Previous Thread: >>3138609/edg/ is the home of 1girl posting. Here, we share AI-generated pics of sexy anime girls and discuss latest advancements in 1girl-related technology.Remember to keep it /e/, as per board rules. If unsure about what you can or cannot post here, consult the sticky thread.> FAQ (check here first)https://rentry.org/edg_faq> Local UIsForge Classic (easiest and simplest for SDXL): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classicForge Neo (supports newer tech like Flux and WAN): https://github.com/Haoming02/sd-webui-forge-classic/tree/neoComfyUI (node based UI, most extensible with custom nodes): https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI>Online Image GenFree no account: https://frosting.ai/ | https://perchance.org/Free Account Required: CivitAI, Tensor.art, SeaArt.ai, pixAIPaid Only: NovelAI>Catbox:4chanX Catbox/NAI prompt userscript: https://rentry.org/hdgcb> Resources and guidesUseful links: https://rentry.org/sdg-linkTags: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_groupsUpscalers: https://openmodeldb.infoWAN Video Gens: https://github.com/Wan-Video/Wan2.2>Useful Extensions/Custom NodesADetailerTag AutocompleteStealth PNG InfoInfinite Image BrowsingLama cleanerRegional PrompterControlNetDynamic Prompts> LoRAsLoRa training: https://rentry.org/59xed3LoRA Collections:https://rentry.org/illustrious_loras_n_stuffhttps://rentry.org/trashcollectshttps://rentry.org/zp7g6https://rentry.org/hdglorarepo> /edg/ logoOP: https://files.catbox.moe/uc2ntj.png | Anchor: https://files.catbox.moe/bx1lo2.png (more color schemes in the FAQ Rentry)> Related generals>>>/b/degen>>>/aco/sdg>>>/d/ddg>>>/g/sdg>>>/h/hdg>>>/trash/sdg>>>/u/udg>>>/vt/vtaiLink Placeholder
Request Anchor
Previous Thread Highlights1/2
2/2
Theme guy is out of town so... in his place.Thread theme: The wastelands (aka: post apocalypse)
>>3140005Oldie that fits the theme.
>>3139998>>3139999>not single of mineAre mine that bad?
>>3140010It's one guy's opinion
>>3140013meant for >>3140012
>>3140012gen for yourself, not to make the highlights on 4chan
>>3140015Well, even if you want to gen for others I wouldn't target the highlights. It's like one 1/30th of a (you), a direct one feels better.
>>3140016true. i don't have a problem whatsoever with op/highlights, but i feel like over time, people gen for the sole reason to try and make the highlights. like they need that validation or something. we just gotta have fun and enjoy the hobby, if one of your gens make them then cool, if not then oh well, someone else will probably like your stuff.
>>3140012We're not going to make it bro
>>3140020Cutie! Very pretty
>>3140012probably
>>3140018do you have any proof of that though
>>3140012btw if you want an opinion, link them from last thread, i promise to be polite
>>3140025Shame.Either way, reworked one of my older (read, two weeks ago) gens.
>>313999690's style
>>3140029
>>3140026Proof that someone else will like his stuff, or proof that we just gotta have fun and enjoy
>>3140037proof that people gen just to be put in the highlights
are legwear garters meant for socks too masculine? too much of a british schoolboy image?>>3140012the highlights guy is anti-anima so if he suspects its genned with anima, he won't include it, excluding the times he accidentally included my stuff
>>3140040I only use anima and had my stuff highlighted few times before.
>>3140042like I said, he thinks high quality anima gens=NAI or some other model
>shimakaze in request anchor>multiple shimakaze in highlightsWhere is your god now >>3138816
>>3140005Already did this OC in HSotD style, but I wanted to see what she'd look like with my current workflow.
>>3140045Forgot image.
>>3140046For comparison:
>>3140044are we just being duped into posting shimakaze by the #1 shimakaze fan pretending to be a hater?
>>3140046i think version looks better. box please?>>3140048wouldn't be the first itme something like this happens here
>>3140049>https://files.catbox.moe/iiuxmu.jpg
>>3140039Doesn't that "I feel" part already imply that it's an opinion unsupported by facts?
>>3140030>>3140031iM@S girls best girls
>>3140052Didn't mean to nomig
>>3140053eyes are wrong reeeeee
>>3140028Catbox please? This looks good.
>>3140055Sorry, but that is like 5 different workflows, 3 models, 2 custom loras and crapton of RNG.
>>3140054Not him, I like the heterochromia.
>>3140057>>3140057>>3140057>>3140057>5 different workflows, 3 models, 2 custom loras and crapton of RNGall that just to gen nasty shit and still have the hat and her hand going through eachother. what a waste of time, unironically
>>3140061It looks pretty good,the armhair is the only thing i'm not a fan of.
>>3140059No her heterochromia is wrong is what I am saying. That's Takagaki Kaede her right eye is green not her left.
Hellol everyone.
>>3140063Oh. Who cares? I swear to god you effeminates will whine about anything
>>3140065You're right my bad.
>>3140012I put a lot of effort into my Kushida gens, and not a single one of them made it into the highlights either. I thought at least a couple of them were decent enough. Oh well, genning because you want to is all the reason you, I, or anyone else needs. I enjoy rolling for hot anime girls.>>3140064Hi. Thanks for putting my gens in the pink highlights.
>>3140063Ah.
>>3140064Do you have prompt or Lora for Pink? I want to try making her in my style.
whaddup
>>3140074Heyo! Cute eldritch gal!
>>3140075>https://files.catbox.moe/l6zsdu.pngthanks, i noticed that i posted the wrong one with the top strap / 6finger error though. here's the fixed version.
>>3140072it's on Civit, someone on /edg/ baked it for him and put it up
>>3139996/r/ chsnge her look into a perverted one
Shave your fucking pussy bitch you got some thick jungle down there
>>3140005
>>3140075>>3140074Eldritch girls are fun to gen sometimes.
>>3140005also one for the theme
>>3140072dark-skinned female, pink hair, long hair, drill sidelocks, green eyes, animal ears, cat ears, cat tail, light brown tail, white dress, print dress, tiger print, sleeveless, bare shoulders, cleavage, sash, red sash, tiger print collar, neck bell, boots, ankle boots, grey boots
>>3140073Requesting putting her both hands on her hips as well as showing her face.
>>3140087This adventure-gote brings joy.
>>3140084kek, i love how neutral her expression is.>my eyes are up here, sir>...the other ones
>>3139998>>3139999Some trolling subhuman wrote in a rentry on /h/ that highlights anon selects "generic aislop style" for highlights but I'm not seeing it. There actually seems like too much diversity here. I feel like highlights anon is trying too hard to put a diversity of styles into his collages instead of just picking what looks good.
>>3140079nice miku
>>3139996Requesting Mio Honda done in the style of Range Murata.
>>3140073imagine the paizuri
>>3140054here you go
>>3140096Now the mole is on the wrong side lmao
>>3140099>Now the mole is on the wrong side lmao
>>3140087the partner every scavenger would love, she could carry tons of material and she can eat whatever, from roots to cans. Also, she kind of cute
>>3140103We did it boys
Oh, good. We're back.
>>3140109hello
>my gens look too smudged and aren't sharp enoughany trick to reducing smudginess in gens?
>>3140109oh, i wish i was that keyboard...
>>3140048Doesn't matter. She's an iconic horny design. She will always have a place here
>>3140031so cute
>>3140005this is an interesting theme
This question is probably going to sound weird. Does anyone know how I can induce "cracking" like in this image? It appeared on the entire image of a few of my gens. I didn't prompt for it at all. The effect can be useful. Has anyone here ever got anything like it on low res gens?
>>3140135the keyboard that's barely being touched? why would you want to be that?
>>3140163because that huge tit will fall down on it
>>3140164considering the other one isn't anywhere near the keyboard, that's highly doubtful
>>3140162it's just a flavor of artifacting. NAI tends to do "comic dots" artifacting with certain styles sometimes. Not 100% sure how to induce it though
>>3140173>Not 100% sure how to induce it thoughAny ideas?
>>3139996Requesting nude Edel with large breasts lay on the bed (Frieren: Beyond Journey's End).
>>3139996girls relaxing and having junk food like this>>3140180
>>3140005How about post-apocalypse fighting androids (with jugs)?
>>3140005>"...equipment is sub-optimal."
>>3140005"Switching to unarmed combat mode."
>>3140179an anon sends his best regards
>>3140180>Ikki Tousenlooks like Yumemi Hidaka from Munto
>>3140184cool elf 2b gen
>>3139996Requesting any of the ARIA girls (IA, OИE or HIPPI) in a Court Jester outfit. Just how /e/ or /c/ that outfit would be as well as the setting (if any) is up to you.
