gunn got fired from the two comic book companies lol

If MoT flops, then the DCU's kill. Clean slate after.

making a thread that's just an article link should be an instaban

>>156245017
pretty sure theres like 2 other threads aswell.

>>156245017
kill yourself wannabe janny

>>156245033
you first, shill

Isn’t Gunn staying on in a creative capacity? It doesn’t seem like he’s leaving entirely.

>>156245013
The DCU isn't over. Corenswet stays as Superman.
Gunn still has creative oversight on finishing MoT but may or may not have a say in the final cut depending on specific contracts.
They aren't intending to start again from scratch (again).

I still don’t know why people dislike Jeremy Latcham. They’re acting like he’s an ultra right wing Christian nationalist when most of the interviews I have seen from this dude is just him talking about super hero movies he produced and family friendly films. He said they he wants to make all types of movies but he just perfers family friendly ones

>>156245107
that's the pr statement to try and stem the tide of shooting man of tomorrow in the foot just like they did for the last 4-5 DCEU movies by announcing Gunn's takeover
it's very likely gunn will leave after marvel of tomorrow

>>156245124
Liberals unironically cannot entertain the idea of consuming media made by people that don't share their group think

>>156245107
Gunn and Safran are staying as creative leads now, which means they will be vetoed by anything that isn't guaranteed to make money and any project that isn't currently in production will be shelved indefinitely.

File: 1783863245619384.png (128 KB, 384x380)

128 KB PNG

>>156244728

>>156245124
That and he’s worked with Gunn before at Marvel and seems friendly with him. And he’s not like Gunn isn’t good friends with Christians like Zachary Levi and Chris Pratt. He’s always been loyal to his friends, even if they think differently than him. I like Gunn but I’m giving this guy a fair shot.

>>156245139
What do you expect happens if they don’t leave after MoT?

>>156244728
So can he finally admit that whashername will be Wonder Woman in the final Superman film?

>>156245201
I legitimately don't know. How do you get fired as creative lead of the whole franchise but go on to direct Justice League or Batman? I don't know what the proper use of a punished Gunn would be outside of giving Superman a full trilogy.

>>156245230
I think he still stays on, finishes a third Superman movie, and works on projects for some obscure characters for HBOMax or whatever the combined streaming service is. Maybe he has a hand in some of the more horror adjacent characters. I’d still want him on the team if I’m Skydance.

File: 1759271010903367.jpg (427 KB, 1800x1200)

427 KB JPG

KWAB

>>156245207
It was confirmed by some faggot reporter that Adria Arjona is playing WW.

File: 1779752247985286.png (1.8 MB, 1280x720)

1.8 MB PNG

>>156245124
because it's a huge red flag and bad actors have poisoned the well.
I can't remember anything christian about phase one but if his granny was ok with the sex scenes then she proly wouldn't care for the gay agenda.

Prediction: Geoff Johns will return to DC Studios in some capacity within the next two years. I’m giving this prediction a time frame so that if it doesn’t happen then I’ll clearly be shown to be wrong and I can’t make any excuses for it. But I feel it’s going to happen, even though I have no knowledge or evidence of it.

>>156245326
I watched Iron Man with my mom on the movie theather and liked the movie. She is a hardcore christian and she didn't felt uncomfortable at any moment while watching the movie with me.

File: 1781224897278220.png (427 KB, 736x736)

427 KB PNG

DCU will still remain unwatchable for the couple of years until the gunn stink dissipates.

I still believe the gunnverse as it is (3 movies and whatever slop was made for streaming) is confirmed dead, just like gunn said, there's no canon that matters so a reboot is extremely possible.

>>156245416
>owl house pic
tell me you are gay without telling me you are gay

>>156245422
I am gay and hate the dcu
the latina should have nothing to do with it.

>>156245429
thanks for confirming you are a worthless faggot

I really liked Superman except for that “my birth partners see evil!” shit, so I hope they find a way to change that. I get why it was done narratively, so don’t bother pointing that out, but the idea was still bad. Luckily, everything else in the movie was good to great. And I’m glad we’re getting Brainiac—finally.

>"I'm sick sick to death of irreverent Marvel quippy capeshit, can you make some sincere heartfelt superhero stories that don't lampoon the genre?"
>"Trust me sir it's very sincere and heartfelt, classic superman"
>watch the movie
>it's irreverent quipshit

>>156245194
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC_18GIPlIg

>>156245111
Yeah they can't afford another reboot, the best move is hoping this new guy can sort out Gunn's mess

>>156245850
Just make Supergirl, Clayface and Creature Commandos not canon. Also, recast Supergirl.

>>156245980
Milly Alcock career is dead, isn't it?

>>156245362
And they blow up lots of muslims in the film too

>>156246002
She looked like that without makeup, at that age. It is.

>>156246136
It was a different time anon

>>156244728
I don't understand...Angryjoe ASSURED me that all of the James Gunn era DCU projects were massively successful...

>>156246136
There is an explicit line in the movie stating that the fundamentalist sectarian terrorist organisation is multicultural

>>156245416
A reboot after 2 movies would be extremely retarded

File: IMG_0924.jpg (137 KB, 1170x821)

137 KB JPG

>>156245980
Why would you erase Clayface. It’s damn near universally liked

>>156246286
What does the DCU’s success have to do with promoting chudism (Israel), goy?

>>156246656
cuz it's a huge flop for something batman related.

>>156246656
1. It's mid as fuck
2. It's completely standalone so you never have to ask the question of why Batman didn't go after this guy

>>156246685
if that a flop then batman v superman is a hydrogen bomb level of failure lmao

>>156246656
>damn near universally liked
Please go back to shitter, we don’t glaze Gunn here.

>>156245124
It’s because Ellisons are zionists, so them putting a vocal Christian in charge of the movies sounds like they’re replacing Gunn and Sefran with someone more ideologically aligned to them that then allows them more easily push things to their agenda.

>>156244728
Ten-year tenure that didn't just last a year

>>156246832
We really shouldn’t let Zionists own companies. Or anyone representing the interests of a foreign nation.

File: IMG_1611.jpg (33 KB, 461x433)

33 KB JPG

>>156245017
>making a thread that's just an article link should be an instaban

>>156246685
has made 109mil on 40mil budget so far, how's thta a flop

>>156245326
>Sex scenes
Lol, lmao

>>156246832
Noone is believing gunn is less Zionist aligned than the new guy

File: 1790665179382344.jpg (158 KB, 667x542)

158 KB JPG

>>156244728
Real talk—what are the odds of DC actually turning things around after this shake up?

>>156245326
There were no sex scenes in Iron Man.

>>156246787
Glaze these nuts faggot

>>156246706
Your opinion is quite literally in the minority

>>156245111
Cornsweet is a terrible superman. Jews aren't ubermench

>>156248801
Retard

>>156248891
Cope harder, Gunnjeet

>>156248271
Why would it happen now when utter clows like the Ellison failson is in charge?

>>156245013
this soon? no, they eill fasttrack a batman flick and if THAT flops yeah full reboot