movie’ is a placeholder title and other options are being considered, including ‘The Simpsons VS. The Future’.How about >THE SIMPSONS MOVIE: WORST. FUTURE. EVER.Very meta, no?
>>155675908Duuuuh, stay outta Springfield!
>>155678246>WORST. FUTURE. EVER.That'd definitely be the tagline. Mixed back and forth with "Worst. Sequel. Ever" to be in on the joke by self-deprication.
>>155679194I dunno if Disney would let them do something fun like that
>>155675908>"Well, at least one thing about the Simpsons hasn't changed in 20 years.">"What's that?">"It's still not funny!">"DOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO"
>>155679400It will be if Disney wants to get ahead of the bad reception once marketing starts by feigning self-awareness and self deprication. They sure didn't seem to mind shitting on a lot of Disney stuff including the actor for Peter Pan in the Chip and da Dale Movie.
>>155677536>Bart getting successful somehow creates the bad future >the way to fix the future is by ruining Bart's chances of success>this creates a good future where Bart is stuck being a lazy deadbeatI swear to God if this happens I will burn down the studio
It it that that plot for that The Mitchells sequel
>>155679594Barts future is to be a supreme Court justice
>>155679594They hate little Cis white straight boys. Liberal ass writers.
>>155676517Wouldn't it be more interesting if The Simpsons finally put up its jersey and ended the series for REAL with this movie? It's OKAY, guys. You were already the first to hit all those scripted-TV milestones. You don't need to keep trying to compete against the South Parks and the Familyguys for "longest-running cartoon ever." Those shows were started by people when they were much younger and thus have at least another 30 years left in 'em, unlike all you sexagenarians who keep repeating episode plots and titles referencing the same Old Hollywood movie for the fiftieth time.
>>155675908>Insider [literal who] I sleep
>>155675908>Sci-Fi Simpsons I fucking KNEW making a second movie would be a mistake. This sounds way too high-concept, like a Treehouse of Horror skit.
>>155675908I remember this movie was meant to be called "Bart vs the world" or something like that, or was that cancelled?
>>155681459I'm getting Recess/Hey Arnold Movie vibes..
>>155679482>They sure didn't seem to mind shitting on a lot of Disney stuff including the actor for Peter Pan in the Chip and da Dale Movie.The higher ups likely didn't even know about it before it came out and people made the connectionThey also don't outright own Peter Pan
>>155675908WHY DON'T THEY LET IT FUCKING DIE ALREADY?DON'T THEY LET IT FUCKING DIEALREADY?
>>155676364Future Homer should speak in gen alpha slang.
>>155675908Red Dwarf did it.
>>155681459>>155681556What's the wildest contraption Frink's ever built? Or the most pollution the power plant's ever wrought upon Springfield?
>>155676138In regards to Marges voice I really think Fox is gonna do something about it, my off the wall theory is that at the climax of the movie Marge is gonna suffer some neck or throat injury in where she'll need drastic surgery and that's when her VA will be permanently changed, of course then everyone will treat it as it's always been that way in about two or three episodes.
>>155682263Fun in theory, but that wouldn't hit as hard in the many many dubs this new film will get. I doubt any of the foreign Marge actresses struggle with portraying the character like Kavner audibly does. If--and I emphasize, IF--they ever recast one of the lead characters, it likely won't be acknowledged in-show at all, like with Prince and Milhouse.
>>155675908The only way to sell a Simpsons movie is as the "series" finale.
>>155680393>the good future is where Bart actually does become a member of SCOTUSOkay, that would actually be based
>>155675908>>Insider Daniel Richtman DanielRPK is not a credible source, shill his "scoops" via Patreon, and steals from other insiders the chance he gets something right out of nowhere.How many times do we have to tell you this? Is /co/ more gullible than /v/eddit?
>Daniel "Zelda will be played by a trans actor" Richtman
>>155684336He was right
>>155675908>The Simpsons must fight these older versions of themselves...why?Reminds me Rick and Morty on how fights to the death happen for no reason at all even between family members
>>155675908They should just rehash the plot from the first movie and pretend it’s commentary on legacy sequels.
>>155684486They should release one of the alternate cuts shown to test audiences 20 years ago and call that the new movie.
FAMILYMEET ME ATTHE KITCHEN CUBE
There is no fucking way that's true. No fucking way. Simpsons isn't Futurama. I know they've fallen hard but there's no way they would fuck up like this
>>155684398
>>155681508You must be thinking of the '90s game
>>155675908>from 20 years in the future back to the present.>The Simpsons must fight these older versions of themselvesWhich is it, a portal to the future or the past? And do the shitty games suck ass?
>>155676138>phone light>millennialThat's at most zillennial but comfortably zoomer.I genuinely think they skipped millennials like everyone else did as there's nothing that generation is known for other than thing boomer hates.
https://youtu.be/y5R2LyyLSVo
>>155675908PLEASE say sike
>>155684282>Still... love you... Homar!
>>155675908I'll believe it when I hear it from a reliable source.