>>3140179delicious
>>3140234how'd this one come out so bad? something is off about the face and the nipples aren't looking good either
tried doing smug cat maid but it's a bit off
>>3140239cute
>>3140241thanks. pinkies out like she's a proper lady or something
>>3140244very cute
>>3140177I would just add it in post
>>3140233Best of the Sakura 5.
>>3140238her face is off in the canon
>>3140258that's not going to work for me. i need a way to 1 shot it at low resolution
>>3140244>>3140239kek, how very mannerly. I like em both but #2 hits right on the smug level>Why are you on my desk?>i'm helping>can i have my pen and papers?>no
>>3140185>>3140179I like this
>>3140182blessed ponytail elf cosplay
Y'shtola's secret
>>3140267>cosplaying as a failed 2B cosplaythat's something I guess
>>3140272yeah for some reason 4.5 doesn't like the poofy dress she wears and kind of randomizes parts of the outfit when using references. I kinda really like that combination even if it's not super accurate though. 5.0 nails is consistently but it's not a consistent style till char ref comes in, pic related
>>3140182>>3140183>>3140184Catbox for one of these, please?
>>3140051no
Has anyone tried Perturbed-Attention Guidance with Illustrious XL? To get more details than CFG 1.
>>3140018>but i feel like over time, people gen for the sole reason to try and make the highlights.I don't know how you would ever reach that conclusion when pretty much all the regular users stick to their own stuff and fetishes.And all the "newbies" and "occasionals" only come, drop whatever and leave>>3140287I don't think many people experiments or tries things with illustrous anymore. Those who still use illustrious stick with illustrious because they refuse to change and feel comfortable with it, so I don't think they experiment a lot with it either.
>>3140289>>3140290I kind of like this old style game cg style, they look fine, but I feel they lack impact. Old cgs where a thing because there was always memorable stuff in there. You should try to do something in this style but more unique situations
>>3140234
>the moment I add a name for a character I like, the quality of the art instantly turns to shit and looks simplistic and poorly draw>have to go all the way down to cfg 2 or lower to get decent details>quality tags in positive don't help>not even shift works by itselfReducing the strength of the character tag by (character name:0.5) along with using shift finally does it and gives me something that looks high quality. Goddamn.
>>3140296You're either using the word "quality" wrong or your setup is super fucked somehow. No way to tell without more information.
>>3140297Some characters will remain looking like anime screenshots until you go down to around cfg2. I tried the same setup with a substituted character name and i got decent details with shift alone and cfg 7. This character required me to weaken it's name tag by half before it start to remotely gain details though. It's taught me that style bias can be heavily embedded in certain characters.(and even if the character name is at the end of your prompt) But now I've figured out how to resolve this going forward.
>>3140296I don't know what the hell you are doing. May be you are touching way too much things people have told you to do, I don't think I ever set cfg under 4 ever and I never played with shiftJust go to civitai, go to the page of the model you use, pick an image you really like and copy the settings
>>3140299Or you know, do what everyone does, get a lora of that character which is not nearly as strong as the tag. Problem solved.Why do you think people does lora of super known characters?
>>3140299Still being so roundabout that I can't try it out for myself. I guess you're talking about the Nia above? She does seem to have unusually strong bias, but you can just prompt lips and nose if you don't want her to look anime. Or was this about someone else?>>3140305Because they don't know any better.
>>3140303I love sexydoka! Madoka as a sexy teacher is great idea.
>>3140310Requesting this with Yelan (Genshin Impact).
>>3140296bwo, sometimes character tags may be biased to a specific style. especially when there aren't many images of them or the bulk of their images are of the same style in the training dataset. for such cases, using a character lora might make more sense, although we can't exactly tell if this is a settings issue too... like what this anon suggested, >>3140303, you could always try someone else's settings to figure out if it is a tag or config issue. or, you could always post a litterbox, some kind anon would probably check it out...
>>3140308>Or was this about someone else?someone else
>>3140303>copy the settingsI've been having a close look at all the illustrious gens that actually look high quality and detailed and almost all use artist tags or style/quality and detail enhancements loras. 95% of the ones that don't rely on those things have their CFG set to around 2 or lower.>>3140315I solved the issue by weakening the character tag.>>3140305>Why do you think people does lora of super known characters?For more accurate clothes.
>>3140078Bump
>>3140318>For more accurate clothes.That is also another of the advantages, yes. But it is also to better control the style.Lora and tags are tools in the end; you use what you need depending on the situation. Sometimes is better to use tags, sometimes lora.You can always put a screw with a hammer, but it is usually better to use the screwdriver. Sometimes you will need to drill first.We have been trying to be helpful, but honestly you look pretty adamant in XI models working in a way you think it should work instead of adapting to how the model works.And thus it is not that you are "encountering" problems; you are causing them by making things harder than it should adhering to methods that simply don't work well on those models.Of course, you can hammer your way and get results in the end but you only will get more poor results despite having to put extra effort
>>3140125Artists probably doing 80% of it if in anima, weird resolutions what have you. Should post an image to see how bad it is but you might be able to get away literally with like >shaper lines Or something in anima.
>>3140322>if in animaillustrious
>>3140138no
out with big sis
>>3140078
>>3140325nice
>>3140292i can't post the rest here
>>3140322Gorgeous figure! Love her lil' bird wings and lovely hair, great outfit too!
>>3140303
>>3140336there is a new spinoff series. "MADOKA,,,IN SPACEEEE!"I'm not fucking joking:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNhz_XQPtOE
>>3140338Looks like cheap To The Stars ripoff.
>>3140339but the girls look cute
bwos i baked a lil' something for anima. (wondering if deadflow anon is still around...)civitai.red/models/2968292
>>3140341Thanks! Is that the soft one you used on noob? Looks similar, or maybe I just remember it wrong.
>>3140343you're welcome, but it's not my mix though.this lora is trained off of deadflow anon's most recent mix.there was an older mix that was softer and more blended which used a higher ratio of cutesexyrobutts.
>>3140347Ah, right.Guess they start to blend together a bit after such a long time.
i wonder what ever happened to deadflow anon. maybe he still lurks.
>>3140353maybe he didn't return after all the spam earlier this year...
>>3140267>>3140275NTA, but interesting. I found this particular 2B Costume Lora to be shockingly versatile and easy to use (well, at least for boob and butt shots, I guess); really, the only consistent problem was the failure to correctly depict her two-toned gloves, which I did actually fix on later generations.Additionally, I laughed how that second one went full Yani Neko (or maybe her sister) in 2B cosplay. >>3140280https://files.catbox.moe/un86xu.png
>>3140354Yeah probably. We lost a lot of good ones like that.
>>3140354>>3140357most likely. most of the good genners left, now it's just the guy who gens pink 300 times a day, the guy with the lolis, sailerfag and newbies. unfortunate, i guess the spammer won in the end.
>>3140358>conveniently ignored the 4+ oldfags in just this threadYeah fuck off
>>3140263thanks! i reproduced her mostly from memory, was trying to figure out if i'd missed things (like the bells on her tail) or if they were like that on account of your style mix, like the blush lines and the tone of her skin. do you prompt for slit pupils as well?>>3140271cute
>>3140359Who? Aside from the big tiddy elf guy that posts a few times every 3-4 threads
More nogen concern trolling. Nothing is keeping you here.
>>3140364I'm here too. I've been for 3+ years now. I made those medukas for example.But I do nothing with an strong personal style I move in between generic anime coloring and specific artists emulation (no personal mixes) so I may be not very identifiable as a poster.But I'm a regular.
>>3140364Me
>>3140364Hah, I normally don't respond to these but jokes on you--at least since the end of the spamming epidemic, I've posted at least once in thread, and typically two or three times. You may just have missed them, in lieu of my rotating cast of big tiddy elf knights, instead uploading big tiddy Karin Nanase, Ogasara Emi, Jabami Yumeko, Ruby from Burn-Up Excess, etc. ...or taking requests that involved large breasts. I did miss a few of the threads that lasted a day or less though.
>>3140385At least you have multiple characters and rotate between them, I appreciate that. Seeing the same character over and over and over and over and over and over and over is exhausting to look at and there's no way to filter it.
>>3140362I think i tried "Small blush" and "Circular blush marks" with inpainting or something along those lines to get the circle blush initially. The tail bell is kinda new so i don't always use it but i do like it. I also prompted for "cat's eyes" and "amber eyes" but now all i need is the color. A lot of style development was chain referencing other images, so she's changed quite a bit since the first gen which i think was picrel.
>>3140388Have you tried crying about it, no-genz? Peeing your pants perhaps? Shidding and cumming maybe?
>>3140389tried the "blush stickers" tag yet?
>>3140389no lineart gives a nice look to certain anime styles. thanks for the tips>>3140392i have
>>3140329is someone trolling the board in order to get this general banned?>>3140394I got some over the top uraraka blush sticker gens let me find that
>>3140341uoh
>>3140395Nice one, Astolfanon ;>Lil' Red Pantyhose.
