>>156288401
So cheesy.

>guy Gardner destroys IDF I mean the Boravian Defense Forces

>>156288401
The general idea is cool but the execution is straight ass

>>156288623

The Court is not made of pedophiles. They just run experiments on kids to create super Talons.

File: 1785334387151791.webm (3.84 MB, 1400x786)

3.84 MB WEBM

>>156288401
>wow, based anti-zionist, he sure pwned those jews by pushing their loxist propaganda!

>>156288623
Oh Now I remember that Ellison kid is son of Larry Ellison, a super ZOG owner of Oracle Corporation.

What you say makes sense.

>>156288579
Yeah even the most important part, the middle finger, just looks so bad. You can tell they were having trouble communicating it visually so they made the digit weirdly long so it's noticeable, but it looks awful

>>156288401
The middle finger made me "heh"

>>156288401
Something inherently unheroic about American heroes fighting for islam

>>156288401
I really liked seeing Guy in Superman, being a lovable prick.
Then he turned into just a prick in Lanterns.
And now we're not going to see him again.

>>156288795
Genocide?

>>156288836
Right but it's all an allegory for a real life islamic country. It's just not very inspiring

>>156288772
The oldest friend of the USA is Morocco which is Muslim

>>156288886
>Projection
Has nothing to do with wishing harm on others. It's just not heroic to see capes fighting for a country that has child brides and outlaws homosexuality

>>156288951
Right but as an adult I'm aware of which country and religion the movie is alluding to. Seeing American heroes stand for that type of stuff just isn't heroic to me

>>156288935
>child brides

Where do I sign.

>>156288990
Okay but Iran has killed and targeted kids too. I don't know why you're projecting onto me but I just think it's unheroic for capes to defend islamic countries

>>156289081
Never said it wasn't clear. I'm saying the use of analogues to real world countries makes the heroes actions less heroic when you watch it. You think I have an issue with the sides when really the movie just shouldn't have this plotline because it comes off as unheroic

>>156288665
There's that but there's also the very tepid impacts/crater eruptions that each construct creates when emerging, which I don't know if GL anons would even think is feasible since having light project underneath a surface isn't something I have seen before.
And the weightlessness of some of the bodies as well as Guy's uncanniness to his presence in the scene makes it look like he is laid over the background.
Finally I just think the constructs just look not good. Like I don't know how you would make it look good but for some reason it just looks off.

>All these deleted posts
Did a magatard crossboard into /co/ again?

Bad thread OP

>>156288772
Just a favour for NYC mayor

>>156288651
based
nazis are just the white version of jews anyway

>>156289255
t. star of david poster

File: 1794205279598044.png (2.05 MB, 1248x1824)

2.05 MB PNG

>>156289163
Sorry.
We don't like Miggers either.

>>156288401
>Gunn fans celebrate flipping off Mom and Dad executives like a completely literal adolescent
And they wonder why their favorite projects flounder.

>>156288401
good

Yeah sure its cause of one scene in a goyslop movie none of the suits watched and not the fact it and all the other dogshit made under Gunn flopped and shitted everywhere nor the fact they are a billion in debt and need to make money while catching wind of Gunn making a Gorilla Grodd musical or Polka Dot man origin story

>>156289952
>Lovecraft's cat's parents were nazis
makes sense

Open borders for Boravia.

>>156289995
Expenses of all Gunn DCU movies:
$430,000,000

Income of all Gunn DCU movies:
$857,000,000

Gunn made them approximately half a billion dollars in about 16 months. Only one movie didn't double its production budget.

This distinction is important, not because it secretly proves Gunn pwns or whatever. Rather, it points to one of two "real" reasons for his sacking:

a) they just didn't like him
b) their expectations for profit are wildly high

It's almost surely both, but we've seen a lot of proof that (b) is the biggest part

and that's really not good. how many movies make $500,000,000+ in net profits? Not many, and those that do are forced to kowtow to the enormous Asian market, often for the worse.

