This site is so much slower now without all the bots, but feels so much better telling you faggots to fuck off without it being drown out by drones with (you)s as a shield for any actual discussion or criticism. Do not open this file if you value your privacy.
>>156247032ewwwwwwwwww
Who put shit in that man's pants, OP?
love you too OP no homo
>>156247937(You) didWhy did you open the image? Monster
>>156247032Hack me please
>>156247032man I've seen this exact same gag but it was in a hungarian porn comic from 1998. same exact paneling and layout even, and similar art style too.I should see if I can find those online somewhere.
>>156247032what makes you think there aren’t any bots browsing this place anymore?
>OP blatantly says he put steganographic malware in the image>(You) click it anyway
>>156249141actually with the number of phonefags on here these days I'm not sure how many would run the script like that
>>156249141>OP blatantly says he put steganographic malware in the imageis it really? it's like 78kb
>>156249882steganographic is typically pretty small.Not /g/ but especially if its just an infograbber like OP said
>>156250000but does it even work these days, since 4chan no longer presents the original file when you open a picture?Using a noncompromised image as the example, going to >https://i.4cdn.org/co/1794277163567493.pngreturns a slightly compressed version of>https://i.4cdn.org/co/1794277163567493.png?xwhich is the original file. I know that this percent of a percent of file compression changes the MD5 (which makes looking for anything on desuarchive hell, but I digress), so shouldn't it disrupt other data embedded in the image?
>>156250221Shit, if that's the case and desu doesn't spoiler the image, wouldn't that mean anyone who scrolls past the thing on desu is kinda fucked
>>156250274well desu still uses thumbnails even if it doesn't put real spoilers over spoilered pics, so they're fine (assuming it's an actual steganograph)
>>156250221That's just the Cloudflare image recompression. It was added because Leto kept coming up with new ways to embed CP into files. At one point he had the file name turn into an encrypted link to a catbox image with CP in it. Before that he also tried embedded metadata, when 4chan filtered that out (the site runs jpegtran to remove all embedded info and runs the png equivalent that strips all non-image chunks) he tried steganography and the site enabled cloudflare recompression. Then he tried filenames.It's the reason we have asinine captchas and waiting 60 seconds before posting or 300 before making threads.
>>156250389So then it's confirmed that steganography doesn't work unless you open the non-compressed version? I never heard of this Leto guy, but that pisses me off if he's really the reason behind the captcha timers. Like I don't mind that the new captcha puzzles are "find the odd one out", what really upsets me is having to click "Get Captcha" and THEN the Cloudflare turnstile, or when I've finished the captcha but forget to hit "Done" so it fails to post and I've gotta wait for the timer to reset, or when a captcha expires while I'm typing.
This thread has been here all day. Do even the mods not use the catalog?
>>156250586There's nothing in the report menu that can be used on it either, aside from off-topic I guess.
>>156250541>I never heard of this Leto guy,He's a pedophile furry autist from texas, his real name is David Hoffman. His favourite past time was spamming 4chan endlessly and creating ways of embedding CP and bypassing the captchas (even making an entire 4chan frontend site), which resulted in all the anti-poster methods we got the past five years, which resulted in over half the posters leaving the site and apps breaking left and right. So indirectly, he killed 4chan.Kiwi farms has a long-ass thread about it, including the 50+ changes added just to block him. I can't link it here because the url autobans you. Lately he's been running twitter bypass sites (he made his own nitter fork).
>>156250762I don't give a fuck what the cunts on kiwifarms are doing, but can you tell me which nitter instance is his so I can avoid it?
>>156250758To be honest this thread is more /co/ related than many others. At least OP post has a comic image, and it hasn't degenerated to death battle kekkerino spam like that last Swat Kats thread.Posting comics to stay on topic. Who do you think would win in an arm wrestling match between Thor, Hercules, Juggernaut, and Hulk?
>>156250762If someone gets rangeblocked randomly, is it possibly due to Leto using their IP as a proxy or spoofing it to avoid a ban?
>>156247032>without all the bots>without it being drown out by droneskek, have you seen the latest live action threads?
>>156247032>without all the botsOh anon you poor, gullible idiot.
>>156252455No, rangeblocks are based on your browser profile. The site calculates a threat score based on how many posts you made, what browser you use, what country you come from, if there are any oddities in the user agent/resolution you use, if you use incognito mode, etc.Except the code is retarded so if you use Firefox normally, it automatically defaults to a higher score. And when the site calculates a high threat score, it will roll a 50% chance at blocking your IP after you make a post. When your IP is on the block list, the site gives the range block message.This is not IP range based, you can use a known trusted setup like Chrome under Win10 and get around it. The IP is also added/removed from the blocklist after every post, so if you get the error, you can post from Chrome once, it'll remove you from the blocklist, and you can post again from Firefox.
>>156252822>>156252455the tl;dr: is that there's no actual range blocking, the site just rolls mt_rand(0,1) (this is the actual code in the source) or a 50% chance at blocking you until you have made enough posts.It's basically a grift to get people to buy passes. Nothing more.
>>156249554Why would it not work for them? Also, what is it doing, exactly?>>156250389So does that mean just clicking on the spoilers image in this thread would actually not do anything, then?
>>156253764>So does that mean just clicking on the spoilers image in this thread would actually not do anything, then?Steganography is just putting hidden data/identification in the message, it will not do anything unless you knew what that info is and how to use it.
>>156254354>hidden datawhat, so there's no CVE in that JTHM comic that'll put a keylogger on my PC and steal my banking data?
>>156250805Juggernaut is more about punching than lifting