>>3140399you have some gall not calling me binjo the racist story teller
>>3140400>BINJO~>THE RA~CIST>SMUT-GENNING YANK
>>3140355Better than just prompting for 2b \(nier:automata\)\(cosplay\)? It's generally pretty reliable for both innate girls and lora ones, even if she doesn't have a cosplay tag like 2B does. Might save you having to use another lora for the outfit.>>3140364I've been here since SD1.5, with some breaks. Keep trying different things so you can't tell other than by filename and the occasional waifupost.
>>3140341this style is nice for spooky stuff
>>3140364I'm still here. My gens probably aren't as recognizable since I switched from aillu to Anima (assuming they were recognizable to begin with.)>>3140181Have an oldie.
>>3140341
>>3140408nta but I can see the quad-boobed blue genie in her eyes no matter what you do
>>3140323Oof, but also find artists with strong lines I guess
>>3140423>bulgeFuta demon?
>>3140384*Mio
>>3140428Me, oh
>>3140430I'm Malenia, blade of Miquella, etc, etc
>>3140423>tasaka shinnosuke Holy boomer throwback
>>3140326I ment for her outfit, sorry
>>3140430finally some mecha
>>3140430What did you prompt to get those scars, anon?
>>3140436cute. i've been working on some original shana stuff too but haven't posted yet since i'm trying to get things to look as good as i can
>>3140438nta but those sort of scar usually come on with "burn scar"
>>3140424Some artists do that pronounced pubic whatever area and it's hard to avoid. Doubt it was intentional.
>>3140443In this thread everything that looks sus is always purposely ill intentioned.
>>3140445Sorry, I can't tell if you're being ironic or if you're the paranoid guy
>>3139996I would like to request Vampire: The Masquerade / Bloodlines girls. At minimum you must state the clan. Debated making a chart but it would be too big
>>3140438>>3140442sample
>>3140442>>3140449Got it, thanks.
bros i miss the breakdomain days where you could just put "masterpiece" in the prompt and it would understand and give you highly detailed aesthetic anime art. now you can put "(masterpiece:1.4)" in illustrious or anima and it makes almost zero difference to the quality. breakdomain was faster by default too and computer could handle it better. we need to go back
>>3140448
>>3140405I was actually surprised to find that my own Illustrious model supported that and....pretty accurately. Though it also wasn't the cure for problems I (incorrectly) blamed on the LoRA itself, mostly a tendency towards very light or very orange skin under "dark skin" (style LoRA is probably to blame then), and it is more prone to putting the side slit on the wrong side--not the end of the world, but still.It's certainly doable, but I'm not sure if preferable. Here's a comparison, without the LoRA and with, with few changes otherwise. It didn't get her gloves wrong, which I thought it would. That additional opening over her abdomen is wrong, but I could see some liking the addition. I don't use a LoRA to generate sailor senshi uniforms, especially in nonstandard colors. I wonder what other "uniforms" this model will know on its own.>>3140388Thanks, I suppose? I do try and vary it as far as "leggy action girls with huge jugs" goes.
>>3140451This. Anima and illustrious zoomers wouldn't understand.
>>3140451>breakdomain was faster by default tooirrefutable
>>3140451just say you're shit at prompting, anon
>>3140433>>3140078
>>3140447Yes, anon. Each and every person who doesn't think exactly as you want them to do is always the same person, who is also stupid and so, always inferior to you.
>>3140445>In this thread everything that looks sus is always purposely ill intentioned.I hightly doubt someone could give a suspicious looking bulge that is not actually a bulge but just some particulary fat venus mount.I guess is technically possible, but it would require inpaint and effort, which is obviously not the case
>>3140459Thanks
>>3140451If you are using the same value for illustrious and anima no wonder you are not having success.If you post an example of what tou consider "highly detailed aesthetic anime art." we could help.But is hard with that definition, I don't know if you want something that looks like an screenshot, or something lhat looks like promotional art, or what exactly
>>3140454Ah, I didn't realize you want back to illustrious. It's pulling from the specific tag at https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/2b_(nier:automata)_(cosplay)With Anima it works even for characters that do not have a cosplay tag on the booru.
>>3140458Nah it's illustrious and anima that are shit. I genuinely used to have more success with breakdomain. I really miss how easy it was to just put "masterpiece" in the prompt and instantly get something that's better looking. Newer models have genuinely regressed in some ways. You can't deny that it did used to be simpler to get detailed art out of older models. Yes, you can use an artist tag for an artist that draws detailed art but that has drawbacks. What if just want the extra details but without the individual stylistic quirks of that particular artist or any particular? A human can understand "detailed anime art" but Anima is too dumb to get it. "detailed background" doesn't increase the detail in illustrious or anima either. Breakdomain really was just better at making the kind of art I wanted. If you just want intricate, higher quality, "generic" regular-looking detailed anime art, it's actually harder to achieve now than it used to be.>>3140464>something that looks like an screenshot, or something lhat looks like promotional artIt doesn't really matter that much. If you have an anime screenshot style but you keep adding more lines and detail to the shading patterns it will start to look more like promo art or anime style LN cover art.
anima zoomers don't know how good things were back in the breakdomain days. it really felt like magic when quality tags actually worked and the ai understood you and just gave you more detailed and better looking art. not being able to do that anymore is the loss of a great quality of life feature
Fuck a detailed art lora. Why should I even have to go through the trouble of downloading that? The model should understand something this basic by default. Vintage models were better at it.
I must confess, sometimes I don't even know what you are talking about.
Masterpiece: 4
>>3140471It definitely doesn't work in illustrious at 1.4 and going over that risks other problems. I guess I didn't try going higher than 1.4 on anima. Still, I'm not seeing vastly more detail from masterpiece to (masterpiece:2.0) in your image.
>>3140474we already said last thread that anima sliders and illustrious sliders are completely different in scale
>>3140464He wants the true AI slop look. Breakdomain is apparently just a random shitmerge on SD1.5, the raw NAI leak with a pile of style loras merged in.On Pony/Animagine and later models this was rolled into the "AI-Generated" tag, on the assumption that people might want to put it into negatives since everyone was sick of the look. Other than some terminal cases od bad taste apparently. The tag also works on illu and anima, see before/after.
>>3140473You'll get more effect out of combining masterpiece with best quality, score_9 and whatever the ye-pop dataset quality tag was, plus putting all their opposites in the negatives, plus the above.
>>3140478I just wanted to show that "masterpiece" alone already has lot of effect in the result. And that effect increases increasing the slider.
>>3140473Ok, now were talking. But how do I achieve the godlike ultra intricate shading patterns of human art like pic related? I've only managed similar things with AI on specific characters in extreme close ups. The AI fails to do this at around 1 megapixel. It particular won't do it in shots where the full body of the character is in the image. How do I push it to max detail? CFG 1.2 won't give me something as detailed as pic related. I want the sharp anime style, anime screenshot cel shading 2d aesthetic with extreme detail like attached image. Or even more detail, just obviously not photorealistic
>>3140477>On Pony/Animagine and later models this was rolled into the "AI-Generated" tag, on the assumption that people might want to put it into negatives since everyone was sick of the look. Other than some terminal cases od bad taste apparently.That's not really what I'm after. I don't want the look in your image.
>>3140471I prefer the left one because of muh anime coloring
>>3140482They all have anime coloing but left looks like something from a budget tv series right more like something from something from an 80s high budget OVA albeit with slight softening.
>Breakdomain is apparently just a random shitmerge on SD1.5, the raw NAI leak with a pile of style loras merged in.Lies. I remember the best art I saw on civitai back in the day was breakdomain stuff and it didn't look much like the image you posted. Both the left and right of your pic are relatively simplistic anyway. Not even worth a (You).
>>3140401Outside of the hair bows being a different colors, that's a nice Eri.
>newfag needs to look up what break domain isPeople here used to gen with it back in 2023, it used to be in the rentry too IIRC. It was one of the OG models.
>>3140487>grrr why arent people using shit from 3 years ago even though its obsolete and nowhere near as advanced as current shitI bet you only like gen 1 pokemon too, faget
>>3140488Not entirely obsolete, clearly, and also faster at genning higher resolutions.
>>3140489link all gens using it itt rn
>>3140486It's Kirishima from the Stringendo hentai, but they are pretty similar.
>>3140448cute
>>3140448>VtMRe-purposing one of my more recent gens for this one. Is she urban enough to be a Brujah, or does she need more biker gear?
>>3140491>Stringendo hentaiI love that series. Can you make some some Mikura AIgold, please?
>>3140493somebody said world of darkness?
>>3140495I should stop adding 4 to 8 gens to a queue at once, I got tons of fish malk bottles nowalso trying to get them to suck a straw+fangs results in this ugly malformed mouth
>>3140496drinking straw to mouth, drinkingThat usually works fine.