We've seen behavior like this in games. EA, Activision, Microsoft, and other big publishers set enormous, impossible-to-reach milestones and thus are "forced" to implement extremely shitty business decisions and consumer-hostile practices just to get close. That industry is in the process of imploding, because obviously it's not sustainable

as Skydance will soon see themselves

>>156290864
Thanks Anon, it's good to see numbers. Gonna save this for later.

>>156290864
It's amazing you typed all that when it's as simple as his movies not making any kids of profit or cultural impact

>>156290864
even simply when you realize where all the political money comes from to not make any mention about global conflicts the US is complicit in

File: duh-retard-alert.gif (48 KB, 492x342)

48 KB GIF

> Gunnfags still still think the decision to fire Gunn had to do with Isreal.
Gunn lost money for the Studio by betting on Supergirl and he is paying for the consequences of those actions. Firing Gunn was purely economical and only idiot Gunnfahs think Gunn was going to create a billion dollar franchise when he lost money for Marvel with Guardians 3 making less then Guardians 2. Gunn is a one trick pony that deserved to get fire.

>>156290864
600 mil of that came from his first film and every single movie sence then has TOTALED 200mil

File: Gunn fucked up badly.jpg (1.14 MB, 3264x1135)

1.14 MB JPG

>>156290864
> Only one movie didn't double its production budget.
Yes a movie that he was in charge of. Gunn's bad decision making lost the studios money. He wasn't forced to make Supergirl. It wasn't a mandate. All he had to do was make the next tentpole movie perform good but he failed and the Studios lost money. I don't understand why you guys are trying to downplay Supergirl flopping as

>>156289946
Please don't post your slop

>>156291063
The Incredible Hulk flopped too, and if Marvel had quit there they'd be fools.

>>156291123
It didn't flop nearly as bad Supergirl and iron man over performed. Not the same situation at all

>>156289274
>nazis are just the white version of jews anyway

,,,,theyre both white

>>156290960
>cultural impact

thats a ....weird thing to say

"cultural impact" is a meaningless unquantifiable metric that can be whatever you want it to be. "the movie failed because i said so."

>>156291331
How? It's the one other area besides financial success that might be relevant to suits deciding shit

File: 1794540422527004.jpg (56 KB, 612x692)

56 KB JPG

>Movies getting KWABOOTY by the Spiderverse with no Spider-man
Another Morb W I'm afraid

>>156288401
>confirmed box office flop
yeah, no shit

>>156291382
except it didn't flop

>>156291343
But it also objectively failed financially
>Cultural impact is meaningless
Not really. The new Spider-Man has normies shipping Peter with Jean Grey of all characters and it's because it was in a huge movie. Superman had no such impact on normies idea of Superman

>>156291391
>But it also objectively failed financially
it didn't though

>>156290864
Apparently a third reason is they don't like him constantly shooting his mouth off on social media.

>>156288401
most retarded cope ever
yeah for sure they wanted him out for a shitty and generic "country A vs country B" conflict and not because the second big movie under his lead was a massive disaster, historical even, despite the positive word of mouth and good faith he had

>>156290864
They didnt like him so much they went directly to him and gave him 4 years to fuck around and do whatever he wanted and their expectations were simply just "make more money than the previous guys" but instead he just spent the entire time jerking himself and his friends off while ignoring what audiences wanted on top of making shit that was divisive and now cause of the merger he has to be taken to task. The worse part is removing his retarded ass is gonna cost even more money and do even more damage to the brand

>>156288401
well yeah he's twice the age of most of those execs and it's obvious

he's got an even more ridiculous wig than boris johnson somehow, his costume doesn't make any sense visually, he's casually murdering those people

if your career before retiring in your 40s rested on reviving the popularity of a franchise the studio has already pissed away billions on and come away at a loss, you wouldn't be looking at Captain Greybeard's Heart Attack Brigade to secure your nest-egg

>>156290864
Why did you purposely not include marketing costs here

>>156291591
sorry my bad

Expenses of all Gunn DCU movies:
$999,000,000,000,000

>>156291421
600 million on a budget over 300 million is objectively bombing

>>156291426
>shitty and generic "country A vs country B"
C'mon anon. We all know

>>156291591
And they ignored the split with the theatres.

