[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: TJK.jpg (30 KB, 344x344)
30 KB JPG
For the past decade or so, there have been many negative threads about Tiny Toons saying "it was never good!" "it aged poorly" "it's terrible!". Yet, Tom & Jerry Kids, which debuted a week after, is a way worse cartoon and more creatively bankrupt than Tiny Toons, yet it gets zero mention here.

Does /co/ actually like this cartoon and defend it?
>>
>>156266924
Yes.
>>
>>156266924
Because Tiny Toons was actually popular and has a fanbase, nobody gives a shit about this show.
>>
>>156266924
People only hate what they remember, and nobody in their right mind remembers Tom and Jerry Kids.
>>
Most of the people who hate on Tiny Toons are Spumcofags. I don't think John K ever spoke ill of baby Tom and Jerry.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.