>>3140498yes but your pink has no fangs that she needs to displayideally I would gen the type of slender fangs that are visible even with a closed mouthalso the realism aspect of the style doesn't help the things
>>3140500thick straw for the thick liquid
>>3140473Ok, anima base is not making it much more detailed when I strengthen that tag. Masterpiece 2, 5 & 15 show little difference for me. 25+ gave me body horror. Exact same steps and prompt each time. CFG 6. How do I get quadruple the line and shading details? Pulling the CFG down to 1.4 yields a little more detail but that's it. Do you have a list of positive and negative quality prompts that work for anima? I have more experience with illustrious. No one has been able to show if anima or illustrious can generate ultra intricate anime screenshots style shading patterns like in >>3140480 The models just refuse to put more in even if you prompt for it.
>>3140501As long isn't a straw as big as the one from that Christian Chandler pic, lol.
>>3140503Not understanding the assignment. What exactly are you trying to get?Drop me a catbox of your current gen for me to take a look.
>>3140493i thought she worked just fine as a brujah the first time around, that hasn't changed
>>3140504I tried to make the straw extra thick but it caused her to levitate, we just need to imagine these as 1L cartonslipstick mark on straw would be erotic tho
>>3140518you take a mortal womanand put her in controlwatch her become a godwatch people's heads a-rollacting like a teenage girlher mature pussy corrodesyou try to take her pulsebefore the head explodes
>>3140324you're not my real dad!!
all I remember about this anime is it had this girl and kick-ass momoclo OP/ED
>>3140508Not quite sure what you want me to say. It just want to massively increase the detail. Do it using a base model only. Preferably anima or illustrious xl. The base models should have the capability in theory. Without needing loras. >Not understanding the assignment. What exactly are you trying to get?Okay, I'll break it up into parts. I just want significantly more line and particularly tone shading details. This >>3140480 image has the anime screenshot style with clear distinct shading tones that don't blend except it has intricate linework and insane levels of detail in it's shading lines. But using tags like "official art" and "anime screenshot" never give me anything close to that level of detail. Adding "detailed" to the prompt doesn't help either. Do you think you can replicate that detailed art with a base model?
>>3140322nice tits
>>3140526Great! now point me to the catbox of what you have so far.Also point to the loras that you do not want to use so I can actually copy the style from
>>3140515Here's a much older gen. What clan would she belong to? Toreador maybe?
>>3140533Also this one. Might also be a Toreador.
>>3140531Catbox won't let me upload. It always gives me an error. I don't see why you'd need it anyway. I can just list the details with the image attached. Use Illustrious or anima or a better base model if one exists for this job.Base Anima, 30 steps, euler a, cfg 5, Prompt: (masterpiece:10), detailed, 1girl, solo, blonde hair, red eyes, very long hair, cleavage, medium breasts, standing, miniskirt, serafuku, looking at viewer, anime coloring, anime screenshot, white backgroundNegative: lowres, worst quality, worst detail, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, simplistic"masterpiece" is at 10 and the level of detail is pathetic.>>3140531>Also point to the loras that you do not want to use so I can actually copy the style from? Just try to copy the exact style here >>3140480 for starters. You've only succeeded if you can do it with all the shading detail. I don't know of any style/detail lora with that exact look anyway. The shading patterns are gorgeous but I'm mainly interested in reproducing it's clear anime screenshot style tone shading with it's level of detail.(and then going beyond it's already extreme level of detail) Like I said, I prompt for details but it doesn't give me them.
>>3140538NTA but like i said before>I prompt for details but it doesn't give me themyou're gonna have a Bad Time
>>3140540>you're gonna have a Bad Timewhy?
>>3140533could go either way. does she hear voices?>>3140535def ToreadorPicrel could be a very dramatic Toreador or an old fashioned Tremere
>>3140541because you're either too much of an autist to realize it's not gonna happen, or you're too much of an autist to know how to explain yourself properly
>>3140542>does she hear voices?She doesn't seem quite crazy enough to be a Malkavian, but then again...
>>3140542oh, her fangs came out all derpy. here's a better one
>>3140543>because you're either too much of an autist to realize it's not gonna happenWhy not? The models are capable of it. >or you're too much of an autist to know how to explain yourself properlyWhat exactly haven't I explained properly? I'll clarify it. I went to extra lengths to make myself clear.
>>3140548cute
>>3140544nice hair
>>3140547nta but it does feel like we've been trying to help you for several days now and I still don't have a clear idea of what you even want. The miku pic above helped a little because it's visual. Anime screenshot and anime coloring will work against you here because it's literally screenshots from anime, they simplify things to save budget and it's only supposed to look good in motion. Ideally you should prompt the artist who made this pic, or similar ones.After seeing the pic your mention of "detail" now translates to me as "clutter". Miku's actual design does not have all these extra things he added, like the writing on the skirt, or the microchips in her sleeves, or the snaking pattern on her thighs. If you want those on Anima I think the only way would be describing each of them, with an LLM prompt if that's too much work. Background clutter is somewhat easier. I guess you're right there, SD1.5 would generate a lot of unprompted stuff when you pushed the quality tags hard enough, just to make sure there was no unused space or a "plain" texture.
>>3140480>>3140558>Miku's actual design does not have all these extra things he added, like the writing on the skirt, or the microchips in her sleeves, or the snaking pattern on her thighs.>he doesn't knowThat's the official art for Hatsune Miku. It's drawn by Ixima. It was for the Hatsune Miku sony xperia. Also you're focusing on the wrong things, that's not why I posted the Miku image. Ignore the outfit and the background in that pic. By "detail" I'm talking more so about line counts and shading lines on the hair. micro detail>nta but it does feel like we've been trying to help you for several days now and I still don't have a clear idea of what you even want.How? What I'm asking for should be super easy to understand. Also, while I do love the stylization and patterning in that image, I am moreso trying to replicate the incredible level detailed in the shading lines. How are you not getting it? I just want super detailed 2d art. Just super detailed tone shading. You know, "tone shading"? Shading that isn't a smooth blending gradient. See pic related so you understand what I want. How are you not grasping what I'm asking for? I just want the shading done with more detail.>Anime screenshot and anime coloring will work against you here because it's literally screenshots from anime, they simplify things to save budgetYes but technically it's using the same fundamental style for it's shading which is what I want. I want the same sharp separation of shading tones that you see in both anime screenshots and that detailed Miku official art image. You can clearly see the boundaries between shadows, base tone and highlight in that art which is what I want. One is just far more intricate and detailed when applying the same concept. I want more detail everywhere but I'm primarily interested in the linework and shading details. The Miku image was supposed to illustrate what I meant. Lower CFG generally gives more of what I'm asking for but still nowhere near enough.
>>3140558I don't know how I can make this any more crystal clear. I want to make the shading in generated images more detailed while maintaining the tone shading characteristic. That's a general goal. Replicating Ixima's style in that image would also be good but is a less important and separate. Can anyone here do this? CFG 1 isn't giving enough details which makes this hard. Had to split because post was too long.
>>3140558I probably should have written "reflection" instead of "highlight" in the image but semantics are besides the point.
>>3140573>>3140574I would consider that a specific style, not something you can force onto an existing one through prompting. Even if it was a lora, you won't know in advance how their shading is going to mix.Wouldn't even say those two are at different levels of detail, you just get more transitions between shadow and highlight because it's coiling hair and not a straight piece.
>>3140576>Wouldn't even say those two are at different levels of detail, you just get more transitions between shadow and highlight because it's coiling hair and not a straight piece.By detail I mean number of lines regardless of context.All I'm really asking for is "do thing with more detail". It's straightforward. Lowering CFG works to a point but you can't go lower than 1.>I would consider that a specific styleEither way it should be possible. A human would understand "do same thing but with more detail".
>>3140577Clearly there are plenty of humans here who didn't understand for several days.
How do I add and strengthen a prompt if the tag has a ":" in it?
>>3140581How about you mention the tag so that I can test out my suggestion before posting it. Every fucking time...Anyway, whenever the tag is inside brackets you have to escape the colon with a backslash, so like the pouting emoji :t would become (\:t) or (\:t:1.3) or [ :\:t:0.3] etc.
>>3139996Requesting panties added.
>>3140520Why is she in prison?
>>3140589nice!
>>3140558>nta but it does feel like we've been trying to help you for several days now and I still don't have a clear idea of what you even want.I think I finally have a rough idea of what he is aiming for. Do you remember the old 1.5 models and how messy and busy the generations were? He probably remembers the old 1.5 generations as being "detailed," while current models are much cleaner and more streamlined.As in, when you made a wristband, since models were so messy, the wristband was full of shadowing that made no sense, lines in different colors, dots, things that with imagination could resemble small badges attached to it, and brown lines that could be interpreted as a rope or some decorative string. Meanwhile, now if you ask for a wristband, you get a simple black wristband with maybe a shading.So, he wants back all the mess ("detail") the models evolved to get rid of.Which is something that, even if I disagree with aesthetically, I can understand if that's what he likes. The problem is he wants to do that, but with current models, which are designed explicitly to avoid that sort of bussy generation.And worst of all he refuses to use Lora, inpainting, or other tools to achieve it, he wants to use only the base model and prompting.
