it is i, chart-anon, after many years (nearly 10), i have returned to you with a far better tool to share your fetishes and interests. send feedback if you want on this thread or on the form in the tool itself. make sure to read the guides and most importantly have fun. ´◡'http://corruchart.com/
>>11474143far better tool than what?
>>11474154far better tool than the previous one i made, which was just a png template that required an image editing program to fill out
>>11474161can you post it? maybe i've seen it before
>>11474162i didnt post it because i dont want anyone to waste their time with it, but pic related is the old (very flawed) one.
>>11474167ah, sorry; i didn't mean to pressure you. if you just said so without posting it i'd understand!!! but, i see, haha. i've never seen it before, but i also only browsed this board starting the better part of a year ago. but also this seems more like the type of thing i assume /b/ and /b/-lite boards like /soc/ do. maybe you should post it there? idk if there're formatting rules for that board tho. but if you posted it here before then only makes sense posting the updated version here too
>>11474143>>11474167This already exists.It's calledF-list.And is way better than what you made....least for laying out yiur wants ir hates.Dreadful for rp though. The user base is shite.
>>11474183nta but the barrier for entry being signing up is far higher. plus f-list might have a stigma for being a boomer site but i wouldn't know
>>11474187a legend would be nice, because as someone who didn't open the site and am only looking at this out of context, i have no idea what the colors mean nor why there are several of them in the same bar. i also looked elsewhere to cross-reference meaning from the colors but i don't think that's a parallel, so it just left me more confused
Gave it a try. Fun website but it took much longer than what I expected.
>>11474143yeah i agree with the anons that a legend would b nice :3
>>11474347but it has a legend now, it's on your screenshot
>>11474413nta, but i see, and it helps a lot!!!
>>11474143Im sorry, but is there any reason why its specified that its for women only?
>>11474676good catch, ill have it fixed.
>>11474679Also one more - maybe its my ESL roots, or what, but i have no idea what "scene" supposed to mean here.
>>11474680"scene" is a subculture from around 2007-ish it was pretty much proto-tumblr, if you want a picture example, look up "boxxy" or scene girls, it's basically a dead fashion trend at this point but that'll give you the jest of it.to put it simply: think of a goth or emo but instead they wear bright colors and listen to punk and watch invader zim
>>11474689Two identically-named belly-plays.
>>11474689its an american subculture too, so if a person isnt american they probably have never even heard of it :')>>11474694that along with some other things, have been fixed and the fixes are live now. as for the rest of the thread: ill be watching feedback and fixing things mentioned, expect periodic site updates. if you have little things and don't want to post on the thread for each one, the form on the results page should be sufficient.
>>11474703eh I did see some scene girls back in the day in my neck of the woods (granted it was rare) so it wasn't purely American, calling it an anglopshere thing would be a tad bit more accurate.
I mean, i have some issues with some wording in those descriptions. Why only verbal? Text doesn't counts? What about cumming from snapping fingers? Both not verbal. Should have been something like "Cum command" in the first place, with description being something like "Any type of command or signal, allowing or forcing an orgasm". Limiting it to only verbal, and to only countdowns - i dunno about that.
>>11474730Or this. "...unknowingly AND without consent" - meaning for this tag to trigger - it MUST be unknowingly. As oppose to (as it should be) "...unknowingly and/or without consent" - which will still be accurate description of "NC cum in food", but without limiting it to being sneaky (i.e. - forcing someone to eat cum-covered food in a noncon scenario. Which wouldn't fall under current "NC cum in food" tag description, because its not unknowingly.)
>>11474730>>11474731Also is there any reason WHY site not allowing you to copy text?
And what with those descriptions of races? Feels so out of place.
Is there any reason why "Nonconsensual Exhibitionism" is not "situations where person is forced to perform exhibitionistic acts either without any clear indication for their consent, or straight-up against their will (for example Walk Of Shame, Stolen Clothes, Blackmail-related tasks, etc)
By this logic if a Dom is a loanshark and a Sub is a very broke individual who really needs money ( or some debt lifted), and forced to perform sexual favors - that's not "Financial Domination"? That's really it. Situation where money is the main reason why dom-sub relationship exists.If loanshark saying "you either do this, or im increasing your interest rate" - that's findom. Financial Domination. Sub is being dominated due to their financial situation.
>>11474413is it? i think i meant specifically which kinks got loves, etc. is it when i hover above it? cuz that doesnt show for me. or is it when i press the search button? sorry im dumb lmao
No reason not to call it "Females with dicks" and leave details to be decided by the viewer, instead of limiting this tag to only both-genitalia futas.
I think its another bug. This includes:Harems (ok)Reverse Harems (so far so good)Succubus Monstergirls (what?)Incubus Monsterboys
What?
wow
>>11474738forced exposure>>11474737the monstergirl descriptions are from MGE lore, so they are a bit different than what the regular versions of them would be described as >>11474733tap and hold is used for swapping labels on mobile so it creates a pain for mobile use (context menu appearing every time), i want to solve this somehow>>11474742you would be describing something i havent added yet, financial sexual coercion>>11474744if i understand you correctly, you want to be able to show all kinks of a certain interest level on your results? sounds like a good idea.
...Why only father? Why only ADULT child?
Also, let me add it - setting color of the stars with mouse wheel sounds great in theory, but on practice - now i had to scroll up to doublecheck, and i have no idea if i changed something accidentally or not. Im not sure because i already experienced scrolling down and setting few random tags as pink.By the way - i had to scroll up to make sure that i found some repeats.
Well, anyway. Im pretty sure i saw, like, 5 different repeats, i saw bad/incorrect groupings (like here >>11474746 ). Some buttons dont work (like plush button in roles). But overall - not awful for 0.29
>>11474739>>11474769Lots of unhinged doms so far. If we include myself, that's already 3 in the thread
I-is it suppose to go that high?
>>11474754yeah thats what i meant! (show all the kinks on a hover or a click over the bars), just for people who might not be familiar with the site. and maybe being able to share our results with the clickable descriptions and all? that last one is more of a pipe dream, this is a great site tho
>>11474753I too remember the man who had a fetish for his state.
>>11474676I've never seen a male aheagou and I don't know if I want to see itif it's some muscleman barashit I don't want to
>>11475642You never heard of males being submissive? How can you wrap your head around the concept of feminization, but cant wrap your head around the concept of non-females doing ahegao?