It's cope. Gunn was supposed to make money, and his best efforts barely broke even.

Worth noting is that he had a lot of wiggle room because these projects aren't reliant on just the box office. A movie can lose money but still be highly profitable due to ancillary sales which can go on for YEARS. These flicks didn't manage that.

The quality of the Gunn era is debatable, but it's failure to connect with audiences isn't.

>>156288795
Oyyyyy veeeeeee-

>>156291674
you're insane if you think every movie has to make over double its budget to not be a bomb

>>156291814
I don't. This movie and other similarly high budgeted blockbusters do

>>156291853
according to whom

>>156291860
The people financing the movies, box office autists, common sense, basic economics, your mother

>>156291878
>people financing the movies
said it did well
>box office autists
know nothing
>common sense
says it did well
>basic economics
says it did well
>your mother
doesn't care

anything else?

>>156291896
>said it did well
They said this in 2025 while trying to cover up how disappointed they were with it. Are you even aware that theaters take cuts? And that the studios don't literally get every cent made by the movie? Even it made 700 million Supergirl is a historic bomb that would off set it

>>156291944
>They said this in 2025 while trying to cover up how disappointed they were with it.
cope
>Are you even aware that theaters take cuts?
they don't take 50%
>Even it made 700 million Supergirl is a historic bomb that would off set it
cope

>>156291958
>Cope
With what? Gunn got fired because Superman and super girl both bombed. I'm getting what I want

>>156291965
except superman didn't bomb

>>156291976
Yes it did. Go back in time and tell Gunn to make it for cheaper or appeal to international markets better. Until then it's a bomb

>>156291983
>it bombed because i said so

Don’t know why /tv/ would say the Superman movie was culturally irrelevant as if everyone wasn’t posting smug Hawkgirl for a month

>>156291992
No it bombed because it didn't make enough money relative to its budget

I wonder if Not-enyahu had any children who might try to get revenge.

>>156292001
and the cycle is complete >>156291814

File: Supergrim.png (338 KB, 612x692)

338 KB PNG

>>156291983
>Man of Steel
>an of Steel earned approximately $42.7 million in profit for Warner Bros. after its theatrical run, with additional revenue from physical sales estimated at $120.9 million. However, the total profit including all revenue streams is not explicitly detailed, but it is significantly lower than newer Superman films.
>Superman
>Overall Profit: Industry reports and major outlets note that ancillary revenue streams—such as digital VOD, physical media, HBO Max (Max) streaming, merchandising, and brand licensing—pushed the film into profitability. Major trade estimates and tracking (including reports highlighted by Variety and Bloomberg) place the final overall profit margin at approximately $125 million to $150 million for Warner Bros. and DC Studios.

Kek, thanks AI.

>>156288401
Isn't this sort of creativity out of character for Guy? I thought he just liked to use his ring to blast things with raw energy.

>>156292015
Your post doesn't make sense. If it didn't bomb Gunn wouldn't have been fired. And since Gunn was fired that can mean one thing

>>156292046
see >>156290864

>>156292037
If he showed any spark of creativity, using the ring to turbo-flip the bird at someone is exactly in-character.

>>156292056
All you can do is cope. The numbers listed in that post are pathetic
>>156292029
Man of steels box office was higher and it's total physical sales are $167 million when adjusted for inflation. I don't even like Snyder but Gunn lost

File: kkk.png (1.65 MB, 1440x1250)

1.65 MB PNG

>>156292029

File: 1681267135107391.png (565 KB, 600x610)

565 KB PNG

>>156292092
>no YOU'RE coping!