>>3140602>bussy generation...
>>3140538close enough?
Was thinking of old stuff
>>3140617I vaguely remember that show
>>3140626nice. very painterly.
>>3140556gonna squeeze that chub
>>3140628The drawing itself? Not really. Only the smudged borders.
>>3140106Cute monster gal!
>>3140602
>>3140636you left out the best sis
>>3140605Thanks but no, that is not remotely close enough. It needs far, far more detail in the shading patterns. Far more shading lines. More micro details in everything, more hair strands and lines. I'm not concerned about the character, outfit, pose or background.(they are irrelevant and you can pick whatever you want) It just needs pure anime screenshot tone shading where the tones do not blend into eachother even slightly. The shading can be on any character or object though Miku and the absurdly long hair tag are good for testing. In your image, the boundaries of the shading tones are not sharp enough, they look a little "soft" and blend a little. Other than that, greater contrast between the shading tones could help make testing easier. I don't want photorealism but I need more micro detail in everything. Look strictly at the hair around the head, in attached image as another example. The hair has sharp tone shading but with highly intricate patterns and in this case 5 tones. I need more detail than in attached image.
>>3140662fantastic!Go to civitai.red and find an image that resembles what you're talking about. post the link so I can dupicate it. (p.s. still waiting on catbox)
>>3140662
>>3140448Here's a gen fresh off the batch. This time it's a Ventrue.
>>3140666Is that a trick question?
>>3140664>Go to civitai.red and find an image that resembles what you're talking about.There is nothing AI made I can find in the ballpark of 1 megapixel. I gave you an example by a human to replicate an you haven't been able to so far. This is about packing as much intricate tone shading detail in as possible. >>3140665This hair is better but there was needs be like 3x the detail in the same area at least. Highlights all across it too rather than just a single ring at the top. Also, try increasing the contrast between the individual tones, i think that will help make things clear and easier to test. Ultra fine linework is also needed I guess.
>>3140668Better, this amount of shading detail on the hair is getting pretty good. Thank you. Can you adjust the shadows to make the individual tones more distinct? Put even more detail into the shading patterns please. The ixima image still has more tone shading details in some small areas and I want to go beyond even that.
>>3140668What model did you use to make this? Anima? Get that sharp intricate tone shading all over the body, clothes and objects as well. Go above 3 tones of shading across larger areas.
>>3140676FFVII cunny?
>>3140676>>3140677>>3140678cute yuffies
>>3140617I wonder, if you could show this to /a/ of 2010, what would they think? They would have no context to know its made by a computer.
>>3140670Who drew the picture?
>>3140673yes, anima, I only used the artist of that illustration >>3140662 and that's it.If you want something that specific, you can't get it without specifiying you want that exactly.If we do not understand vague concepts the AI will understand them even less, it needs specifi.>Get that sharp intricate tone shading all over the body, clothes and objects as well.And if you want that all over the picture in every single area you would need to go around the picture inpainting each of those areas so it get more detail.
>>3140687Or just grab one of those "detail" loras that spill AI noise everywhere. I'm guessing if you only enable it halfway through the gen it shouldn't fuck up composition at least, only the style somewhat.
>>3140690Trying to emulate that 90's anime screencap feeling, lol.
>>3140687Artist tags are the quick and dirty way of doing it and come with the baggage of that artists quirks rather than just adding detail alone. If I want to change the style then I have to fight against the artist tag. The artist tag method doesn't let you exceed the detail level of the artist significantly either. I'm trying to do this without artist tags.>>3140691Looks very nice but the bound are not sharp enough. They blend together too much. The sharper like in an anime screenshot or the ixima image.
>>3140686What picture?
>>3140695>>3140691>Looks very nice but the bound are not sharp enough. They blend together too much. The sharper like in an anime screenshot or the ixima image.Wow, i really fucked up that sentence. Meant to say:*Looks very nice but the boundaries of the shading tones are not sharp enough. They blend together too much. They need to be sharper like in an anime screenshot or the ixima image.
>>3140687>yes, animabase? catbox?
>>3140700i think is wai since was the one that was selectedhttps://files.catbox.moe/6hi2br.png
>>3140689No one here seems to be able to reliably and significantly improve micro detail and sharp cel shading shading complexity without artist tags or detail loras. But the fact that some artist tags do drastically increase detail and shading complexity without increasing the image resolution proves the models are capable of it. The question is what the detail limit of models like illustrious or anima really are and we just don't know. There must be a trick to bringing out more of this intricate detail by default and without the the style specific biases of artist tags. That's the challenge I need help with. Lowering CFG to like 1.2 has been the only super effective thing for me so far but I want triple or more detail than what CFG 1.2 gives me. CFG 1.1 and 1.0 are too unpredictable and only give a slight detail bump over 1.2.
>>3140704Thanks.
Nosferatits>>3140667the gold embroidery on the bra is a nice touch>>3140670>>3140671>>3140673>>3140705KEK
Uh-oh. Angry Pink Kitty!
>>3140705>There must be a trick to bringing out more of this intricate detail by default and without the the style specific biases of artist tags.No? You want to "give me a very specific type of shading" but without telling it where to find that very specific type of shading (in an artist, for example). or without having a lora guiding for that sort of shadingSo it can't do something if you don't give it a reference to that something.Increasing the cfg is pointless because the cfg is basically how hard the model reads your prompt. If your prompt doesn't have an artist or a LORA to read... you can play with the CFG as much as you want; the info it needs won't be there because you refuse to give it.The only thing you will get by playing with the CFG is more melted images, not more detail in the shading."I want this specific sort of shading but without using any of the things that give this sort of shading."That's not a challenge; that's like asking, "Hey, I want to make an image that looks like this particular artist, but I don't want to use the artist tag or this artist, Lora."That sort of shading doesn't have a specific tag, so either you get a Lora or you use an artist that does that sort of stuff. The same way you wouldn't get a very specific artist style without mentioning that artist or using a lora of him
>>3140705>what the detail limit of models like illustrious or anima really are and we just don't knowWe do know, it's limited by VAE compression. At some point small stuff just gets melted and you have to upscale to get them well defined. On SDXL you'd often see this in eyes before Adetailer, and in other stuff people were too lazy to inpaint like jewelry, buttons, zippers, lace, etc. Anima doesn't suffer as much here unless it's a wide shot with multiple characters. That is what the detail limit looks like, which is why you calling what you want "detail" didn't make any sense. You want a busy style that has no flat areas.The model can produce full-on photorealism where the detail is on another level, down to showing individual hair strands. The "issue" you are facing is a matter of conditioning. You have yet to find a prompt that produces what you want. If such even has a separate tag/caption in the dataset. I would just go with a lora, it'll also be easier to mix with anime_screenshot that way. The styles are too different otherwise, it's almost the polar opposite. I mean, when's the last time you've seen one https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/11358110
>>3140667cute
>>3140624looking good
>>3140747
>>3140748nice
>>3140698anon, what you want is impossible without a loraeven if the model has seen it in the images, if it was never tagged or described, it is only coming out in RNGIt's fundamental to how these models work, you are chasing something that doesn't exist in the prompt side.
Anyone know anything about the basics of nude edits? The recent ZZZ mindscapes have been complete ass. Would doing a nude edit be easier, or I could give a paint.net photoshop a try.
>>3140585Kitties need furry pussies.
>>3140178I don't think AI knows about her too much
>>3140772can't really fault the AI when I also assumed she had hairbands at the ends
Fall naked week begins before the weather gets too cool.
>>3140778they are all so cute
>>3140778catbox please
>>3140780there was a lot of inpainting that went into this and I'm still using illustrious because I'm waiting for anima to improve a little before swapping.But here's what I started with:https://files.catbox.moe/7g4k76.png
>>3140778The blue girl in the background looks nice.
>>3140782thanks
>>3140765In my case, I plug it into Nai, use>official art, zenless zone zeroselect the area, in character 1 put>girl, completely nude, nipplesand select her clotheshttps://files.catbox.moe/avzs51.png
>>3140789I can fix her
>>3140772>panty ribbon:3
>>3140790no you can't
Over the weekend, I've been slopping together a tool for preparing lora datasets. Because all I found either didn't work or were really ass.What would you like to see in Lora tagging/prompting tool?
>>3140793can i see the haruhi bunny image?
>>3140793Looks good. What's the difference between "Automated Tags" and "Prompt Caption"?And Catbox for the Gyarudoka pics?
