Discuss ideas and concepts for a world and/or fantasies where women are on top.What advantages would girls have and what disadvantages would boys have?Did the matriarchy happen due to some biological, social, religious, technological or magical reason? Has all of human history been matriarchal, or did it begin at some period and strip away patriarchy?Could there be some sort of reality warp at play?Previous thread: >>11491820
>>11513645I just like the sex ratio being something like a 9/1 split. Men are too rare and valuable to be risked doing any stupid shit, so are defacto wards of the community, and can be married/adopted by women that prove they can provide for them. Men are pampered, but ultimately without agency. Pets or maybe livestock is the most direct comparison I can think of, but, not quite.Because the ratio is what it is, more collective work to maintain a boy habitat is pretty common. 10-15 women working to build a home for the boy they share is the standard, even larger collectives of 50ish women to maintain a stable of 4 or 5 happens as well. This also means collectivism is much more common; things like an entire apartment complex being the collective holdings of the essentially clan or amorphous family unit is pretty normal.
>>11513696Any changes to the way reproduction works? If the guy isn't allowed to do any hard work, then I'm guessing the 10 plus women sharing him have to agree not to get impregnated at the same time or the whole collective gets incapacitated
>>11513713Yeah, there'd have to be that kind of responsibility juggling. Though, I would imagine, with the "small village" style of household organization, things like family businesses of a scale large enough that the family can sort of act as a weird small corporation, or weird clannish, pseudo-feudal entity, so individual employment would probably be less pressing of an issue. Just as an emergent property of how collective ownership and use of the men goes. It just doesn't make much sense for a household of 20 women to all go to work at different places, you know. I imagine some alternative methods exist, there would probably be a lot of research into artificial insemination, or at least breeding stud practices, and smaller scale independent mothers/lesbian couples that don't integrate into those familial units. But those probably wouldn't be the standard, more just the sort of outculture groups that always exist. While I imagine lesbian behaviors would be a lot more normalized, just because of lack of options, I still see a mostly heteronormative society, at least on the part of women. A bit more range for female identities, since they fill most positions and roles, but, fundamentally similar. Being a lesbian is probably more associated with being low class than anything else though
are male chests the ultimate goal in life for women
>>11513840I could see girls being into it, but I can't really imagine it being on the level of boobs for us. Girls already have more pronounced chests themselves, and flatchested girls exist, too. Nothing special about the male nipple either.The reverse world equivalent should be a uniquely male body part. Why not balls?
>>11513869Nta, but women lusting after balls just seems really degrading for the women. Doesn't seem equivalent to boobs.
>>11513870>seems really degrading for the women.Depends how you look at it.Balls are a very vulnerable part of the body, and are basically only used for reproduction, rarely sex, as it is. Suppose, for a moment, a guy has his balls molested. You know, on a subway or trolley, minding his own business, and then a hand is pressed into his pants and fondled his nuts.He doesn't know who's doing it, they're being rough and coarse about it. He's both being violated, and it's probably pretty painful. Then, a guy having his nuts worshipped and fixated on, as the physical container for genetic material and legacy, is actually pretty demeaning, I'd think. You're not important, your cum bags are. If we could chop those off and keep them working, you wouldn't even be here. Imagine girls wanting to do testicle inspections to see if you're even worth dating, imagine clothing that reveals them a bit catching on, since it's all women are interested in anyways. You can barely find a good pair of pants that doesn't show off your balls, and a pair of pants that isn't slightly uncomfortable when you sit, is something you have found maybe once or twice in your life. Women will casually scrutinize their thoughts on the cleft of your scrotum, and complain that your sack is too wrinkly, or that you would be pretty if you shaved them.They're constantly cold. Nothing keeps them warm, even sweatpants sometimes have a little slit to show off a bit.
>>11513870>women lusting after balls just seems really degrading for the women.That's based on the patriarchal tendencies of our world, isn't it? Dick and balls shouldn't have the same dominant/prideful/degrading to who interacts with it connotation in the reverse world. Its also worth noting that guys get squeamish over having their balls grabbed even in our world. Imagine them getting casually groped.
New and revolutionary form of gene therapy by trusted pharmecuetical group S. Modeus Ltd. gives women strengthened bodies on par with or exceeding men's in speed and strength, reduced complications from menstruation and childbirth, and greater confidence (may or may not be result of the former two). With minimal side effects*!(*side effects may include mutations such as development of horns, bat wings, pointy tails, macromastia, lactation, mind control abilities, intense urges to use mind control abilities, heightened sex drive, heightened aggression, casual misandry, spontaneous egomania, hallucinations of voices promoting all of the above, and mild dizziness.)Don't be left behind by girls getting the upgrade and men who already have it all! Upgrade yourself! Show the world what peak female performance looks like! (S. Modeus Ltd. is not legally responsible for any unintended side effects.)
>>11513840in real life I thinklook at like, male gacha characters, they all have that little chest window
>>11513887Would women teabag eachother with their tits?
>>11513977No better way to humiliate another girl than rubbing your superior tits on her face. Getting actual boob sweat on the face is especially held to be one of the most demeaning things you can suffer.
>>11513713Women are large enough that high pregnancy is just a baby bump and doesn't impair them in any way.