>>3140782There are no improvements planned
>>3140794Here>>3140796The big point of my tool is that instead of making the prompt directly, there is intermediary json file containing different inputs, like tags, description, manual descriptions. And then it is run through LLM to produce final prompt. This way, the automated tools don't mess with manual changes.And Gyarudoka:https://files.catbox.moe/j45bab.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/ee90i8.png
>>3140799But why would you want to LLM-process the tags? Those are ready to use as-is.
>>3140800Because Illustrious is dead and Anima understands more than tags.
>>3140799Nice, thanks.Not sure I understand the reasoning for "the final prompt" though. Is this to recreate images you have not genned yourself (and thus don't have the exact tags/NL prompt used originally)?
>>3140802>Is this to recreate images you have not genned yourself (and thus don't have the exact tags/NL prompt used originally)?That too. I've also found that final description might be bigger than the original prompt.Also to learn how the whole Agentic Coding works.
>>3140799>HereThanks, it looks nice.
>>3140801Yes but you still want the dataset captions to resemble the way you prompt. Not be three paragraphs of LLMslop.
>>3140805True. Thats why I explicitly mentioned that the prompt should be short and will be used for training Anima. Current gen LLMs are more than capable in understanding this and producing a reasonable prompt.
>>3140806If you gen your images this way too, alright then.
>>3140807I do. Anima can understand sentences. As long as they are kept simple and specific. I especially use it to combine adjectives with their subjects and when more than one subjects are in the scene (although it fails more often than not).
>>3140808Yeah I know. It's getting there.
>>3140808Another idea is that it can create prompts for other models like Krea or Qwen. If you tried to use vision model to make more complex prompt, it will likely not recognize characters. But by adding tags from danbooru, it can build much richer prompt.
>>3140812>>3140808My concern was that LLMs get unnecessarily wordy and with flowery descriptions. Ones that the model might not have a strong association with even if/when it does somewhat understand.The best advice I ever read for lora training is to write your dataset captions as if you were trying to generate that image using your checkpoint. Ties into how lora training works, in simple terms it first generates an image using your dateset caption as a prompt, then compares the result to the actual image, and learns some of the difference between them. Which works predictably well if you have 1girl, nia teppelin, long hair; less so when you have "stylized golden clouds" as in >>3140793 where it clearly misidentified her hair. Even worse with meaningless trash like "Spatial depth is achieved through meticulous layering and controlled contrast" or "invokes feelings of peace" that LLMs tend to produce as captions or prompts.
>>3140815I do get that. And after checking the generated prompts, they all look like perfectly normal Anima prompts. The "stylized golden clouds" is exactly the point of having manual fields. If I wanted to fix it, I could just write "stylized golden clouds" into the negative field. Or maybe written "Her wavy white hair can be misclasified as clouds". And the LLM should be able to produce prompt that doesn't include mention of clouds.
>>3140816Guess that's kinda cool.
>>3140778
Does anyone here pay to use GPT Astra?
>>3140843Cute! Now make the superior version.
>>3140843Do not make the inferior version that the other anon suggested (and which I'm sure reminds him of his mother).
>>3140845kekcan't we all just get along?
>>3140850Apart from the missing finger, this looks great. Did you use a lora to get that 90s look, or was it all prompts?
>>3140853prompt, all fingers are there.
hot anime girls
>>3140856Cute butt
Hellol everyone,
Took a lot of rerolls but I finally got Lumberjack the Ripper being nimble and quick, jumping over a candlestick
>>3140856How about cool anime girls?>>3140868A lot of rerolls or one inpaint job, if you have the option.glad you're not dead, anon
>>3140875tiny fix
>>3140181
>>3140856
>>3140861You've got to be trolling at this point
>>3140906nice
>>3140765Yes >>3140459Just send your image to inpaint tab, sketch the nudity over the picture, inpaint.There is no more secret on it beyond your patience to do it as careful or roughly as you want.Quick easy one can be done in a couple of mins, something more precise may be 10 mins or so.That one was under 20 seconds
>>3140793>What would you like to see in Lora tagging/prompting tool?Being able to choose if it should include series and characters tags or not. Honestly I don't like tools that autotag characters and series, I want only the generic tags. So you always have to go around removing series tag. It would be really comfortable if the autolabel didn't give it in first place.
Trying out more realistic proportions for once.
>>3140877is this a character or an oc?
>>3140914I don't have the creativity for an OC with more than five tagsShe's Irene \(Arknights\)
>>3140466If it matters, I wasn't using the actual cosplay specific tag (I almost never do when putting a character in a distinctive outfit--typically, just specifying the character, and their outfit, after the "model's" information, etc., seems to do the job very well). The YoRHa cosplay has probably run its course for the time being, still, certainly with these two characters anyway.
Yet another gen inspired by real life. Saw a girl like this at a bus stop today.
>>3139996Create your own Madoka character and make her in style that resembles the series, please.
>>3140851catbox?
>>3140924
No more alcohol for you, Pink.
>>3140932kek
>>3140858nice
>>3140928>https://files.catbox.moe/74jjwm.pngno seed
>>3140936Nice detail but the face has too much realism. Try to slim the nose and lips as well as enlarge the eyes.
>>3140938Like this?
>>3140940NTA but a lot better with only the pubes as the eww part.
Sigh, I actually forgot Lyra's womb tattoo twice. I'm sorry for that. That's like forgetting she has wings. Have them enjoying PE outdoors during naked week. The bird in the background seems unfazed.
>>3140941> pubes as the eww partwhy are you gay
>>3140935maybe im just a retard but i don't see what artist you used for this style in the flow, can you tell me who it is?
>>3140945anyone who has seen a vagina in real life can confirm that pubes in general are eww
>>3140947if they keep them maintained, they're not terrible but 9/10 they aren't maintained and just turn me off from eatin pussy
>>3140940Eyes are slightly better, lips are a massive improvement so well done there. Nose is still too wide, needs to be slimmer and try to get rid of the nostrils.
>>3140949dont lieyou have never been with a real woman and never willnot even paying for it
>>3140943i want to stick my head under her sweater and in her cleavage, it looks so cosy and warm
>>3140946There wasn't
big.
>>3140955These ugly ass nipples always remind me of a pirahna plant. I hope anyone and everyone who draws them and generates AI art with them, especially the one(s) who did it first, have a hot pillow on both sides.
Is it good to put "long hair" AND "very long hair" when prompting just 1 girl? Or is it better to just use one tag or the other? I want hair to feature prominently in the image.
>>3140958"long hair, very long hair" will be up to her ass
>>3140956>remind me of a pirahna plantwhat's wrong with that? i would suck on piranha plant lips too.
>>3140959i want it past the ass definitely but not to the floor. should stop around the knee
>>3140961anima "very long hair" or "long hair to her knees"
>>3140963i said i was using illustrious
>>3140964"Estra very long hair"
>>3140947why are you gay
>>3140973aigold
>>3140973The character style looks great. Catbox?
>>3140977it looks like generic illustrious model style lol tf are you talking about. can go to civit and find 10 images that look the same style on the front page.
>>3140979Fuck off.
>>3140920I do this sometimes too. There are some really fashionable people out there
Does illustrious ever update tags? because new tags are added to danbooru and gelbooru as time goes on.
>>3140979Couldn't find one. The front page is where people auction slots to get "featured", it's normie artsy SFW shit.But I know what you meant. Browse new images instead. Or checkpoints. it just happens to be the default style of WAI-illustrious, without the lips. Which is still in first place a year later, funnily enough.
>>3140989The generic style is so boring to look at now days, that's why I enjoy using noob/anima, experimenting with actual artist tags (even though some don't work), it's refreshing and makes the hobby fun again.
>>3140990>>3140990>I enjoy using noob/anima, experimenting with actual artist tags (even though some don't work), it's refreshing and makes the hobby fun again.Not him. That's all good and I don't disagree but the style in that image will never stop being great.
>>3140990>The generic styleYou mean the classic style, autist kun.
>>3140997she looks good in that swimsuit
>>3140988There have been attempts, but it's expensive and impractical. Mostly they were experimenting with something else, v-prediction, rectified flow, etc, and the dataset update came as a bonus. NoobAI is about six months ahead but it took a research grant from China to make it happen, probably tens of thousands in training costs. If you're using any of the major merges including Wai and Plantmilk then you have some small ratio of it included already. You could move onto a more dedicated NoobAI merge, or straight to Anima which is another year on top. There are no other reasonable options afaik, Chroma lied about including anime, Pony v7 was a bad joke, MageFlow is too early to be usable, bluvoll's rectified flow experiment I can't even find the name of so it didn't take off either,...
>>3140999I need a reliable way to summon tone complex shading like >>3140480 & >>3140662 have on the hair. Sometimes the AI does something in that direction but it's random and much less common than 3 overall or blended tones. I'm thinking of uploading and tagging images with 5-tone shading to danbooru and gelbooru. I've seen over 1000 anime and it does appear in still frames in modern series, even in tv shows. Not just old OVAs. I could start marking timestamps and collecting the highest quality png screenshots in the meantime. Maybe I or someone else can train a lora when that's done. 80s style loras exist but they're also unreliable and usually heavily style biased to a particular series rather than towards the shading in and of itself. I'm surprised more tags for different types of tone shading don't exist on the boorus already. I see see detail enhancement loras but not really any tone shading enhancement loras.
>>3141002I doubt anyone cares about it as much as you do.If you put together a dataset and tag it I can give it a try on Anima, don't care about illu/noob anymore. But generic art concepts tend to not train well, it'll likely just average itself out into a full style. Same as how "no lineart" is a style of its own yet struggles to remove outlines from other artists, or how 3D forces realistic anatomy and can't make chibis. Loras do mix easier than artists though, so maybe it'll still achieve something.
>>3141005>If you put together a dataset and tag it I can give it a try on AnimaThanks.>But generic art concepts tend to not train well, it'll likely just average itself out into a full style.The key is getting as many images as possible and having them as diverse as possible isn't it? As well as tagging. Getting a few dozen should be easy for me. I'm confident I can find at least 100 examples.>Same as how "no lineart" is a style of its own yet struggles to remove outlines from other artistsOh, I know what you mean. I've had lineart resist removal with loras in the past.
>>3141005>But generic art concepts tend to not train well, it'll likely just average itself out into a full style. Same as how "no lineart" is a style of its own yet struggles to remove outlines from other artists, or how 3D forces realistic anatomy and can't make chibis. Loras do mix easier than artists though, so maybe it'll still achieve something.Well, a 5-tone shading lora would be a huge upgrade in shading quality if it could push average tones to 5 from 3. Seems like a much easier idea to train a lora on than something like "increase the number of tones as the lora strength increases". So I think this is a good starting point. Simply putting "anime screenhot" in the prompts doesn't work because the AI doesn't comprehend "detail" and it spits out the average and not what the most detailed 0.01% are like.
>>3140523it was okay overall
>>3141009>The key is getting as many images as possible and having them as diverse as possiblePretty much, ideally the only thing they'd have in common is the thing you're trying to train. In reality most of them are going to be focused on sfw 1girl and in similar styles. Less of an issue if everything's tagged properly, but still.
>>3141016box?
>>3141005>I doubt anyone cares about it as much as you do.Well, there was otaking.
>>3140930cute
>>3140979>can go to civit and find 10 images that look the same style on the front page.Yeah, I wonder, why would people ever want MORE of something they like!I don't understand why people praise an image that looks like what everyone loves.Instead of what people loves seeing and doing people should generate something different no one cares about
>>3141002And we told you use that artist tag or use a lora that gives that effect.Even if the model can do something it CAN NOT do that thing whithout proper guidance and proper guidance are lora and artists and styles, even if the model potentially can do it the model won't do it without any of those.Is not really that hard to understand
>>3141015>In reality most of them are going to be focused on sfw 1girl and in similar stylesAbsolutely not. Here is 1boy from the isekai maou anime with complex 5-tone shading. I can think of mecha and other objects I've seen in anime with 5-tones before too. I will need to gather those.
>>3141015>In reality most of them are going to be focused on sfwVarious hentai have 5-tone shading too. Youkoso! Sukebe Elf no Mori e comes to mind. There's a NSFW example for you.
>>3140850catbox?
cool pink
>>3141015>In reality most of them are going to be focused on sfw 1girl and in similar styles.A higher percentage of hentai have 5-tone shading compared to sfw anime. This one is from Saimin Seishidou, I remembered it had great shading. I guess I could also make a thread for sharing more examples to speed things up. It would also just be a great idea for a thread in general.
>>3141007prone
Nice. catbox?
>>3141027>>3141033did you forget to quote? lol
No
Yes
>>3141017https://litter.catbox.moe/tqdrkwvu22uu7dt2.pnghttps://litter.catbox.moe/9wskfdh53hdtt0nw.safetensors(@barch tag)got lazy and only did a couple bakes but this works okay
>shit taste is "classic"always has b/e/en unfortunately.
>>3141034well, usually there are a lot of Pink posts so even if you don't quote there is a good chance of hitting one. Like... you know, if you shoot to an small pond with a ton of ducks you will hit one even if you don't aim
>>3141029but on the negative they are barely animated like all those queen bee anime, you see an shot and think "wow, that looks amazing" then you download it and think, the fuck is this shit, the manga version was better animated than this
>>3141041Completely irrelevant to it's utility as AI training data. And AI will be able to animate complex shading better than any human soon.
>>3141041>the manga version was better animated than thisLol I'm going to start using that phtrase from now on because it's great, good job.
>>3141016Hypothermia kills.
Is this an alternate official hairstyle?
>>3141042>Completely irrelevant to it's utility as AI training data.Well, true, but I felt compelled to say it
>>3141043hey
>>3141029>>3141025You should've put up these examples days ago, we could have avoided so much back-and-forth about what the goal is. I still can't believe this was it.
>>3141049That's not it though. I'm asking for something far more detailed and intricate than those screenshots. They just have 1 element of what i'm after. Replicating that first just brings me one step closer.
>>3141054Not sure that's the right approach. I would go for a target style directly, not try to assemble it from parts.
>>3141016shribble best geah
>>3141057I'm after general 2d micro detail and shading complexity that I can then use to enhance any style I want.
>>3141060I'm afraid you are asking way, way too much.
>>3141061You can't properly replicate the complex and intricate hair shading patterns on >>3140480 & >>3140662 even when tagging their artists because the rest of their art doesn't look like that. These are examples of the artists going all out and going above and beyond what they usually do. That Miku art is an anomaly because the hair shading on it is vastly more intricate than anything else Ixima did for the rest of Miku's v3 art. I even tried image to image with a color swap and the AI couldn't reproduce the shading patterns. Replicating the styles in those images isn't my only goal here anyway but you're welcome to try if you think you can do it.
>>3141062You ask way too much
>>3141063I want too much from the art and should just accept lower detail, lower quality, less beautiful images? I don't think so. I love that kind of intricate 2d art so I'll persist at the problem until it's solved. Have higher standards for art.
it is nearly october my dudes
>>3141035that 3D style for the remake was really off putting at first. they wanted it to look as ugly as Twilight Princess and I don't get it. it looks ok when you're fighting monsters, but the Deku scrubs look horrifying.
>>3141067oh
>>3141064You are asking too much
>>3141064You are a sperg yelling for someone else to create a magic button for you and that's never going to happen.
bigger
>>3141070slurp
>>3141072To be fair, we already have a magic button that lets us say "hello computer make anime boobs pls thank you I love you" and it just works. It's not unreasonable to expect that someday the magic button will be equipped with a "ok, now make it higher quality" function.
>>3141075It is. You just don't understand because you are a sperg.
>>3141069>>3141057>I would go for a target style directly, not try to assemble it from parts.You can try your approach but it won't work. If an artist does 99 images in a particular style and one image that's far more detailed than the rest then tagging that artist won't make an image in the style of that one anomaly. I'll be happy to see you prove me wrong. Yes, this is not straightforward problem to solve. An alternative would be a character lora based on that on image. Generating variations and feeding them back into the AI. That tedious method.
>>3141075>It's not unreasonable to expect that someone will click on the magic img2img tab and click the button to make it higher qualityoh mai goddo. why didn't think of that?
>>3141078>img2imgDidn't you read the thread? It was already tried.
>>3141044anime girls are made of slime
>>3141070cute
>>3141075I am willing to train the lora for him. One roll, it'll be a fun experiment if nothing else. Though I expect even if it does learn the concept it'll be to heavy on style. We'll see.
>>3141078img2img didn't work
>>3141084style looks like maikine
anon was miraculously cured of his crippling boneitis within like a day.
>>3140920
>>3141090abhorrent
>>3141084Attach an english title to this and looks like the last netflix show for normalfags
>>3141090stellar
>>3141088cute butt bump.
I love OLs
>>3141109the cutie who used to sit next to me got engaged and quit...
>>3141080You're made of slime.
>>3141111i suppose so
>>3141110Based SAHM.
>>3141109Same.
If you use the tag close-up and get a speech bubble zoom of a body part, try putting this in the negative: multiple views, spoken pussy, borderless panels, comic, spoken object
>still have Dezgo credits because that is what I use>getting "prompt: Content moderation rejected the text request containing this input." if prompting anything NSFW related lately
>>3141115>>3141109Can't say I particulary like them but I can at least see their appealYFW your coworker loses the pads
>>3141122Well, yeah, is more stirct now, same happens with civitai, is blocking shit further and further,Time to move on to local.I know the "muh can't buy a computer" but lets be real here, whoever has been paying very little attention has seen how the restrictions became bigger and bigger to the point barely is doable nowdays-So its time to face it, IF you want to generate naked ai shit you need to go local. IF you don't care you can give up but services are stopping being an option regardless you liking it or not
>>3141126>I know the "muh can't buy a computer"Ah, the sweet bliss and unawareness of the eternally unemployed manchild.
What do you think about the new fotm girl?
>>3141133I think I was slopping r63 Dracos and Rons months ago and wonder if I had a hand in this
>>3141133good
>>3141080>>3141111counterpoint: slime girls are made of anime
>>3141110It is a shame that because I work in a mathematics heavy field, it is mostly all old russian physicists, there are no cute OL's.
>>3141092Excellent.
>>3141043did you switch checkpoints again?>>3141060>>3141064see >>3140543>>3141109same
>>3141138may be put here in the bee outfit?
>>3141141Yes lol. Now that Civitai has released all checkpoints for everyone's use, I'm trying out some new stuff.
>>3141144I've heard the generator blocks more shit than ever
>>3141142this isn't canon but I like it
>>3141141>>3141115>>3141109>I love OLs>Same.>sameGood taste. >>3134717
>>3141145cute
>>3141133stunning gal
>>3141116>spoken pussykek
I think genderswap is neat!
>>3141157I agree, It's one of the most fun things to do with AIgold.
>>3141146Yeah, that has been happening more often now.
>>3141109>>3141148nice thread
>>3141162I thought that was Saten from the thumbnail.
>>3139996Requesting an interaction of Misty and Lorelei based after thishttps://www.fanfiction.net/s/14262782/3/Cynthia-s-Private-Island
>>3141109
>>3140948cute. i thought her eye was melting at first glance.
>>3141169swollen lips ruined an otherwise decent image
>>3141172It's just a symptom of the general /aco/ face
>>3141172>otherwise decent image?
>>3141175It's not particularly badLooks like SD1.5 except the room layout makes sense
>>3141175It's aigoldkek...
/aco/ is in the room with us right now.
oh noes
>>3141178its the flatties degenerate ruining everyones day as usual
>>3141180who is fucking who?
>>3141184it's mutual
>>3141147
they/them see you are p p
Revived some OCs that I gened back on Midjourney almost three years ago. I'll just rapid-fire them off real quick.>The Menagerie: a mercenary group>Mom Boss: the leader.
>>3141190>The Secretary: enforcer and negotiator
>>3141191>Goober: wild-card
>>3141192>Jackie: courier
>>3141193>La Bomba: demolitions
>>3141194>Cocker: muscle
>>3141195>Nezu: hacking and intelligence
>>3141196Fisher: marksman
>>3141197>Dr. Cutter: medical
Recently picked up the new singleplayer campaign for Warcraft III, surprised how much I'm enjoying it. Have some big not-quite-zombie mommy milkers. >>3141190They're naturally dated, but I do like the courier and the marksman.
>>3141126True, but they did not make any public announcement about this restriction at all. I've sent a support email/ticket, no response.
No context
Remembered saving this from Pixai, but I cannot find the original link where I saved it. Gonna upload it, so that it's preserved. Hoping someone else will find the link, if its still possible to find it.
>>3141190>I'll just rapid-fire them off real quick.next time just catbox them
>>3141188beautiful
>>3141215Not him, I think it's fine. It wasn't too many images and it was of different characters too.
I got pixiv premium to get some inspiration but the search function is absolute trash and I can't find anything on purpose
>>3141209>they did not make any public announcementthey never do
>>3141157>>3141133Oh, I didn't know this was a meme until today. How long has been running? IS too late to join the fray
>>3141231like 2 and a half days
>>3141188>>3141142Catbox for these?
>>3141229cute
>>3141190You really don't have to. It's fine, honestly
is this a lora?
>>3141190>>3141191>>3141193>>3141195nice
>>3140772>>3140774Thank you.
>>3141244Requesting topless version
>>3141247This isn't /b/ or /aco/. You need to make the face look more eastern styled. Body is ok but the face needs less realism.
>>3141212vague post.
Hellol everyone. October is heeere!
>>3141267nice pink
mmmmmmmmmagic.
>>3141271give it bit more detail at least. looks /aco/
>>3141273look at the horrible nipplesits just the same guy who posts troll pics no matter what
>>3139996>>3141188Requesting Hikaru Shidou like this
>>3141273>>3141274She looks extremely cute and very /e/ IMO
>>3141277
>>3141278>>3141279cute nuke.
>>3141280>>3141281Not him. These are cute and the style is nice.
Forgot to add "uncensoreed"Whatever, is just a quick gen
>>3141274Those are inverted nipples, some women have them. But yeah, best to report this maggot. It does seem like he's trolling by posting cartoons and loli shit. It looks like cancer I've seen posted on /h/ since that place has regressed so much.
so much samefaggotry in this threadhow can a tard be so desperate for any kind of attention
>>3141267post more pink
>>3141214Requesting panties added.
>>3141273you are being disingenuous.
>>3141288That won't be necessary
>>3141290I'm not being disingenuous at all. It blatantly looks like a cartoon and there is a separate board for that.
>>3141288nah(nyo)
>>3141292>>3141294seethe. plenty of us like his gens
>>3141295No, silly. I meant it won't be necessary to request more Pink, since Pink gets posted a bunch
>>3141293what's the evidence for you claims? do you even know recognize the artists used?
Even her costume is spectral, lol.
>>3141296Nicerini Pinkerini.
>>3141297Are you fucking mentally ill? Even someone with half a brain can see that it looks like a cartoon. I don't care if it's based on an artist with eastern origins. /e/ rules say that art also has to be eastern style. An easterner could draw shit in calarts but it wouldn't make it eastern styled. It would still be a cartoon.
>>3141299good pink
>>3141293Eastern cartoon, well within the rules. But you already knew that.https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/124992497>>3141298Wouldn't this work better without the thigh gap?
>>3141303>Wouldn't this work better without the thigh gap?no
>>3141303Like I said, not eastern styled. Fuck off.
>>3141300Widdle baby had a kwash out :(
>>3141306>pissing himself because he has no argument for his off topic shit
>>3141303take it to /b/
>>3141300Report it for off-topic and move on, jannies have guidelines they follow to make judgement calls
>>3141307>pic related
bwos just mad he can only generate images of the Nintendo Switch 2.
>>3141283cute nipples. catbox please?
>>3141310Nice! Can you animate it, please?
>>3141288
>>3141312i'll post it in full.
>>3141313"WAAAH! BUT THE /E/ RULES SAY SO! IT'S NOT FAIR"
It is Pink's first day at Hogwarts, lol
>>3141322
OP&Anchor:100%Highlights: 70%
>>3141293>>3141300Seriously, now I'm genuinely curious. Where does that look like cartoon?I mean it kind of does like a cartoon but it is also anime enough to pass perfectly as anime.There always have been styles and artist that look very western and the opositeBut we have been decades with a pretty wide grey area. Dowman Sayman. GashiGashi, Panty and stoking, Nakayama Tooru and a long etcIs not my any means so cartoony like lets say an american comic that could go only on aco board, not by a mile.I could accept that has some western inspiration perhaps, perhaps not because the line has become so blur no one can really tell.But is not nearly western enough to claime without doubt that belongs to other board
No wonder her bones are so tough, lol.
>>3141325no shit?
>>3141327Yeah, this ended in sex. It always ends like that.
>>3141326>Where does that look like cartoon?>I mean it kind of does like a cartoonDo you even read the stuff you write before smashing your head against the "post" button?
>>3141326True, but even if it were /aco/ the correct approach is to report it and move on. Not samefag a bunch of posts shitting on it. So I think you might be wasting words on this one.
>>3141331>Not samefagYeah, right.
>>3141330He's retarded. Dunno why he's trying to white knight /aco/ shit.
>>3141333>He's retarded.We have known for a long time that he's just a disabled wi-fi-diot with a phone.
A little to obvious there
>>3141333>>3141334samefag
>>3141330Do you only understand things in terms of "yes" or "no"?You do not understand the idea that something KIND of looks like a cartoon but does not look SO cartoon as to claim that without doubt that belongs to /aco/?If the mere concept of "grey area" and styles with several influences (cartoon among then) is beyond you, I guess there is not much to discuss or inquiry
>>3141337you need to get laid
>>3141338He's not the one who spends all day whining about free slop porn.
New Thread:>>3141340>>3141340>>3141340
>>3141337>Do you only understand things in terms of "yes" or "no"?Yes, because that's how the world works. There's no middle zone because if we ever accepted that dumb argument, the would would be full of tards claiming that whetever they do is okay because it's partially right and so, it's 100% okay and not wrong.Is this clear enough to you?
>>3141363No, the world works in greys, anyone with an IQ over 80 knows that.
>>3141364You live in an irreal world.No means no. It doesn't matter if you like it or not.
>>3141374retard
>>3141280>>3141281>>3141282Cute MKRs.
